Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 49 references

UF-AMA: A unified framework for cross-domain emotion recognition via adaptive multimodal alignment

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An adaptive alignment framework for brain and eye signals enables emotion recognition that generalizes across people and sessions.

desk verdict UF-AMA stitches together transformer fusion, confidence screening, and multi-level adaptation into a usable pipeline for cross-subject EEG emotion work, but the SOTA claim sits on thin evidence from the abstract alone. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.00170 v1 pith:N4IHG7Z5 submitted 2026-05-29 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CV

Zheng Wang , Shuo Wang , Junhong Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.CV
keywords emotionrecognitionmultimodalfusiondomainadaptationEEGsignalseye-trackingcross-subjectcross-sessionphysiological
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper develops a unified framework that fuses EEG and eye-tracking data through transformer encoders and cross-attention modules to create integrated features. It adds a screening step that evaluates each modality's reliability on new samples and applies different alignment strategies accordingly, followed by multi-level domain adaptation that matches both marginal and conditional distributions at local and global scales. This combination targets the distribution shifts that arise from individual differences and session variations, which currently limit how well models transfer. A reader would care if the approach succeeds because it could make physiological emotion detection practical without extensive per-user data collection. The reported results on the SEED and SEED-IV datasets show improved accuracy in the targeted cross-domain settings.

What carries the argument

The adaptive multimodal alignment process that combines confidence-aware screening of modality reliability with multi-level optimization of marginal and conditional distributions on fused features.

What would settle it

Running the framework on a fresh collection of subjects or sessions outside the SEED datasets and finding that accuracy does not exceed prior methods, or that the confidence scores fail to predict which modality branches perform well, would undermine the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The framework constructs a cross-modal feature fusion network with Transformer encoders and multi-head cross-attention modules for deep integration of EEG and eye-tracking signals, introduces a confidence-aware screening mechanism that partitions target samples by predictive reliability and applies global consistency alignment plus cross-modal distillation accordingly, and proposes a multi-level domain adaptation framework that jointly optimizes marginal and conditional distributions of both modality-specific and global fusion features, thereby reducing cross-domain shifts at multiple granularities and achieving state-of-the-art performance on SEED and SEED-IV datasets in cross-subject and c

Load-bearing premise

The screening mechanism will correctly identify reliable modalities and the multi-level adaptation will reduce distribution shifts without creating new biases or overfitting when applied to subjects and sessions not seen during training.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Deep fusion of EEG and eye-tracking produces richer representations than single-modality approaches for emotion tasks.
  • Dynamic screening by confidence allows the model to use global alignment only where sample quality supports it and distillation where one modality is weaker.
  • Joint marginal and conditional alignment at both local and global levels reduces shifts more thoroughly than single-level methods.
  • The resulting model supports generalization in both cross-subject and cross-session scenarios without separate retraining.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The screening step could be examined on other signal types such as heart-rate variability to test whether modality reliability estimation transfers.
  • If the multi-level adaptation proves decisive, similar hierarchical matching might reduce calibration effort in related physiological classification problems.
  • Practical systems built on this pattern could lower the data requirements for deploying emotion-aware interfaces in everyday settings.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes UF-AMA, a unified framework for cross-domain multimodal emotion recognition from EEG and eye-tracking signals. It consists of a cross-modal feature fusion network using Transformer encoders and multi-head cross-attention, a confidence-aware screening mechanism that partitions target-domain samples by predictive reliability into quality subsets for global consistency alignment and cross-modal distillation, and a multi-level domain adaptation module that jointly aligns marginal and conditional distributions at local modality-specific and global fusion levels. The central claim is that this approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on cross-subject and cross-session tasks on the SEED and SEED-IV datasets.

