Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 46 references

The paper derives explicit short-wavelength Floquet modes for the oscillon and shows the resulting creation and annihilation operators obey the standard oscillator algebra, completing the proof that a periodic quantum oscillon state exists

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 22:45 UTC pith:NHSP5S43

load-bearing objection New analytic relativistic Floquet modes that are likely correct but rest on an admitted ill-defined expansion; worth a referee's time. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.15624 v1 pith:NHSP5S43 submitted 2026-07-17 hep-th

Oscillon Floquet Modes and the Operators that Excite Them

Bilguun Bayarsaikhan , Jarah Evslin , Sujoy Mahato This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords oscillonFloquet modesFodor expansionquantum field theorycreation and annihilation operatorsscalar field theorynon-topological solitonsQ-balls
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper is trying to prove that the short-wavelength (relativistic) perturbations of a small-amplitude oscillon can be written as simple elementary functions at the first three orders of the Fodor expansion, and that the quantum operators built from these modes satisfy the usual creation–annihilation algebra. The point of the algebra is that a quantum oscillon state was previously constructed as the simultaneous ground state of all Floquet-mode annihilation operators, and such a state exists only if those operators commute with each other. That commutation had been shown for nonrelativistic modes only; the present work extends it to relativistic modes using an explicit analytic formula. If the claim is right, the periodic quantum oscillon state exists at fixed order in the expansion, and its energy and radiation amplitudes can now be computed analytically.

Core claim

The main result, Eq. (4.35), is an explicit expression for the relativistic Floquet modes of a symmetric small-amplitude oscillon: g_k(x,t) = e^{-i(kx+ω_k t)}[1 − 2i(ε/k)tanh(εx) + (ε²/k²)sech²(εx)(2cos²(Ωt)+i(ω_k/Ω)sin(2Ωt))] + O(ε³), with ω_k = √(m²+k²) and Ω = √(m²−ε²). Using this formula and a dual basis of modes, the paper decomposes the field and its conjugate momentum into Floquet-mode operators, inverts the decomposition, and computes the commutators. It finds [b_{k1}, b†_{k2}] = 2πδ(k1−k2) and [b_{k1}, b_{k2}] = [b†_{k1}, b†_{k2}] = 0 at the computed orders, and also that commutators with the amplitude and boost operators are exponentially suppressed in ε/|k|. The authors therefore

What carries the argument

The central object is the Floquet mode, a perturbation g_k(x,t) that returns to itself up to a phase after one oscillation period of the oscillon, g_k(x,t+2π/Ω) = e^{iν}g_k(x,t). The machinery is a double expansion in ε/m and ε/k of the master equation, with the fast factor e^{-ikx} pulled out so that the small parameter does not appear in an exponent; this expansion is acknowledged in the paper to be 'somewhat ill-defined' because derivatives mix orders. The computation is carried by three devices: the variation-of-parameters solution of the resonant zero-wavenumber term, which produces the tanh and sech² corrections; the construction of a dual basis g_{D,k} orthogonal to the Floquet modes

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that pulling out the plane-wave factor and expanding the rest in ε/m and ε/k is a valid asymptotic series for the Floquet modes, even though derivatives mix orders; if that series is not asymptotic, terms of the same order as those retained in Eq. (4.35) may be missing and the commutator algebra could acquire O(ε²) corrections.

What would settle it

Compute the order-ε³ correction to g_k from the exact hypergeometric solution of the master equation, or solve the linearized equation numerically at small ε and k/ε, and check whether [b_{k1}, b†_{k2}] − 2πδ(k1−k2) is genuinely O(ε³) or receives O(ε²) contributions. A simpler probe is to compare the phase and amplitude of the numerically propagated mode at t=2π/Ω with Eq. (4.35) to see if the missing terms alter the Floquet phase at order ε².

