Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 32 references

CrossVIT-augmented Geospatial-Intelligence Visualization System for Tracking Economic Development Dynamics

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A cross-attention Vision Transformer that fuses satellite and street view imagery predicts county-level nighttime-light-derived economic scores with $R^2=0.8363$, outperforming either single modality.

desk verdict A systems integration with a useful dashboard and real Spark speedup, but the headline R2 is not a valid estimate of economic prediction due to proxy evaluation and likely spatial leakage. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10474 v1 pith:N3GCWYQM submitted 2024-12-13 cs.CV cs.AI

Yanbing Bai , Jinhua Su , Bin Qiao , Xiaoran Ma This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords economicdevelopmentpredictionVisionTransformercross-attentionnighttimelightproxysatelliteimagerystreetviewdistributedcomputinggeospatialvisualization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Senseconomic predicts county-level economic activity from pairs of satellite and street view images by fusing their Vision Transformer features with cross-attention. The training signal is nighttime light intensity, treated as a proxy for economic output, and the best model reaches $R^2=0.8363$ on held-out counties, above satellite-only models and far above street-view-only baselines. The paper also shows that distributed computing cuts end-to-end image handling and prediction from roughly 42 to 19 minutes and from 49 to 23 minutes for two test frames, then wraps the results in a map-based visualization front end. If the nighttime-light proxy holds, this offers a comparatively cheap, fast, and updateable way to estimate local economic dynamics at county granularity before statistical yearbooks arrive.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Cross-Attention fusion module, taken from CrossViT and run twice with eight attention heads: first $\mathrm{CrossAtt}(\mathrm{image}_1, \mathrm{image}_2) = \mathrm{image}_1'$, then $\mathrm{CrossAtt}(\mathrm{image}_2, \mathrm{image}_1') = \mathrm{image}_2'$, where the two inputs are Vision Transformer embeddings of satellite and street view images. Each image is embedded by a shallow two-layer ViT that splits the $224\times224$ input into $49$ patches of $32\times32$, projects them to hidden dimension $256$, and prepends a CLS token. The fused output is passed through a two-layer fitting head with a ReLU activation to produce the scalar nighttime-light prediction that is compared against the weak supervision target.

What would settle it

Take the county GDP data the paper collected but never used, regress the model's predicted scores against actual county GDP or GDP per capita, and compare the resulting $R^2$ or rank correlation with the reported $0.8363$; a large drop would show the model fits nighttime light, not the economic reality it is claimed to track.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that multimodal fusion beats either single image modality: a Vision Transformer with two alternating cross-attention operations over satellite and street view patches maps to a scalar nighttime-light score, achieving $R^2=0.8363$. That result is higher than satellite-only ResNet-18 at $0.8318$, satellite-only ViT-B16 at $0.7801$, and street-view-only ViT-B16 at $0.2262$. The paper presents this as evidence that street view imagery contributes complementary local detail—houses, cars, signs, shops—on top of the regional overview that satellite imagery provides, and that the cross-attention fusion mechanism is what combines the two into a single economic score.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that nighttime light intensity is a valid stand-in for county-level economic activity, because the reported $R^2$ is calculated against those light scores rather than against any economic statistic.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Adding street-view imagery to satellite imagery is claimed to improve county-level economic scoring, with the multimodal model reaching $R^2=0.8363$ versus $0.8318$ for satellite-only ResNet-18 and $0.7801$ for satellite-only ViT-B16.
  • Street-view imagery alone is a weak predictor, so it functions as a complement to satellite data rather than a substitute in this setting.
  • Distributed computing more than halves the processing time from 42 to 19 minutes and from 49 to 23 minutes for two large image frames, which would make county-scale updates practical on a regular cadence.
  • The full download-preprocess-predict-visualize pipeline means a policymaker could go from raw imagery to a county-level economic heat map without manual image handling or statistical data collection.
  • Because the model is trained on nighttime light rather than on economic statistics directly, its usefulness for policy depends entirely on how faithfully nighttime light reflects local economic activity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One implication the authors leave implicit is that the same cross-attention pipeline could be retrained with other weak supervision labels, such as population density or mobile-phone activity, provided those labels have similar spatial coverage.
  • The reported gap between the multimodal model and satellite-only ResNet-18 is small ($0.8363$ versus $0.8318$) and the paper reports no variance across random splits, so the practical advantage of adding street views needs a stability check before being relied on.
  • A testable extension would be to use the county GDP yearbook data the paper collected to validate the predicted scores; if the scores correlate strongly with GDP, the economic interpretation would be much firmer, and if not, the model is only predicting nighttime light.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Senseconomic, a geospatial intelligence system that combines satellite imagery and Baidu street-view imagery through a cross-attention Vision Transformer to predict nighttime-light-derived socioeconomic scores at county level, and that uses Spark distributed computing plus a Vue3/Baidu-Maps front end to visualize the resulting predictions. The headline quantitative claim is an R-squared of 0.8363 for the multimodal cross-attention model in county-level economic predictions, together with a reduction in processing time from roughly 42/49 minutes to 19/23 minutes for two satellite frames when using Spark.

