Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 183 references

Electronic band structures of topological kagome materials

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the diverse exotic phases of kagome metals—superconductivity, charge-density waves, Chern magnetism—all trace back to the geometric band structure of the kagome lattice, and it surveys four material families to make…

desk verdict Useful, current review of kagome band structures, but its concluding causal synthesis overstates what its own sections show about CDW mechanisms in FeGe and ScV6Sn6. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01838 v1 pith:N6MZZJDV submitted 2025-01-03 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.supr-con

Man Li , Huan Ma , Rui Lou , Shancai Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.supr-con PACS 71.20.-b79.60.-i
keywords kagomelatticeflatbandDiracfermionvanHovesingularitytopologicalstructurechargedensitywavemagneticWeylsemimetalangle-resolvedphotoemission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This topical review tries to establish a common geometric origin for a wide range of quantum states observed in solid kagome materials. It argues that the kagome lattice, a two-dimensional array of corner-sharing triangles, imprints three characteristic features on the electronic structure: a Dirac cone, a nearly flat band, and van Hove singularities. Across the $T_3X$, $TX$, $AT_6X_6$, and $RT_3X_5$ families, the review finds that every material exhibits at least one of these signatures, and that combining them with electron correlations and magnetism generates phenomena such as superconductivity, charge and spin density waves, pair density waves, and Chern insulator phases. A sympathetic reader would care because this points to a single design principle: the lattice geometry, not any one compound, is the common thread connecting these otherwise disparate materials.

What carries the argument

The organizing object is the ideal kagome tight-binding band structure: a Dirac cone at the $K$ point, a flat band across the Brillouin zone, and two van Hove saddle points at the $M$ point. This single template carries the argument because each material family is framed as a perturbation of it; intercalated layers, spin-orbit coupling, magnetic order, and electronic correlations gap, split, or renormalize these geometric features, and the exotic phases are attributed to the modified features. The flat band provides a high density of states and enhanced Coulomb interactions, the Dirac cone supplies topology and Berry curvature, and the van Hove singularities offer a nesting mechanism for instabilities such as charge density waves.

What would settle it

One concrete check is to measure the Dirac point DP1 in Fe$_3$Ge with spin- and polarization-resolved ARPES while continuously controlling the magnetization direction through temperature or applied field; if the $3d_{z^2}$ gap does not open and close with out-of-plane versus in-plane moments, the orbital-selective Dirac-mass scenario breaks down. More broadly, a high-quality ARPES or STM study of any claimed kagome family member that resolves none of the three signatures near the Fermi level—Dirac cone, flat band, or van Hove singularity—would undercut the universality claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that all kagome materials surveyed retain at least one of the three band characteristics of the ideal kagome lattice—a Dirac crossing at $K$, a dispersionless flat band, and van Hove singularities at $M$—and that these geometric features, when combined with correlations and magnetism, give rise to the observed exotic quantum states. The review illustrates this with specific examples: the orbital-selective Dirac gap controlled by spin reorientation in ferromagnetic Fe$_3$Ge, the spin-polarized flat band and massive Dirac fermion in YMn$_6$Sn$_6$, the CDW and superconductivity in $R$V$_3$Sb$_5$ driven by van Hove singularities near the Fermi level, and magnetic Weyl fermions emerging from the kagome Dirac cone when time-reversal symmetry is broken. By comparing families with different stacking, intercalation, and magnetic order, the paper argues that the frustrated geometry of the kagome lattice is the common origin of these diverse phenomena.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the ARPES and DFT band assignments in the cited primary studies, especially the orbital characters used for orbital-selective gaps and spin-polarized flat bands, are correct, since the review compares those assignments rather than re-deriving them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, the diverse quantum phases observed across kagome families share a common geometric origin, making the kagome lattice a predictive platform rather than a collection of independent molecules.
  • The orbital-selective response of Dirac fermions in Fe$_3$Ge implies that spin reorientation can be used as a control knob for tuning Dirac masses and topological gaps.
  • Van Hove singularities near the Fermi level become a useful predictor for CDW instabilities, as emphasized in FeGe and $R$V$_3$Sb$_5$.
  • Flat bands near the Fermi level, as in CoSn and YMn$_6$Sn$_6$, are natural candidates for correlation-driven phases such as magnetism and possible fractional quantum Hall states.
  • The outlook suggests that exfoliation and molecular-beam epitaxy could realize cleaner two-dimensional kagome layers, amplifying the geometric band features and their emergent phenomena.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the orbital-selective Dirac gap in Fe$_3$Ge suggests a general design rule: controlling the direction of magnetic moments could systematically tune Dirac masses in other kagome magnets, a prediction testable by angle-resolved photoemission under applied fields.
  • The comparative logic implies that a high-quality measurement showing none of the three kagome band signatures near the Fermi level in a claimed kagome metal would falsify the universality claim; searching for such outliers would sharpen the boundary of the geometric origin.
  • The flat-band diamagnetism reported in CoSn, combined with doping studies such as CoSn$_{1-x}$In$_x$, suggests that flat-band engineering could be extended to tune orbital magnetism and transport anisotropy in other kagome families.
  • The review's emphasis on stacking sequences hints that constructing kagome moiré superlattices, an idea mentioned in the outlook, could push flat-band correlations into regimes not accessible in bulk compounds.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper is a topical review of the electronic band structures and exotic quantum phases of kagome materials, covering the T3X, TX, AT6X6, and RT3X5 families. It summarizes ARPES, STM, and DFT results for a wide range of compounds, including Fe3Ge, FeSn, FeGe, CoSn, YMn6Sn6, ScV6Sn6, RV3Sb5, and related systems, and discusses how Dirac cones, flat bands, and van Hove singularities connect to magnetism, charge and spin density waves, superconductivity, and topological properties. The review concludes that all surveyed kagome materials exhibit at least one kagome band characteristic and that these geometric features, combined with electron correlations and magnetism, induce the observed exotic states.

