Investigation of GeSn aspect ratio trapping growth up to 8% Sn

Baohua Li; Fernando M. de Oliveira; Gregory Salamo; Hryhorii Stanchu; Jifeng Liu; Matthew Cook; Mourad Benamara; Perry C. Grant; Quang Minh Thai; Shui-Qing Yu

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 12 references

Investigation of GeSn aspect ratio trapping growth up to 8% Sn

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Aspect-ratio trapping grows GeSn on silicon with up to 8% Sn, opening a defect-filtered path to CMOS-compatible infrared devices.

desk verdict First GeSn ART growth is plausibly real but the 'up to 8% Sn' claim is only as strong as a few single-island EDX measurements, so it needs more statistics before it can carry the weight. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02710 v1 pith:NCMLMY67 submitted 2026-08-03 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.app-ph

Hryhorii Stanchu , Quang Minh Thai , Fernando M. de Oliveira , Mourad Benamara , Stephen Margiotta , Matthew Cook , Xiaoxin Wang , Jifeng Liu

show 5 more authors

Perry C. Grant Baohua Li Wei Du Gregory Salamo Shui-Qing Yu

This is my paper

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph

keywords GeSnaspectratiotrappingselectiveareagrowthcore-shelltinincorporationRPCVDmicro-RamanTEM-EDX

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first demonstration of aspect ratio trapping (ART) growth of germanium-tin (GeSn) on silicon, with tin contents up to 8%. ART grows material inside narrow oxide windows that stop threading dislocations from reaching the upper layers, so success here would combine GeSn's infrared optoelectronic properties with a defect-reducing, CMOS-compatible geometry. The authors observe two growth regimes: a self-induced Ge core with a GeSn shell carrying 6–8% Sn, and bulk GeSn below 1% Sn. They link successful tin incorporation to a pyramid-shaped island with {111} facets and to low growth selectivity, and identify local heating inside the oxide window as the main obstacle to high bulk Sn content. If the result holds, it opens a route to defect-reduced GeSn lasers, detectors, and imagers integrated directly on silicon.

What carries the argument

Aspect ratio trapping (ART): growth in high-aspect-ratio SiO2 windows that trap threading dislocations against the oxide sidewalls. The argument is carried by the observed island morphology—dome, multi-faceted polygon, then pyramid with {111} facets—which the paper uses as a monitor of Sn nucleation status; by the self-induced Ge core/GeSn shell structure revealed in cross-sectional TEM-EDX; and by two kinetic controls, HCl-based growth selectivity and local heating from the low-thermal-conductivity SiO2 mask. The misfit dislocation spacing at the Ge/Si interface (10 nm, matching $d = b_{\mathrm{Ge}}/\varepsilon$ for fully relaxed Ge) shows the ART template works as intended.

What would settle it

Use a wafer-averaged composition probe, such as X-ray diffraction or Raman mapping calibrated against GeSn standards, on the same growth rounds and check whether most 180 nm and 280 nm window islands show a 6–8% Sn shell; if the single-island TEM-EDX values are outliers and typical islands are near 1% Sn, the up-to-8%-Sn claim would not stand.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that GeSn can be grown by aspect ratio trapping on Si, with two stable configurations: a self-induced Ge core/GeSn shell in which the shell carries 6–8% Sn, and a bulk GeSn island with less than 1% Sn. The 6–8% shell values come from TEM-EDX on individual islands, while Raman mapping shows wafer-level scatter; the authors also report that pyramid-shaped islands with {111} facets are the reliable morphological signature of successful Sn incorporation, that reducing HCl flow to lower growth selectivity promotes Sn/GeSn nucleation, and that local heating inside the deep oxide window likely suppresses bulk Sn incorporation until overgrowth escapes the window.

