Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 114 references

Anomalous suppression of large-scale density fluctuations in classical and quantum spin liquids

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Disordered spin liquids hide crystal-like density order

desk verdict Solid exact result on dimer-covering hyperuniformity; the realistic QSL extension is under-supported and needs work. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.05313 v1 pith:NBE3FUUC submitted 2025-02-07 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.softquant-ph

Duyu Chen , Rhine Samajdar , Yang Jiao , Salvatore Torquato This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.softquant-ph MSC 82B2082D3060G5582B26 PACS 75.10.Jm75.10.-b05.20.-y64.60.-i
keywords hyperuniformityquantumspinliquidresonatingvalencebonddimermodelkagomelatticeRydbergatomsdensityfluctuationsstructurefactor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the density fluctuations of classical dimer-covering spin liquids and their quantum resonating-valence-bond superpositions are completely suppressed at long wavelengths, a property called hyperuniformity. Perfect dimer coverings of the kagome lattice have a structure factor $S(k) \sim k^6$ at small $k$, and equal-amplitude quantum superpositions of such coverings inherit exactly the same structure factor. For a realistic Rydberg-atom realization of a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ quantum spin liquid, the paper shows that the state remains effectively hyperuniform even with a finite density of spinon (monomer) excitations, as long as the underlying dimer constraint is largely preserved. The practical payoff is a structural fingerprint that separates a QSL from a trivial paramagnet and from a valence-bond solid using only single-site measurement snapshots.

What carries the argument

The central object is the static structure factor $S(k)$ and its partner, the local number variance $\sigma^2(R)$, evaluated for the positions of Rydberg excitations (dimer centers). The load-bearing identity is the exact relation at the Rokhsar-Kivelson point, $S_q(k) = \langle S_c(k) \rangle$, equating the quantum structure factor of an equal-amplitude superposition of dimer coverings to the ensemble-averaged structure factor of classical dimer coverings; this carries perfect hyperuniformity from the classical ensemble into the quantum wavefunction. The mechanism that produces hyperuniformity is the dimer constraint: with exactly one dimer per kagome vertex, the number of dimers in a large window is fixed by the number of vertices up to surface corrections, so fluctuations scale like the window perimeter rather than its area. For the realistic Rydberg QSL, the working machinery is the classical analog: a 2160-site system's excitation-number distribution is reconstructed as the sum of nine independent 240-site subsystem distributions obtained from tensor-network snapshots, and classical dimer-monomer coverings drawn from that distribution are used to estimate $\sigma^2(R)$ and the $B/A$ ratio.

