Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Automated Design of Metaheuristic Algorithms: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.06532 v3 pith:N42E4DDT submitted 2023-03-12 cs.NE cs.LG

Automated Design of Metaheuristic Algorithms: A Survey

classification cs.NE cs.LG
keywords designalgorithmsautomatedmetaheuristicevaluationproblemsolutionstrategies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Metaheuristics have gained great success in academia and practice because their search logic can be applied to any problem with available solution representation, solution quality evaluation, and certain notions of locality. Manually designing metaheuristic algorithms for solving a target problem is criticized for being laborious, error-prone, and requiring intensive specialized knowledge. This gives rise to increasing interest in automated design of metaheuristic algorithms. With computing power to fully explore potential design choices, the automated design could reach and even surpass human-level design and could make high-performance algorithms accessible to a much wider range of researchers and practitioners. This paper presents a broad picture of automated design of metaheuristic algorithms, by conducting a survey on the common grounds and representative techniques in terms of design space, design strategies, performance evaluation strategies, and target problems in this field.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SCOPE: Synthetic Conditional Objectives for Policy Evolution in Black-Box Combinatorial Optimization

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    SCOPE evolves LLM-generated auxiliary objective functions and selects a validated portfolio of them to guide fixed combinatorial search engines under strict black-box query budgets.