Load-bearing premise

The whole up-to-8%-Sn result rests on TEM-EDX measurements of a small number of individual islands; if those islands are not representative of the wafer, the claim collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

GeSn ART growth is feasible on Si, showing that defect trapping and Sn incorporation are not mutually exclusive, at least in the 6–8% shell configuration.
Pyramid shape with {111} facets can serve as a rapid indicator of whether a growth round is likely to incorporate Sn.
Lowering growth selectivity via reduced HCl flow is a practical lever for initiating GeSn ART growth, at the cost of random oxide nucleation that must be controlled.
High bulk Sn content is currently blocked by local heating inside the oxide window; adjusting growth temperature during the confined phase is the paper's stated next step toward bulk GeSn ART.
Success would extend ART's proven defect filtering from Ge and III–V compounds to GeSn, a platform for short- and mid-wavelength infrared photodetectors and lasers on CMOS-compatible Si.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the local-heating picture is right, a two-temperature recipe—cooler during confined growth and warmer after overgrowth—should raise bulk Sn content; that prediction is directly testable.
The shape-to-Sn correlation suggests facet monitoring, for example in-situ reflectometry, could become a process-control signal, something the paper does not itself claim.
The observed wafer-level scatter implies that co-existing core-shell and bulk islands may be the norm under local growth fluctuations, so areal averaging or a uniformity fix would be needed before this becomes a manufacturable platform.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The genuinely new thing here is that this appears to be the first reported GeSn aspect ratio trapping growth. Two configurations are claimed: self-induced Ge core/GeSn shell at 6-8% Sn, and bulk GeSn at below 1%. The paper does a lot of things right: it documents unsuccessful growth rounds, correlates island shape with Sn incorporation, and uses both TEM-EDX and micro-Raman to support the presence of Sn. The evolution from dome to multi-facet to pyramid is convincing as a morphological signature, and the local-heating explanation for core/shell formation is reasonable, even if speculative. This is a serious materials-growth study, not a hype piece.

The soft spot is exactly where the reader and the stress test put it: the central claim of 'up to 8% Sn' rests on one or two TEM-EDX cut sections, and the paper itself admits on p. 19 that these might not be representative of the full wafer. The micro-Raman data show noticeable island-to-island dispersion in the Ge(F2g) shift, and the shift cannot be converted to absolute Sn content because the Raman coefficient for strained GeSn is only known under biaxial [100] strain, not for the {111}-faceted, non-biaxial geometry of these ART islands. So the Raman corroborates Sn uptake but cannot quantify it. No EDX error bars, detection-limit calibration, or multi-island statistics are provided. The below-1% bulk value sits near the EDX noise floor for Sn in Ge. The Methods also omit growth temperature, pressure, precursor flows, and times, which would prevent independent reproduction.

None of this is fatal to the manuscript's value as a first demonstration, but it means the headline 'up to 8% Sn' should be read as 'observed in a small number of islands' rather than a demonstrated growth capability. The authors deserve credit for flagging the representativeness issue themselves, which makes the paper more honest than most.

Who is this for? People working on GeSn heteroepitaxy, selective area growth, and CMOS-compatible integration. It is an incremental but useful step. It deserves a serious peer review, with the expectation that referees ask for multi-island composition statistics and a complete growth recipe. I would bring it to a reading group, and I'd cite it if I worked in the area.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental investigation of aspect ratio trapping (ART) growth of GeSn on patterned SiO2/Si substrates using RPCVD. Five growth rounds are described, systematically varying growth design (baseline, Ge core/GeSn shell, short Ge nucleation) and HCl-mediated growth selectivity. The authors report two successful configurations: self-induced Ge core/GeSn shell islands with 6–8% Sn (samples 4-A, 4-B) and bulk GeSn islands with <1% Sn (sample 5-A). The paper correlates successful Sn incorporation with a pyramid-shaped island morphology with {111} facets and attributes the core/shell distribution to local heating inside SiO2 windows. The central claim is the first demonstration of GeSn ART growth with up to 8% Sn.