Significance. If the performance claims are substantiated with full experimental details, the work could advance robust multimodal physiological signal processing for emotion recognition by addressing distribution shifts through adaptive screening and multi-granularity alignment. The public release of source code at the cited GitHub repository is a clear strength that supports reproducibility.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The state-of-the-art performance claim is asserted without any quantitative results, baseline comparisons, ablation studies, error bars, or statistical significance tests, which is load-bearing for the central empirical claim and prevents verification of the magnitude of improvement or the contribution of the confidence-aware screening and multi-level adaptation components.
  2. [Experimental validation] Experimental validation (as summarized in the abstract): The generalization premise that the confidence-aware screening mechanism and multi-level marginal/conditional alignment reliably reduce distribution shifts without introducing selection bias or overfitting is tested only on the SEED and SEED-IV datasets; no external hold-out corpus, no sensitivity analysis on the screening threshold, and no per-fold variance reporting are described, leaving the robustness claim under-supported.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract could be strengthened by briefly noting the key quantitative improvements over prior methods once the experimental section is expanded.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address the major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The state-of-the-art performance claim is asserted without any quantitative results, baseline comparisons, ablation studies, error bars, or statistical significance tests, which is load-bearing for the central empirical claim and prevents verification of the magnitude of improvement or the contribution of the confidence-aware screening and multi-level adaptation components.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from quantitative support for the SOTA claim. In the revised manuscript, we will update the abstract to include specific performance metrics (e.g., accuracies on cross-subject and cross-session tasks for SEED and SEED-IV), baseline comparisons, and references to the ablation studies and statistical tests detailed in the experimental section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experimental validation] Experimental validation (as summarized in the abstract): The generalization premise that the confidence-aware screening mechanism and multi-level marginal/conditional alignment reliably reduce distribution shifts without introducing selection bias or overfitting is tested only on the SEED and SEED-IV datasets; no external hold-out corpus, no sensitivity analysis on the screening threshold, and no per-fold variance reporting are described, leaving the robustness claim under-supported.

    Authors: SEED and SEED-IV are the standard benchmarks for cross-subject and cross-session multimodal emotion recognition, and our protocols directly target the distribution shifts in these datasets. We will add sensitivity analysis on the screening threshold and per-fold variance reporting in the revision to strengthen the robustness evidence. An external hold-out corpus is not part of the current evaluation. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Validation on an external hold-out corpus beyond the SEED and SEED-IV benchmarks

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; framework is an empirical proposal evaluated on external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper introduces a new architecture (cross-modal Transformer fusion, confidence-aware screening, multi-level marginal/conditional alignment) and reports empirical SOTA results on the standard external SEED/SEED-IV datasets. No equations, loss terms, or screening thresholds are shown to be defined in terms of the target performance metric; no self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems; no fitted hyperparameters are relabeled as independent predictions. The derivation chain consists of architectural choices plus standard domain-adaptation objectives whose correctness is tested against held-out subject/session splits rather than reducing to the inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted beyond the standard assumption that the SEED/SEED-IV datasets are representative of cross-domain shifts and that the proposed losses optimize the intended distributions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of UF-AMA: A unified framework for cross-domain emotion recognition via adaptive multimodal alignment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N4IHG7Z5

@misc{pith2026260600170,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: UF-AMA: A unified framework for cross-domain emotion recognition via adaptive multimodal alignment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N4IHG7Z5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.00170}
}
read the original abstract