What would settle it

Directly compute the structure factor of the 2160-site cylindrical ground state with tensor-network methods without the nine-subsystem stitching; if the resulting $B/A$ ratio falls below 10 or $S(k)$ does not vanish at small $k$, the claim that the realistic $\mathbb{Z}_2$ QSL is effectively hyperuniform is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the hidden large-scale structure of classical and quantum spin liquids on the kagome and triangular lattices is perfectly hyperuniform, and that the realistic Rydberg $\mathbb{Z}_2$ quantum spin liquid remains effectively hyperuniform even when quantum fluctuations introduce a finite density of spinons. Perfectly hyperuniform means the normalized local number variance $\sigma^2(R)/R^2$ vanishes as $R \to \infty$, or equivalently the static structure factor $S(k)$ tends to zero as $k \to 0$; the paper proves, via a theoretical argument in the Supplemental Information plus finite-size scaling from simulated-annealing ensembles, that the small-$k$ exponent is $\alpha = 6$ for kagome dimer coverings and $\alpha = 4$ for triangular-lattice dimer coverings. For the fixed-point Rokhsar-Kivelson RVB state, the structure factor is exactly the ensemble average of classical dimer coverings, so perfect hyperuniformity is preserved by quantum coherence. For the PXP model on the ruby lattice, the paper constructs a classical dimer-monomer analog whose excitation-number distribution is stitched from nine 240-site tensor-network subsystems, and finds $B/A$ ratios of 10.10, 11.27, and 12.48 at $\Delta/\Omega = 1.7, 1.8, 1.9$, all above the chosen threshold of 10, whereas the trivial phase at $\Delta/\Omega = 0.5$ has $B/A = 2.54$. The paper concludes that hyperuniformity metrics can distinguish the QSL from both the paramagnet and the valence-bond solid, which is stealthy hyperuniform.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that matching the probability distribution of the number of Rydberg excitations is enough to reproduce the density fluctuations of the quantum state; if spatial correlations among spinons carry significant weight, the conclusion that the realistic $\mathbb{Z}_2$ QSL is effectively hyperuniform is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Single-site projective snapshots of a Rydberg array carry enough information to distinguish the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ QSL from a trivial paramagnet and a valence-bond solid through the $B/A$ ratio.
  • Perfect dimer coverings on the kagome lattice provide a new example of a disordered hyperuniform lattice packing generated purely by a packing constraint, with structure factor $S(k) \sim k^6$.
  • The fixed-point RVB (Rokhsar-Kivelson) wavefunction has exactly the same structure factor as the classical ensemble of dimer coverings, so quantum phase coherence does not alter perfect hyperuniformity.
  • The small-$k$ exponent $\alpha$ depends on the lattice: $\alpha = 6$ for kagome and $\alpha = 4$ for triangular, so hyperuniformity is generic to constrained dimer liquids but the precise fluctuation scaling is set by the local constraint graph.
  • In the realistic Rydberg $\mathbb{Z}_2$ QSL, quantum fluctuations degrade hyperuniformity compared to classical dimer-monomer coverings at the same mean filling, but effective hyperuniformity ($B/A \geq 10$) survives for mean fillings at least 0.231.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same classical-stitching procedure could, in principle, screen any proposed QSL material: if the particle-number distribution of excitations can be estimated from any approximate method, the $B/A$ ratio of the corresponding classical analog predicts whether the quantum phase will be effectively hyperuniform.
  • Because hyperuniformity is insensitive to phase factors, it cannot detect vison excitations; pairs of states differing only by flux attachment are indistinguishable by this metric, so hyperuniformity alone will never certify topological order.
  • The threshold $B/A \geq 10$ is a practical, not rigorous, cut-off; finite-size and edge effects in a real experiment may push a genuinely hyperuniform QSL below this threshold, so the metric should be calibrated on the specific lattice and cylinder geometry before being used as a phase discriminator.
  • If the spinon density exceeds the ~0.231 mean-filling threshold, the QSL would lose effective hyperuniformity, suggesting a quantitative link between quasiparticle density and the robustness of the hidden long-range order.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that classical spin liquids, exemplified by ensembles of perfect dimer coverings on the kagome lattice, are perfectly hyperuniform with S(k) ~ k^6 at small k, and that fixed-point resonating-valence-bond (RVB) quantum superpositions inherit this property. It then addresses the experimentally relevant Rydberg-atom Z2 quantum spin liquid (QSL) on the ruby lattice. Using DMRG snapshots of 240- and 288-site cylinders, the authors construct a 2160-site classical dimer-monomer ensemble whose particle-number distribution is stitched from nine 240-site subsystems, and use the B/A ratio extracted from the scaled number variance to argue that the QSL at Δ/Ω = 1.7, 1.8, and 1.9 is effectively hyperuniform (B/A ≥ 10), unlike the trivial disordered phase and the valence-bond solid. The paper closes by proposing hyperuniformity metrics as a first-pass experimental diagnostic for QSL candidates.