Significance. If the reported results are robust, this would be the first demonstration of GeSn aspect ratio trapping growth, a potentially important step toward defect-reduced, CMOS-compatible GeSn optoelectronics on silicon. The paper's systematic documentation of unsuccessful rounds (samples 1-B, 2-B, 2-C, etc.) and its explicit acknowledgment that some attempts failed are examples of good reporting practice. The correlation between pyramid-shaped ART islands and successful Sn incorporation is a useful empirical observation that could guide future growth optimization. However, the headline claim of "up to 8% Sn" currently rests on a single TEM-EDX measurement per sample, and the paper itself concedes that the measurement may not be representative across the wafer. The absence of EDX uncertainty estimates and the known difficulty of converting micro-Raman shifts to Sn content under non-biaxial strain mean that the quantitative composition claims are not yet firmly established.

major comments (3)

[Abstract; p. 19, Fig. 8] The central claim of "GeSn ART growth up to 8% Sn" is supported by TEM-EDX data from a single ART island per sample (4-A, 4-B, 5-A). The paper states on p. 19 that "TEM-EDX results were limited to individual ART island and might not be representative for the full ART wafer in each case, as suggested by the scattered micro-Raman data observed earlier." This limitation is load-bearing: Figures 6d and 6e show substantial island-to-island dispersion in the Ge(F2g) Raman shift, so the reader cannot know whether the 6–8% values describe a reproducible growth capability or a few favorable islands. The abstract and conclusion should either be rephrased to reflect the single-island nature of the composition data, or the authors should add multi-island EDX statistics with error bars and detection-limit calibration. Without this, the headline claim is not established.
[p. 16, "Micro-Raman spectroscopy"; p. 22, Methods] The micro-Raman data are presented as "further verification of Sn incorporation," but the authors correctly note that direct Sn quantification from Raman is not possible because the Raman-strain coefficient is only known for biaxial [100] strain, not for the {111}-faceted, non-biaxial strain state of these ART islands. Consequently, the only quantitative composition evidence is TEM-EDX. For the bulk configuration, the reported Sn content of <1% sits near the typical EDX noise/detection floor for Sn in Ge, so the claim of "bulk GeSn" with <1% Sn is not securely distinguished from zero Sn incorporation. Please provide EDX measurement uncertainty, a discussion of the Sn detection limit under the experimental conditions, and ideally multiple islands to support the <1% bulk claim.
[Methods, p. 22] The Methods section lists the reactor, precursors, and mask geometry but omits growth temperature, chamber pressure, precursor flow rates, HCl flow rates, and growth times for each round. These parameters are essential for independent reproduction and for evaluating the proposed mechanism of local heating and growth-selectivity control. A summary table of growth conditions per sample/round should be added.

minor comments (5)

[Table 1] The notation for round 2-D samples (2-D (1), (2), (3), (4)) is confusing; consider using subscripts or a separate column to clarify that these are distinct samples within one growth round.
[Fig. 8] The figure shows Sn content extracted from TEM-EDX cut sections but lacks scale bars and error bars. Adding at least a scale bar and indicating the location of the cut section on a larger image would improve readability.
[p. 21, local heating discussion] The local-heating explanation is plausible but speculative. It is presented with qualifiers ("can", "might"), which is appropriate, but the authors should explicitly label it as a hypothesis requiring direct thermal measurement or modeling.
[p. 18, HR-TEM description] The phrase "different layers on the GeSn shell on sample 4-B" is vague; please specify the number of layers and the nature of the compositional difference (e.g., abrupt vs. graded), or refer the reader to Fig. 8.
[Throughout] Consistently use subscript formatting for F2g (i.e., F2g in italic/subscript) and correct "Burger's vector" to "Burgers vector".

