pith. sign in

arxiv: 2308.04813 · v2 · pith:MYWQKVUNnew · submitted 2023-08-09 · 💻 cs.CL

CLEVA: Chinese Language Models EVAluation Platform

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords chinesellmsclevaevaluationmodelplatformcontaminationevaluate
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

With the continuous emergence of Chinese Large Language Models (LLMs), how to evaluate a model's capabilities has become an increasingly significant issue. The absence of a comprehensive Chinese benchmark that thoroughly assesses a model's performance, the unstandardized and incomparable prompting procedure, and the prevalent risk of contamination pose major challenges in the current evaluation of Chinese LLMs. We present CLEVA, a user-friendly platform crafted to holistically evaluate Chinese LLMs. Our platform employs a standardized workflow to assess LLMs' performance across various dimensions, regularly updating a competitive leaderboard. To alleviate contamination, CLEVA curates a significant proportion of new data and develops a sampling strategy that guarantees a unique subset for each leaderboard round. Empowered by an easy-to-use interface that requires just a few mouse clicks and a model API, users can conduct a thorough evaluation with minimal coding. Large-scale experiments featuring 23 Chinese LLMs have validated CLEVA's efficacy.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SCAN: Structured Capability Assessment and Navigation for LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SCAN is a framework for fine-grained LLM capability assessment via automatic taxonomy construction from queries, query synthesis for coverage, visualization tools, and a PC2-enhanced LLM-as-a-judge method, applied to ...

  2. TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    TrustLLM defines eight trustworthiness principles, creates a six-dimension benchmark, and evaluates 16 LLMs showing proprietary models generally lead but some open-source ones are close while over-calibration can hurt...