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The relativistic Floquet modes are no longer just numerically known: Eq. (4.35) gives them in terms of tanh and sech², so their Fourier transforms can be computed analytically for quantum corrections to oscillon energy and radiation.
  • The oscillon is reflectionless for short-wavelength modes up to O(ε³) corrections, since no e^{+ikx} term appears in the mode.
  • The commutators [π_0, b_k] and [ε̂, b_k] are exponentially suppressed as e^{-π|k|/(2ε)}, so the projection formulas that define the boost and amplitude operators remain valid when relativistic modes are included.
  • Because the b_k and b†_k satisfy the oscillator algebra, the simultaneous zero-eigenvalue state of all b_k exists, and the periodic quantum oscillon state of the earlier construction survives at fixed Fodor order.
  • The paper expects the same construction to carry over essentially unchanged to Q-ball continuum modes, enabling the full quantization of the Q-ball.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: Since the paper works only at t=0 to define the dual basis, the oscillator algebra might not hold at intermediate times within a period; a stroboscopic Hamiltonian construction would need to verify that the algebra persists at other phases of the oscillon.
  • Inference: The expansion is not a standard asymptotic series, so a finite-ε/k numerical comparison against the exact hypergeometric modes would show whether the vanishing of commutators at O(ε²) is genuine or an artifact of the truncation; the next order (ε³) computation is the cleanest test.
  • Inference: The same expansion technique could be applied to cubic-leader potentials (the φ⁴ double well, for example), which the paper explicitly leaves open; there the master equation is no longer universal and the leading relativistic modes may no longer be plane waves.
  • Inference: The exponential decoupling of relativistic modes from the zero-mode collective coordinates suggests a hierarchy that might make the effective quantum-oscillon Hamiltonian approximately free at short wavelengths, which could simplify calculations of radiative decay.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs short-wavelength (relativistic) Floquet modes of a small-amplitude symmetric oscillon in 1+1 dimensions, to the first three orders in the Fodor expansion, and gives them in closed elementary form (Eq. 4.35). Using these modes and a proposed dual mode (Eq. 5.2), it inverts the field decomposition and computes the commutators of the corresponding creation and annihilation operators, finding the standard oscillator algebra at the computed order (Sec. 5.4). The authors argue this extends to relativistic modes the earlier nonrelativistic proof that a periodic quantum oscillon state exists at fixed Fodor order. The paper explicitly acknowledges that the double expansion in ε/m and ε/k is 'somewhat ill-defined' (Sec. 4) and that higher-order terms may correct the commutators (Sec. 6).

Significance. If the computation is correct, the paper provides a useful analytic tool: relativistic Floquet modes are usually only available as hypergeometric functions or numerically, while Eq. (4.35) gives elementary expressions and can be Fourier-transformed analytically. The operator algebra result would complete the program of Refs. [19, 22] and support the existence of a fixed-order periodic quantum oscillon state. The paper has no free parameters and derives the modes from the master equation rather than fitting to a target. However, two load-bearing points are not sufficiently established: the double expansion is admitted to be ill-defined, and the dual mode is stated without derivation. These issues affect the central claim and need to be addressed before the results can be relied upon.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 5.1, Eqs. (5.1)–(5.2)] The dual mode is introduced without derivation, and the claimed orthogonality relation (5.1) is not verified at the order used in the subsequent commutator calculation. Inserting g_k(x,0) from Eq. (4.35) and g_D,k from Eq. (5.2) into the left-hand side of (5.1), the O(ε) cross term is 2iε(1/k1−1/k2) ∫ e^{i(k1−k2)x} tanh(εx) dx, plus O(ε²) terms from the sech² pieces. The tanh integral is not a delta function: for small momentum transfer it behaves as 2i/(k1−k2), so the product gives a smooth kernel of amplitude O(ε/k²), and for larger momentum transfer it is exponentially small but not zero. The prefactor k²/(k²+4ε²) does not cancel this kernel. Thus Eq. (5.1) is not established even at order ε/k, and the inversion formulas (5.6) and all commutators (5.18)–(5.23) inherit this gap. The authors should either derive the dual mode by an explicit biorthogonal construction, or verify (5.1) by
  2. [Sec. 4, Eq. (4.35)] The central mode function (4.35) rests on a double expansion in ε/m and ε/k that the paper itself calls 'somewhat ill-defined' and says will not capture the Floquet modes. Section 4.3 gives a concrete warning: a term of exactly the retained order (the sech² term) was initially missed and only recovered after including a source generated by the leading tanh term. No order-by-order counting is given to show that further iterations are higher order — for example, the coupling of g2^(±2) into the n=0 equation through the ε² sech² potential, or the next self-coupling of g2^(0). A scaling estimate suggests such terms are O(ε³) or O(ε/m) suppressed, but the paper does not provide it. Because the commutator algebra in Sec. 5.4 uses Eq. (4.35) at O(ε²/k²), the claimed exactness of the oscillator algebra at that order is not demonstrated. Please supply an explicit order-counting argument or verify
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 5.4, Eqs. (5.19)–(5.20)] The notation is confusing: b_{-k} is defined in (5.19), then b†_k is written in (5.20), and Eq. (5.23) uses b_{k1}. The reality/Hermiticity conditions on ϕ_k and π_k (e.g. ϕ_{-k}=ϕ_k†, π_{-k}=π_k†) are never stated, although they are needed to justify calling b†_k the adjoint of b_k.
  2. [Figs. 1 and 2] The comparison with the hypergeometric modes of Ref. [19] is purely visual; no error measure or convergence estimate is given. Moreover, in Fig. 1, k=0.2 and ε=0.1, so k/ε=2, which is not deep in the short-mode regime |k/ϵ|≫1.
  3. [Sec. 2.2] The dimensional analysis discussion is not used later; a brief statement of which dimensionless ratios are assumed small would be clearer.
  4. [References] The DOI in Ref. [41] appears malformed ('10.1103/mw9r-3qdx'); please check.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular reduction found; the main mode formula and commutator algebra are computed from the master equation rather than assumed or fitted.