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the up-to-8% Sn claim is a direct TEM-EDX observation, not a self-referential derivation or fitted prediction.

full rationale

This paper is an experimental study; it contains no derivation chain, fitted model, or first-principles prediction that could reduce to its own inputs. The headline result ('GeSn ART growth up to 8% Sn') rests directly on TEM-EDX composition maps and on SEM/Raman observations, which the paper reports with explicit caveats. The paper itself states on p. 19 that 'TEM-EDX results were limited to individual ART island and might not be representative for the full ART wafer in each case, as suggested by the scattered micro-Raman data observed earlier.' That is a data-representativeness limitation, not a circularity: a single-island composition measurement is an independent observation, even if its generalizability is uncertain. The only self-citations (ref. 17 for the authors' prior GeSn selective-area-growth work, and ref. 22 for the authors' prior Ge ART study) supply context and reference material; neither is used as a load-bearing premise to define the observed Sn content, and no 'uniqueness theorem' or fitted parameter is invoked. The paper also explains why Raman shifts cannot be converted to Sn content in this geometry, so the TEM-EDX values are not backed into from Raman data. No equation is fitted to a subset and then used to 'predict' a quantity that was an input, and no known result is merely renamed. The central claim therefore has independent observational content, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities are introduced. The central claim rests on assumptions about data representativeness, the role of pyramid morphology, the local-heating mechanism, and the effect of HCl-controlled selectivity, none of which are independently quantified.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption TEM-EDX composition on single ART islands is representative enough to support the stated Sn contents (6%, 8%, <1%).
The paper acknowledges limited single-island sampling and wafer-scale Raman dispersion, so the representative claim is an unverified assumption about the data.
domain assumption Pyramid shape with {111} facets is the stable, low-surface-energy configuration that permits Sn incorporation in GeSn ART.
The paper invokes surface-energy data (ref 49) and Ge nanocrystal shape transitions (ref 50) without a direct calculation for GeSn ART islands.
ad hoc to paper Local heating inside SiO2 windows due to the low thermal conductivity of the mask suppresses bulk Sn incorporation, explaining the core/shell distribution.
Proposed mechanism is supported only by analogy to InAs quantum dot growth (ref 52); no temperature measurement inside the ART windows is provided.
domain assumption HCl-controlled growth selectivity is the primary knob controlling Sn and GeSn nucleation in ART growth.
Inferred from morphology and Sn-droplet observations across rounds 2 to 5; no quantitative selectivity or precursor-partial-pressure measurements are reported.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Investigation of GeSn aspect ratio trapping growth up to 8% Sn." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NCMLMY67

@misc{pith2026260802710,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Investigation of GeSn aspect ratio trapping growth up to 8% Sn},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NCMLMY67}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02710}
}

read the original abstract

Aspect ratio trapping (ART) growth of germanium-tin (GeSn) is a promising approach to target important objectives on the quest towards commercialization of complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS)-compatible GeSn optoelectronics devices. Its local growth on patterned substrate allows for versatile device integration into photonics integrated circuit or for stand-alone structure like focal plane array imager. Additionally, high aspect ratio from nano-sized window can terminate early threading dislocation propagation on the oxide sidewalls, leaving subsequent growth defect-free and potentially improving the device performance. Knowledge remains missing regarding GeSn ART growth kinetics, morphology and how they evolve from thin film growth, with successful growth itself yet to be demonstrated. In this work, we report GeSn ART growth up to 8% Sn. Two configurations -- self-induced Ge core/GeSn shell for Sn content between 6% and 8%, and bulk GeSn ART for Sn content below 1% -- are observed. We present a comprehensive study on GeSn ART growth kinetics through different growth rounds and designs, showing a link between pyramid shape of ART island and successful Sn incorporation, as well as the role of growth selectivity and local heating.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

12 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

[1]

M.; Frauenrath, M.; Casiez, L.; Chelnokov, A.; Reboud, V.; Hartmann, J.- M.; El-Kurdi, M.; Pauc, N.; Calvo, V

(1) Chretien, J.; Thai, Q. M.; Frauenrath, M.; Casiez, L.; Chelnokov, A.; Reboud, V.; Hartmann, J.- M.; El-Kurdi, M.; Pauc, N.; Calvo, V. Room Temperature Optically Pumped GeSn Microdisk Lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2022, 120, 051107. (2) Buca, D.; Bjelajac, A.; Spirito, D.; Concepción, O.; Gromovyi, M.; Sakat, E.; Lafosse, X.; Ferlazzo, L.; von den Driesch,...