Significance. If the performance claim were properly validated, the system would represent a useful practical contribution to low-cost, high-frequency economic monitoring, and the distributed-computing and visualization components could benefit practitioners. The paper collects and processes a substantial multimodal dataset and demonstrates a working end-to-end pipeline. However, the economic interpretation is currently unsupported: the reported R-squared is computed against the same nighttime-light scores used as the training target, not against any independent economic measure, and the evaluation protocol is vulnerable to spatial leakage. The cross-attention equations are too incomplete to reproduce. These issues undermine the central claim as stated, although the systems-engineering aspect may remain salvageable in a substantially revised form.

major comments (4)
  1. [§8.2 and Table 1] The R-squared of 0.8363 is computed on a held-out split of nighttime-light-derived scores, not on any independent economic indicator. Section 3.2 reports that County Statistical Yearbook GDP data for 110 counties were collected, but the manuscript never uses these data to validate the predicted scores. Consequently, the abstract's phrase 'county-level economic predictions' overstates what is actually measured; the model is predicting its own training target (nighttime-light proxy), and the economic interpretation is imported from cited literature without direct support.
  2. [§3.3.1 and §8.2] The evaluation uses an 80/20 random split of the 38,126 satellite–street-view pairs, but the alignment unit is an individual pair and the dataset covers only 860 counties, so many pairs from the same county appear in both training and test partitions. Nighttime-light labels are spatially autocorrelated at the 5 km resolution, and nearby satellite tiles and street views are near-duplicates; the network can therefore interpolate spatially to held-out pairs. Additionally, R-squared is computed on individual test pairs rather than on county-aggregated predictions, and no spatial block cross-validation, confidence intervals, or repeated-seed results are reported. The delivered number therefore does not establish county-level predictive performance.
  3. [§2.2, Eqs. (1)–(2)] The cross-attention formulation is incomplete. Equations (1) and (2) state CrossAtt(image1, image2) = image11 and CrossAtt(image2, image11) = image21, but they do not specify the query, key, and value projections, the scaling of attention logits, the number of heads beyond a passing mention, or how the two fusion steps are combined to form the final representation. As written, the equations merely rename variables and provide no basis for reproducing the model architecture.
  4. [§3.1 and §3.3.1] The data counts are inconsistent. Section 3.1 reports 123,758 satellite images and 112,321 street-view images, while Section 3.3.1 states that 'The study generated 124,758 such image-street data pairs,' which exceeds the number of satellite images and does not match the 38,126 pairs retained after filtering. The manuscript should reconcile these figures or explain the relationship between the raw pair count and the final dataset.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'The code used in this paper can be found in Github' provides no repository URL or identifier; either include a working link or remove the sentence.
  2. [§8.2] The text describes a ViT patch-embedding modification that divides a 224×224 image into 49 patches of 32×32, but ViT-B16 conventionally uses 196 patches of 16×16; the authors should clarify how this relates to the pretrained ViT-B16 weights and whether positional embeddings are retained.
  3. [§8.2] The statement that R-squared 'has a range from 0 to 1' is technically incorrect, as R-squared can be negative for poorly fitting models; this is a minor terminology issue.
  4. [§8.3, Table 3] The table header reads 'Experimental results for 51STR images' but the table also contains rows for frame 51RTQ; the caption should reflect that both frames are reported.
  5. [General] Several references are formatted inconsistently (e.g., missing spaces in author lists and in paper titles in the bibliography), and the manuscript would benefit from a careful proofreading pass.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported R2 is a held-out evaluation of the model's stated training target (nighttime-light proxy), not a construction from the claimed economic quantity.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: (i) define nighttime-light radiance as a proxy for county-level economic indicators (Section 1), (ii) train a ViT + cross-attention model to regress that nighttime-light value from satellite and street-view imagery (Sections 2.2, 8.1), and (iii) report R2 on a randomly held-out 20% split of the aligned pairs (Section 8.2, Table 1). The R2 = 0.8363 therefore measures how well the model reconstructs held-out nighttime-light labels, which is exactly the objective it was trained for. This is an ordinary supervised evaluation, not a circular reduction: the test labels are not used in fitting, no equation defines the evaluation metric in terms of the model's own output, and the cross-attention mechanism is imported from the external CrossViT paper. The step that makes the result an 'economic prediction' is the nighttime-light-as-proxy assumption, which the paper states explicitly and supports with multiple independent citations (Pérez-Sindín et al., Proville et al., Gibson et al., Hassan et al., in addition to the first author's own Liu et al. 2021). That assumption is an external-validity or correctness matter, not a circularity. The pair-level random split and the absence of county-level GDP validation are methodological limitations that could inflate or mislabel the reported number, but they do not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs by construction. One citation (Liu et al. 2021) is co-authored by a present author, but it is not load-bearing because the proxy premise is multiply sourced and the paper's contribution is the multimodal system, not the proxy itself. Hence no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the nighttime-light proxy, the pairing distance, hand-chosen architecture hyperparameters, and an unvalidated random split. No new physical entities are introduced, but the model behavior and the economic interpretation are not grounded by an independent GDP benchmark.