full rationale

The paper's central new result, Eq. (4.35), is obtained by solving the master equation (2.7) order by order: the leading plane wave is fixed by (4.3)-(4.4), the leading correction is obtained by variation of parameters (4.16)-(4.28), and the subleading sign correction (4.31)-(4.34) is a self-consistency step, not an input. The master equation is cited to the authors' Ref. [19], but it is stated as a direct linearization of the equations of motion ('The classical equations of motion imply...'), so the self-citation supplies a derivable external input rather than the target result. The operator algebra in Sec. 5.4 also is not definitional fiat: the dual mode (5.2) is constructed so that the biorthogonality relation (5.1) holds, and the commutators (5.18)-(5.23) are then evaluated using this biorthogonality and the canonical [phi,pi] commutator, including the nontrivial cancellation in [b,b]. The b operators are defined in (5.19) with conventional normalization factors, but their algebra is checked rather than assumed. The paper's own warnings that the epsilon/k double expansion is 'somewhat ill-defined' and that O(epsilon^3) terms may correct the commutators are consistency/completeness caveats; the Sec. 4.3 sign-flip episode is an example of terms missed at a given order, which would be a correctness defect if it recurred, not an instance of the claimed result being equivalent to its input. The reflectionless comment after (4.35) rests on a boundary-condition choice (a homogeneous solution was removed at (4.28)), but it is not load-bearing for the main claims. No parameter is fitted to the target commutators, no uniqueness theorem is imported to force the mode choice, and the self-citations to Refs. [1,19,22] do not carry the derivation of (4.35).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; ε and m are physical parameters of the oscillon and field, k is the mode wavenumber. The derivation leans on the authors' earlier master equation and nonrelativistic modes but does not fit the target result. The two ad hoc axioms (double-expansion validity and sector decoupling) are the main unproven premises.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The Floquet mode master equation (2.7), truncated at O(ε²), governs linear perturbations of the small-amplitude oscillon.
    Taken from Ref [19] (same group); used throughout Secs 3-5 as the starting point.
  • domain assumption The oscillon solution is the leading-order Fodor expression f(x,t) = 4ε/√(-λV⁽⁴⁾) sech(εx)cos(Ωt) with Ω=√(m²-ε²).
    Sec 2.1; needed to derive the master equation. Standard result.
  • ad hoc to paper The double expansion in ε/m and ε/k is a valid asymptotic expansion of the Floquet modes.
    Sec 4: the authors state the series is 'somewhat ill-defined' because ε/k appears in the denominator of e^{ikx}; the expansion's validity is not established.
  • ad hoc to paper Cross-contamination between nonrelativistic and short (relativistic) sectors is exponentially suppressed and vanishes to all orders in ε/k.
    Sec 5.3: demonstrated for example projections; the authors say it is 'not clear that this exponential suppression occurs at all orders'. This is needed for the claim that the full field decomposition is invertible.
  • standard math Canonical commutation relations [ϕ(x),π(y)] = i δ(x-y) hold.
    Sec 5.4: used to compute all operator commutators.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 15721 in / 26096 out tokens · 232804 ms · 2026-08-01T22:45:08.100099+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the scattering modes of the oscillon, to the first three orders in the Fodor expansion, in terms of elementary functions. In the case of relativistic modes, these results are new. We use them to fully decompose the field and also to analytically invert the decomposition. In quantum field theory, this allows us to show that the corresponding creation and annihilation operators satisfy the usual oscillator algebra, extending to relativistic modes the demonstration that, at a fixed order in the Fodor expansion, a periodic oscillon state exists.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15624 by Bilguun Bayarsaikhan, Jarah Evslin, Sujoy Mahato.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Setting m = 1 and ϵ = 0.1, these are the real (left) and imaginary (right) parts of the k = 0.2 Floquet modes at time t = 0, using the expansion of Ref. [19] (red), the nonrelativistic formula Eq. (3.7) (black) and the short mode formula Eq. (4.35) (blue). They have been normalized to have amplitude one asymptotically and the leading order plane wave has been subtracted. Assembling everything, we find the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: As in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 31 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The universal floquet modes of (quasi)-breathers and oscillons,

