REVIEW 2 cited by
Neural-Symbolic Integration for Interactive Learning and Conceptual Grounding
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We propose neural-symbolic integration for abstract concept explanation and interactive learning. Neural-symbolic integration and explanation allow users and domain-experts to learn about the data-driven decision making process of large neural models. The models are queried using a symbolic logic language. Interaction with the user then confirms or rejects a revision of the neural model using logic-based constraints that can be distilled into the model architecture. The approach is illustrated using the Logic Tensor Network framework alongside Concept Activation Vectors and applied to a Convolutional Neural Network.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Two Axes of LLM Abstention: Answer Correctness and Question Answerability
Answer correctness and question answerability are separate axes: ordinary confidence tracks the first while hidden probes track the second, and a factorized dual-threshold policy certifies both risk budgets at higher ...
-
From Large AI Models to Agentic AI: A Tutorial on Future Intelligent Communications
This paper is a broad tutorial on applying LAMs and agentic AI to 6G, largely restating existing research rather than introducing new results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.