Significance. The conceptual connection between local dimer constraints and suppressed long-wavelength density fluctuations is attractive and, if established, would add a new structural fingerprint to the spin-liquid toolkit. The derivation of Eq. (1) is clean and exact: because the density operator is diagonal in the orthogonal dimer-covering basis, any superposition of perfectly hyperuniform coverings is also perfectly hyperuniform, and vison-like phase factors are irrelevant. The classical perfect-dimer result is supported by numerics at several system sizes and by an intuitive surface-fluctuation argument. The paper is also explicit about the operational metric B/A and about the approximate nature of the large-system reconstruction, which makes the claims concrete and testable. However, the practical claim that the realistic Rydberg QSL remains effectively hyperuniform currently rests on an unvalidated stitching approximation and on B/A margins of roughly 0.1 above threshold; those parts need strengthening before the broader proposal of a QSL diagnostic is fully supported.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section II.B and Methods, Eq. (4)] The construction of the 2160-site 'classical analog' assumes that the six edge and three bulk 240-site excitation numbers are i.i.d. and that only the marginal distribution P(Nexc) matters, with the text asserting that 'this distinction is irrelevant.' This assertion is load-bearing: density fluctuations at large R are controlled by the spatial correlations of monomers/spinons, both inside and between the stitched blocks, not by the marginal number distribution alone. Because the reported B/A = 10.10 at Δ/Ω = 1.7 is only 0.10 above the effective-hyperuniformity threshold, a modest change in reconstructed correlations could move the system below B/A = 10. I ask the authors to validate the reconstruction, for example by computing S(k) or σ²(R) directly from the 240/288-site DMRG snapshots and comparing with the classical dimer-monomer ensemble at the same filling, or by constructing stitched configurations that preserve inter-block and intra-block correlations.
  2. [Figure 5 and associated text] No statistical uncertainties are reported for the B/A ratios or the mean filling fractions. At Δ/Ω = 1.7 the ratio is 10.10 against a threshold of 10, and the mean filling 0.231 is only 0.004 above the classical threshold f = 0.227 quoted from the SI. These margins are comparable to what one would expect from sampling 10,000 snapshots plus DMRG finite-size effects. Please provide bootstrap or run-to-run error bars, test the sensitivity of B/A to the fitting window 2.0 ≤ R ≤ 5.0, and report how the threshold f = 0.227 is obtained in the SI.
  3. [Section I, Fig. 2(d), and the SI] The exact small-k exponent α = 6 for perfect kagome dimer coverings is a headline result, but the main text only reports a finite-size extrapolation through the spreadability and defers the proof to the SI. Analyticity of S(k) at k = 0 alone only forces α to be an even integer for this class of systems, so the identification α = 6 requires the proof or at least a detailed sketch; please include it in an appendix or in the main text so the claim is self-contained and checkable.
  4. [Methods, Eq. (3)] The simulated-annealing move set is a single-dimer swap, and the fictitious energy E counts violations of the hard-core constraint. Starting from a perfect covering, any single-dimer move leaves one vertex uncovered and creates a doubly covered vertex, so E increases and the move is rejected at low temperature. It is therefore not self-evident that the algorithm samples the uniform ensemble of perfect dimer coverings (or of dimer-monomer coverings at fixed f). Please validate the sampling, for instance by comparison with exact enumeration on small systems or by using loop-flip moves, or state explicitly which properties of the final claim are independent of sampling uniformity.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Methods, Quantum numerics] 'The DMRG calculations were preformed' should read 'performed.'
  2. [References] References [87] and [90] are the same Sutherland paper and should be merged.
  3. [Methods, last paragraph] The description of the 2160-site system as 'a 60×12 system' is confusing because 60×12 = 720; please specify whether these are unit cells or give the dimensions in units of the 240-site blocks.
  4. [Section II.A, Eq. (1)] Equation (1) is stated for equal-amplitude coefficients at the Rokhsar-Kivelson point; since the density operator is diagonal in the occupation basis, the same equality holds for arbitrary coefficients |c_α|². Stating this generalization would strengthen the claim for generic RVB states.
  5. [Figure 5 caption] The identity of the VBS state, including the corresponding Δ/Ω and whether it comes from the same DMRG calculation, should be stated in the caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the classical and RK-point hyperuniformity results are derived from the dimer constraint, and the realistic-QSL B/A values are computed from an explicitly labeled approximation rather than fitted.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Perfect hyperuniformity of kagome dimer coverings is established by direct simulated-annealing computation of S(k), sigma^2(R), and C(r), with the small-k exponent alpha=6 numerically extrapolated and, per the text, proved in the SI from the local one-dimer-per-vertex constraint; this is a genuinely new computation, not a restatement of the definition of hyperuniformity. The fixed-point RVB result is a theorem: Eq. (1) expresses the quantum structure factor as the ensemble average of the classical structure factors because the occupation operators are diagonal in the dimer-covering basis, so the perfect hyperuniformity is inherited, not assumed. The realistic Rydberg-QSL analysis is explicitly an approximation: the 2160-site system is modeled by stitching nine 240-site DMRG count distributions (Methods, Eq. (4)) and generating classical dimer-monomer coverings. This is a stated approximation, not a by-construction equivalence: the B/A values (2.54, 10.10, 11.27, 12.48) are computed from the generated configurations, not imposed by the input P(Nexc) distribution, and the paper explicitly flags that the reconstructed distribution is an approximation. The B/A>=10 criterion is taken from Ref. [103] by the senior author, but it is an a priori classification convention, not fitted to make the QSL pass; the qualitative separation between the QSL (B/A near 10-12) and the paramagnet (B/A near 2.5) stands independently of the exact cutoff. No load-bearing step reduces to its own input by definition, so no circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. It applies the existing hyperuniformity framework to spin liquids. The main assumptions are the identification of the DMRG phase as a QSL, the validity of the PXP model, and the classical analog approximation for large systems. The B/A threshold and fitting window are procedural choices that affect the classification.

free parameters (2)
  • B/A effective-hyperuniformity threshold = 10
    The paper classifies systems as 'effectively hyperuniform' when B/A >= 10, following Ref [103]. This threshold is a convention, not derived from first principles, and the QSL points (10.10, 11.27, 12.48) barely exceed it.
  • Fitting window for B/A extraction = 2.0 <= R <= 5.0
    The quadratic fit of the cumulative moving average sigma^2(R) is restricted to R in [2,5], a small range whose choice affects the B/A values.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The DMRG ground state at Delta/Omega = 1.7, 1.8, 1.9 is indeed a Z2 QSL.
    This is supported by the topological entanglement entropy gamma = ln 2, but the identification relies on finite-size numerics and prior phase diagram knowledge.
  • domain assumption The PXP model captures the physics of the Rydberg atom array.
    The paper assumes the infinite-energy hard-core PXP model is equivalent to the realistic van der Waals interaction, citing Ref [50].
  • ad hoc to paper The classical dimer-monomer coverings with stitched particle-number distribution faithfully reproduce the quantum density fluctuations of the large system.
    This is the central approximation in Section II B; the paper acknowledges it is an approximation and does not directly compute the quantum S(k) for large systems.
  • domain assumption Standard statistical mechanics of dimer coverings, including the mapping between Rydberg excitations and dimers.
    The paper relies on the established mapping between Rydberg blockade and kagome dimer coverings (Refs [67-69]).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anomalous suppression of large-scale density fluctuations in classical and quantum spin liquids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NBE3FUUC

