Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Learning Convolutional Networks for Multiphoton Microscopy Vasculature Segmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1606.02382 v1 pith:MVWFK6FF submitted 2016-06-08 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords deepsegmentationvasculaturelearningarchitecturesbeenconvolutionaldataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently there has been an increasing trend to use deep learning frameworks for both 2D consumer images and for 3D medical images. However, there has been little effort to use deep frameworks for volumetric vascular segmentation. We wanted to address this by providing a freely available dataset of 12 annotated two-photon vasculature microscopy stacks. We demonstrated the use of deep learning framework consisting both 2D and 3D convolutional filters (ConvNet). Our hybrid 2D-3D architecture produced promising segmentation result. We derived the architectures from Lee et al. who used the ZNN framework initially designed for electron microscope image segmentation. We hope that by sharing our volumetric vasculature datasets, we will inspire other researchers to experiment with vasculature dataset and improve the used network architectures.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Out-of-distribution data supervision towards biomedical semantic segmentation

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Med-OoD adds background-only 'OOD' patches from the ID dataset as negative samples with zero-mask Dice loss, claiming modest gains on Lizard but an internally inconsistent 76.1% mIoU for the OOD-only case.

Pith tools