Significance. The review provides a broad, current, and well-referenced survey of a fast-moving field, and its comparative Table I is a useful resource. Because it contains no original derivations or new datasets, its value lies in synthesis and interpretation rather than in new results. The paper is most valuable if its concluding causal synthesis is accurate and appropriately qualified; if the synthesis is overstated, the review risks giving a misleading impression of the state of the evidence. The review does credit the relevant experimental and theoretical literature, including recent work by the authors' own group, which is appropriate for a topical review.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section VI (Conclusion) vs. Sections III and IV] The central claim of the conclusion—that kagome band features, together with correlations and magnetism, induce the exotic phases, and specifically that "the nesting of vHSs near EF could trigger CDW instabilities"—is undercut by the review's own descriptions of FeGe and ScV6Sn6. In Section III, the review states that a proposed origin of the FeGe CDW is "dominated by Ge z-axis dimerization without a Kohn anomaly in electron-phonon coupling but with spin-charge-lattice coupling." In Section IV, the review reports that Cr doping in ScV6Sn6 moves the vHSs away from EF while "the CDW order remains stable over a wide doping range, affirming the marginal role of vHSs at the M point," and that the relevant phonon instabilities involve Sc and Sn sites with negligible V-kagome contribution. These statements directly contradict a common geometric-origin explanation for CDW in these materials. The review compiles these competing mechanisms without adjudicating them, so the conclusion overstates the evidence. The conclusion should be revised to explicitly acknowledge the cases where non-kagome lattice mechanisms are viable and to frame the common geometric origin as an open hypothesis rather than an established result.
  2. [Section IV, AMn6Sn6 paragraph] The claim that "magnetic order plays a secondary role in influencing the band structure" is presented as a general conclusion from the observation of robust Dirac points and flat bands across several AMn6Sn6 compounds. This is a load-bearing comparative claim, but the review does not discuss potential surface-bulk differences, photoemission matrix-element effects, or the extent to which the band assignments rely on spin-polarized DFT+DMFT calculations from a limited set of primary papers, including Ref. [84] by the same group. The claim should be qualified by an explicit note that these band assignments are inherited from the cited ARPES and DMFT studies and have not been independently re-established in this review.
  3. [Section III, FeGe CDW discussion] The review presents two competing origins for the FeGe CDW—vHS nesting and Ge z-axis dimerization with spin-charge-lattice coupling—but does not indicate which is favored by current evidence or why the vHS scenario remains viable given the reported absence of a Kohn anomaly. Since FeGe is cited in the introduction and conclusion as a key example of kagome-driven CDW, the ambiguity is not merely a literature detail. The authors should either state the current consensus or explicitly mark this as an open debate that weakens the general geometric-origin narrative.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section III, paragraph on Fe3Sn2] The phrase "the phase-destructive FB has slao been reported" contains a typo; "slao" should be "also."
  2. [Table I and Section V] The entries "Wely semimetal" (Table I) and "Wely fermions" (Section V) should be corrected to "Weyl semimetal" and "Weyl fermions."
  3. [Section IV, first paragraph on AT6Sn6] The sentence "The interval between kagome layers is greater than that in T3X family but slightly greater than in TX family" is unclear; given the quasi-2D characterization, the comparison with the TX family likely should be "slightly less" or "comparable," and the sentence should be reworded for clarity.
  4. [Abstract] The phrase "quantum spin Fermi liquid states" is unusual; standard usage would be "quantum spin liquids" or "quantum spin liquid states."
  5. [Figure 2 caption] In the caption for Fig. 2(m), the phrase "as indicated in Fig. 2l" is confusing because the temperature-dependent EDCs are shown in Fig. 2(m) itself; the cross-reference should be clarified or removed.
  6. [References] Several arXiv preprints are cited without journal identifiers (e.g., Refs. [8], [17], [18], [90]); this is acceptable for a quickly evolving field but should be made consistent with the journal's reference style.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review compiles external ARPES, STM, and DFT results, and its self-citations are independently falsifiable primary data rather than derivation inputs.

full rationale

This paper is a topical review, not a derivation. It introduces the ideal kagome tight-binding band structure (Dirac cone, flat band, van Hove singularities) as known background and then surveys ARPES, STM, and DFT results for the T3X, TX, AT6X6, and RV3Sb5 families. The central concluding statement, that the reviewed kagome materials show at least one kagome band feature and that geometry plus correlations and magnetism can produce correlated and topological phases, is a synthesis of cited experiments and calculations, not a prediction obtained from fitted parameters or from equations defined in the paper. Many key citations are to the authors' own primary works, e.g., Refs [23], [59], [84], [105], [106], and [111]; however, these are ARPES/DFT/transport studies with external data, and the review does not redefine their results to force the conclusion. The closest thing to a derivation is Table II, which lists charge-order states from a cited tight-binding model H0 (Ref [16]); this is a restatement of prior theory, not a new derivation and not circular. The review does present competing CDW mechanisms, for example, Ge z-axis dimerization for FeGe and Sc/Sn phonon instabilities with negligible V-kagome contribution for ScV6Sn6, that weaken the universal vHS-nesting narrative, but an internal tension or overstatement is a scientific correctness issue, not a circular reduction. No equation-level or definition-level circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters, fits, or entities. It relies on standard kagome tight-binding models and on the correctness of the primary ARPES, DFT, and STM results it summarizes. The listed axioms are the interpretive premises required for the comparative narrative.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The ideal kagome tight-binding model with Dirac cone, van Hove singularity, and flat band describes the real materials' low-energy electronic structure closely enough for interpretation.
    Used throughout Sections II through V as the interpretive template for ARPES and DFT data.
  • domain assumption ARPES spectral features and DFT calculations are correctly matched to orbital characters and kagome-derived bands, including the orbital-selective Dirac fermion response in Fe3Ge.
    Underpins comparisons in Fig. 2(i-l) and the narrative in Section II; not independently re-derived in this review.
  • standard math The standard kagome tight-binding Hamiltonian H0 = sum_k c_k^dag H_k c_k and the charge-order order parameters in Table II enumerate the relevant low-energy instabilities.
    Invoked in Section V and Table II, adapted from Ref. [16].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electronic band structures of topological kagome materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N6MZZJDV

@misc{pith2026250101838,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electronic band structures of topological kagome materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N6MZZJDV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01838}
}
abstract

The kagome lattice has garnered significant attention due to its ability to host quantum spin Fermi liquid states. Recently, the combination of unique lattice geometry, electron-electron correlations, and adjustable magnetism in solid kagome materials has led to the discovery of numerous fascinating quantum properties. These include unconventional superconductivity, charge and spin density waves (CDW/SDW), pair density waves (PDW), and Chern insulator phases. These emergent states are closely associated with the distinctive characteristics of the kagome lattice's electronic structure, such as van Hove singularities, Dirac fermions, and flat bands, which can exhibit exotic quasi-particle excitations under different symmetries and magnetic conditions. Recently, various quantum kagome materials have been developed, typically consisting of kagome layers stacked along the $z$-axis with atoms either filling the geometric centers of the kagome lattice or embedded between the layers. In this topical review, we begin by introducing the fundamental properties of several kagome materials. To gain an in-depth understanding of the relationship between topology and correlation, we then discuss the complex phenomena observed in these systems. These include the simplest kagome metal $T_3X$, kagome intercalation metal $TX$, and the ternary compounds $AT_6X_6$ and $RT_3X_5$ ($A$ = Li, Mg, Ca, or rare earth; $T$ = V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni; $X$ = Sn, Ge; $R$ = K, Rb, Cs). Finally, we provide a perspective on future experimental work in this field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.01838 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) The structure of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

183 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [84]

    Li M, Wang Q, Wang G, Yuan Z, Song W, Lou R, Liu Z, Huang Y, Liu Z, Lei H, Yin Z and Wang S 2021 Nature Communications 12(1) 3129

    2021

  2. [1]

    Liu Z, Liu F and Wu Y S 2014 Chinese Physics B 23(7) 077308

    2014

  3. [2]

    Tanaka A and Ueda H 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(6) 067204