@misc{pith2026250205313,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anomalous suppression of large-scale density fluctuations in classical and quantum spin liquids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NBE3FUUC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05313}
}
abstract

Classical spin liquids (CSLs) are intriguing states of matter that do not exhibit long-range magnetic order and are characterized by an extensive ground-state degeneracy. Adding quantum fluctuations, which induce dynamics between these different classical ground states, can give rise to quantum spin liquids (QSLs). QSLs are highly entangled quantum phases of matter characterized by fascinating emergent properties, such as fractionalized excitations and topological order. One such exotic quantum liquid is the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ QSL, which can be regarded as a resonating valence bond (RVB) state formed from superpositions of dimer coverings of an underlying lattice. In this work, we unveil a \textit{hidden} large-scale structural property of archetypal CSLs and QSLs known as hyperuniformity, i.e., normalized infinite-wavelength density fluctuations are completely suppressed in these systems. In particular, we first demonstrate that classical ensembles of close-packed dimers and their corresponding quantum RVB states are perfectly hyperuniform in general. Subsequently, we focus on a ruby-lattice spin liquid that was recently realized in a Rydberg-atom quantum simulator, and show that the QSL remains effectively hyperuniform even in the presence of a finite density of spinon and vison excitations, as long as the dimer constraint is still largely preserved. Moreover, we demonstrate that metrics based on the framework of hyperuniformity can be used to distinguish the QSL from other proximate quantum phases. These metrics can help identify potential QSL candidates, which can then be further analyzed using more advanced, computationally-intensive quantum numerics to confirm their status as true QSLs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.05313 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mapping between a configuration of Rydberg atoms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Structure factor S(k) of perfect classical dimer coverings on the kagome lattice at different system sizes N. (b) Local number variance σ 2 (R) of perfect dimer coverings on the kagome lattice at different system sizes N. (c) Dimer￾dimer pair correlation function C(r) of perfect dimer cover￾ings on the kagome lattice at N = 9600. (d) Small-k scaling exponent α of S(k) as a function of system size N for per￾fect … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of fixed-point quantum spin liquids, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The scaled local number variance σ 2 (R)/R2 for the 2160-site classical analogs of the quantum systems at ∆/Ω = 0.5, 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9 (the results are averaged over 10,000 configurations/snapshots) as well as for the ordered valence bond solid state. respectively. On t…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) A representative snapshot of Rydberg excita [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A configuration of N = 2400 atoms satisfying the dimer constraint (see Fig. S5 in the SI for a visualization of just the dimers), as generated by our simulated annealing algorithm. As before, light (dark) green circles represent an atom in the |r⟩ (|g⟩) state. Quantum …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Torquato and F

    S. Torquato and F. H. Stillinger, Local density fluctu- ations, hyperuniformity, and order metrics, Phys. Rev. E 68, 041113 (2003)

    2003

  2. [2]

    Torquato, Hyperuniform states of matter, Phys

    S. Torquato, Hyperuniform states of matter, Phys. Rep. 745, 1 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    C. E. Zachary and S. Torquato, Hyperuniformity in point patterns and two-phase random heterogeneous media, J. Stat. Mech. Theor. Exp.2009, P12015 (2009)

    2009

  4. [4]

    Y. Jiao, T. Lau, H. Hatzikirou, M. Meyer-Hermann, J. C. Corbo, and S. Torquato, Avian photoreceptor pat- terns represent a disordered hyperuniform solution to a multiscale packing problem, Phys. Rev. E 89, 022721 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    Dreyfus, Y

    R. Dreyfus, Y. Xu, T. Still, L. A. Hough, A. G. Yodh, and S. Torquato, Diagnosing hyperuniformity in two-dimensional, disordered, jammed packings of soft spheres, Phys. Rev. E 91, 012302 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    Hexner and D

    D. Hexner and D. Levine, Hyperuniformity of critical absorbing states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 110602 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    R. L. Jack, I. R. Thompson, and P. Sollich, Hyperuni- formity and phase separation in biased ensembles of trajectories for diffusive systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 060601 (2015)

    2015

  8. [8]

    G. Rumi, J. A. S´ anchez, F. El ´ ıas, R. C. Maldonado, J. Puig, N. R. C. Bolecek, G. Nieva, M. Konczykowski, Y. Fasano, and A. B. Kolton, Hyperuniform vortex pat- terns at the surface of type-ii superconductors, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033057 (2019)

    2019

Show all 114 references
  1. [9]

    Q.-L. Lei, M. P. Ciamarra, and R. Ni, Nonequilib- rium strongly hyperuniform fluids of circle active par- ticles with large local density fluctuations, Sci. Adv. 5, eaau7423 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Lei and R

    Q.-L. Lei and R. Ni, Hydrodynamics of random- organizing hyperuniform fluids, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 22983 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Huang, W

    M. Huang, W. Hu, S. Yang, Q.-X. Liu, and H. P. Zhang, Circular swimming motility and disordered hyperuni- form state in an algae system, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2100493118 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Y. Liu, D. Chen, J. Tian, W. Xu, and Y. Jiao, Universal hyperuniform organization in looped leaf vein networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 028401 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Florescu, S

    M. Florescu, S. Torquato, and P. J. Steinhardt, Designer disordered materials with large, complete photonic band gaps, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 20658 (2009)

    2009

  6. [14]

    W. Man, M. Florescu, E. P. Williamson, Y. He, S. R. Hashemizad, B. Y. C. Leung, D. R. Liner, S. Torquato, P. M. Chaikin, and P. J. Steinhardt, Isotropic band gaps and freeform waveguides observed in hyperuniform dis- ordered photonic solids, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, ...