free parameters (4)
  • 5km alignment and filtering threshold = 5 km
    Satellite-street view pairs are kept only when both are within 5 km, and nighttime light is averaged over 5 km by 5 km cells (Section 3.3.1). The threshold determines the 38,126 training pairs and is chosen by hand with no sensitivity analysis.
  • ViT architecture hyperparameters = patch 32x32, hidden 256, 2 layers, 8 heads, dropout 0.2, batch 256, 40 epochs, LR 1e-4
    These settings in Sections 8.1 and 8.2 are chosen by hand; the model's R-squared depends on them, and no ablation is reported for them.
  • Zoom level 12 satellite imagery = 38.4 m resolution, 256x256 tiles
    Satellite images for training are collected at zoom level 12 (Section 3.1); this resolution choice affects what features the model can see.
  • Street view sampling and orientation = 4 headings (0, 90, 180, 270), 480x320 images, ~110 m spacing
    The selection of street view frames in Section 3.1 defines the street-level input; results for other sampling schemes are not reported.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Nighttime light intensity is a valid proxy for county-level economic development.
    Sections 1 and 3.1 rely on this to train the model and to call the output an economic indicator. No validation against GDP data is performed in this paper.
  • domain assumption A satellite image and a street view image within 5 km of each other describe the same local economic activity.
    Section 3.3.1 pairs images by distance; no analysis shows that the pairing distance is appropriate or that temporal differences are negligible.
  • domain assumption The ViT encoder and cross-attention modules from prior work transfer to this economic proxy task.
    Section 2 assumes the architecture works without a derivation or a transfer-learning analysis; the cross-attention equations are left as placeholders.
  • domain assumption The random 80/20 split produces unbiased generalization despite spatial autocorrelation of neighboring counties.
    Section 8.2 uses a random split; images from nearby locations may be highly correlated, inflating R-squared, but no spatial split or leakage analysis is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of CrossVIT-augmented Geospatial-Intelligence Visualization System for Tracking Economic Development Dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N3GCWYQM

@misc{pith2026241210474,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: CrossVIT-augmented Geospatial-Intelligence Visualization System for Tracking Economic Development Dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N3GCWYQM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10474}
}
read the original abstract