    2003

  4. [3]

    Chen Y, Xu S, Xie Y, Zhong C, Wu C and Zhang S B 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98(3) 035135

    2018

  5. [4]

    Wu C, Bergman D, Balents L and Das Sarma S 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99(7) 070401

    2007

  6. [5]

    Jaworowski B, G¨ u¸ cl¨ u A D, Kaczmarkiewicz P, Kupczy´ nski M, Potasz P and W´ ojs A 2018New Journal of Physics 20 063023

  7. [6]

    Tang E, Mei J W and Wen X G 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106(23) 236802

    2011

  8. [7]

    Xu G, Lian B and Zhang S C 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115(18) 186802

    2015

Show all 183 references
  1. [8]

    Kassem M A, Shiotani T, Ohta H, Tabata Y, Waki T and Nakamura H 2023 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 2312.17069)

    2023 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Jiang K, Wu T, Yin J X, Wang Z, Hasan M Z, Wilson S D, Chen X and Hu J 2022 National Science Review 10 nwac199

    2022

  3. [10]

    Wang Y, Wu H, McCandless G T, Chan J Y and Ali M N 2023 Nature Reviews Physics 5(11) 635–658

    2023

  4. [11]

    Yin J X, Lian B and Hasan M Z 2022 Nature 612(7941) 647–657

    2022

  5. [12]

    Wang Q, Xu Y, Lou R, Liu Z, Li M, Huang Y, Shen D, Weng H, Wang S and Lei H 2018 Nature Communications 9(1) 3681 15

    2018

  6. [13]

    Liu D F, Liang A J, Liu E K, Xu Q N, Li Y W, Chen C, Pei D, Shi W J, Mo S K, Dudin P, Kim T, Cacho C, Li G, Sun Y, Yang L X, Liu Z K, Parkin S S P, Felser C and Chen Y L 2019 Science 365(6459) 1282–1285

    2019

  7. [14]

    Yu S L and Li J X 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85(14) 144402

    2012

  8. [15]

    Kiesel M L, Platt C and Thomale R 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(12) 126405

    2013

  9. [16]

    Feng X, Jiang K, Wang Z and Hu J 2021 Science Bulletin 66 1384–1388

    2021

  10. [17]

    Li Y, Liu Y, Du X, Wu S, Zhao W, Zhai K, Hu Y, Zhang S, Chen H, Liu J, Yang Y, Peng C, Hashimoto M, Lu D, Liu Z, Wang Y, Chen Y, Cao G and Yang L 2024 Correlated Electronic Structure and Incipient Flat Bands of the Kagome Superconductor CsCr 3Sb5 (Preprint 2406.03740)

    2024 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Guo Y, Wang Z, Xie F, Huang Y, Gao B, Oh J S, Wu H, Liu Z, Ren Z, Fang Y, Biswas A, Zhang Y, Yue Z, Hu C, Jozwiak C, Bostwick A, Rotenberg E, Hashimoto M, Lu D, Kono J, Chu J H, Yakobson B I, Birgeneau R J, Si Q, Dai P and Yi M 2024 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 2406.05293)

    2024

  12. [19]

    Li L, Chi S, Ma W, Guo K, Xu G and Jia S 2024 Chinese Physics B 33 057501

    2024

  13. [20]

    Kuroda K, Tomita T, Suzuki M T, Bareille C, Nugroho A A, Goswami P, Ochi M, Ikhlas M, Nakayama M, Akebi S, Noguchi R, Ishii R, Inami N, Ono K, Kumigashira H, Varykhalov A, Muro T, Koretsune T, Arita R, Shin S, Kondo T and Nakatsuji S 2017 Nature Materials 16(11) 1090–1095

    2017

  14. [21]

    Yin J X, Zhang S S, Chang G, Wang Q, Tsirkin S S, Guguchia Z, Lian B, Zhou H, Jiang K, Belopolski I, Shumiya N, Multer D, Litskevich M, Cochran T A, Lin H, Wang Z, Neupert T, Jia S, Lei H and Hasan M Z 2019 Nature Physics 15(5) 443–448

    2019

  15. [22]

    Huang H, Zheng L, Lin Z, Guo X, Wang S, Zhang S, Zhang C, Sun Z, Wang Z, Weng H, Li L, Wu T, Chen X and Zeng C 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 128(9) 096601

    2022

  16. [23]

    Lou R, Zhou L, Song W, Fedorov A, Tu Z, Jiang B, Wang Q, Li M, Liu Z, Chen X, Rader O, B¨ uchner B, Sun Y, Weng H, Lei H and Wang S 2024 Nature Communications 15(1) 9823

    2024

  17. [24]

    Higo T, Kondou K, Nomoto T, Shiga M, Sakamoto S, Chen X, Nishio-Hamane D, Arita R, Otani Y, Miwa S and Nakatsuji S 2022 Nature 607(7919) 474–479

    2022

  18. [25]

    Kimata M, Chen H, Kondou K, Sugimoto S, Muduli P K, Ikhlas M, Omori Y, Tomita T, MacDonald A H, Nakatsuji S and Otani Y 2019 Nature 565(7741) 627–630

    2019

  19. [26]

    Nakatsuji S, Kiyohara N and Higo T 2015 Nature 527(7577) 212–215

    2015

  20. [27]

    Nagaosa N, Sinova J, Onoda S, MacDonald A H and Ong N P 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82(2) 1539–1592

    2010

  21. [28]

    Yang H, Sun Y, Zhang Y, Shi W J, Parkin S S P and Yan B 2017 New Journal of Physics 19 015008

    2017

  22. [29]

    Nielsen H B and Ninomiya M 1983 Physics Letters B 130(6) 389–396

    1983

  23. [30]

    Nandy S, Sharma G, Taraphder A and Tewari S 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(17) 176804

    2017

  24. [31]

    West F G 1963 Journal of Applied Physics 34 1171–1173

    1963

  25. [32]

    Li P, Zhang C H, Zhang J W, Wen Y and Zhang X X 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98(12) 121108

    2018

  26. [33]

    Hu J, Xu S Y, Ni N and Mao Z 2019 Annual Review of Materials Research 49 207–252

    2019

  27. [34]

    Armitage N P, Mele E J and Vishwanath A 2018 Rev. Mod. Phys. 90(1) 015001

    2018

  28. [35]

    Ikhlas M, Tomita T, Koretsune T, Suzuki M T, Nishio-Hamane D, Arita R, Otani Y and Nakatsuji S 2017 Nature Physics 13(11) 1085–1090

    2017

  29. [36]

    Li X, Xu L, Ding L, Wang J, Shen M, Lu X, Zhu Z and Behnia K 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(5) 056601

    2017

  30. [37]

    Higo T, Man H, Gopman D B, Wu L, Koretsune T, van ’t Erve O M J, Kabanov Y P, Rees D, Li Y, Suzuki M T, Patankar S, Ikhlas M, Chien C L, Arita R, Shull R D, Orenstein J and Nakatsuji S 2018 Nature Photonics 12(2) 73–78

