Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey on LLM Test-Time Compute via Search: Tasks, LLM Profiling, Search Algorithms, and Relevant Frameworks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.10069 v4 pith:NDCNIWFM submitted 2025-01-17 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords searchframeworksalgorithmsdefinitionsprofilingcomparisonscomputegithub
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

LLM test-time compute (or LLM inference) via search has emerged as a promising research area with rapid developments. However, current frameworks often adopt distinct perspectives on three key aspects: task definition, LLM profiling, and search procedures, making direct comparisons challenging. Moreover, the search algorithms employed often diverge from standard implementations, and their specific characteristics are not thoroughly specified. This survey aims to provide a comprehensive but integrated technical review on existing LIS frameworks. Specifically, we unify task definitions under Markov Decision Process (MDP) and provides modular definitions of LLM profiling and search procedures. The definitions enable precise comparisons of various LLM inference frameworks while highlighting their departures from conventional search algorithms. We also discuss the applicability, performance, and efficiency of these methods. For ongoing paper updates, please refer to our GitHub repository: https://github.com/xinzhel/LLM-Search.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Deciphering Trajectory-Aided LLM Reasoning: An Optimization Perspective

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Reasoning trajectories are formalized as pseudo-gradient descent on LLM parameters, making LLM reasoning training a MAML-style meta-learning problem.

  2. AutoChemSchematic AI: Agentic Physics-Aware Automation for Chemical Manufacturing Scale-Up

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The framework trains small models on synthetic AI-generated data to produce PFD/PID text, then validates two examples by manual DWSIM setup, leaving the industrial-viability claim unproven.

Pith tools