    2013

  7. [15]

    Leseur, R

    O. Leseur, R. Pierrat, and R. Carminati, High-density hyperuniform materials can be transparent, Optica 3, 763 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Zhang, F

    G. Zhang, F. H. Stillinger, and S. Torquato, Transport, geometrical, and topological properties of stealthy disor- dered hyperuniform two-phase systems, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 244109 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Chen and S

    D. Chen and S. Torquato, Designing disordered hyper- uniform two-phase materials with novel physical prop- erties, Acta Mater. 142, 152 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Y. Xu, S. Chen, P. Chen, W. Xu, and Y. Jiao, Mi- crostructure and mechanical properties of hyperuni- form heterogeneous materials, Phys. Rev. E 96, 043301 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    Kim and S

    J. Kim and S. Torquato, Multifunctional composites for elastic and electromagnetic wave propagation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 8764 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Kim and S

    J. Kim and S. Torquato, Effective electromagnetic wave properties of disordered stealthy hyperuniform layered media beyond the quasistatic regime, Optica 10, 965 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    M. A. Klatt, P. J. Steinhardt, and S. Torquato, Wave propagation and band tails of two-dimensional disor- dered systems in the thermodynamic limit, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2213633119 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    G. J. Aubry, L. S. Froufe-P´ erez, U. Kuhl, O. Legrand, F. Scheffold, and F. Mortessagne, Experimental tuning of transport regimes in hyperuniform disordered pho- tonic materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 127402 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Romero-Garc ´ ıa, ´E

    V. Romero-Garc ´ ıa, ´E. Ch´ eron, S. Kuznetsova, J.-P. Groby, S. F´ elix, V. Pagneux, and L. Garcia-Raffi, Wave transport in 1D stealthy hyperuniform phononic materi- als made of non-resonant and resonant scatterers, APL Mater. 9, 101101 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    S. Aeby, G. J. Aubry, L. S. Froufe-P´ erez, and F. Schef- fold, Fabrication of hyperuniform dielectric networks via heat-induced shrinkage reveals a bandgap at telecom wavelengths, Adv. Opt. Mater. 10, 2200232 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Christogeorgos, H

    O. Christogeorgos, H. Zhang, Q. Cheng, and Y. Hao, Extraordinary directive emission and scanning from an array of radiation sources with hyperuniform disorder, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 014062 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    H. Tang, Z. Hao, Y. Liu, Y. Tian, H. Niu, and J. Zang, Soft and disordered hyperuniform elastic metamaterials for highly efficient vibration concentration, Natl. Sci. Rev. 9, nwab133 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Torquato, A

    S. Torquato, A. Scardicchio, and C. E. Zachary, Point processes in arbitrary dimension from fermionic gases, random matrix theory, and number theory, J. Stat. Mech. Theor. Exp. 2008, P11019 (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    Scardicchio, C

    A. Scardicchio, C. E. Zachary, and S. Torquato, Sta- tistical properties of determinantal point processes in high-dimensional Euclidean spaces, Phys. Rev. E 79, 041108 (2009)

    2009

  21. [29]

    L. D. Abreu, J. M. Pereira, J. L. Romero, and S. Torquato, The Weyl–Heisenberg ensemble: hyper- uniformity and higher Landau levels, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2017 (4), 043103

    2017

  22. [30]

    Matsui, M

    T. Matsui, M. Katori, and T. Shirai, Local number vari- ances and hyperuniformity of the Heisenberg family of determinantal point processes, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 10 54, 165201 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    R. P. Feynman and M. Cohen, Energy Spectrum of the Excitations in Liquid Helium, Phys. Rev. 102, 1189 (1956)

    1956

  24. [32]

    Y. A. Gerasimenko, I. Vaskivskyi, M. Litskevich, J. Ravnik, J. Vodeb, M. Diego, V. Kabanov, and D. Mi- hailovic, Quantum jamming transition to a correlated electron glass in 1T-TaS2, Nat. Mater. 18, 1078 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    J. B. Llorens, I. Guillam´ on, I. G. Serrano, R. C´ ordoba, J. Ses´ e, J. De Teresa, M. R. Ibarra, S. Vieira, M. Ortu˜ no, and H. Suderow, Disordered hyperunifor- mity in superconducting vortex lattices, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033133 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Sakai, R

    S. Sakai, R. Arita, and T. Ohtsuki, Hyperuniform elec- tron distributions controlled by electron interactions in quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. B 105, 054202 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Sakai, R