    J. Evslin, T. Roma´ nczukiewicz, K. Slawi´ nska and A. Wereszczynski, “The universal floquet modes of (quasi)-breathers and oscillons,” Phys. Lett. B872(2026), 140112 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.140112 [arXiv:2511.03961 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    An Electroweak oscillon,

    N. Graham, “An Electroweak oscillon,” Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007), 101801 [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007), 189904] doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.101801 [arXiv:hep- th/0610267 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2007

  3. [3]

    Oscillon and sphaleron in SMEFT,

    Z. Drogosz and K. Slawi´ nska, “Oscillon and sphaleron in SMEFT,” (June 23, 2026) Nonlinear Dynamics in Classical and Quantum Systems (SIG XIV), Jagiellonian U., Krakow

    2026

  4. [4]

    Oscillon resonances and creation of kinks in particle collisions,

    T. Romanczukiewicz and Y. Shnir, “Oscillon resonances and creation of kinks in particle collisions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010), 081601 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.081601 [arXiv:1002.4484 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  5. [5]

    Collision Dynamics of False- Vacuum Oscillons,

    J. G. F. Campos, N. S. Manton and A. Mohammadi, “Collision Dynamics of False- Vacuum Oscillons,” [arXiv:2605.12633 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Gleiser, Oscillons in scalar field theories: Applications in higher dimensions and inflation, Int

    M. Gleiser, Oscillons in scalar field theories: Applications in higher dimensions and inflation, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D16(2007) 219

    2007

  7. [7]

    Oscillons and Dark Matter,

    J. Oll´ e, O. Pujol` as and F. Rompineve, “Oscillons and Dark Matter,” JCAP02(2020), 006 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/02/006 [arXiv:1906.06352 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Oscillon formation during inflation- ary preheating with general relativity,

    J. C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough and F. Muia, “Oscillon formation during inflation- ary preheating with general relativity,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.2, 023501 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.023501 [arXiv:2304.01673 [gr-qc]]. 20

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Non-topological solitons and quasi-solitons,

    S. Y. Zhou, “Non-topological solitons and quasi-solitons,” Rept. Prog. Phys.88(2025) no.4, 046901 doi:10.1088/1361-6633/adc69e [arXiv:2411.16604 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Primordial black hole formation from the merger of oscil- lons,

    K. Kasai and N. Kitajima, “Primordial black hole formation from the merger of oscil- lons,” [arXiv:2510.25300 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  11. [11]

    Classical Decay Rates of Oscillons,

    H. Y. Zhang, M. A. Amin, E. J. Copeland, P. M. Saffin and K. D. Lozanov, “Classical Decay Rates of Oscillons,” JCAP07(2020), 055 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/07/055 [arXiv:2004.01202 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Radiation and Relaxation of Oscillons,

    P. Salmi and M. Hindmarsh, “Radiation and Relaxation of Oscillons,” Phys. Rev. D85 (2012), 085033 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.085033 [arXiv:1201.1934 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    Excited oscillons: Cascading levels and higher multipoles,

    Y. J. Wang, Q. X. Xie and S. Y. Zhou, “Excited oscillons: Cascading levels and higher multipoles,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.2, 025006 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.025006 [arXiv:2210.04969 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Oscillon spectroscopy,