work page 2022
[5]

Study of GeSn Selective Area Growth with Demonstration of SWIR Light Detection

(15) Concepción, O.; Søgaard, N. B.; Bae, J.-H.; Yamamoto, Y.; Tiedemann, A. T.; Ikonic, Z.; Capellini, G.; Zhao, Q.-T.; Grützmacher, D.; Buca, D. Isothermal Heteroepitaxy of Ge1–XSnx Structures for Electronic and Photonic Applications. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2023, 5 (4), 2268–2275. 26 (16) Hartmann, J. M.; Marion, T. An Assessment of Germane and Tin ...

work page Pith review arXiv 2023
[88]

M.; Pauc, N.; Aubin, J.; Bertrand, M.; Chrétien, J.; Delaye, V.; Chelnokov, A.; Hartmann, J.-M.; Reboud, V.; Calvo, V

(25) Thai, Q. M.; Pauc, N.; Aubin, J.; Bertrand, M.; Chrétien, J.; Delaye, V.; Chelnokov, A.; Hartmann, J.-M.; Reboud, V.; Calvo, V. GeSn Heterostructure Micro-Disk Laser Operating at 230 K. Opt. Express 2018, 26 (25), 32500. (26) Dou, W.; Benamara, M.; Mosleh, A.; Margetis, J.; Grant, P.; Zhou, Y.; Al-Kabi, S.; Du, W.; Tolle, J.; Li, B.; Mortazavi, M.; Y...

work page 2018
[115]

M.; Mazur, Y

(22) Stanchu, H.; Kryvyi, S.; Margiotta, S.; Cook, M.; Grant, J.; Tran, H.; Acharya, S.; de Oliveira, F. M.; Mazur, Y. I.; Benamara, M.; King, C. A.; Du, W.; Li, B.; Salamo, G.; Yu, S.-Q. Comprehensive Material Study of Ge Grown by Aspect Ratio Trapping on Si Substrate. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2024, 57 (25), 255107. (23) De Koninck, Y.; Caer, C.; Yudistira...

work page 2024
[207]

M.; Marion, T

(37) Hartmann, J. M.; Marion, T. Impact of Flows, Temperature and Pressure on the GeSn Growth Kinetics with a Digermane and Tin Tetrachloride Chemistry. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2024, 169, 107893. (38) Gassenq, A.; Milord, L.; Aubin, J.; Pauc, N.; Guilloy, K.; Rothman, J.; Rouchon, D.; Chelnokov, A.; Hartmann, J. M.; Reboud, V.; Calvo, V. Raman Spec...

work page 1979
[265]

T.; Clark, A.; Debnath, M.; Koscica, R.; Leake, G.; Herman, J.; Harame, D.; Ludewig, P.; Wan, Y.; Bowers, J

(52) Shang, C.; Feng, K.; Hughes, E. T.; Clark, A.; Debnath, M.; Koscica, R.; Leake, G.; Herman, J.; Harame, D.; Ludewig, P.; Wan, Y.; Bowers, J. E. Electrically Pumped Quantum-Dot Lasers Grown on 300 Mm Patterned Si Photonic Wafers. Light Sci. Appl. 2022, 11 (1),

work page 2022
[1434]

Local Loading Effect in Selective Silicon Epitaxy

(28) Ishitani, A.; Endo, N.; Tsuya, H. Local Loading Effect in Selective Silicon Epitaxy. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1984, 23 (6A), L391. 27 (29) Menon, C.; Bentzen, A.; Radamson, H. H. Loading Effect in SiGe Layers Grown by Dichlorosilane- and Silane-Based Epitaxy. J. Appl. Phys. 2001, 90 (9), 4805–4809. (30) Bodnar, S.; Morin, C.; Regolini, J. L. Single-Wafer ...

work page 1984
[2009]

Defect Reduction of Selective Ge Epitaxy in Trenches on Si(001) Substrates Using Aspect Ratio Trapping

