REVIEW 2 cited by
Tokenized SAEs: Disentangling SAE Reconstructions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Sparse auto-encoders (SAEs) have become a prevalent tool for interpreting language models' inner workings. However, it is unknown how tightly SAE features correspond to computationally important directions in the model. This work empirically shows that many RES-JB SAE features predominantly correspond to simple input statistics. We hypothesize this is caused by a large class imbalance in training data combined with a lack of complex error signals. To reduce this behavior, we propose a method that disentangles token reconstruction from feature reconstruction. This improvement is achieved by introducing a per-token bias, which provides an enhanced baseline for interesting reconstruction. As a result, significantly more interesting features and improved reconstruction in sparse regimes are learned.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
x-Prediction Is All You Need:Training-Free Accelerated Generation via Endpoint Decodability
Truncated Jump Sampling stops the ODE early and outputs the algebraically decoded x0 estimate, reducing NFEs by 20-70% across six model families with no retraining.
-
How does Chain of Thought Think? Mechanistic Interpretability of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Sparse Autoencoding
The paper reports that chain-of-thought features extracted by sparse autoencoders and transferred through activation patching improve answer confidence in Pythia-2.8B but not in Pythia-70M, implying a scale threshold ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.