Pith

open record

sign in

arxiv: 2403.08151 · v1 · pith:NCOE4HTI · submitted 2024-03-13 · cs.LG · cs.AI· cs.NE

Measuring the Energy Consumption and Efficiency of Deep Neural Networks: An Empirical Analysis and Design Recommendations

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:NCOE4HTIrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.NE
keywords energynetworkconsumptiondatasetneuraldesignefficiencynetworks
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Addressing the so-called ``Red-AI'' trend of rising energy consumption by large-scale neural networks, this study investigates the actual energy consumption, as measured by node-level watt-meters, of training various fully connected neural network architectures. We introduce the BUTTER-E dataset, an augmentation to the BUTTER Empirical Deep Learning dataset, containing energy consumption and performance data from 63,527 individual experimental runs spanning 30,582 distinct configurations: 13 datasets, 20 sizes (number of trainable parameters), 8 network ``shapes'', and 14 depths on both CPU and GPU hardware collected using node-level watt-meters. This dataset reveals the complex relationship between dataset size, network structure, and energy use, and highlights the impact of cache effects. We propose a straightforward and effective energy model that accounts for network size, computing, and memory hierarchy. Our analysis also uncovers a surprising, hardware-mediated non-linear relationship between energy efficiency and network design, challenging the assumption that reducing the number of parameters or FLOPs is the best way to achieve greater energy efficiency. Highlighting the need for cache-considerate algorithm development, we suggest a combined approach to energy efficient network, algorithm, and hardware design. This work contributes to the fields of sustainable computing and Green AI, offering practical guidance for creating more energy-efficient neural networks and promoting sustainable AI.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Stochastic Thermodynamics of Associative Memory

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DenseAMs show tradeoffs between entropy production, retrieval accuracy, and speed at intermediate loads, with a new failure mode in higher-order networks at finite temperature.

  2. Neuromorphic Computing with Microfluidic Memristors

    cond-mat.soft 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Microfluidic memristors in coupled oscillators enable XOR, NAND, and all standard logic gates for iontronic neuromorphic computing.

  3. COMPASS: A Unified Decision-Intelligence System for Navigating Performance Trade-off in HPC

    cs.PF 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    COMPASS formalizes HPC configuration questions as ML tasks on traces, quantifies recommendation trustworthiness, and delivers 65.93% lower average job turnaround time plus 80.93% lower node usage versus prior methods ...

  4. Physical Neural Networks Need Nonlinearity, Amplification, and Suppression for Learning

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Simulations show physical neural networks need nonlinearity, amplification, and suppression for learning, with physically plausible circuit designs presented.

  5. From Cradle to Cloud: A Life Cycle Review of AI's Environmental Footprint

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A review of AI sustainability studies finds inconsistent life cycle definitions and predominant reliance on coarse CO2e proxies, with limited coverage of water, materials, and multi-impact assessments.

  6. Energy-Aware Routing to Large Reasoning Models

    cs.AI 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    In the critical regime for energy provisioning to large reasoning models, performance is volatility-limited, motivating variance-aware routing policies based on training and inference compute scaling laws.

  7. Quantifying the Climate Risk of Generative AI: Region-Aware Carbon Accounting with G-TRACE and the AI Sustainability Pyramid

    cs.CY 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    G-TRACE provides region-aware estimates of GenAI carbon emissions including 4309 MWh and 2068 tCO2 for a 2024-2025 image generation trend, paired with a seven-level AI Sustainability Pyramid for policy guidance.

  8. Quantifying the Climate Risk of Generative AI: Region-Aware Carbon Accounting with G-TRACE and the AI Sustainability Pyramid

    cs.CY 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    G-TRACE quantifies region-aware GenAI emissions and estimates 4,309 MWh energy use plus 2,068 tCO2 from the Ghibli-style image generation trend, paired with the AI Sustainability Pyramid for translating metrics into policy.