Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

This paper derives the first closed-form, all-order expression for the quark-gluon splitting kernel at small x, converting an extrapolated ingredient of QCD evolution into an exact one and extending the resummation to large coupling.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 19:23 UTC pith:MVVYCKFA

load-bearing objection A technically strong paper that delivers a genuinely new all-order closed form for the qg anomalous dimension; the central caveat is that the all-order form rests on pattern inference and remains a conjecture. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.02312 v2 pith:MVVYCKFA submitted 2026-03-02 hep-ph

New results on small-x resummation for splitting functions

Marco Bonvini , Stefano Frixione , Giovanni Stagnitto This is my paper
classification hep-ph PACS 12.38.Bx12.38.Cy
keywords small-x resummationsplitting functionsanomalous dimensionsBFKL equationDGLAP evolutionparton distribution functionsnext-to-leading logarithmsQCD
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

When quarks and gluons are probed at very small momentum fractions x, the equations that evolve their distributions develop large logarithms of 1/x that must be summed to all orders. One entry of that evolution, the quark-gluon splitting kernel P_qg — the function governing how quark and gluon densities mix as the resolution scale changes — resisted this treatment: it was known only through a handful of exactly computed coefficients, with the rest patched by an extrapolation whose error could not be quantified. This paper establishes a closed, all-order formula for the function that encodes that kernel, h_qg, so that the resummed P_qg is, for the first time, exact in this ingredient rather than approximate. If the formula is right, the main numerical uncertainty of small-x evolution collapses, results become independent of the arbitrary integration paths used to compute them, and the evolution can be pushed to couplings of order one — the regime relevant to muon and electron colliders. The authors themselves flag (Section 2.3) that this closed form was inferred by guesswork from the pattern of the first twenty or so exactly computed coefficients; the claim therefore stands or falls on that pattern persisting at higher orders.

Core claim

Eq. (3.24) is the first all-order closed form of h_qg(z), the function behind the quark-gluon anomalous dimension γ_qg at next-to-leading-logarithmic accuracy: h_qg(z) = (z χ(z)/4)(3 e^{2Ω(z)} + e^{(2/3)Ω(z)}), with χ(z) the leading-order BFKL kernel and Ω(z) the integral of the leading-logarithmic gluon anomalous dimension γ_s. All transcendental complexity of γ_qg is absorbed into Ω; the remainder is a sum of two exponentials. The authors isolate the singular-in-ε part of an auxiliary function F in the high-energy factorisation of the bare quark Green function, recognise it as a function of Ω alone, read its all-order form from the first ~20 exactly computed coefficients, and sum the serie

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is Ω(z) = ∫₀^{1/χ(z)} (da/a) γ_s(a), the integral of the leading-logarithmic gluon anomalous dimension γ_s, which obeys the duality a χ(γ_s(a)) = 1. Working in Ω rationalises everything: the singular-in-ε part of the auxiliary function F collapses to F_div(Ω) = (3/4)e^{2Ω}/(1+2ε) + (3/4)e^{(2/3)Ω}/(3+2ε) (up to cancelling terms), and the identity h_qg = zχ(z)(ε dF_div/dΩ + F_div) — forced by the requirement that the factorised quark Green function be finite as ε→0 — yields the closed form. Here χ is the leading-order BFKL kernel and γ_s the leading-logarithmic gluon anomalous dimension.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's all-order formula is read off, by its own disclosure in Section 2.3, from the pattern of the first ~20 exactly computed coefficients of an auxiliary series in Ω, so the result depends on that exponential pattern never breaking at an uncomputed higher order.

What would settle it

Perform an exact, independent computation of the qg anomalous-dimension coefficients beyond the roughly thirty the paper verified (for instance the next ten coefficients of h_qg in the variable z): Eq. (3.24) gives a definite value for each, so one mismatch shows the exponential pattern was an artifact of low orders. A weaker, accessible cross-check is to confirm the complex-plane structure the formula promises — no singularities of h_qg(z) inside |z| < 1/2 and the specific large-|z| asymptotics of Ω(z).

