REVIEW 5 cited by
Solving the wave equation with physics-informed deep learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We investigate the use of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for solving the wave equation. Whilst PINNs have been successfully applied across many physical systems, the wave equation presents unique challenges due to the multi-scale, propagating and oscillatory nature of its solutions, and it is unclear how well they perform in this setting. We use a deep neural network to learn solutions of the wave equation, using the wave equation and a boundary condition as direct constraints in the loss function when training the network. We test the approach by solving the 2D acoustic wave equation for spatially-varying velocity models of increasing complexity, including homogeneous, layered and Earth-realistic models, and find the network is able to accurately simulate the wavefield across these cases. By using the physics constraint in the loss function the network is able to solve for the wavefield far outside of its boundary training data, offering a way to reduce the generalisation issues of existing deep learning approaches. We extend the approach for the Earth-realistic case by conditioning the network on the source location and find that it is able to generalise over this initial condition, removing the need to retrain the network for each solution. In contrast to traditional numerical simulation this approach is very efficient when computing arbitrary space-time points in the wavefield, as once trained the network carries out inference in a single step without needing to compute the entire wavefield. We discuss the potential applications, limitations and further research directions of this work.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Three-dimensional crustal deformation analysis using physics-informed deep learning
A physics-informed neural network solves 3-D static elastic deformation and inverts real GPS data for the 2008 Iwate-Miyagi earthquake slip, giving a pattern consistent with previous studies but a lower moment magnitude.
-
Are Two Hidden Layers Still Enough for the Physics-Informed Neural Networks?
A collection of deterministic initialization, loss weighting, data-driven initialization, and gradient-free training methods for shallow physics-informed neural networks, tested on ODEs and PDEs.
-
Physics-Informed Neural Networks for the Korteweg-de Vries Equation for Internal Solitary Wave Problem: Forward Simulation and Inverse Parameter Estimation
A physics-informed neural network pipeline reproduces the known soliton family of the internal-wave KdV equation and recovers layer parameters from sparse synthetic observations when one density is fixed.
-
PINN-FEM: A Hybrid Approach for Enforcing Dirichlet Boundary Conditions in Physics-Informed Neural Networks
PINN-FEM enforces Dirichlet boundary conditions in PINNs by blending neural network fields with finite element shape functions in a boundary layer, but the 2D extension is ambiguous and the experimental comparisons ar...
-
About rectified sigmoid function for enhancing the accuracy of Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Rectified sigmoid (hard sigmoid) activation is reported to cut PINN solution errors by about an order of magnitude on two ODE benchmarks, but the result may be an interpolation artifact because the paper never disclos...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.