Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The Materials Science Procedural Text Corpus: Annotating Materials Synthesis Procedures with Shallow Semantic Structures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.06939 v2 pith:MWPMWJYL submitted 2019-05-16 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords synthesismaterialsprocedurestextscientificanalysisannotatingcorpus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Materials science literature contains millions of materials synthesis procedures described in unstructured natural language text. Large-scale analysis of these synthesis procedures would facilitate deeper scientific understanding of materials synthesis and enable automated synthesis planning. Such analysis requires extracting structured representations of synthesis procedures from the raw text as a first step. To facilitate the training and evaluation of synthesis extraction models, we introduce a dataset of 230 synthesis procedures annotated by domain experts with labeled graphs that express the semantics of the synthesis sentences. The nodes in this graph are synthesis operations and their typed arguments, and labeled edges specify relations between the nodes. We describe this new resource in detail and highlight some specific challenges to annotating scientific text with shallow semantic structure. We make the corpus available to the community to promote further research and development of scientific information extraction systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Incorporating Domain Knowledge into Materials Tokenization

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A domain-knowledge-weighted tokenizer, MATTER, preserves material concepts and improves materials NLP performance by 4% on generation and 2% on classification tasks.

  2. Foundational Large Language Models for Materials Research

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Domain-adapted LLaMA models (LLaMat) outperform commercial LLMs on materials NLP and structured extraction tasks and generate M3GNet-predicted stable crystals, with LLaMA-2-based variants beating LLaMA-3-based ones.

  3. A survey on cutting-edge relation extraction techniques based on language models

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey of 2020-2023 ACL-family papers on relation extraction finds BERT-based models dominate, while large language models like T5 show promise mainly in few-shot settings.

Pith tools