REVIEW 6 cited by
EffiBench-X: A Multi-Language Benchmark for Measuring Efficiency of LLM-Generated Code
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
EffiBench-X: A Multi-Language Benchmark for Measuring Efficiency of LLM-Generated Code
read the original abstract
Existing code generation benchmarks primarily evaluate functional correctness, with limited focus on code efficiency and often restricted to a single language like Python. To address this gap, we introduce EffiBench-X, the first multi-language benchmark designed to measure the efficiency of LLM-generated code. EffiBench-X supports Python, C++, Java, JavaScript, Ruby, and Golang. It comprises competitive programming tasks with human-expert solutions as efficiency baselines. Evaluating state-of-the-art LLMs on EffiBench-X reveals that while models generate functionally correct code, they consistently underperform human experts in efficiency. Even the most efficient LLM-generated solutions (Qwen3-32B) achieve only around \textbf{62\%} of human efficiency on average, with significant language-specific variations. LLMs show better efficiency in Python, Ruby, and JavaScript than in Java, C++, and Golang. For instance, DeepSeek-R1's Python code is significantly more efficient than its Java code. These results highlight the critical need for research into LLM optimization techniques to improve code efficiency across diverse languages. The dataset and evaluation infrastructure are submitted and available at https://github.com/EffiBench/EffiBench-X.git and https://huggingface.co/datasets/EffiBench/effibench-x.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
PerfCodeBench: Benchmarking LLMs for System-Level High-Performance Code Optimization
PerfCodeBench reveals that state-of-the-art LLMs produce functionally correct but significantly slower code than expert-optimized versions on system-level tasks, especially those involving parallelism and GPUs.
-
CodeSpecBench: Benchmarking LLMs for Executable Behavioral Specification Generation
CodeSpecBench shows LLMs achieve at most 20.2% pass rate on repository-level executable behavioral specification generation, revealing that strong code generation does not imply deep semantic understanding.
-
RLPF: Reinforcement Learning from Performance Feedback for Code Generation
RLPF's staged performance reward lifts Qwen3-32B on PerfCodeBench from 11.1% to 54.6% correct-and-runnable and from 8.1% to 38.6% relative efficiency.
-
Multi-LLM Orchestration for High-Quality Code Generation: Exploiting Complementary Model Strengths
PerfOrch is a four-agent multi-LLM system that uses offline profiling to build language-and-category rankings for routing tasks, achieving 97.19% and 95.83% pass@1 on HumanEval-X and EffiBench-X with generalization ac...
-
Rethinking Technology Stack Selection with AI Coding Proficiency
AI coding proficiency, a new measure of how effectively LLMs use a given library, reveals large quality gaps between competing Python libraries, with winners varying by model.
-
SysLLMatic: Large Language Models are Software System Optimizers
SysLLMatic integrates LLMs with performance diagnostics and a 43-pattern catalog to optimize complex software, reporting 1.54x latency and 1.24x energy gains over compilers on large Java systems where prior LLM method...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.