Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Generative AI in Transportation Planning: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.07158 v6 pith:MZVH5GJH submitted 2025-03-10 cs.AI

Generative AI in Transportation Planning: A Survey

classification cs.AI
keywords transportationplanninggenaigenerativesurveytasksapplicationschallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into transportation planning has the potential to revolutionize tasks such as demand forecasting, infrastructure design, policy evaluation, and traffic simulation. However, there is a critical need for a systematic framework to guide the adoption of GenAI in this interdisciplinary domain. In this survey, we, a multidisciplinary team of researchers spanning computer science and transportation engineering, present the first comprehensive framework for leveraging GenAI in transportation planning. Specifically, we introduce a new taxonomy that categorizes existing applications and methodologies into two perspectives: transportation planning tasks and computational techniques. From the transportation planning perspective, we examine the role of GenAI in automating descriptive, predictive, generative, simulation, and explainable tasks to enhance mobility systems. From the computational perspective, we detail advancements in data preparation, domain-specific fine-tuning, and inference strategies, such as retrieval-augmented generation and zero-shot learning tailored to transportation applications. Additionally, we address critical challenges, including data scarcity, explainability, bias mitigation, and the development of domain-specific evaluation frameworks that align with transportation goals like sustainability, equity, and system efficiency. This survey aims to bridge the gap between traditional transportation planning methodologies and modern AI techniques, fostering collaboration and innovation. By addressing these challenges and opportunities, we seek to inspire future research that ensures ethical, equitable, and impactful use of generative AI in transportation planning.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MobEvolve: An Agentic Self-Evolving Heuristic System for Interpretable Human Mobility Generation

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MobEvolve is an agentic self-evolving heuristic framework that generates interpretable human mobility trajectories and outperforms deep generative and LLM-based methods on Singapore and Montreal benchmarks.

  2. A Two-Level Plackett-Luce Model for preference modeling in smart mobility platforms

    stat.AP 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A novel two-level Plackett-Luce model with Bayesian inference supports personalized route choice and preference modeling in smart mobility platforms.

  3. LiloDriver: A Lifelong Learning Framework for Closed-loop Motion Planning in Long-tail Autonomous Driving Scenarios

    cs.RO 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LiloDriver uses LLMs and memory-augmented planning in a four-stage pipeline to outperform rule-based and learning-based methods on both common and rare scenarios in the nuPlan benchmark.

  4. Broadening Access to Transportation Safety Data with Generative AI: A Schema-Grounded Framework for Spatial Natural Language Queries

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    A schema-grounded natural language interface for transportation safety data that uses LLMs for intent interpretation, rule-based validation, and deterministic spatial query execution on an authoritative database.

  5. Large Language Models for Next-Generation Wireless Network Management: A Survey and Tutorial

    cs.NI 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0

    A survey and tutorial that organizes LLM-enabled wireless network optimization into formulation, solution, and verification stages, with case studies drawn from the authors' own prior papers.