    S. Sakai, R. Arita, and T. Ohtsuki, Quantum phase transition between hyperuniform density distributions, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033241 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    H. Wang, R. Samajdar, and S. Torquato, Correlations in interacting electron liquids: Many-body statistics and hyperuniformity, Phys. Rev. B 110, 104201 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    P. J. D. Crowley, C. R. Laumann, and S. Gopalakr- ishnan, Quantum criticality in Ising chains with ran- dom hyperuniform couplings, Phys. Rev. B 100, 134206 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Bose and S

    A. Bose and S. Torquato, Quantum phase transitions in long-range interacting hyperuniform spin chains in a transverse field, Phys. Rev. B 103, 014118 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    H. Yan, O. Benton, R. Moessner, and A. H. Nevidom- skyy, Classification of classical spin liquids: Typology and resulting landscape, Phys. Rev. B 110, L020402 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    H. Yan, O. Benton, L. D. C. Jaubert, and N. Shannon, Rank–2 U (1) Spin Liquid on the Breathing Pyrochlore Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 127203 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Benton and R

    O. Benton and R. Moessner, Topological Route to New and Unusual Coulomb Spin Liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 107202 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a re- view, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016502 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    Knolle and R

    J. Knolle and R. Moessner, A field guide to spin liquids, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 451 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    Broholm, R

    C. Broholm, R. J. Cava, S. A. Kivelson, D. G. Nocera, M. R. Norman, and T. Senthil, Quantum spin liquids, Science 367, eaay0668 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Read and S

    N. Read and S. Sachdev, Large-N expansion for frus- trated quantum antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1773 (1991)

    1991

  38. [46]

    X. G. Wen, Mean-field theory of spin-liquid states with finite energy gap and topological orders, Phys. Rev. B 44, 2664 (1991)

    1991

  39. [47]

    Sachdev, Kagom´ e- and triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnets: Ordering from quantum fluctuations and quantum-disordered ground states with unconfined bosonic spinons, Phys

    S. Sachdev, Kagom´ e- and triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnets: Ordering from quantum fluctuations and quantum-disordered ground states with unconfined bosonic spinons, Phys. Rev. B 45, 12377 (1992)

    1992

  40. [48]

    Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Ann

    A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Ann. Phys. 321, 2 (2006)

    2006

  41. [49]

    P. A. Lee, An end to the drought of quantum spin liq- uids, Science 321, 1306 (2008)

    2008

  42. [50]

    Semeghini, H

    G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kali- nowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vish- wanath, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Prob- ing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simul...

    2021

  43. [51]

    Jaksch, J

    D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Cˆ ot´ e, and M. D. Lukin, Fast quantum gates for neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2208 (2000)

    2000

  44. [52]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Om- ran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many- body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Na- ture 551, 579 (2017)

    2017

  45. [53]

    de L´ es´ eleuc, V

    S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. Weber, N. Lang, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with Rydberg atoms, Science 365, 775 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    Samajdar, W

    R. Samajdar, W. W. Ho, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, and S. Sachdev, Complex Density Wave Orders and Quan- tum Phase Transitions in a Model of Square-Lattice Rydberg Atom Arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 103601 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    Felser, S

    T. Felser, S. Notarnicola, and S. Montangero, Efficient Tensor Network Ansatz for High-Dimensional Quantum Many-Body Problems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 170603 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    Ebadi, T

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pichler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum phases of mat- ter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature 595, 227 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    Scholl, M

    P. Scholl, M. Schuler, H. J. Williams, A. A. Eberharter, D. Barredo, K.-N. Schymik, V. Lienhard, L.-P. Henry, T. C. Lang, T. Lahaye, A. M. L¨ auchli, and A. Browaeys, Quantum simulation of 2D antiferromagnets with hun- dreds of Rydberg atoms, Nature 595, 233 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    Miles, R

    C. Miles, R. Samajdar, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Pich- ler, S. Sachdev, M. D. Lukin, M. Greiner, K. Q. Wein- berger, and E.-A. Kim, Machine learning discovery of new phases in programmable quantum simulator snap- shots, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013026 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Samajdar, S

    R. Samajdar, S. Choi, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, and S. Sachdev, Numerical study of the chiral Z3 quantum phase transition in one spatial dimension, Phys. Rev. A 98, 023614 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    Whitsitt, R

    S. Whitsitt, R. Samajdar, and S. Sachdev, Quantum field theory for the chiral clock transition in one spatial dimension, Phys. Rev. B 98, 205118 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Chepiga and F

    N. Chepiga and F. Mila, Floating Phase versus Chiral Transition in a 1D Hard-Boson Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 017205 (2019)

    2019

  54. [62]

    Chepiga and F

    N. Chepiga and F. Mila, Kibble-Zurek exponent and chi- ral transition of the period-4 phase of Rydberg chains, Nat. Commun. 12, 1 (2021)

    2021

  55. [63]

    Kalinowski, R

    M. Kalinowski, R. Samajdar, R. G. Melko, M. D. Lukin, S. Sachdev, and S. Choi, Bulk and boundary quantum phase transitions in a square Rydberg atom array, Phys. Rev. B 105, 174417 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Ser- byn, and Z. Papi´ c, Weak ergodicity breaking from quan- tum many-body scars, Nature Phys. 14, 745 (2018)

    2018

  57. [65]

    Keesling, A

    A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Levine, H. Bernien, H. Pich- ler, S. Choi, R. Samajdar, S. Schwartz, P. Silvi, S. Sachdev, P. Zoller, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum Kibble–Zurek mechanism 11 and critical dynamics on a programmable Rydberg sim- ulator, ...