In recent years, emotion recognition based on physiological signals such as electroencephalogram (EEG) has gained considerable attention, as internal physiological data offer greater objectivity and reliability compared to external behavioral data like facial expressions. However, due to distribution shifts caused by individual and contextual differences, along with variations in sample quality across modalities, constructing a cross-domain multimodal emotion recognition model with high generalization and robustness remains a key challenge. In this study, we propose a Unified Framework with Adaptive Multimodal Alignment (UF-AMA) to address cross-subject and cross-session emotion recognition using multimodal physiological signals. First, we construct a cross-modal feature fusion network comprising Transformer encoders and multi-head cross-attention modules, enabling the deep integration of EEG signals and eye-tracking data. Subsequently, we introduce a confidence-aware screening mechanism that dynamically assesses the predictive reliability of each modality branch on target domain samples, partitions samples into different quality subsets, and accordingly applies global consistency alignment and cross-modal distillation. Finally, we propose a multi-level domain adaptation framework that jointly optimizes the marginal and conditional distributions of both local modality-specific and global fusion features, thereby reducing cross-domain distribution shifts at multiple granularities. Extensive experiments on the SEED and SEED-IV datasets demonstrate that UF-AMA achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in both cross-subject and cross-session tasks. The source code is available at: https://github.com/BetterCoderLab/UF-AMA.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.00170 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overall flowchart of the proposed UF-AMA. a cross-modal alignment loss to exploit inter-modal cor￾relations by constraining representation consistency across modalities in a common feature space. Although multi-level collaborative alignment improves generalization, existing methods remain largely limited to coarse-grained marginal distribution alignment, neglecting semantic-guided conditional distribution alignment … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Architecture of the inter-modality cross-attention fusion (ICAF) module. Through the aforementioned deep encoding process, each modality encoder can extract highly semantically dis￾criminative features, thereby providing a high-quality se￾mantic representation foundation for the subsequent cross￾modal fusion process. 2.2.2. Inter-modality cross-attention fusion The EEG modality captures emotional arousal through fre… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Workflow of the confidence-based sample screening mechanism. Following threshold-based screening, the retained samples are categorized into two main types: high-confidence consistent samples (green dashed boxes), which are sent to the global consistency alignment module; and partially low-quality samples (orange dashed boxes), which are routed to the local cross-modal distillation module. (2) Semantically conflictin… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Stability analysis of UF-AMA on the SEED dataset under repeated runs with different random seeds: (a) Cross-subject experiments; (b) Cross-session experiments. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Subject 50 60 70 80 90 100 Accuracy Mean Accuracy Trend (a) 1 2 3 Subject…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Stability analysis of UF-AMA on the SEED-IV dataset under repeated runs with different random seeds: (a) Cross-subject experiments; (b) Cross-session experiments. equally competitive CSMM (89.82%). In the cross-session experiment, its accuracy was 0.54% higher than tha…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Confusion matrices of UF-AMA on the SEED and SEED-IV datasets under the best-performing seed: (a) Cross-subject experiment on the SEED dataset; (b) Cross-session experiment on the SEED dataset; (c) Cross-subject experiment on the SEED-IV dataset; (d) Cross-session expe…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: t-SNE feature visualization of UF-AMA on the SEED and SEED-IV datasets: (a) Cross-subject experiment on the SEED dataset (Subject 5, Session 3); (b) Cross-session experiment on the SEED dataset (Session 3); (c) Cross-subject experiment on the SEED-IV dataset (Subject 8…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The in- fluencesofemotiononlearningandmemory

    Tyng, C.M., Amin, H.U., Saad, M.N.M., Malik, A.S., 2017. The in- fluencesofemotiononlearningandmemory. FrontiersinPsychology 8, 235933

    2017

  2. [2]

    Facial expression and emotion

    Ekman, P., 1993. Facial expression and emotion. American Psychol- ogist 48, 384

    1993

  3. [3]

    Facial emotion expressions inhuman–robotinteraction:Asurvey

    Rawal, N., Stock-Homburg, R.M., 2022. Facial emotion expressions inhuman–robotinteraction:Asurvey. InternationalJournalofSocial Robotics 14, 1583–1604

    2022

  4. [4]

    Rajapakshe, T., Rana, R., Khalifa, S., Liu, J., Palaniswami, M.,

  5. [5]

    A novel policy for pre-trained deep reinforcement learning for speechemotionrecognition,in:Proceedingsofthe2022Australasian Computer Science Week, pp. 96–105

  6. [6]

    Eeg-based emo- tion recognition using hierarchical network with subnetwork nodes

    Yang, Y., Wu, Q.M.J., Zheng, W.L., Lu, B.L., 2017. Eeg-based emo- tion recognition using hierarchical network with subnetwork nodes. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems 10, 408–419

    2017

  7. [7]

    Eeg emotion recognition using fusion model of graph convolutional neural net- works and lstm

    Yin, Y., Zheng, X., Hu, B., Zhang, Y., Cui, X., 2021. Eeg emotion recognition using fusion model of graph convolutional neural net- works and lstm. Applied Soft Computing 100, 106954

    2021

  8. [8]

    Lgdaan-nets: A localandglobaldomainadversarialattentionneuralnetworksforeeg emotion recognition