    2018

  31. [38]

    Rout P K, Madduri P V P, Manna S K and Nayak A K 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99(9) 094430

    2019

  32. [39]

    Xu L, Li X, Ding L, Behnia K and Zhu Z 2020 Applied Physics Letters 117 222403

    2020

  33. [40]

    Burkov A A 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96(4) 041110

    2017

  34. [41]

    Zhang S S, Yin J X, Ikhlas M, Tien H J, Wang R, Shumiya N, Chang G, Tsirkin S S, Shi Y, Yi C, Guguchia Z, Li H, Wang W, Chang T R, Wang Z, Yang Y f, Neupert T, Nakatsuji S and Hasan M Z 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125(4) 046401

    2020

  35. [42]

    Sung N H, Ronning F, Thompson J D and Bauer E D 2018 Applied Physics Letters 112 132406

    2018

  36. [43]

    Li X, Koo J, Zhu Z, Behnia K and Yan B 2023 Nature Communications 14(1) 1642

    2023

  37. [44]

    liang Yu G, min Cheng T, lin Li M and xin Zhang X 2022 Physics Letters A 452 128450

    2022

  38. [45]

    Drijver J W, Sinnema S G and van der Woude F 1976 Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics 6 2165

    1976

  39. [46]

    Zhang Z, Zhao M, Ma L, Li G, Zhen C, Zhao D and Hou D 2024 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 2403.17354)

    2024 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Kane C L and Mele E J 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95(22) 226801

    2005

  41. [48]

    Yin J X, Zhang S S, Li H, Jiang K, Chang G, Zhang B, Lian B, Xiang C, Belopolski I, Zheng H, Cochran T A, Xu S Y, Bian G, Liu K, Chang T R, Lin H, Lu Z Y, Wang Z, Jia S, Wang W and Hasan M Z 2018 Nature 562(7725) 91–95

    2018

  42. [49]

    Teng X, Oh J S, Tan H, Chen L, Huang J, Gao B, Yin J X, Chu J H, Hashimoto M, Lu D, Jozwiak C, Bostwick A, Rotenberg E, Granroth G E, Yan B, Birgeneau R J, Dai P and Yi M 2023 Nature Physics 19(6) 814–822

    2023

  43. [50]

    Wang Q, Sun S, Zhang X, Pang F and Lei H 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94(7) 075135

    2016

  44. [51]

    Du Q, Hu Z, Han M G, Camino F, Zhu Y and Petrovic C 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129(23) 236601

    2022

  45. [52]

    Ye L, Kang M, Liu J, von Cube F, Wicker C R, Suzuki T, Jozwiak C, Bostwick A, Rotenberg E, Bell D C, Fu L, Comin R and Checkelsky J G 2018 Nature 555(7698) 638–642

    2018

  46. [53]

    Lin Z, Choi J H, Zhang Q, Qin W, Yi S, Wang P, Li L, Wang Y, Zhang H, Sun Z, Wei L, Zhang S, Guo T, Lu Q, Cho J H, Zeng C and Zhang Z 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(9) 096401

    2018

  47. [54]

    Sales B C, Yan J, Meier W R, Christianson A D, Okamoto S and McGuire M A 2019 Phys. Rev. Mater. 3(11) 114203

    2019

  48. [55]

    Kang M, Ye L, Fang S, You J S, Levitan A, Han M, Facio J I, Jozwiak C, Bostwick A, Rotenberg E, Chan M K, McDonald R D, Graf D, Kaznatcheev K, Vescovo E, Bell D C, Kaxiras E, van den Brink J, Richter M, Ghimire M P, Checkelsky 16 J G and Comin R 2020 Nature Materials 19(2) 163–169

    2020

  49. [56]

    Lin Z, Wang C, Wang P, Yi S, Li L, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Wang Z, Huang H, Sun Y, Huang Y, Shen D, Feng D, Sun Z, Cho J H, Zeng C and Zhang Z 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102(15) 155103

    2020

  50. [57]

    Teng X, Chen L, Ye F, Rosenberg E, Liu Z, Yin J X, Jiang Y X, Oh J S, Hasan M Z, Neubauer K J, Gao B, Xie Y, Hashimoto M, Lu D, Jozwiak C, Bostwick A, Rotenberg E, Birgeneau R J, Chu J H, Yi M and Dai P 2022 Nature 609(7927) 490–495

    2022

  51. [58]

    Xie Y, Chen L, Chen T, Wang Q, Yin Q, Stewart J R, Stone M B, Daemen L L, Feng E, Cao H, Lei H, Yin Z, MacDonald A H and Dai P 2021 Communications Physics 4(1) 240

    2021

  52. [59]

    Liu Z, Li M, Wang Q, Wang G, Wen C, Jiang K, Lu X, Yan S, Huang Y, Shen D, Yin J X, Wang Z, Yin Z, Lei H and Wang S 2020 Nature Communications 11(1) 4002

    2020

  53. [60]

    Kang M, Fang S, Ye L, Po H C, Denlinger J, Jozwiak C, Bostwick A, Rotenberg E, Kaxiras E, Checkelsky J G and Comin R 2020 Nature Communications 11(1) 4004

    2020

  54. [61]

    Mazet T, Ihou-Mouko H, Marˆ ech´ e J F and Malaman B 2006The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 51(2) 173–180

  55. [62]

    Chen D, Le C, Fu C, Lin H, Schnelle W, Sun Y and Felser C 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103(14) 144410

    2021

  56. [63]

    Ma W, Xu X, Wang Z, Zhou H, Marshall M, Qu Z, Xie W and Jia S 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103(23) 235109

    2021

  57. [64]

    Mazet T, Tobola J, Venturini G and Malaman B 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65(10) 104406

    2002

  58. [65]

    Song Z, Chen Z, Kan X, Wang S, Zhu C, Wang M, Zheng G and Ma Y 2024Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 172182

  59. [66]

    Chafik El Idrissi B, Venturini G and Malaman B 1991 Materials Research Bulletin 26 431–437

    1991

  60. [67]

    Zhang H, Liu C, Zhang Y, Hou Z, Fu X, Zhang X, Gao X and Liu J 2022 Applied Physics Letters 121 202401

    2022

  61. [68]

    Wang Q, Neubauer K J, Duan C, Yin Q, Fujitsu S, Hosono H, Ye F, Zhang R, Chi S, Krycka K, Lei H and Dai P 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103(1) 014416

    2021

  62. [69]

    Ghimire N J, Dally R L, Poudel L, Jones D C, Michel D, Magar N T, Bleuel M, McGuire M A, Jiang J S, Mitchell J F, Lynn J W and Mazin I I 2020 Science Advances 6(51) eabe2680

    2020

  63. [70]

    Ma W, Xu X, Yin J X, Yang H, Zhou H, Cheng Z J, Huang Y, Qu Z, Wang F, Hasan M Z and Jia S 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(24) 246602

    2021

  64. [71]