    2019

  58. [66]

    Bluvstein, A

    D. Bluvstein, A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Se- meghini, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, A. A. Michailidis, N. Maskara, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, M. Serbyn, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Controlling quantum many-body dynamics in driven Rydberg atom arrays, Science 371, 1355...

    2021 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Samajdar, W

    R. Samajdar, W. W. Ho, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, and S. Sachdev, Quantum phases of Rydberg atoms on a kagome lattice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2015785118 (2021), 2011.12295

    2021 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Verresen, M

    R. Verresen, M. D. Lukin, and A. Vishwanath, Pre- diction of Toric Code Topological Order from Rydberg Blockade, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031005 (2021)

    2021

  61. [69]

    Z. Yan, R. Samajdar, Y.-C. Wang, S. Sachdev, and Z. Y. Meng, Triangular lattice quantum dimer model with variable dimer density, Nat. Commun. 13, 5799 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    Moessner and S

    R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Ising models of quantum frustration, Phys. Rev. B 63, 224401 (2001)

    2001

  63. [71]

    Moessner and K

    R. Moessner and K. S. Raman, Quantum dimer mod- els, in Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism(Springer,

  64. [72]

    Misguich, D

    G. Misguich, D. Serban, and V. Pasquier, Quantum Dimer Model on the Kagome Lattice: Solvable Dimer- Liquid and Ising Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 137202 (2002)

    2002

  65. [73]

    Misguich, D

    G. Misguich, D. Serban, and V. Pasquier, Quantum dimer model with extensive ground-state entropy on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B 67, 214413 (2003)

    2003

  66. [74]

    Misguich, D

    G. Misguich, D. Serban, and V. Pasquier, Interaction between static holes in a quantum dimer model on the kagome lattice, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, S823 (2004)

    2004

  67. [75]

    Elser and C

    V. Elser and C. Zeng, Kagome spin-1/2 antiferromag- nets in the hyperbolic plane, Phys. Rev. B 48, 13647 (1993)

    1993

  68. [76]

    M. E. Fisher, On the dimer solution of planar Ising mod- els, J. Math. Phys. 7, 1776 (1966)

    1966

  69. [77]

    Moessner and S

    R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Ising and dimer models in two and three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 68, 054405 (2003)

    2003

  70. [78]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    2010

  71. [79]

    R. A. DiStasio Jr, G. Zhang, F. H. Stillinger, and S. Torquato, Rational design of stealthy hyperuniform two-phase media with tunable order, Phys. Rev. E 97, 023311 (2018)

    2018

  72. [80]

    D. Chen, X. Jiang, D. Wang, J. I. Vidallon, H. Zhuang, and Y. Jiao, Multihyperuniform long-range order in medium-entropy alloys, Acta Mater. 246, 118678 (2023)

    2023

  73. [81]

    Wang and S

    H. Wang and S. Torquato, Dynamic measure of hype- runiformity and nonhyperuniformity in heterogeneous media via the diffusion spreadability, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 034022 (2022)

    2022

  74. [82]

    L. C. Pauling, A resonating-valence-bond theory of met- als and intermetallic compounds, Proc. R. Soc. A 196, 343 (1949)

    1949

  75. [83]

    P. W. Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?, Mat. Res. Bull. 8, 153 (1973)

    1973

  76. [84]

    Baskaran and P

    G. Baskaran and P. W. Anderson, Gauge theory of high- temperature superconductors and strongly correlated Fermi systems, Phys. Rev. B 37, 580 (1988)

    1988

  77. [85]

    D. S. Rokhsar and S. A. Kivelson, Superconductivity and the Quantum Hard-Core Dimer Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2376 (1988)

    1988

  78. [86]

    Selem, C

    A. Selem, C. M. Herdman, and K. B. Whaley, Entangle- ment entropy at generalized Rokhsar-Kivelson points of quantum dimer models, Phys. Rev. B87, 125105 (2013)

    2013

  79. [88]

    Read and B

    N. Read and B. Chakraborty, Statistics of the excita- tions of the resonating-valence-bond state, Phys. Rev. B 40, 7133 (1989)

    1989

  80. [89]

    Senthil and M

    T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher, Z2 gauge theory of electron fractionalization in strongly correlated systems, Phys. Rev. B 62, 7850 (2000)

    2000

  81. [90]

    Sutherland, Systems with resonating-valence-bond ground states: Correlations and excitations, Phys