(19) Park, J.-S.; Bai, J.; Curtin, M.; Adekore, B.; Carroll, M.; Lochtefeld, A. Defect Reduction of Selective Ge Epitaxy in Trenches on Si(001) Substrates Using Aspect Ratio Trapping. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90 (5), 052113. (20) Li, J. Z.; Bai, J.; Major, C.; Carroll, M.; Lochtefeld, A.; Shellenbarger, Z. Defect Reduction of GaAs/Si Epitaxy by Aspect Rati...

work page 2007

Show all 12 references

[2026]

A.; Devaiya, A

(13) Tetzner, H.; Corley-Wiciak, A. A.; Devaiya, A. J.; Concepción, O.; Stolarek, D.; Schubert, M. A.; Yamamoto, Y.; Buca, D.; Capellini, G. Dislocations Influence the Background Hole Densities in Ge/Si Virtual Substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2025, 127 (25), 251901. (14) Thai, Q...

2025 arXiv
[2815]

CMOS- Compatible Bias-Tunable Dual-Band Detector Based on GeSn/Ge/Si Coupled Photodiodes

(9) Talamas Simola, E.; Kiyek, V.; Ballabio, A.; Schlykow, V.; Frigerio, J.; Zucchetti, C.; De Iacovo, A.; Colace, L.; Yamamoto, Y.; Capellini, G.; Grützmacher, D.; Buca, D.; Isella, G. CMOS- Compatible Bias-Tunable Dual-Band Detector Based on GeSn/Ge/Si Coupled Photodiodes. A...

2021
[3954]

M.; Amoah, S.; Salamo, G.; Du, W.; Liu, J.; Margetis, J.; Tolle, J.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, G.; Soref, R

(4) Zhou, Y.; Miao, Y.; Ojo, S.; Tran, H.; Abernathy, G.; Grant, J. M.; Amoah, S.; Salamo, G.; Du, W.; Liu, J.; Margetis, J.; Tolle, J.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, G.; Soref, R. A.; Li, B.; Yu, S.-Q. Electrically Injected GeSn Lasers on Si Operating up to 100 K. Optica 2020, 7 (8), 924–9...

2020
[5640]

A.; Liu, J.; Sun, G.; Soref, R

(27) Zhou, Y.; Dou, W.; Du, W.; Ojo, S.; Tran, H.; Ghetmiri, S. A.; Liu, J.; Sun, G.; Soref, R. A.; Margetis, J.; Tolle, J.; Li, B.; Chen, Z.; Mortazavi, M.; Yu, S.-Q. Optically Pumped GeSn Lasers Operating at 270 K with Broad Waveguide Structures on Si. ACS Photonics 2019, 6 (6),

2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

M.; Frauenrath, M.; Casiez, L.; Chelnokov, A.; Reboud, V.; Hartmann, J.- M.; El-Kurdi, M.; Pauc, N.; Calvo, V

(1) Chretien, J.; Thai, Q. M.; Frauenrath, M.; Casiez, L.; Chelnokov, A.; Reboud, V.; Hartmann, J.- M.; El-Kurdi, M.; Pauc, N.; Calvo, V. Room Temperature Optically Pumped GeSn Microdisk Lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2022, 120, 051107. (2) Buca, D.; Bjelajac, A.; Spirito, D.; Concepción, O.; Gromovyi, M.; Sakat, E.; Lafosse, X.; Ferlazzo, L.; von den Driesch,...

work page 2022

[2] [5]

Study of GeSn Selective Area Growth with Demonstration of SWIR Light Detection

(15) Concepción, O.; Søgaard, N. B.; Bae, J.-H.; Yamamoto, Y.; Tiedemann, A. T.; Ikonic, Z.; Capellini, G.; Zhao, Q.-T.; Grützmacher, D.; Buca, D. Isothermal Heteroepitaxy of Ge1–XSnx Structures for Electronic and Photonic Applications. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2023, 5 (4), 2268–2275. 26 (16) Hartmann, J. M.; Marion, T. An Assessment of Germane and Tin ...