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The resummed qg splitting kernel in the accompanying code, HELL 4.0, is now exact in its all-order ingredient rather than built from a 16-coefficient extrapolation; the authors show the exact result is essentially unchanged when the Mellin-inversion path is deformed, while the old extrapolation drifts with the path.
  • The previous approximation is vindicated within a limited region but fails outside it: it becomes path-dependent for larger inversion parameters and worsens when more Padé coefficients are used — so only the exact result makes the error controllable.
  • The new construction of the resummed gluon anomalous dimension (a modified fixed-order approximation, a shifted-pole treatment of running-coupling resummation, and a branch-change fix) removes a spurious singularity that had made splitting functions bend downward at small x, and extends stable evolution to αs ≈ 0.5.
  • All-order closed forms for the finite qg and gg Green functions and their interconnection, γ_s Ĝ_qg = −γ̂_qg + α_N φ_1(γ_s) Ĝ_gg, are derived; they do not enter the numerics but chart the all-order structure of high-energy factorisation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A sharp, cheap test follows from the formula itself: it predicts every coefficient of h_qg and γ_qg, analytically and non-recursively, so an exact computation of the next few orders (beyond the ~30 already checked) would either confirm the exponential pattern or break it — no new physics input needed.
  • The same change of variable that rationalised h_qg might apply to the other small-x ingredients: the quark-quark and gluon-quark entries, currently obtained from the qg and gg entries through colour-factor relations, and the small-x coefficient functions treated by the same high-energy factorisation, are natural candidates for analogous closed forms.
  • The paper's adoption of the r = αs β0 running-coupling evolution operator as central value is pragmatic — the alternative form requires an αs derivative that the new branch-handling makes unreliable; reducing that residual scheme dependence is a natural next step for quantifying uncertainty at αs ≈ 0.5.
  • If the exact P_qg stands, the dominant theory uncertainty in small-x PDF evolution shifts away from the qg entry toward the γ+ eigenvalue construction; the authors' stated arbiter is comparison with data, so the large-αs, small-x corners of lepton-collider kinematics become the natural testing ground.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper revisits the small-x resummation of the singlet DGLAP splitting functions within the HELL framework. Its main new analytical result is a closed-form all-order expression for the function h_qg, Eq. (3.24), which determines the NLL qg anomalous dimension; equivalently, Eq. (3.25) gives the all-order resummed γ_qg. The result is obtained by pattern inference: the first ~20 exactly computed coefficients of the divergent part of F(Ω) are used to conjecture the exponential form 3 e^{2Ω} + e^{2Ω/3}, Eqs. (3.20)–(3.22), as explicitly acknowledged in §2.3. The paper also presents new all-order representations of γ_s, closed-form coefficient formulae based on Bell polynomials, results for the finite qg and gg Green functions, and a revised numerical implementation for HELL 4.0 that handles large α_s. The numerical section compares the exact h_qg with the previous Borel-Padé approximation and shows that the old implementation is much more sensitive to Mellin-inversion path choices.