    Gao L, Shen S, Wang Q, Shi W, Zhao Y, Li C, Cao W, Pei C, Ge J Y, Li G, Li J, Chen Y, Yan S and Qi Y 2021 Applied Physics Letters 119 092405

    2021

  65. [72]

    Venturini G, Idrissi B E and Malaman B 1991 Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 94 35–42

    1991

  66. [73]

    Xu X, Yin J X, Ma W, Tien H J, Qiang X B, Reddy P V S, Zhou H, Shen J, Lu H Z, Chang T R, Qu Z and Jia S 2022 Nature Communications 13(1) 1197

    2022

  67. [74]

    Zeng H, Yu G, Luo X, Chen C, Fang C, Ma S, Mo Z, Shen J, Yuan M and Zhong Z 2022Journal of Alloys and Compounds 899 163356

  68. [75]

    Kabir F, Filippone R, Dhakal G, Lee Y, Poudel N, Casey J, Sakhya A P, Regmi S, Smith R, Manfrinetti P, Ke L, Gofryk K, Neupane M and Pathak A K 2022 Phys. Rev. Mater. 6(6) 064404

    2022

  69. [76]

    Dhakal G, Cheenicode Kabeer F, Pathak A K, Kabir F, Poudel N, Filippone R, Casey J, Pradhan Sakhya A, Regmi S, Sims C, Dimitri K, Manfrinetti P, Gofryk K, Oppeneer P M and Neupane M 2021 Phys. Rev. B 104(16) L161115

    2021

  70. [77]

    Suga K, Kindo K, Zhang L, Br¨ uck E, Buschow K, de Boer F, Lef` evre C and Venturini G 2006 Journal of Alloys and Compounds 408-412 158–160 proceedings of Rare Earths’04 in Nara, Japan

    2006

  71. [78]

    Riberolles S X M, Han T, Slade T J, Wilde J M, Sapkota A, Tian W, Zhang Q, Abernathy D L, Sanjeewa L D, Bud’ko S L, Canfield P C, McQueeney R J and Ueland B G 2024 npj Quantum Materials 9(1) 42

    2024

  72. [79]

    Wang B, Yi E, Li L, Qin J, Hu B F, Shen B and Wang M 2022 Phys. Rev. B 106(12) 125107

    2022

  73. [80]

    Gorbunov D, Kuz’min M, Uhl ´ ıˇ rov´ a K,ˇZ´ aˇ cek M, Richter M, Skourski Y and Andreev A 2012 Journal of Alloys and Compounds 519 47–54

    2012

  74. [81]

    Liu C, Zhang H, Li Z, Yan Y, Zhang Y, Hou Z and Fu X 2023 Surfaces and Interfaces 39 102866

    2023

  75. [82]

    Asaba T, Thomas S M, Curtis M, Thompson J D, Bauer E D and Ronning F 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101(17) 174415

    2020

  76. [83]

    Lv B, Zhong R, Luo X, Ma S, Chen C, Wang S, Luo Q, Gao F, Fang C, Ren W and Zhong Z 2023 Journal of Alloys and Compounds 957 170356

    2023

  77. [85]

    Liu Z, Zhao N, Li M, Yin Q, Wang Q, Liu Z, Shen D, Huang Y, Lei H, Liu K and Wang S 2021 Phys. Rev. B 104(11) 115122

    2021

  78. [86]

    Gu X, Chen C, Wei W S, Gao L L, Liu J Y, Du X, Pei D, Zhou J S, Xu R Z, Yin Z X, Zhao W X, Li Y D, Jozwiak C, Bostwick A, Rotenberg E, Backes D, Veiga L S I, Dhesi S, Hesjedal T, van der Laan G, Du H F, Jiang W J, Qi Y P, Li G, Shi W J, Liu Z K, Chen Y L and Yang L X 2022 Phys...

    2022

  79. [87]

    Yin J X, Ma W, Cochran T A, Xu X, Zhang S S, Tien H J, Shumiya N, Cheng G, Jiang K, Lian B, Song Z, Chang G, Belopolski I, Multer D, Litskevich M, Cheng Z J, Yang X P, Swidler B, Zhou H, Lin H, Neupert T, Wang Z, Yao N, Chang T R, Jia S and Hasan M Z 2020 Nature 583(7817) 533–536

    2020

  80. [88]

    Pokharel G, Teicher S M L, Ortiz B R, Sarte P M, Wu G, Peng S, He J, Seshadri R and Wilson S D 2021 Phys. Rev. B 104(23) 235139

    2021

  81. [89]

    Lee J and Mun E 2022 Phys. Rev. Mater. 6(8) 083401

    2022

  82. [90]

    Huang X, Cui Z, Huang C, Huo M, Liu H, Li J, Liang F, Chen L, Sun H, Shen B, Zhang Y and Wang M 2023 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 2303.00627) 17

    2023 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Pokharel G, Ortiz B, Chamorro J, Sarte P, Kautzsch L, Wu G, Ruff J and Wilson S D 2022 Phys. Rev. Mater. 6(10) 104202

    2022

  84. [92]

    Ishikawa H, Yajima T, Kawamura M, Mitamura H and Kindo K 2021 Journal of the Physical Society of Japan

    2021

  85. [93]

    Zhang X, Liu Z, Cui Q, Guo Q, Wang N, Shi L, Zhang H, Wang W, Dong X, Sun J, Dun Z and Cheng J 2022 Phys. Rev. Mater. 6(10) 105001

    2022

  86. [94]

    Mozaffari S, Meier W R, Madhogaria R P, Peshcherenko N, Kang S H, Villanova J W, Arachchige H W S, Zheng G, Zhu Y, Chen K W, Jenkins K, Zhang D, Chan A, Li L, Yoon M, Zhang Y and Mandrus D G 2024 Phys. Rev. B 110(3) 035135

    2024

  87. [95]

    Peng S, Han Y, Pokharel G, Shen J, Li Z, Hashimoto M, Lu D, Ortiz B R, Luo Y, Li H, Guo M, Wang B, Cui S, Sun Z, Qiao Z, Wilson S D and He J 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127(26) 266401

    2021

  88. [96]

    Sante D D, Bigi C, Eck P, Enzner S, Consiglio A, Pokharel G, Carrara P, Orgiani P, Polewczyk V, Fujii J, King P D C, Vobornik I, Rossi G, Zeljkovic I, Wilson S D, Thomale R, Sangiovanni G, Panaccione G and Mazzola F 2023 Nature Physics 19(8) 1135–1142

    2023

  89. [97]

    Hu Y, Wu X, Yang Y, Gao S, Plumb N C, Schnyder A P, Xie W, Ma J and Shi M 2022 Science Advances 8 eadd2024

    2022

  90. [98]

    Hu Y, Ma J, Li Y, Jiang Y, Gawryluk D J, Hu T, Teyssier J, Multian V, Yin Z, Xu S, Shin S, Plokhikh I, Han X, Plumb N C, Liu Y, Yin J X, Guguchia Z, Zhao Y, Schnyder A P, Wu X, Pomjakushina E, Hasan M Z, Wang N and Shi M 2024 Nature Communications 15(1) 1658