    An, Y., Hu, S., Liu, S., Wang, Z., Gao, X., 2025. Lgdaan-nets: A localandglobaldomainadversarialattentionneuralnetworksforeeg emotion recognition. Knowledge-Based Systems 318, 113613

    2025

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Shi, X., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Yeung, D.Y., Wong, W.K., Woo, W.C.,

  2. [10]

    AdvancesinNeuralInformationProcessing Systems 28

    Convolutional lstm network: A machine learning approach for precipitationnowcasting. AdvancesinNeuralInformationProcessing Systems 28

  3. [11]

    Attention is all you need

    Vaswani,A.,Shazeer,N.,Parmar,N.,Uszkoreit,J.,Jones,L.,Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, Ł., Polosukhin, I., 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30

    2017

  4. [12]

    Transformers foreeg-basedemotionrecognition:Ahierarchicalspatialinformation learning model

    Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Hu, C., Yin, Z., Song, Y., 2022. Transformers foreeg-basedemotionrecognition:Ahierarchicalspatialinformation learning model. IEEE Sensors Journal 22, 4359–4368

    2022

  5. [13]

    Temporal relative transformer encoding cooperating with channel attention for eeg emotion analysis

    Peng, G., Zhao, K., Zhang, H., Xu, D., Kong, W., 2023. Temporal relative transformer encoding cooperating with channel attention for eeg emotion analysis. Computers in Biology and Medicine 154, 106537

    2023

  6. [14]

    Aflemp: Attention-based federated learning for emotion recognition using multi-modal physiological data

    Gahlan, N., Sethia, D., 2024. Aflemp: Attention-based federated learning for emotion recognition using multi-modal physiological data. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 94, 106353

    2024

  7. [15]

    Emsn: An energy-efficient memristive sequencer network for human emotion classification in mental health monitoring

    Ji, X., Dong, Z., Han, Y., Lai, C.S., Qi, D., 2023. Emsn: An energy-efficient memristive sequencer network for human emotion classification in mental health monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 69, 1005–1016

    2023

  8. [16]

    Dema: Deep eeg-first multi-physiological affect model for emotion recognition

    Li, Q., Jin, D., Huang, J., Zhong, N., Qin, J., 2025. Dema: Deep eeg-first multi-physiological affect model for emotion recognition. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 99, 106812

    2025

  9. [17]

    Incongruity- awaremultimodalphysiologysignalsfusionforemotionrecognition

    Li, J., Chen, N., Zhu, H., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., 2024. Incongruity- awaremultimodalphysiologysignalsfusionforemotionrecognition. Information Fusion 105, 102220

    2024

  10. [18]

    Efficient low-rank multimodal fusion with modality-specificfactors,in:Proceedingsofthe56thAnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp

    Liu, Z., Shen, Y., Lakshminarasimhan, V.B., Liang, P.P., Zadeh, A., Morency, L.P., 2018. Efficient low-rank multimodal fusion with modality-specificfactors,in:Proceedingsofthe56thAnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 2247–2256

    2018

  11. [19]

    Emotion recognitionfrommultiplephysiologicalsignalsusingintra-andinter- modality attention fusion network

    Gong, L., Chen, W., Li, M., Zhang, T., Yi, D., 2024. Emotion recognitionfrommultiplephysiologicalsignalsusingintra-andinter- modality attention fusion network. Digital Signal Processing 144, 104278

    2024

  12. [20]

    Mf-net: a multimodalfusionnetworkforemotionrecognitionbasedonmultiple Wang et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 16 of 17 physiological signals

    Zhu, L., Ding, Y., Huang, A., Liu, G., Wang, H., 2025. Mf-net: a multimodalfusionnetworkforemotionrecognitionbasedonmultiple Wang et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 16 of 17 physiological signals. Signal, Image and Video Processing 19, 58

    2025

  13. [21]

    Sartipi, S., Cetin, M., 2023. Adversarial discriminative domain adaptation and transformers for eeg-based cross-subject emotion recognition, in: 2023 11th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER), IEEE. pp. 1–4

    2023

  14. [22]

    Multi-source domain separation adversarial domain adaptation for eeg emotion recognition

