pith. sign in

arxiv: 1209.5367 · v2 · pith:MW7QAFETnew · submitted 2012-09-24 · 🧮 math-ph · math.FA· math.MP· math.RT· nlin.CG· quant-ph

When is a Quantum Cellular Automaton (QCA) a Quantum Lattice Gas Automaton (QLGA)?

classification 🧮 math-ph math.FAmath.MPmath.RTnlin.CGquant-ph
keywords quantumqlgaautomatacellularlatticeautomatonfiniteunbounded
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Quantum cellular automata (QCA) are models of quantum computation of particular interest from the point of view of quantum simulation. Quantum lattice gas automata (QLGA - equivalently partitioned quantum cellular automata) represent an interesting subclass of QCA. QLGA have been more deeply analyzed than QCA, whereas general QCA are likely to capture a wider range of quantum behavior. Discriminating between QLGA and QCA is therefore an important question. In spite of much prior work, classifying which QCA are QLGA has remained an open problem. In the present paper we establish necessary and sufficient conditions for unbounded, finite Quantum Cellular Automata (QCA) (finitely many active cells in a quiescent background) to be Quantum Lattice Gas Automata (QLGA). We define a local condition that classifies those QCA that are QLGA, and we show that there are QCA that are not QLGA. We use a number of tools from functional analysis of separable Hilbert spaces and representation theory of associative algebras that enable us to treat QCA on finite but unbounded configurations in full detail.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.