REVIEW 4 cited by
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at the 2017 International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)
read the original abstract
This article describes the design, implementation, and results of the latest installment of the dermoscopic image analysis benchmark challenge. The goal is to support research and development of algorithms for automated diagnosis of melanoma, the most lethal skin cancer. The challenge was divided into 3 tasks: lesion segmentation, feature detection, and disease classification. Participation involved 593 registrations, 81 pre-submissions, 46 finalized submissions (including a 4-page manuscript), and approximately 50 attendees, making this the largest standardized and comparative study in this field to date. While the official challenge duration and ranking of participants has concluded, the dataset snapshots remain available for further research and development.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
E-TCAV: Formalizing Penultimate Proxies for Efficient Concept Based Interpretability
E-TCAV shows that penultimate-layer proxies yield TCAV scores agreeing with earlier layers while delivering linear speedups in computation.
-
MARVEL: Margin-Aware Robust von Mises-Fischer Expert Learning for Long-Tailed Out-of-Distribution Detection
MARVEL introduces a multi-expert NvMF-based system with an outlier expert that reduces FPR95 in OOD detection on medical datasets by 8-37%.
-
Deep neural networks with Fisher vector encoding for medical image classification
Fisher vector encoding integrated into CNN-ViT hybrids outperforms benchmarks on MedMNIST datasets and matches literature results on other medical image sets.
-
MedGemma 1.5 Technical Report
MedGemma 1.5 4B reports absolute gains of 11% on 3D MRI classification, 3% on 3D CT, 47% macro F1 on pathology slides, 35% IoU on anatomical localization, and 5-22% on clinical QA tasks over MedGemma 1.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.