    2024

  91. [99]

    Arachchige H W S, Meier W R, Marshall M, Matsuoka T, Xue R, McGuire M A, Hermann R P, Cao H and Mandrus D 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129(21) 216402

    2022

  92. [100]

    Mielke C, Das D, Yin J X, Liu H, Gupta R, Jiang Y X, Medarde M, Wu X, Lei H C, Chang J, Dai P, Si Q, Miao H, Thomale R, Neupert T, Shi Y, Khasanov R, Hasan M Z, Luetkens H and Guguchia Z 2022 Nature 602 245–250

    2022

  93. [101]

    Khasanov R, Das D, Gupta R, Mielke C, Elender M, Yin Q, Tu Z, Gong C, Lei H, Ritz E T, Fernandes R M, Birol T, Guguchia Z and Luetkens H 2022 Phys. Rev. Res. 4(2) 023244

    2022

  94. [102]

    Yang S Y, Wang Y, Ortiz B R, Liu D, Gayles J, Derunova E, Gonzalez-Hernandez R, ˇSmejkal L, Chen Y, Parkin S S P, Wilson S D, Toberer E S, McQueen T and Ali M N 2020 Science Advances 6 eabb6003

    2020

  95. [103]

    Zhou X, Liu H, Wu W, Jiang K, Shi Y, Li Z, Sui Y, Hu J and Luo J 2022 Phys. Rev. B 105(20) 205104

    2022

  96. [104]

    Ortiz B R, Teicher S M L, Hu Y, Zuo J L, Sarte P M, Schueller E C, Abeykoon A M M, Krogstad M J, Rosenkranz S, Osborn R, Seshadri R, Balents L, He J and Wilson S D 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125(24) 247002

    2020

  97. [105]

    Liu Z, Zhao N, Yin Q, Gong C, Tu Z, Li M, Song W, Liu Z, Shen D, Huang Y, Liu K, Lei H and Wang S 2021 Phys. Rev. X 11(4) 041010

    2021

  98. [106]

    Figure 5(h) shows the temperature evolution of the bands along the K–M direction

    shows a high intensity around the M points, suggesting the singularities or the surface states at the proximity of EF. Figure 5(h) shows the temperature evolution of the bands along the K–M direction. The bands near the 12 R(K/Rb/Cs)V3Sb5 a b c Sb1 V1 Sb2 94 K CsV3Sb5 2.5 K Cs...

  99. [107]

    Lou R, Fedorov A, Yin Q, Kuibarov A, Tu Z, Gong C, Schwier E F, B¨ uchner B, Lei H and Borisenko S 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 128(3) 036402

    2022

  100. [108]

    Neupert T, Denner M M, Yin J X, Thomale R and Hasan M Z 2022 Nature Physics 18(2) 137–143

    2022

  101. [109]

    Yang Y, Fan W, Zhang Q, Chen Z, Chen X, Ying T, Wu X, Yang X, Meng F, Li G, Li S, Gu L, Qian T, Schnyder A P, gang Guo J and Chen X 2021 Chinese Physics Letters 38 127102

    2021

  102. [110]

    Yin Q, Tu Z, Gong C, Tian S and Lei H 2021 Chinese Physics Letters 38 127401

    2021

  103. [111]

    Cai Y, Wang J, Wang Y, Hao Z, Liu Y, Zhou L, Sui X, Jiang Z, Xu S, Ge H, Ma X M, Zhang C, Shen Z, Yang Y, Jiang Q, Liu Z, Ye M, Shen D, Liu Y, Cui S, Wang L, Liu C, Lin J, Huang B, Wu L, Zhuang J, He H, Zhang W, Mei J W and Chen C 2023 Advanced Electronic Materials 9 2300212 (...

    2023 doi

  104. [112]

    Ma H, Liu G, Yang L, Yin Q, Ding P, Liu Z, Lu H Y, Lei H and Wang S 2023 Phys. Rev. B 108(23) 235129

    2023

  105. [113]

    Shi M, Yu F, Yang Y, Meng F, Lei B, Luo Y, Sun Z, He J, Wang R, Jiang Z, Liu Z, Shen D, Wu T, Wang Z, Xiang Z, Ying J and Chen X 2022 Nature Communications 13 2773

    2022

  106. [114]

    Liu E, Sun Y, Kumar N, Muechler L, Sun A, Jiao L, Yang S Y, Liu D, Liang A, Xu Q, Kroder J, S¨ uß V, Borrmann H, Shekhar C, Wang Z, Xi C, Wang W, Schnelle W, Wirth S, Chen Y, Goennenwein S T B and Felser C 2018 Nature Physics 14(11) 1125–1131

    2018

  107. [115]

    Zhang T, Yilmaz T, Vescovo E, Li H X, Moore R G, Lee H N, Miao H, Murakami S and McGuire M A 2022 npj Computational Materials 8(1) 155

    2022

  108. [116]

    Cao L, Liu G, Zhang Y, Yu Z, Lv Y Y, Yao S H, Zhou J, Chen Y B and Chen Y F 2023 Phys. Rev. Mater. 7(8) 084203

    2023

  109. [117]

    Pradhan S K, Pradhan S, Mal P, Rambabu P, Lakhani A, Das B, Chittari B L, Turpu G R and Das P 2024 Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter

    2024

  110. [118]

    Ye L, Chan M K, McDonald R D, Graf D, Kang M, Liu J, Suzuki T, Comin R, Fu L and Checkelsky J G 2019 Nature Communications 10(1) 4870

    2019

  111. [119]

    Hartmann O and W¨ appling R 1987Physica Scripta 35 499

  112. [120]

    Kulshreshtha S K and Raj P 1981 Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics 11 281

    1981

  113. [121]

    Moore R G, Okamoto S, Li H, Meier W R, Miao H, Lee H N, Hashimoto M, Lu D, Dagotto E, McGuire M A and Sales B C 2022 Phys. Rev. B 106(11) 115141

    2022

  114. [122]

    Meier W R, Yan J, McGuire M A, Wang X, Christianson A D and Sales B C 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100(18) 184421

    2019

  115. [123]

    Xie T, Yin Q, Wang Q, Kolesnikov A I, Granroth G E, Abernathy D L, Gong D, Yin Z, Lei H and Podlesnyak A 2022 Phys. Rev. B 106(21) 214436

    2022

  116. [124]

    Bernhard J, Lebech B and Beckman O 1984 Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics 14 2379

    1984

  117. [125]

    Bernhard J, Lebech B and Beckman O 1988 Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics 18 539

    1988

  118. [126]

    Yu F H, Wu T, Wang Z Y, Lei B, Zhuo W Z, Ying J J and Chen X H 2021 Phys. Rev. B 104(4) L041103

    2021

  119. [127]

    Yi S, Liao Z, Wang Q, Ma H, Liu J, Teng X, Dai P, Dai Y, Zhao J, Qi Y, Xu B and Qiu X 2024 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 18 2403.09950)