Significance. If Eq. (3.24) is correct, this is a significant advance: it would provide the first closed-form all-order expression for the NLL qg anomalous dimension, replacing the approximate Borel-Padé extrapolation of the first 16 coefficients used in previous HELL versions. The paper is unusually transparent about its methodology: the pattern-inference step is openly called 'guesswork' and the conjecture-like status is acknowledged in §2.3. The authors provide many explicit coefficients, integral representations, and detailed appendices, and the numerical stress tests are valuable. However, the significance is conditional. The six known coefficients from ref. [62] and the agreement with Borel-Padé results are genuine non-trivial checks, but the re-expansion against 30+ coefficients in §3.2 is largely a consistency check, not an independent validation of the all-order extrapolation. A pattern break at an uncomputed higher order would invalidate Eq. (3.24) and with it the paper's headline claim of a 'properly resummed' P_qg.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.3, §3.1, Eq. (3.24)] The all-order form of F_div(Ω), Eqs. (3.20)–(3.22), is inferred from a finite number of exactly computed coefficients. The paper itself states in §2.3 that the methodology 'entails some guesswork' and that number theorists would call the results 'conjectures'. This is a load-bearing step: Eq. (3.24) is built directly on this inferred exponential pattern. The re-expansion against 30+ analytically computed coefficients in §3.2 is not a fully independent test, because those coefficients are obtained from the same order-by-order solution of Eq. (3.11) that underlies the pattern extraction. The six coefficients of ref. [62] and the Borel-Padé comparison are independent and reassuring, but none of them proves that the pattern 3 e^{2Ω} + e^{2Ω/3} persists to all orders. I recommend that the authors either (i) compute independent higher-order coefficients beyond the set used for the pattern infe
  2. [§3.3, Eq. (3.49)] The implementation of resummed P_qg, while using the exact all-order h_qg, still relies on the ABF approximation of the evolution operator, Eq. (2.22), with r(α_s,N)=α_s β_0. The derivation of Eq. (3.49) involves contour assumptions: the circle in z must contain no singularities of h_qg(z), and the O(z) term from the expansion of the incomplete Gamma function is dropped using the residue theorem. These steps are plausible and are tested numerically in the fixed-coupling limit, but they are not proved for all α_s and N. Therefore the statement that the paper arrives at a 'properly resummed' P_qg should be read with care: the h_qg ingredient is exact (modulo the conjecture in Eq. (3.24)), but the running-coupling resummation and the contour prescription introduce additional approximations. This does not invalidate Eq. (3.24), but it is relevant to the paper's central claim and to the compa
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and §2.3] The abstract and introduction present the all-order h_qg as an established derivation, while §2.3 says the results are based on guesswork and would be called conjectures by number theorists. Please align the language in the abstract with the caveat stated in §2.3.
  2. [§4.2, Fig. 4 and Fig. 5] The legend label 'exact h_qg' could be misleading, since the numerical implementation still uses the ABF approximation for the evolution operator and the contour prescription of §3.3. Consider labeling it 'closed-form all-order h_qg'.
  3. [§5] The 'tribute to ref. [62]' passage, with its 'exercise for the reader', is charming but unconventional in a research paper. Consider moving it to a footnote or an appendix remark.
  4. [Text near Eq. (3.49)] There is a typo: 'negarive' should be 'negative'. Similar small typos appear elsewhere; a careful proofreading pass is recommended.
  5. [§C.1 and §C.4] For reproducibility, please state explicitly where the HELL 4.0 code will be available and which numerical settings (e.g., the Chebyshev parameters n=12, q=6, p=-0.1) are default in the released version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular reduction: the central h_qg result is a disclosed pattern extrapolation from external factorization input, cross-checked by an independent coefficient calculation.

full rationale

The derivation chain runs: Eq. (3.24) is obtained from Eq. (3.19), h_qg = gamma_s chi(gamma_s)(epsilon dF_div/dOmega + F_div), where F_div(Omega) is extracted from the bare quark Green function G^(0)_qg of the external Catani-Hautmann factorization [62] through Eq. (3.12). The all-order form of F_div, Eqs. (3.20)-(3.22), is inferred from finitely many exact terms; Sect. 2.3 explicitly labels this procedure 'guesswork' and 'conjectures'. This is an induction/completeness caveat, not a circularity: the fitted sequence (coefficients of F_div in Omega) is not the sequence being predicted. The later large-number check (more than thirty h_k coefficients obtained by solving Eq. (3.11) order by order, Sect. 3.2) is an independent cross-check of the same input rather than a restatement of the fitted pattern. No parameter is fitted to the target prediction; no load-bearing self-citation or uniqueness theorem forces Eq. (3.24); the self-citations to earlier HELL/ABF work concern implementation details and running-coupling improvements, not the all-order qg result itself. The residual risk is a possible pattern break at higher order, which the paper itself acknowledges; that is a conjecture-extrapolation risk, not an equation-by-equation reduction of the result to its inputs. Hence no significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central analytical result (3.24) contains no fitted constants; its inputs are the external factorization of ref. [62] and the standard BFKL-duality setup. The paper's own contribution is the conjectured pattern completion of F_div(Omega). The numerical implementation, by contrast, carries several hand-chosen elements (lambda, eta, Chebyshev-patch parameters, contour parameters, damping, the choice of r) that shift the final splitting functions and the uncertainty band. No new physical entities are introduced; Omega(z), h_qg(z), the eta-modified collinear approximation, and the Chebyshev-patched gamma_+ are mathematical/numerical constructs.