    B. Sutherland, Systems with resonating-valence-bond ground states: Correlations and excitations, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3786 (1988)

    1988

  82. [91]

    Moessner and S

    R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Resonating Valence Bond Phase in the Triangular Lattice Quantum Dimer Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1881 (2001)

    2001

  83. [92]

    Moessner, S

    R. Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, and E. Fradkin, Short-ranged resonating valence bond physics, quantum dimer mod- els, and Ising gauge theories, Phys. Rev. B 65, 024504 (2002)

    2002

  84. [93]

    Samajdar, D

    R. Samajdar, D. G. Joshi, Y. Teng, and S. Sachdev, Emergent Z2 Gauge Theories and Topological Excita- tions in Rydberg Atom Arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 043601 (2023)

    2023

  85. [94]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quan- tum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992)

    1992

  86. [95]

    S. R. White, Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. B 48, 10345 (1993)

    1993

  87. [96]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group, Rev

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 259 (2005)

    2005

  88. [97]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group: a short introduction, Phil

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group: a short introduction, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 2643 (2011)

    2011

  89. [98]

    Nikolic and T

    P. Nikolic and T. Senthil, Physics of low-energy singlet states of the Kagome lattice quantum Heisenberg anti- ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 68, 214415 (2003)

    2003

  90. [99]

    R. R. P. Singh and D. A. Huse, Ground state of the spin- 1/2 kagome-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 76, 180407 (2007)

    2007

  91. [100]

    Poilblanc and G

    D. Poilblanc and G. Misguich, Competing valence bond crystals in the kagome quantum dimer model, Phys. Rev. B 84, 214401 (2011)

    2011

  92. [101]

    Kitaev and J

    A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Topological Entanglement En- tropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110404 (2006)

    2006

  93. [102]

    Jiang, Z

    H.-C. Jiang, Z. Wang, and L. Balents, Identifying topo- logical order by entanglement entropy, Nature Physics 8, 902 (2012)

    2012

  94. [103]

    Torquato, Structural characterization of many- particle systems on approach to hyperuniform states, Phys

    S. Torquato, Structural characterization of many- particle systems on approach to hyperuniform states, Phys. Rev. E 103, 052126 (2021)

    2021

  95. [104]

    Kim and S

    J. Kim and S. Torquato, Effect of window shape on the detection of hyperuniformity via the local number vari- ance, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2017, 013402 (2017)

    2017

  96. [105]

    R. D. Batten, F. H. Stillinger, and S. Torquato, Clas- sical disordered ground states: Super-ideal gases and stealth and equi-luminous materials, J. Appl. Phys. 104, 033504 (2008). 12

    2008

  97. [106]

    Torquato, G

    S. Torquato, G. Zhang, and F. H. Stillinger, Ensem- ble theory for stealthy hyperuniform disordered ground states, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021020 (2015)

    2015

  98. [107]

    Hitin-Bialus, C

    A. Hitin-Bialus, C. E. Maher, P. J. Steinhardt, and S. Torquato, Hyperuniformity classes of quasiperiodic tilings via diffusion spreadability, Phys. Rev. E 109, 064108 (2024)

    2024

  99. [108]

    Giudice, F

    G. Giudice, F. M. Surace, H. Pichler, and G. Giu- dici, Trimer states with Z3 topological order in Rydberg atom arrays, Phys. Rev. B 106, 195155 (2022)

    2022

  100. [109]

    Kornjaˇ ca, R

    M. Kornjaˇ ca, R. Samajdar, T. Macr ` ı, N. Gemelke, S.- T. Wang, and F. Liu, Trimer quantum spin liquid in a honeycomb array of rydberg atoms, Commun. Phys. 6, 358 (2023)

    2023

  101. [110]

    Snyder, J

    J. Snyder, J. S. Slusky, R. J. Cava, and P. Schiffer, How ‘spin ice’ freezes, Nature 413, 48 (2001)

    2001

  102. [111]

    A. O. Scheie, M. Lee, K. Wang, P. Laurell, E. S. Choi, D. Pajerowski, Q. Zhang, J. Ma, H. D. Zhou, S. Lee, et al., Spectrum and low-energy gap in tri- angular quantum spin liquid NaYbSe 2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.17773 (2024)

    2024

  103. [112]

    A. O. Scheie, E. A. Ghioldi, J. Xing, J. A. M. Paddison, N. E. Sherman, M. Dupont, L. D. Sanjeewa, S. Lee, A. J. Woods, D. Abernathy,et al., Proximate spin liquid and fractionalization in the triangular antiferromagnet KYbSe2, Nat. Phys. 20, 74 (2024)

    2024

  104. [113]

    C. L. Y. Yeong and S. Torquato, Reconstructing random media, Phys. Rev. E 57, 495 (1998)

    1998

  105. [114]

    C. L. Y. Yeong and S. Torquato, Reconstructing ran- dom media. II. Three-dimensional media from two- dimensional cuts, Phys. Rev. E 58, 224 (1998)

    1998

  106. [115]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calcula- tions, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.