REVIEW 2 cited by
Language Models are Crossword Solvers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Crosswords are a form of word puzzle that require a solver to demonstrate a high degree of proficiency in natural language understanding, wordplay, reasoning, and world knowledge, along with adherence to character and length constraints. In this paper we tackle the challenge of solving crosswords with large language models (LLMs). We demonstrate that the current generation of language models shows significant competence at deciphering cryptic crossword clues and outperforms previously reported state-of-the-art (SoTA) results by a factor of 2-3 in relevant benchmarks. We also develop a search algorithm that builds off this performance to tackle the problem of solving full crossword grids with out-of-the-box LLMs for the very first time, achieving an accuracy of 93% on New York Times crossword puzzles. Additionally, we demonstrate that LLMs generalize well and are capable of supporting answers with sound rationale.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Reasoning-Based Approach to Cryptic Crossword Clue Solving
An open pipeline of answer generation, wordplay proposal, and Python proof verification sets a new state of the art on the Cryptonite cryptic crossword benchmark.
-
What Makes Cryptic Crosswords Challenging for LLMs?
LLMs solve cryptic crossword clues with at most 11.4% accuracy, far below human experts, and fail mainly at definition extraction and wordplay type identification.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.