free parameters (6)
  • lambda(alpha_s) = lambda = 1/(1+6*alpha_s^2)
    Hand-chosen (eq. C.12) to control the large-gamma asymptotic of the approximate fixed-order anomalous dimension so the subleading gamma=-1 singularity is avoided at large alpha_s. Affects resummed gamma_+ at O(alpha_s) and above; described as 'a simple form that gives satisfactory results'.
  • eta(alpha_s) = eta = (1-lambda)*a1 + lambda*a0
    Hand-chosen pole shift (eq. C.22) introduced to move the spurious alpha-bar_s=0 pole leftward so the leading pole has positive residue at large alpha_s. Directly changes the small-x behavior of resummed splitting functions at large alpha_s (fig. 13).
  • Chebyshev-patch parameters = p=-0.1, q=6, n=12, x_min=10^-7, x_extr=0.02, N0=1.1, theta=2*pi/3
    Chosen for numerical stability in the branch-change problem of gamma_+ (app. C.4); the patched gamma_+ is then used inside the qg resummation formula (3.49), so these choices propagate into the numerical splitting functions.
  • Integration-contour parameters = A=0.2, B=2 (z-contour); N0=1, theta=2*pi/3 (Mellin contour)
    Numerical choices for the Hankel and Mellin contours (apps. C.1 and C.4); chosen to avoid singularities of h_qg and numerical oscillations. The exact result is shown to be stable under contour variation, while the old Borel-Pade result was not.
  • Large-x damping function = (1-x)^2*(1-sqrt(x))^4
    Applied to all resummed splitting functions (sect. 4.2); common practice because resummation is invalid at large x, but a choice that shifts numerical results and for which the paper gives no error estimate.
  • Choice of r(alpha_s,N) in the ABF evolution operator = r = alpha_s*beta_0
    Modeling choice for the central implementation of running-coupling resummation (sect. 4.1). The previously-default derivative form r = alpha_s^2*beta_0*d(log gamma_+)/d(alpha_s) was abandoned because it fails numerically near branch changes. This changes central values relative to HELL3 and is only partially covered by the uncertainty band.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption High-energy collinear factorization of the bare quark Green function, G_qg^(0) = G_qg*Gamma_gg + Gamma_qg (eq. 3.1), in the Q0MS scheme
    Load-bearing input taken from ref. [62]; the paper corrects a typo in ref. [62]'s Gamma_qg definition, showing close dependence on that external result. Used throughout sect. 3.1 to derive h_qg.
  • domain assumption BFKL/DGLAP duality chi_BFKL(alpha_s, gamma_+(alpha_s,N)) = N (eq. 2.3) and the LO BFKL kernel chi(gamma) = 2*psi_0(1) - psi_0(gamma) - psi_0(1-gamma) (eqs. 2.5-2.6)
    Underpins the definition of gamma_s (eq. 2.7) that enters h_qg and Omega; standard in the ABF framework and in the cited literature.
  • ad hoc to paper Pattern-inference conjecture: the first ~20 exactly computed coefficients of F_div(Omega) determine its all-order exponential form (eqs. 3.20-3.22)
    The authors explicitly describe this as 'guesswork' (sect. 2.3) and note it would be called a conjecture in number theory. This is the main epistemic gap in the derivation of the central result.
  • domain assumption NLL relations among matrix entries (eq. 2.2): gamma_gq = (CF/CA)*gamma_gg, gamma_qq = (CF/CA)*gamma_qg, etc.
    Used to assemble the full singlet matrix from gamma_+ and gamma_qg; the paper notes eq. (2.2b) is formally valid only at LL and is used as a defining convention at NLL.
  • domain assumption Momentum conservation is restored by adding a suitable term to resummed P_gg (sect. 4.3, following ref. [57] sect. 4.2.2)
    The damping applied to resummed splitting functions violates eq. (4.3); the correction term is added ad hoc, as in previous HELL versions.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 60567 in / 20115 out tokens · 169115 ms · 2026-08-02T19:23:14.308217+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We revisit the basic steps necessary to obtain next-to-leading-logarithmic accurate small-$x$ results for the DGLAP splitting functions, and their implementations within the HELL framework. We derive new analytical all-order results for the leading-logarithmic $gg$ anomalous dimension, the $qg$ and $gg$ finite Green functions, and most importantly for the $qg$ anomalous dimension, which allows us to arrive for the first time at a properly resummed $qg$ splitting kernel. We use these results as cornerstones of a new implementation of small-$x$ splitting-function resummation which is more solid and numerically better behaved with respect to those available thus far. All of these novelties are included in the upcoming 4.0 version of HELL.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Scaffold Effect: How Prompt Framing Drives Apparent Multimodal Gains in Clinical VLM Evaluation

