REVIEW 1 cited by
Are Graph Neural Networks Miscalibrated?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have proven to be successful in many classification tasks, outperforming previous state-of-the-art methods in terms of accuracy. However, accuracy alone is not enough for high-stakes decision making. Decision makers want to know the likelihood that a specific GNN prediction is correct. For this purpose, obtaining calibrated models is essential. In this work, we perform an empirical evaluation of the calibration of state-of-the-art GNNs on multiple datasets. Our experiments show that GNNs can be calibrated in some datasets but also badly miscalibrated in others, and that state-of-the-art calibration methods are helpful but do not fix the problem.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Multimodal Graph Representation Learning for Robust Surgical Workflow Recognition with Adversarial Feature Disentanglement
GRAD fuses spatial, wavelet, and Fourier visual features with kinematic robot data through graph attention and adversarial alignment, and reports top accuracy plus improved corruption tolerance on two surgical gesture...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.