REVIEW 3 cited by
DiffusionDet: Diffusion Model for Object Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We propose DiffusionDet, a new framework that formulates object detection as a denoising diffusion process from noisy boxes to object boxes. During the training stage, object boxes diffuse from ground-truth boxes to random distribution, and the model learns to reverse this noising process. In inference, the model refines a set of randomly generated boxes to the output results in a progressive way. Our work possesses an appealing property of flexibility, which enables the dynamic number of boxes and iterative evaluation. The extensive experiments on the standard benchmarks show that DiffusionDet achieves favorable performance compared to previous well-established detectors. For example, DiffusionDet achieves 5.3 AP and 4.8 AP gains when evaluated with more boxes and iteration steps, under a zero-shot transfer setting from COCO to CrowdHuman. Our code is available at https://github.com/ShoufaChen/DiffusionDet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
VisAlgae 2023: A Dataset and Challenge for Algae Detection in Microscopy Images
The VisAlgae 2023 dataset and challenge provide a new public benchmark for detecting six microalgae species in microscopy images, with baseline and top-10 leaderboard results.
-
Probabilistic Spatial Interpolation of Sparse Data using Diffusion Models
KrigSCD, a kriging-smoothed diffusion inpainting method, reconstructs 2D temperature fields from sparse masks and beats IDW, kriging, and plain diffusion on LPIPS at all tested coverage levels.
-
SHeRL-FL: When Representation Learning Meets Split Learning in Hierarchical Federated Learning
The submitted body is an unrelated survey, not the SHeRL-FL method claimed in the metadata.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.