    cs.AI 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Merely mentioning MRI availability in the prompt drives 70-80% of apparent multimodal F1 gains in clinical VLMs, even when no imaging is present.

  2. PDF evolution in alternative factorisation schemes

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Derives NLO splitting functions and anomalous dimensions for PDFs in alternative factorization schemes and interprets their leading x-behavior as a modified effective evolution scale.

  3. Multimodal Fragmentation of All-Heavy Pentaquarks: Uncertainty-Aware Predictions for Hadron Colliders

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A multimodal, uncertainty-quantified set of leading-power fragmentation functions for all-charm pentaquarks is constructed and applied to NLL/NLO+ pentaquark-plus-jet production at future hadron colliders.

  4. Multimodal Fragmentation of All-Heavy Pentaquarks: Uncertainty-Aware Predictions for Hadron Colliders

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Develops uncertainty-aware fragmentation functions PQ5Q1.1 for all-charm pentaquarks using multimodal perturbative and nonperturbative modeling for collider predictions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 53 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    V. N. Gribov and L. N. Lipatov,Deep inelastic e p scattering in perturbation theory,Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.15(1972) 438

    1972

  2. [2]

    Y. L. Dokshitzer,Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scattering and e+ e- Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromodynamics.,Sov. Phys. JETP46(1977) 641. – 63 –

    1977

  3. [3]

    Altarelli and G

    G. Altarelli and G. Parisi,Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language,Nucl. Phys. B126(1977) 298

    1977

  4. [4]

    S. Moch, J. A. M. Vermaseren and A. Vogt,The Three loop splitting functions in QCD: The Nonsinglet case,Nucl. Phys. B688(2004) 101 [hep-ph/0403192]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  5. [5]

    A. Vogt, S. Moch and J. A. M. Vermaseren,The Three-loop splitting functions in QCD: The Singlet case,Nucl. Phys. B691(2004) 129 [hep-ph/0404111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  6. [6]