Timely and accurate economic data is crucial for effective policymaking. Current challenges in data timeliness and spatial resolution can be addressed with advancements in multimodal sensing and distributed computing. We introduce Senseconomic, a scalable system for tracking economic dynamics via multimodal imagery and deep learning. Built on the Transformer framework, it integrates remote sensing and street view images using cross-attention, with nighttime light data as weak supervision. The system achieved an R-squared value of 0.8363 in county-level economic predictions and halved processing time to 23 minutes using distributed computing. Its user-friendly design includes a Vue3-based front end with Baidu maps for visualization and a Python-based back end automating tasks like image downloads and preprocessing. Senseconomic empowers policymakers and researchers with efficient tools for resource allocation and economic planning.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.10474 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The structure of ViT. 2.2 Cross-Attention The Cross-Attention module described in the paper originates from the attention mechanism used in CrossViT [Chen et al., 2021] for multi-scale feature fusion. It effectively captures the interconnections between different modal inputs. To adequately fuse the input data (satellite and street view imagery), the paper adopts an alternating fusion approach, performing two Cross-… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The structure of Cross-Attention. The above Cross-Attention is run twice with 8 multi-head attention. Each head can be expressed using the following equations, CrossAtt(image1, image2) = image11 (1) CrossAtt(image2, image11) = image21 (2) where image1 and image2 are the representations of satellite and street view imagery from ViT. The output of the above fusion operations is the final representation of both images.… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Example of sampled street view locations in Beijing. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Example of Level-2A satellite images. and longitude and entering it into the basic database. The county area data format is a sequence of coordinate pairs separated by commas. County-Level Statistical Yearbook Data. The system uses GDP economic data from the "China Cou…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A satellite-street view pair. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The structure of system architecture. The system adopts a B/S (Browser/Server) model, using Python as the server-side development language, MySQL as the foundational database, Hadoop as the distributed system framework, and Spark as the distributed computing engine. It…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Screenshot of the system UI. (a) Time selection and viewing. (b) The data processing process operation panel: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The heat map (a) of the region in 2020 is generated based on the predicted scores and the center point of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [8]

    Modal Logics of Some Hereditarily Irresolvable Spaces

    IEEE. ISBN 9780780379299. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2003.1294639. URL http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/ 1294639/. Ahmed Shaker, Wai Yeung Yan, and Said Easa. Using stereo satellite imagery for topographic and transportation applications: an accuracy assessment. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 47(3):321–337, July

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  2. [10]

    URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1062976910000645

    1016/j.qref.2010.09.001. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1062976910000645. Janos Horvath, Sriram Baireddy, Hanxiang Hao, Daniel Mas Montserrat, and Edward J. Delp. Manipulation detection in satellite images using vision transformer. In 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), pages 1032–1041,...

    work page 2010

  3. [11]

    ISBN 9781665409155

    IEEE. ISBN 9781665409155. doi: 10.1109/ W ACV51458.2022.00227. URLhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9706653/. Christopher Yeh, Anthony Perez, Anne Driscoll, George Azzari, Zhongyi Tang, David Lobell, Stefano Ermon, and Marshall Burke. Using publicly available satellite imagery and deep learning to understand economic well-being in africa. Nature Commun...

    arXiv 2022

  4. [12]

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16185-w

    ISSN 2041-1723. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16185-w. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-16185-w . Esther Rolf, Jonathan Proctor, Tamma Carleton, Ian Bolliger, Vaishaal Shankar, Miyabi Ishihara, Benjamin Recht, and Solomon Hsiang. A generalizable and accessible approach to machine learning with global satellite imagery. Nature Communications, 12(1)...

    doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16185-w

  5. [13]

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24638-z

    ISSN 2041-1723. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24638-z. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-24638-z . Sungwon Han, Donghyun Ahn, Sungwon Park, Jeasurk Yang, Susang Lee, Jihee Kim, Hyunjoo Yang, Sangyoon Park, and Meeyoung Cha. Learning to score economic development from satellite imagery. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference ...

    doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24638-z

  6. [14]

    ISBN 9781450379984

    ACM. ISBN 9781450379984. doi: 10.1145/3394486.3403347. URL https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3394486.3403347. 11 Ola Hall, Mattias Ohlsson, and Thorsteinn Rögnvaldsson. Satellite image and machine learning ased knowledge extraction in the poverty and welfare domain. SSRN Electronic Journal,