    2024 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Miao H, Zhang T T, Li H X, Fabbris G, Said A H, Tartaglia R, Yilmaz T, Vescovo E, Yin J X, Murakami S, Feng X L, Jiang K, Wu X L, Wang A F, Okamoto S, Wang Y L and Lee H N 2023 Nature Communications 14(1) 6183

    2023

  121. [129]

    Teng X, Tam D W, Chen L, Tan H, Xie Y, Gao B, Granroth G E, Ivanov A, Bourges P, Yan B, Yi M and Dai P 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett. 133(4) 046502

    2024

  122. [130]

    Wu S, Klemm M L, Shah J, Ritz E T, Duan C, Teng X, Gao B, Ye F, Matsuda M, Li F, Xu X, Yi M, Birol T, Dai P and Blumberg G 2024 Phys. Rev. X 14(1) 011043

    2024

  123. [131]

    Chen Z, Wu X, Zhou S, Zhang J, Yin R, Li Y, Li M, Gong J, He M, Chai Y, Zhou X, Wang Y, Wang A, Yan Y J and Feng D L 2024 Nature Communications 15(1) 6262

    2024

  124. [132]

    Yin J X, Jiang Y X, Teng X, Hossain M S, Mardanya S, Chang T R, Ye Z, Xu G, Denner M M, Neupert T, Lienhard B, Deng H B, Setty C, Si Q, Chang G, Guguchia Z, Gao B, Shumiya N, Zhang Q, Cochran T A, Multer D, Yi M, Dai P and Hasan M Z 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129(16) 166401

    2022

  125. [133]

    Shi C, Liu Y, Maity B B, Wang Q, Kotla S R, Ramakrishnan S, Eisele C, Agarwal H, Noohinejad L, Tao Q, Kang B, Lou Z, Yang X, Qi Y, Lin X, Xu Z A, Thamizhavel A, Cao G H, Smaalen S V, Cao S and Bao J K 2023 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 2308.09034)

    2023 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Zhou S and Wang Z 2022 Nature Communications 13(1) 7288

    2022

  127. [135]

    Xiao D, Chang M C and Niu Q 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82(3) 1959–2007

    2010

  128. [136]

    Yin J X, Shumiya N, Mardanya S, Wang Q, Zhang S S, Tien H J, Multer D, Jiang Y, Cheng G, Yao N, Wu S, Wu D, Deng L, Ye Z, He R, Chang G, Liu Z, Jiang K, Wang Z, Neupert T, Agarwal A, Chang T R, Chu C W, Lei H and Hasan M Z 2020 Nature Communications 11(1) 4003

    2020

  129. [137]

    Sales B C, Meier W R, Parker D S, Yin L, Yan J Q, May A F, Calder S, Aczel A A, Zhang Q, Li H, Yilmaz T, Vescovo E, Miao H, Hermann R P and McGuire M A 2022 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 2201.12421)

    2022 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Tan H and Yan B 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 130(26) 266402

    2023

  131. [139]

    Cao S, Xu C, Fukui H, Manjo T, Dong Y, Shi M, Liu Y, Cao C and Song Y 2023 Nature Communications 14(1) 7671

    2023

  132. [140]

    Gu Y, Ritz E T, Meier W R, Blockmon A, Smith K, Madhogaria R P, Mozaffari S, Mandrus D, Birol T and Musfeldt J L 2023 npj Quantum Materials 8(1) 58

    2023

  133. [141]

    Lee S, Won C, Kim J, Yoo J, Park S, Denlinger J, Jozwiak C, Bostwick A, Rotenberg E, Comin R, Kang M and Park J H 2024 npj Quantum Materials 9(1) 15

    2024

  134. [142]

    Zhang X, Hou J, Xia W, Xu Z, Yang P, Wang A, Liu Z, Shen J, Zhang H, Dong X, Uwatoko Y, Sun J, Wang B, Guo Y and Cheng J 2022 Materials 15

    2022

  135. [143]

    Guo K, Ye J, Guan S and Jia S 2023 Phys. Rev. B 107(20) 205151

    2023

  136. [144]

    Guo H M and Franz M 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80(11) 113102

    2009

  137. [145]

    Siegfried P E, Bhandari H, Jones D C, Ghimire M P, Dally R L, Poudel L, Bleuel M, Lynn J W, Mazin I I and Ghimire N J 2022 Communications Physics 5(1) 58

    2022

  138. [146]

    Li H, Zhao H, Jiang K, Wang Q, Yin Q, Zhao N N, Liu K, Wang Z, Lei H and Zeljkovic I 2022 Nature Physics 18(6) 644–649

    2022

  139. [147]

    Ortiz B R, Gomes L C, Morey J R, Winiarski M, Bordelon M, Mangum J S, Oswald I W H, Rodriguez-Rivera J A, Neilson J R, Wilson S D, Ertekin E, McQueen T M and Toberer E S 2019 Phys. Rev. Materials 3(9) 094407

    2019

  140. [148]

    Du F, Luo S, Ortiz B R, Chen Y, Duan W, Zhang D, Lu X, Wilson S D, Song Y and Yuan H 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103(22) L220504

    2021

  141. [149]

    Chen K Y, Wang N N, Yin Q W, Gu Y H, Jiang K, Tu Z J, Gong C S, Uwatoko Y, Sun J P, Lei H C, Hu J P and Cheng J G 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(24) 247001

    2021

  142. [150]

    Li H, Zhang T T, Yilmaz T, Pai Y Y, Marvinney C E, Said A, Yin Q W, Gong C S, Tu Z J, Vescovo E, Nelson C S, Moore R G, Murakami S, Lei H C, Lee H N, Lawrie B J and Miao H 2021 Phys. Rev. X 11(3) 031050

    2021

  143. [151]

    Ortiz B R, Sarte P M, Kenney E M, Graf M J, Teicher S M L, Seshadri R and Wilson S D 2021 Phys. Rev. Materials 5(3) 034801

    2021

  144. [152]

    Yin Q, Tu Z, Gong C, Fu Y, Yan S and Lei H 2021 Chinese Physics Letters 38 037403

    2021

  145. [153]

    Varma C M and Simons A L 1983 Phys. Rev. Lett. 51(2) 138–141

    1983

  146. [154]

    Miao H, Ishikawa D, Heid R, Le Tacon M, Fabbris G, Meyers D, Gu G D, Baron A Q R and Dean M P M 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8(1) 011008

    2018

  147. [155]

    Weber F, Rosenkranz S, Castellan J P, Osborn R, Hott R, Heid R, Bohnen K P, Egami T, Said A H and Reznik D 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107(10) 107403

    2011

  148. [156]

    Weber F, Rosenkranz S, Castellan J P, Osborn R, Karapetrov G, Hott R, Heid R, Bohnen K P and Alatas A 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107(26) 266401

    2011

  149. [157]

    Kogar A, Rak M S, Vig S, Husain A A, Flicker F, Joe Y I, Venema L, MacDougall G J, Chiang T C, Fradkin E, van Wezel J and Abbamonte P 2017 Science 358 1314–1317