    Davies, A

    J. Davies, A. Vogt, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda and J. A. M. Vermaseren,Large-nf contributions to the four-loop splitting functions in QCD,Nucl. Phys. B915(2017) 335 [1610.07477]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren and A. Vogt,Four-Loop Non-Singlet Splitting Functions in the Planar Limit and Beyond,JHEP10(2017) 041 [1707.08315]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch and A. Vogt,Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – The gluon-to-quark case,Phys. Lett. B846(2023) 138215 [2307.04158]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch and A. Vogt,Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – The quark-quark case,Phys. Lett. B842(2023) 137944 [2302.07593]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, J. Vermaseren and A. Vogt,The double fermionic contribution to the four-loop quark-to-gluon splitting function,Phys. Lett. B848(2024) 138351 [2310.01245]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Gehrmann, A

    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel, V. Sotnikov and T.-Z. Yang,CompleteN2 f contributions to four-loop pure-singlet splitting functions,JHEP01(2024) 029 [2308.07958]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Gehrmann, A

    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel, V. Sotnikov and T.-Z. Yang,The NfCF3 contribution to the non-singlet splitting function at four-loop order,Phys. Lett. B849(2024) 138427 [2310.12240]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, A. Pelloni and A. Vogt,Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – The quark-to-gluon case,Phys. Lett. B856(2024) 138906 [2404.09701]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, A. Pelloni and A. Vogt,Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – the gluon-gluon case –,Phys. Lett. B860(2025) 139194 [2410.08089]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    B. A. Kniehl, S. Moch, V. N. Velizhanin and A. Vogt,Flavor Nonsinglet Splitting Functions at Four Loops in QCD: Fermionic Contributions,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 071902 [2505.09381]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, A. Pelloni and A. Vogt,Additional results on the four-loop flavour-singlet splitting functions in QCD, [2512.10783]

    arXiv

  17. [17]

    Bertone, M

    V. Bertone, M. Cacciari, S. Frixione and G. Stagnitto,The partonic structure of the electron at the next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy in QED,JHEP03(2020) 135 [1911.12040]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Bertone, M

    V. Bertone, M. Cacciari, S. Frixione, G. Stagnitto, M. Zaro and X. Zhao,Improving methods and predictions at high-energy e+e− colliders within collinear factorisation,JHEP10(2022) 089 [2207.03265]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Frixione,Initial conditions for electron and photon structure and fragmentation functions,JHEP 11(2019) 158 [1909.03886]

    S. Frixione,Initial conditions for electron and photon structure and fragmentation functions,JHEP 11(2019) 158 [1909.03886]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Stahlhofen,NNLO electron structure functions (PDFs) from SCET, [2508.16964]

    M. Stahlhofen,NNLO electron structure functions (PDFs) from SCET, [2508.16964]

    arXiv

  21. [21]

    Schnubel and R

    M. Schnubel and R. Szafron,Electron and Photon Structure Functions at Two Loops, [2509.09618]

    arXiv

  22. [22]

    Blumlein, A

    J. Blumlein, A. De Freitas and W. van Neerven,Two-loop QED Operator Matrix Elements with Massive External Fermion Lines,Nucl. Phys. B855(2012) 508 [1107.4638]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  23. [23]

    T. Han, Y. Ma and K. Xie,Quark and gluon contents of a lepton at high energies,JHEP02(2022) 154 [2103.09844]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Garosi, D

    F. Garosi, D. Marzocca and S. Trifinopoulos,LePDF: Standard Model PDFs for high-energy lepton colliders,JHEP09(2023) 107 [2303.16964]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Frixione and G

    S. Frixione and G. Stagnitto,The muon parton distribution functions,JHEP12(2023) 170 [2309.07516]. – 64 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Y. V. Kovchegov and E. Levin,Quantum Chromodynamics at High Energy, vol. 33. Oxford University Press, 2013, 10.1017/9781009291446

    doi:10.1017/9781009291446 2013

  27. [27]

    J. R. Forshaw and D. A. Ross,Quantum Chromodynamics and the Pomeron, vol. 9. Oxford University Press, 1998, 10.1017/9781009290111

    doi:10.1017/9781009290111 1998

  28. [28]

    L. N. Lipatov,Reggeization of the Vector Meson and the Vacuum Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.23(1976) 338