    F. van Dissel, O. Pujolas and E. I. Sfakianakis, “Oscillon spectroscopy,” JHEP 07(2023), 194 [erratum: JHEP04(2025), 191] doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2023)194 [arXiv:2303.16072 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Small amplitude quasi-breathers and oscillons,

    G. Fodor, P. Forgacs, Z. Horvath and A. Lukacs, “Small amplitude quasi-breathers and oscillons,” Phys. Rev. D78(2008), 025003 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.025003 [arXiv:0802.3525 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  16. [16]

    Lifetime of Pulsating Solitons in Some Clas- sical Models,

    I. L. Bogolyubsky and V. G. Makhankov, “Lifetime of Pulsating Solitons in Some Clas- sical Models,” Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.24(1976), 15-18

    1976

  17. [17]

    Nonexistence of Small Amplitude Breather Solutions in ϕ4 Theory,

    H. Segur and M. D. Kruskal, “Nonexistence of Small Amplitude Breather Solutions in ϕ4 Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.58(1987), 747-750 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.747

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.58.747 1987

  18. [18]

    Nonexistence of spatially localized free vibrations for a class of non- linear wave equations,

    P. A. Vuillermot, “Nonexistence of spatially localized free vibrations for a class of non- linear wave equations,” Comment. Math. Helvetici 64, 573 (1987)

    1987

  19. [19]

    Normal modes of the small-amplitude oscillon,

    J. Evslin, T. Romanczukiewicz, K. Slawinska and A. Wereszczynski, “Normal modes of the small-amplitude oscillon,” JHEP01(2025), 039 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2025)039 [arXiv:2409.15661 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Quantum Radiation of Oscillons,

    M. P. Hertzberg, “Quantum Radiation of Oscillons,” Phys. Rev. D82(2010), 045022 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.045022 [arXiv:1003.3459 [hep-th]]. 21

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  21. [21]

    Quantum Evaporation of Classical Breathers,

    J. Oll´ e, O. Pujolas, T. Vachaspati and G. Zahariade, “Quantum Evaporation of Classical Breathers,” Phys. Rev. D100(2019) no.4, 045011 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.045011 [arXiv:1904.12962 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Quantum Oscil- lons are Long-Lived,

    J. Evslin, K. Slawi´ nska, T. Roma´ nczukiewicz and A. Wereszczy´ nski, “Quantum Oscil- lons are Long-Lived,” [arXiv:2512.17193 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    First Order Phase Transitions in a Sector of Fixed Charge,

    D. Spector, “First Order Phase Transitions in a Sector of Fixed Charge,” Phys. Lett. B194(1987), 103 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)90777-5

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)90777-5 1987

  24. [24]

    Small Q balls,

    A. Kusenko, “Small Q balls,” Phys. Lett. B404(1997), 285 doi:10.1016/S0370- 2693(97)00582-0 [arXiv:hep-th/9704073 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  25. [25]

    Particlelike Solutions to Nonlinear Complex Scalar Field Theories with Positive-Definite Energy Densities,

    G. Rosen, “Particlelike Solutions to Nonlinear Complex Scalar Field Theories with Positive-Definite Energy Densities,” J. Math. Phys.9(1968), 996 doi:10.1063/1.1664693

    doi:10.1063/1.1664693 1968

  26. [26]

    Q-balls,

    S. R. Coleman, “Q-balls,” Nucl. Phys. B262(1985) no.2, 263 doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(86)90520-1

    doi:10.1016/0550- 1985

  27. [27]

    Q-balls, Integrability and Duality,

    P. Bowcock, D. Foster and P. Sutcliffe, “Q-balls, Integrability and Duality,” J. Phys. A 42(2009), 085403 doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/8/085403 [arXiv:0809.3895 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  28. [28]

    Perturbations against a Q-ball: Charge, energy, and additiv- ity property,

    M. N. Smolyakov, “Perturbations against a Q-ball: Charge, energy, and additiv- ity property,” Phys. Rev. D97(2018) no.4, 045011 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.045011 [arXiv:1711.05730 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    Vibrational modes of Q-balls,

    A. Kovtun, E. Nugaev and A. Shkerin, “Vibrational modes of Q-balls,” Phys. Rev. D 98(2018) no.9, 096016 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.096016 [arXiv:1805.03518 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    Perturbations of Q- balls: from spectral structure to radiation pressure,

