Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Scaling Advantage in Approximate Optimization with Quantum Annealing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.07184 v1 pith:N65KPF7H submitted 2024-01-14 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mech

classification quant-phcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mech
keywords quantumadvantageannealingoptimizationapproximateenergyscalingstates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantum annealing is a heuristic optimization algorithm that exploits quantum evolution to approximately find lowest energy states. Quantum annealers have scaled up in recent years to tackle increasingly larger and more highly connected discrete optimization and quantum simulation problems. Nevertheless, despite numerous attempts, a computational quantum advantage in exact optimization using quantum annealing hardware has so far remained elusive. Here, we present evidence for a quantum annealing scaling advantage in approximate optimization. The advantage is relative to the top classical heuristic algorithm: parallel tempering with isoenergetic cluster moves (PT-ICM). The setting is a family of 2D spin-glass problems with high-precision spin-spin interactions. To achieve this advantage, we implement quantum annealing correction (QAC): an embedding of a bit-flip error-correcting code with energy penalties that leverages the properties of the D-Wave Advantage quantum annealer to yield over 1,300 error-suppressed logical qubits on a degree-5 interaction graph. We generate random spin-glass instances on this graph and benchmark their time-to-epsilon, a generalization of the time-to-solution metric for low-energy states. We demonstrate that with QAC, quantum annealing exhibits a scaling advantage over PT-ICM at sampling low energy states with an optimality gap of at least 1.0%. This amounts to the first demonstration of an algorithmic quantum speedup in approximate optimization.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum Annealing Hyperparameter Analysis for Optimal Sensor Placement in Production Environments

    cs.ET 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A QUBO-based quantum annealing study shows that tuned hyperparameters and spectral decomposition improve sensor placement solutions on D-Wave, but classical solvers remain superior.

  2. Quantum Algorithm Software for Condensed Matter Physics

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-06 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review of quantum algorithm software that advertises a benchmark suite, yet the body contains no benchmarks, data, or code.

Pith tools