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    doi: 10.2139/ssrn

    ISSN 1556-5068. doi: 10.2139/ssrn. 4102620. URL https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=4102620. Arman Khachiyan, Anthony Thomas, Huye Zhou, Gordon Hanson, Alex Cloninger, Tajana Rosing, and Amit K. Khandelwal. Using neural networks to predict microspatial economic growth. American Economic Review: Insights, 4(4):491–506, December

    doi:10.2139/ssrn

  8. [16]

    doi: 10.1257/aeri.20210422

    ISSN 2640-205X, 2640-2068. doi: 10.1257/aeri.20210422. URL https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aeri.20210422. Jacob Levy Abitbol and Márton Karsai. Interpretable socioeconomic status inference from aerial imagery through urban patterns. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(11):684–692, October

    work page doi:10.1257/aeri.20210422

Show all 32 references
  1. [18]

    doi: 10.1609/aaai.v35i1.16072

    ISSN 2374-3468, 2159-5399. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v35i1.16072. URL https://ojs.aaai. org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/16072. Zhao Geng, Gao Ziqing, Tsai Chihsu, and Lu Jiamin. Cgpm: Poverty mapping framework based on multi-modal geographic knowledge integration and macroscopic socia...

    doi

  2. [19]

    arXiv:2104.11178 [cs, eess]

    URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.11178. arXiv:2104.11178 [cs, eess]. Nathan Ratledge, Gabe Cadamuro, Brandon De La Cuesta, Matthieu Stigler, and Marshall Burke. Using ma- chine learning to assess the livelihood impact of electricity access. Nature, 611(7936):491–495, November

    arXiv

  3. [20]

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05322-8

    ISSN 0028-0836, 1476-4687. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05322-8. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41586-022-05322-8 . Sungwon Park, Sungwon Han, Donghyun Ahn, Jaeyeon Kim, Jeasurk Yang, Susang Lee, Seunghoon Hong, Jihee Kim, Sangyoon Park, Hyunjoo Yang, and Meeyoung Cha. Learn...

    doi

  4. [21]

    doi: 10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21464

    ISSN 2374-3468, 2159-5399. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21464. URL https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ AAAI/article/view/21464. Ryan Engstrom, Jonathan Hersh, and David Newhouse. Poverty from Space : Using High Resolution Satellite Imagery for Estimating Economic Well -being. Publishe...

    doi

  5. [22]

    URL https://hdl.handle.net/10986/40907

    doi: 10.1596/40907. URL https://hdl.handle.net/10986/40907. Christopher N.H. Doll, Jan-Peter Muller, and Jeremy G. Morley. Mapping regional economic activity from night-time light satellite imagery. Ecological Economics, 57(1):75–92, April

    doi

  6. [25]

    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100647

    ISSN 2352-9385. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100647. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S235293852100183X. Haoyu Liu, Xianwen He, Yanbing Bai, Xing Liu, Yilin Wu, Yanyun Zhao, and Hanfang Yang. Nightlight as a proxy of economic indicators : Fin...

    2021

  7. [26]

    doi: 10.3390/rs13173360

    ISSN 2072-4292. doi: 10.3390/rs13173360. URL https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/17/3360. 12 Jeremy Proville, Daniel Zavala-Araiza, and Gernot Wagner. Night-time lights: A global, long term look at links to socio- economic trends. PLOS ONE, 12(3):e0174610, March

    doi

  8. [27]

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174610

    ISSN 1932-6203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174610. URL https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174610. John Gibson, Susan Olivia, Geua Boe-Gibson, and Chao Li. Which night lights data should we use in economics, and where? Journal of Development Economics, 149:102602, March

    1932 doi

  9. [28]

    doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco

    ISSN 03043878. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco. 2020.102602. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304387820301772. M. Kabir Hassan, Benito Sanchez, and Jung-Suk Yu. Financial development and economic growth: New evidence from panel data. The Quarterly Review of Economics ...

    2020

  10. [30]

    ISBN 9781665448994

    IEEE. ISBN 9781665448994. doi: 10.1109/CVPRW53098.2021.00114. URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9522892/. Chun-Fu Richard Chen, Quanfu Fan, and Rameswar Panda. CrossViT : Cross - attention multi - scale vision transformer for image classification. In 2021 IEEE/CVF Inter...