work page Pith review arXiv 2023

[3] [88]

M.; Pauc, N.; Aubin, J.; Bertrand, M.; Chrétien, J.; Delaye, V.; Chelnokov, A.; Hartmann, J.-M.; Reboud, V.; Calvo, V

(25) Thai, Q. M.; Pauc, N.; Aubin, J.; Bertrand, M.; Chrétien, J.; Delaye, V.; Chelnokov, A.; Hartmann, J.-M.; Reboud, V.; Calvo, V. GeSn Heterostructure Micro-Disk Laser Operating at 230 K. Opt. Express 2018, 26 (25), 32500. (26) Dou, W.; Benamara, M.; Mosleh, A.; Margetis, J.; Grant, P.; Zhou, Y.; Al-Kabi, S.; Du, W.; Tolle, J.; Li, B.; Mortazavi, M.; Y...

work page 2018

[4] [115]

M.; Mazur, Y

(22) Stanchu, H.; Kryvyi, S.; Margiotta, S.; Cook, M.; Grant, J.; Tran, H.; Acharya, S.; de Oliveira, F. M.; Mazur, Y. I.; Benamara, M.; King, C. A.; Du, W.; Li, B.; Salamo, G.; Yu, S.-Q. Comprehensive Material Study of Ge Grown by Aspect Ratio Trapping on Si Substrate. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2024, 57 (25), 255107. (23) De Koninck, Y.; Caer, C.; Yudistira...

work page 2024

[5] [207]

M.; Marion, T

(37) Hartmann, J. M.; Marion, T. Impact of Flows, Temperature and Pressure on the GeSn Growth Kinetics with a Digermane and Tin Tetrachloride Chemistry. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2024, 169, 107893. (38) Gassenq, A.; Milord, L.; Aubin, J.; Pauc, N.; Guilloy, K.; Rothman, J.; Rouchon, D.; Chelnokov, A.; Hartmann, J. M.; Reboud, V.; Calvo, V. Raman Spec...

work page 1979

[6] [265]

T.; Clark, A.; Debnath, M.; Koscica, R.; Leake, G.; Herman, J.; Harame, D.; Ludewig, P.; Wan, Y.; Bowers, J

(52) Shang, C.; Feng, K.; Hughes, E. T.; Clark, A.; Debnath, M.; Koscica, R.; Leake, G.; Herman, J.; Harame, D.; Ludewig, P.; Wan, Y.; Bowers, J. E. Electrically Pumped Quantum-Dot Lasers Grown on 300 Mm Patterned Si Photonic Wafers. Light Sci. Appl. 2022, 11 (1),

work page 2022

[7] [1434]

Local Loading Effect in Selective Silicon Epitaxy

(28) Ishitani, A.; Endo, N.; Tsuya, H. Local Loading Effect in Selective Silicon Epitaxy. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1984, 23 (6A), L391. 27 (29) Menon, C.; Bentzen, A.; Radamson, H. H. Loading Effect in SiGe Layers Grown by Dichlorosilane- and Silane-Based Epitaxy. J. Appl. Phys. 2001, 90 (9), 4805–4809. (30) Bodnar, S.; Morin, C.; Regolini, J. L. Single-Wafer ...

work page 1984

[8] [2009]

Defect Reduction of Selective Ge Epitaxy in Trenches on Si(001) Substrates Using Aspect Ratio Trapping

(19) Park, J.-S.; Bai, J.; Curtin, M.; Adekore, B.; Carroll, M.; Lochtefeld, A. Defect Reduction of Selective Ge Epitaxy in Trenches on Si(001) Substrates Using Aspect Ratio Trapping. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90 (5), 052113. (20) Li, J. Z.; Bai, J.; Major, C.; Carroll, M.; Lochtefeld, A.; Shellenbarger, Z. Defect Reduction of GaAs/Si Epitaxy by Aspect Rati...

work page 2007