    D. Ciurla, P. Dorey, T. Roma´ nczukiewicz and Y. Shnir, “Perturbations of Q- balls: from spectral structure to radiation pressure,” JHEP07(2024), 196 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)196 [arXiv:2405.06591 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Q-ball perturbations with more details: Linear analysis vs lattice,

    A. Azatov, Q. T. Ho and M. M. Khalil, “Q-ball perturbations with more details: Linear analysis vs lattice,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.9, 096010 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.096010 [arXiv:2412.13885 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Linearized Q-Ball Perturbations,

    J. Evslin, H. Liu, T. Roma´ nczukiewicz, Y. Shnir, A. Wereszczy´ nski and P. Ziobro, “Linearized Q-Ball Perturbations,” [arXiv:2604.07713 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Charge-Swapping Q-balls,

    E. J. Copeland, P. M. Saffin and S. Y. Zhou, “Charge-Swapping Q-balls,” Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) no.23, 231603 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.231603 [arXiv:1409.3232 [hep-th]]. 22

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    Q-ball polarization - A smooth path to oscillons,

    F. Blaschke, T. Romanczukiewicz, K. Slawinska and A. Wereszczynski, “Q-ball polarization - A smooth path to oscillons,” Phys. Lett. B865(2025), 139468 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139468 [arXiv:2502.20519 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Oscillons from Q-balls,

    F. Blaschke, T. Roma´ nczukiewicz, K. S lawi´ nska and A. Wereszczy´ nski, “Oscillons from Q-balls,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.3, 036034 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.036034 [arXiv:2502.09136 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Quantum corrections to Q balls,

    N. Graham, “Quantum corrections to Q balls,” Phys. Lett. B513(2001), 112-118 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00669-4 [arXiv:hep-th/0105009 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  37. [37]

    Large solitons flattened by small quantum corrections,

    E. Kim, E. Nugaev and Y. Shnir, “Large solitons flattened by small quantum corrections,” Phys. Lett. B856(2024), 138881 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138881 [arXiv:2405.09262 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Quantum corrected Q-ball dynam- ics,

    Q. X. Xie, P. M. Saffin, A. Tranberg and S. Y. Zhou, “Quantum corrected Q-ball dynam- ics,” JHEP01(2024), 165 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)165 [arXiv:2312.01139 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Quantum-Corrected Q-balls in the Friedberg-Lee- Sirlin Model,

    Y. X. Su, Q. X. Xie and S. Y. Zhou, “Quantum-Corrected Q-balls in the Friedberg-Lee- Sirlin Model,” [arXiv:2605.25243 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    The fate of small classically stable Q-balls,

    D. Levkov, E. Nugaev and A. Popescu, “The fate of small classically stable Q-balls,” JHEP12(2017), 131 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2017)131 [arXiv:1711.05279 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  41. [41]

    Quantum fields in boson star spacetime,

    P. M. Saffin and Q. X. Xie, “Quantum fields in boson star spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D 113(2026) no.12, 125025 doi:10.1103/mw9r-3qdx [arXiv:2601.05129 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    Classical Lumps and their Quantum Descendents,

    S. R. Coleman, “Classical Lumps and their Quantum Descendents,” Subnucl. Ser.13 (1977), 297 PRINT-77-0088 (HAR V ARD)

    1977

  43. [43]

    Krakow Lectures on Scalar Quantum Solitons,

    J. Evslin, “Krakow Lectures on Scalar Quantum Solitons,” to appear in Eur. Phys. Jour. C, [arXiv:2605.22285 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    A finite tension for theϕ44 domain wall,

    J. Evslin, H. Guo, H. Liu and B. Zhang, “A finite tension for theϕ44 domain wall,” Phys. Lett. B864(2025), 139457 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139457 [arXiv:2411.05406 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Inflaton self resonance, oscillons, and gravitational waves in small field polynomial inflation,

    M. Drees and C. Wang, “Inflaton self resonance, oscillons, and gravitational waves in small field polynomial inflation,” JCAP04(2025), 078 doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2025/04/078 [arXiv:2501.13811 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Self-resonance preheating in deformed attractor models: oscillon formation and evolution,

    B. M. Gu, Y. P. Zhang, F. W. Shu and Y. X. Liu, “Self-resonance preheating in deformed attractor models: oscillon formation and evolution,” [arXiv:2602.07972 [astro-ph.CO]]. 23

    Pith/arXiv arXiv