    2017

  150. [158]

    Rice T M and Scott G K 1975 Phys. Rev. Lett. 35(2) 120–123

    1975

  151. [159]

    Hoesch M, Bosak A, Chernyshov D, Berger H and Krisch M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(8) 086402

    2009

  152. [160]

    Miao H, Li H X, Meier W R, Huon A, Lee H N, Said A, Lei H C, Ortiz B R, Wilson S D, Yin J X, Hasan M Z, Wang Z, Tan H and Yan B 2021 Phys. Rev. B 104(19) 195132

    2021

  153. [161]

    Chen H, Yang H, Hu B, Zhao Z, Yuan J, Xing Y, Qian G, Huang Z, Li G, Ye Y, Ma S, Ni S, Zhang H, Yin Q, Gong C, Tu Z, Lei H, Tan H, Zhou S, Shen C, Dong X, Yan B, Wang Z and Gao H J 2021 Nature 599 222–228

    2021

  154. [162]

    Liang Z, Hou X, Zhang F, Ma W, Wu P, Zhang Z, Yu F, Ying J J, Jiang K, Shan L, Wang Z and Chen X H 2021 Phys. Rev. X 11(3) 031026 19

    2021

  155. [163]

    Zhao H, Li H, Ortiz B R, Teicher S M L, Park T, Ye M, Wang Z, Balents L, Wilson S D and Zeljkovic I 2021 Nature 599 216–221

    2021

  156. [164]

    Ortiz B R, Teicher S M L, Kautzsch L, Sarte P M, Ratcliff N, Harter J, Ruff J P C, Seshadri R and Wilson S D 2021 Phys. Rev. X 11(4) 041030

    2021

  157. [165]

    Shumiya N, Hossain M S, Yin J X, Jiang Y X, Ortiz B R, Liu H, Shi Y, Yin Q, Lei H, Zhang S S, Chang G, Zhang Q, Cochran T A, Multer D, Litskevich M, Cheng Z J, Yang X P, Guguchia Z, Wilson S D and Hasan M Z 2021 Phys. Rev. B 104(3) 035131

    2021

  158. [166]

    Li H, Zhao H, Ortiz B R, Park T, Ye M, Balents L, Wang Z, Wilson S D and Zeljkovic I 2022 Nature Physics 18 265–270

    2022

  159. [167]

    Ni S, Ma S, Zhang Y, Yuan J, Yang H, Lu Z, Wang N, Sun J, Zhao Z, Li D, Liu S, Zhang H, Chen H, Jin K, Cheng J, Yu L, Zhou F, Dong X, Hu J, Gao H J and Zhao Z 2021 Chinese Physics Letters 38 057403

    2021

  160. [168]

    Xiang Y, Li Q, Li Y, Xie W, Yang H, Wang Z, Yao Y and Wen H H 2021 Nature Communications 12 6727

    2021

  161. [169]

    Jiang Y X, Yin J X, Denner M M, Shumiya N, Ortiz B R, Xu G, Guguchia Z, He J, Hossain M S, Liu X, Ruff J, Kautzsch L, Zhang S S, Chang G, Belopolski I, Zhang Q, Cochran T A, Multer D, Litskevich M, Cheng Z J, Yang X P, Wang Z, Thomale R, Neupert T, Wilson S D and Hasan M Z 202...

    2021

  162. [170]

    Yu F H, Ma D H, Zhuo W Z, Liu S Q, Wen X K, Lei B, Ying J J and Chen X H 2021 Nature Communications 12 3645

    2021

  163. [171]

    Chen X, Zhan X, Wang X, Deng J, Liu X B, Chen X, Guo J G and Chen X 2021 Chinese Physics Letters 38 057402

    2021

  164. [172]

    Tsirlin A A, Fertey P, Ortiz B R, Klis B, Merkl V, Dressel M, Wilson S D and Uykur E 2022 SciPost Phys. 12 049

    2022

  165. [173]

    Qian T, Christensen M H, Hu C, Saha A, Andersen B M, Fernandes R M, Birol T and Ni N 2021 Physical Review B 104 144506

    2021

  166. [174]

    Schoop L M, Xie L S, Chen R, Gibson Q D, Lapidus S H, Kimchi I, Hirschberger M, Haldolaarachchige N, Ali M N, Belvin C A, Liang T, Neaton J B, Ong N P, Vishwanath A and Cava R J 2015 Phys. Rev. B 91(21) 214517

    2015

  167. [175]

    Nayak J, Wu S C, Kumar N, Shekhar C, Singh S, Fink J, Rienks E E D, Fecher G H, Parkin S S P, Yan B and Felser C 2017 Nature Communications 8 13942

    2017

  168. [176]

    Fu Y, Zhao N, Chen Z, Yin Q, Tu Z, Gong C, Xi C, Zhu X, Sun Y, Liu K and Lei H 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127(20) 207002

    2021

  169. [177]

    Cho S, Ma H, Xia W, Yang Y, Liu Z, Huang Z, Jiang Z, Lu X, Liu J, Liu Z, Li J, Wang J, Liu Y, Jia J, Guo Y, Liu J and Shen D 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127(23) 236401

    2021

  170. [178]

    Hu Y, Wu X, Ortiz B R, Ju S, Han X, Ma J, Plumb N C, Radovic M, Thomale R, Wilson S D, Schnyder A P and Shi M 2022 Nature Communications 13 2220

    2022

  171. [179]

    Kang M, Fang S, Kim J K, Ortiz B R, Ryu S H, Kim J, Yoo J, Sangiovanni G, Di Sante D, Park B G, Jozwiak C, Bostwick A, Rotenberg E, Kaxiras E, Wilson S D, Park J H and Comin R 2022 Nature Physics 18 301–308

    2022

  172. [180]

    Belopolski I, Cochran T A, Liu X, Cheng Z J, Yang X P, Guguchia Z, Tsirkin S S, Yin J X, Vir P, Thakur G S, Zhang S S, Zhang J, Kaznatcheev K, Cheng G, Chang G, Multer D, Shumiya N, Litskevich M, Vescovo E, Kim T K, Cacho C, Yao N, Felser C, Neupert T and Hasan M Z 2021 Phys. ...

    2021

  173. [181]

    Muechler L, Liu E, Gayles J, Xu Q, Felser C and Sun Y 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101(11) 115106

    2020

  174. [182]

    Howard S, Jiao L, Wang Z, Morali N, Batabyal R, Kumar-Nag P, Avraham N, Beidenkopf H, Vir P, Liu E, Shekhar C, Felser C, Hughes T and Madhavan V 2021 Nature Communications 12(1) 4269

    2021

  175. [183]

    Fang H, Lyu M, Su H, Yuan J, Li Y, Xu L, Liu S, Wei L, Liu X, Yang H, Yao Q, Wang M, Guo Y, Shi W, Chen Y, Liu E and Liu Z 2023 Science China Materials 66(5) 2032–2038

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.