    Ai, Q., Wang, C., Chen, K., Liu, G., Zhang, L., 2025. Multi-source domain separation adversarial domain adaptation for eeg emotion recognition. BiomedicalSignalProcessingandControl109,108016

    2025

  15. [23]

    Gretton,A.,Borgwardt,K.M.,Rasch,M.J.,Schölkopf,B.,Smola,A.,

  16. [24]

    The Journal of Machine Learning Research 13, 723–773

    A kernel two-sample test. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 13, 723–773

  17. [25]

    Maximum mean discrepancy for gener- alization in the presence of distribution and missingness shift

    Ouyang, L., Key, A., 2021. Maximum mean discrepancy for gener- alization in the presence of distribution and missingness shift. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.10344

    2021

  18. [26]

    Mlda: Multi- loss domain adaptor for cross-session and cross-emotion eeg-based individual identification

    Miao, Y., Jiang, W., Su, N., Liu, Y., Zha, D., 2023. Mlda: Multi- loss domain adaptor for cross-session and cross-emotion eeg-based individual identification. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 27, 5767–5778

    2023

  19. [27]

    Spatiotemporal isomorphic cross-brain region interaction network for cross-subject eeg emotion recognition

    An, Y., Hu, S., Liu, S., Wang, Z., Zhao, Y., 2025. Spatiotemporal isomorphic cross-brain region interaction network for cross-subject eeg emotion recognition. Knowledge-Based Systems , 114115

    2025

  20. [28]

    Hierarchical multimodal-fusion of physiological signals for emotion recognition withscenarioadaptionandcontrastivealignment

    Tang, J., Ma, Z., Gan, K., Zhang, J., Luo, Z., 2024. Hierarchical multimodal-fusion of physiological signals for emotion recognition withscenarioadaptionandcontrastivealignment. InformationFusion 103, 102129

    2024

  21. [29]

    Emotion recognition empowered human-computer interaction with domain adaptation network

    Xu, X., Fu, C., Chen, J., 2024. Emotion recognition empowered human-computer interaction with domain adaptation network. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 71, 6777–6786

    2024

  22. [30]

    Cfda-csf: A multi-modal domain adaptation method for cross-subject emotion recognition

    Jiménez-Guarneros, M., Fuentes-Pineda, G., 2024. Cfda-csf: A multi-modal domain adaptation method for cross-subject emotion recognition. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 15, 1502– 1513

    2024

  23. [31]

    Modfinity: Unsupervised domain adaptation with multimodal information flow intertwining, in: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pp

    Liu, S., Lv, J., Kang, J., Hu, D., Dou, Q., 2025. Modfinity: Unsupervised domain adaptation with multimodal information flow intertwining, in: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pp. 5092–5101

    2025

  24. [32]

    Differential entropy fea- ture for eeg-based emotion classification, in: 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER), IEEE

    Duan, R.N., Zhu, J.Y., Lu, B.L., 2013. Differential entropy fea- ture for eeg-based emotion classification, in: 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER), IEEE. pp. 81–84

    2013

  25. [33]

    Cat: Cross attention in vision transformer, in: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), IEEE

    Lin, H., Cheng, X., Wu, X., Shen, D., 2022. Cat: Cross attention in vision transformer, in: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), IEEE. pp. 1–6

    2022

  26. [34]

    Investigating critical frequency bands and channels for eeg-based emotion recognition with deep neural networks

    Zheng, W.L., Lu, B.L., 2015. Investigating critical frequency bands and channels for eeg-based emotion recognition with deep neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development 7, 162–175

    2015

  27. [35]

    Emo- tionmeter:Amultimodalframeworkforrecognizinghumanemotions

    Zheng, W.L., Liu, W., Lu, Y., Lu, B.L., Cichocki, A., 2018. Emo- tionmeter:Amultimodalframeworkforrecognizinghumanemotions. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 49, 1110–1122

    2018

  28. [36]

    Adam:Amethodforstochasticoptimiza- tion

    Kingma,D.P.,Ba,J.,2014. Adam:Amethodforstochasticoptimiza- tion. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980

    2014 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Eeg-based emotion recognition via channel-wise attention and self attention