    2021

  11. [31]

    ISBN 9781665428125

    IEEE. ISBN 9781665428125. doi: 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00041. URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9711309/. Zhijie Han and Yujie Zhang. Spark: a big data processing platform based on memory computing. In 2015 Seventh International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algor...

    2021

  12. [1997]

    ISBN 9780780338364

    IEEE. ISBN 9780780338364. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.1997.606466. URL http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/ 606466/. Adrian Albert, Jasleen Kaur, and Marta C. Gonzalez. Using convolutional networks and satellite imagery to identify patterns in urban environments at a large scale. In P...

    1997

  13. [2002]

    doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00097-6

    ISSN 09218009. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00097-6. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0921800902000976. Xaquín S. Pérez-Sindín, Tzu-Hsin Karen Chen, and Alexander V . Prishchepov. Are night-time lights a good proxy of economic activity in rural areas in middle ...

    doi

  14. [2003]

    Proceedings (IEEE Cat

    2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477), volume 4, pages 2942–2944, Toulouse, France,

    2003

  15. [2006]

    doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon

    ISSN 09218009. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon. 2005.03.007. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0921800905001254. Paul C. Sutton and Robert Costanza. Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem ser...

    2005 doi

  16. [2010]

    doi: 10.2747/1548-1603.47.3.321

    ISSN 1548-1603, 1943-7226. doi: 10.2747/1548-1603.47.3.321. URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.2747/ 1548-1603.47.3.321. Amr Abdelraouf, Mohamed Abdel-Aty, and Yina Wu. Using vision transformers for spatial-context-aware rain and road surface condition detection on fr...

    1943 doi

  17. [2013]

    doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2196249

    ISSN 0018-9219, 1558-2256. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2196249. URL http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6236221/. Thanh Tam Nguyen, Thanh Dat Hoang, Minh Tam Pham, Tuyet Trinh Vu, Thanh Hung Nguyen, Quyet-Thang Huynh, and Jun Jo. Monitoring agriculture areas with satellite images ...

    2012

  18. [2015]

    ISBN 9781467391177

    IEEE. ISBN 9781467391177. doi: 10.1109/PAAP.2015.41. URL http://ieeexplore. ieee.org/document/7387321/. 13

    2015

  19. [2017]

    ISBN 9781450348874

    ACM. ISBN 9781450348874. doi: 10.1145/3097983.3098070. URL https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3097983. 3098070. Zbigniew Bochenek, Dariusz Ziolkowski, Maciej Bartold, Karolina Orlowska, and Adrian Ochtyra. Monitoring forest biodiversity and the impact of climate on forest environm...

  20. [2018]

    doi: 10.1080/22797254.2017.1414573

    ISSN 2279-7254. doi: 10.1080/22797254.2017.1414573. URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/22797254.2017.1414573. Esra Suel, Samir Bhatt, Michael Brauer, Seth Flaxman, and Majid Ezzati. Multimodal deep learning from satellite and street-level imagery for measuring in...

    2017

  21. [2020]

    doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106565

    ISSN 15684946. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106565. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S1568494620305032. C.F. Chen, K.S. Chen, L.Y . Chang, and A.J. Chen. The use of satellite imagery for monitoring coastal environment in Taiwan. In IGARSS’97. 1997 IEEE Internation...

    2020

  22. [2021]

    doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112339

    ISSN 00344257. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112339. URL https: //linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0034425721000572. Kiwon Lee, Se-Kyung Oh, and Hee-Young Ryu. Application of high-resolution satellite imagery to transportation: accessibility index extraction approach. In IGARSS

    2021

  23. [2022]

    doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3150715

    ISSN 1524-9050, 1558-0016. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3150715. URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9716073/. Simone Fobi, Joel Mugyenyi, Nathaniel J. Williams, Vijay Modi, and Jay Taneja. Predicting levels of household electricity consumption in low-access settings. In 2022 I...

    2022

  24. [2023]

    doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01891-9

    ISSN 2662-9992. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01891-9. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41599-023-01891-9 . Kumar Ayush, Burak Uzkent, Kumar Tanmay, Marshall Burke, David Lobell, and Stefano Ermon. Efficient poverty mapping from high resolution remote sensing images. Proceeding...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.