    1976

  29. [29]

    V. S. Fadin, E. A. Kuraev and L. N. Lipatov,On the Pomeranchuk Singularity in Asymptotically Free Theories,Phys. Lett. B60(1975) 50

    1975

  30. [30]

    E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov and V. S. Fadin,Multiregge processes in the Yang-Mills theory,Sov. Phys. JETP44(1976) 443

    1976

  31. [31]

    E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov and V. S. Fadin,The Pomeranchuk singularity in nonabelian gauge theories,Sov. Phys. JETP45(1977) 199

    1977

  32. [32]

    I. I. Balitsky and L. N. Lipatov,The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Quantum Chromodynamics,Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.28(1978) 822

    1978

  33. [33]

    V. S. Fadin and L. N. Lipatov,BFKL pomeron in the next-to-leading approximation,Phys. Lett. B 429(1998) 127 [hep-ph/9802290]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  34. [34]

    Ciafaloni and G

    M. Ciafaloni and G. Camici,Energy scale(s) and next-to-leading BFKL equation,Phys. Lett. B430 (1998) 349 [hep-ph/9803389]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  35. [35]

    Caola, A

    F. Caola, A. Chakraborty, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi,Three-Loop Gluon Scattering in QCD and the Gluon Regge Trajectory,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 212001 [2112.11097]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Falcioni, E

    G. Falcioni, E. Gardi, N. Maher, C. Milloy and L. Vernazza,Disentangling the Regge Cut and Regge Pole in Perturbative QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 132001 [2112.11098]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Falcioni, E

    G. Falcioni, E. Gardi, N. Maher, C. Milloy and L. Vernazza,Scattering amplitudes in the Regge limit and the soft anomalous dimension through four loops,JHEP03(2022) 053 [2111.10664]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Buccioni, F

    F. Buccioni, F. Caola, F. Devoto and G. Gambuti,Investigating the universality of five-point QCD scattering amplitudes at high energy,JHEP03(2025) 129 [2411.14050]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Abreu, G

    S. Abreu, G. De Laurentis, G. Falcioni, E. Gardi, C. Milloy and L. Vernazza,The two-loop Lipatov vertex in QCD,JHEP04(2025) 161 [2412.20578]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    E. P. Byrne, V. Del Duca, L. J. Dixon, E. Gardi and J. M. Smillie,One-loop central-emission vertex for two gluons inN= 4 super Yang-Mills theory,JHEP08(2022) 271 [2204.12459]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    E. P. Byrne, V. Del Duca, E. Gardi, Y. Mo and J. M. Smillie,Regge factorization of tree-level QCD amplitudes using a minimal set of lightcone variables, [2506.10644]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    R. D. Ball and S. Forte,Summation of leading logarithms at small x,Phys. Lett. B351(1995) 313 [hep-ph/9501231]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  43. [43]

    R. D. Ball and S. Forte,Asymptotically free partons at high-energy,Phys. Lett. B405(1997) 317 [hep-ph/9703417]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  44. [44]

    Altarelli, R

    G. Altarelli, R. D. Ball and S. Forte,Factorization and resummation of small x scaling violations with running coupling,Nucl. Phys. B621(2002) 359 [hep-ph/0109178]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  45. [45]

    Altarelli, R

    G. Altarelli, R. D. Ball and S. Forte,An Anomalous dimension for small x evolution,Nucl. Phys. B 674(2003) 459 [hep-ph/0306156]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  46. [46]

    Altarelli, R

    G. Altarelli, R. D. Ball and S. Forte,Perturbatively stable resummed small x evolution kernels,Nucl. Phys. B742(2006) 1 [hep-ph/0512237]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  47. [47]

    Altarelli, R

    G. Altarelli, R. D. Ball and S. Forte,Small x Resummation with Quarks: Deep-Inelastic Scattering, Nucl. Phys. B799(2008) 199 [0802.0032]. – 65 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  48. [48]