    Tao,W.,Li,C.,Song,R.,Cheng,J.,Liu,Y.,Wan,F.,Chen,X.,2020. Eeg-based emotion recognition via channel-wise attention and self attention. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 14, 382–393

    2020

  30. [38]

    Da- capsnet:Amulti-branchcapsulenetworkbasedonadversarialdomain adaption for cross-subject eeg emotion recognition

    Liu, S., Wang, Z., An, Y., Zhao, J., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Y.D., 2024. Da- capsnet:Amulti-branchcapsulenetworkbasedonadversarialdomain adaption for cross-subject eeg emotion recognition. Knowledge- Based Systems 283, 111137

    2024

  31. [39]

    Pr-pl:Anovelprototypicalrepresentation basedpairwiselearningframeworkforemotionrecognitionusingeeg signals

    Zhou,R.,Zhang,Z.,Fu,H.,Zhang,L.,Li,L.,Huang,G.,Dong,Y.,Li, F.,Yang,X.,Tao,Q.,2023. Pr-pl:Anovelprototypicalrepresentation basedpairwiselearningframeworkforemotionrecognitionusingeeg signals. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 15, 657–670

    2023

  32. [40]

    Temporal- spectral-spatialsynchronizationattention-basednetworkforeegemo- tion recognition

    Guo, Z., Wang, J., Luo, H., Liu, Z., Li, J., 2025. Temporal- spectral-spatialsynchronizationattention-basednetworkforeegemo- tion recognition. Knowledge-Based Systems 323, 113762

    2025

  33. [41]

    Fmlan: A novel frame- work for cross-subject and cross-session eeg emotion recognition

    Yu, P., He, X., Li, H., Sun, Y., Wei, L., 2025. Fmlan: A novel frame- work for cross-subject and cross-session eeg emotion recognition. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 100, 106912

    2025

  34. [42]

    Sdc-net:Adomain adaptation framework with semantic-dynamic consistency for cross- subject eeg emotion recognition

    Tang,J.,Li,Y.,Fan,X.,Song,A.,Zeng,Y.,2025. Sdc-net:Adomain adaptation framework with semantic-dynamic consistency for cross- subject eeg emotion recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.17524

    2025

  35. [43]

    Codf-net: Coordinated- representation decision fusion network for emotion recognition with eeg and eye movement signals

    Gong, X., Dong, Y., Zhang, T., 2024. Codf-net: Coordinated- representation decision fusion network for emotion recognition with eeg and eye movement signals. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 15, 1213–1226

    2024

  36. [44]

    Cross-cultural emotion recognition with eeg and eye movement signals based on multiple stackedbroadlearningsystem

    Gong, X., Chen, C.L.P., Zhang, T., 2023. Cross-cultural emotion recognition with eeg and eye movement signals based on multiple stackedbroadlearningsystem. IEEETransactionsonComputational Social Systems 11, 2014–2025

    2023

  37. [45]

    Jiménez-Guarneros, M., Fuentes-Pineda, G., Grande-Barreto, J.,

  38. [46]

    IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems 12, 2214–2227

    Mmda: A multimodal and multisource domain adaptation methodforcross-subjectemotionrecognitionfromeegandeyemove- ment signals. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems 12, 2214–2227

  39. [47]

    Multi-modal cross- subject emotion feature alignment and recognition with eeg and eye movements

    Zhu, Q., Zhu, T., Fei, L., Li, S., Wu, D., 2025. Multi-modal cross- subject emotion feature alignment and recognition with eeg and eye movements. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing

    2025

  40. [48]

    Multimodalemotion recognitionbyfusingcomplementarypatternsfromcentraltoperiph- eral neurophysiological signals across feature domains

    Ma,Z.,Li,A.,Tang,J.,Liu,Y.,Zhao,S.,2025. Multimodalemotion recognitionbyfusingcomplementarypatternsfromcentraltoperiph- eral neurophysiological signals across feature domains. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 143, 110004

    2025

  41. [49]

    Visualizing data using t-SNE

    Van der Maaten, L., Hinton, G., 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9. Wang et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 17 of 17

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.