    G. P. Salam,A Resummation of large subleading corrections at small x,JHEP07(1998) 019 [hep-ph/9806482]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  49. [49]

    Ciafaloni, D

    M. Ciafaloni, D. Colferai and G. P. Salam,Renormalization group improved small x equation,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 114036 [hep-ph/9905566]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  50. [50]

    Ciafaloni, D

    M. Ciafaloni, D. Colferai, G. P. Salam and A. M. Stasto,Renormalization group improved small x Green’s function,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 114003 [hep-ph/0307188]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  51. [51]

    Ciafaloni, D

    M. Ciafaloni, D. Colferai, G. P. Salam and A. M. Stasto,A Matrix formulation for small-x singlet evolution,JHEP08(2007) 046 [0707.1453]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  52. [52]

    R. S. Thorne,Explicit calculation of the running coupling BFKL anomalous dimension,Phys. Lett. B 474(2000) 372 [hep-ph/9912284]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  53. [53]

    R. S. Thorne,NLO BFKL equation, running coupling and renormalization scales,Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 054031 [hep-ph/9901331]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  54. [54]

    R. S. Thorne,The Running coupling BFKL anomalous dimensions and splitting functions,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 074005 [hep-ph/0103210]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  55. [55]

    C. D. White and R. S. Thorne,A Global Fit to Scattering Data with NLL BFKL Resummations, Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 034005 [hep-ph/0611204]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  56. [56]

    Bonvini, S

    M. Bonvini, S. Marzani and T. Peraro,Small-xresummation from HELL,Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 597 [1607.02153]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  57. [57]

    Bonvini, S

    M. Bonvini, S. Marzani and C. Muselli,Towards parton distribution functions with small-x resummation: HELL 2.0,JHEP12(2017) 117 [1708.07510]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    Bonvini and S

    M. Bonvini and S. Marzani,Four-loop splitting functions at smallx,JHEP06(2018) 145 [1805.06460]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    B. R. Webber,QCD power corrections from a simple model for the running coupling,JHEP10 (1998) 012 [hep-ph/9805484]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  60. [60]

    Bonvini, S

    M. Bonvini, S. Frixione and G. Stagnitto,Lepton parton distribution functions with a mixed QED+QCD evolution and small-xresummation, to appear

  61. [61]

    Catani, M

    S. Catani, M. Ciafaloni and F. Hautmann,High-energy factorization in QCD and minimal subtraction scheme,Phys. Lett. B307(1993) 147

    1993

  62. [62]

    Catani and F

    S. Catani and F. Hautmann,High-energy factorization and small x deep inelastic scattering beyond leading order,Nucl. Phys. B427(1994) 475 [hep-ph/9405388]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  63. [63]

    Ciafaloni and D

    M. Ciafaloni and D. Colferai,Dimensional regularisation and factorisation schemes in the BFKL equation at subleading level,JHEP09(2005) 069 [hep-ph/0507106]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  64. [64]

    Marzani, R

    S. Marzani, R. D. Ball, P. Falgari and S. Forte,BFKL at next-to-next-to-leading order,Nucl. Phys. B 783(2007) 143 [0704.2404]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  65. [65]

    R. D. Ball,Resummation of Hadroproduction Cross-sections at High Energy,Nucl. Phys. B796 (2008) 137 [0708.1277]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  66. [66]

    Bonvini and S

    M. Bonvini and S. Marzani,Resummed Higgs cross section at N3LL,JHEP09(2014) 007 [1405.3654]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    Ciafaloni, D

    M. Ciafaloni, D. Colferai, G. P. Salam and A. M. Stasto,The Gluon splitting function at moderately small x,Phys. Lett. B587(2004) 87 [hep-ph/0311325]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  68. [68]

    Altarelli, R

    G. Altarelli, R. D. Ball and S. Forte,Resummation of singlet parton evolution at small x,Nucl. Phys. B575(2000) 313 [hep-ph/9911273]. – 66 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000