Paradoxical non-Gaussian behavior in fractional Laplace motion with drift

Aleksei V. Chechkin; Ralf Metzler; Wei Wang; Yingjie Liang

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 103 references

Paradoxical non-Gaussian behavior in fractional Laplace motion with drift

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Fractional Laplace motion with internal drift develops a Gaussian core with non-Gaussian tails, while external drift only recenters the distribution

desk verdict Solid extension of FLM to two drift mechanisms; moment results are correct, but the central Gaussian PDF for internal drift is assumed rather than derived. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14674 v1 pith:NIOJCI33 submitted 2024-12-19 cond-mat.stat-mech physics.bio-phq-bio.QM

Wei Wang , Yingjie Liang , Aleksei V. Chechkin , Ralf Metzler This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.bio-phq-bio.QM MSC 60G2260G5182C31 PACS 05.40.Fb

keywords fractionalLaplacemotionBrowniangammaprocesssubordinationexternaldriftinternalnon-Gaussianprobabilitydensitykurtosis

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies fractional Laplace motion (FLM), a process made by running fractional Brownian motion on a gamma clock, and asks how a constant drift changes its statistics. It claims that where the drift is applied matters: a drift acting on the composite process only shifts the probability density, whereas a drift acting on the fractional Brownian parent process alters the mean-squared displacement itself, adding a linear-in-time term that dominates at long times for Hurst exponents $H<1/2$. It further claims that the probability density develops a central Gaussian region that widens with time, surrounded by non-Gaussian tails whose probability weight shrinks, so the kurtosis approaches the Gaussian value 3 even though the tails are not Gaussian. If these claims hold, FLM with internal drift is a tractable construction that produces apparently normal diffusion from subdiffusive fractional Gaussian noise, and produces 'Brownian yet non-Gaussian' displacement statistics with a Hurst-controlled crossover. Stochastic simulations in the paper match the analytic results.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the subordination integral $P(x,t)=\int_0^\infty G(x,s)h(s,t)\,ds$, with the Gaussian FBM density $G(x,s)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi s^{2H}}}\exp(-x^2/(2s^{2H}))$ and the gamma subordinator density $h(s,t)=s^{t-1}e^{-s}/\Gamma(t)$. The paper evaluates this integral through an H-function, a Mellin-Barnes special function, and then applies Laplace's method to the exponent $\varphi(s)$; the location of its minimum decides whether the PDF is Gaussian or non-Gaussian in a given $x$-region. For internal drift the same moment machinery produces the term $v^2t$ in the MSD, and the Gaussian core is assigned the variance $t^{2H}+v^2t$ on the strength of the process's long-time statistics.

What would settle it

Run high-statistics simulations of internal-drift FLM at extreme Hurst exponents (for instance $H=0.1$ and $H=0.45$) with small drift, and histogram displacements inside the strip $|x-vt|<t^{H+1/2}$ at several long times. If the local distribution is measurably non-Gaussian, or if its variance is not $t^{2H}+v^2t$, the assumed Gaussian core is wrong; alternatively, confirmation of the Gaussian core and the predicted boundary would support the paper's central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a sharp separation between two drift mechanisms for $x(t)=B_H(s(t))$, where $B_H$ is fractional Brownian motion and $s(t)$ is a gamma process. External drift $v$ acts on the composite process, so the PDF is exactly the drift-free PDF with $x$ replaced by $x-vt$, and the MSD stays $\Gamma(2H+t)/\Gamma(t)$. Internal drift acts on the parent process, and the exact MSD becomes $\Gamma(2H+t)/\Gamma(t)+v^2 t$; asymptotically this is $t^{2H}+v^2 t$, so the ordinary diffusion term $v^2 t$ dominates for $H<1/2$. For the internal-drift PDF the paper claims a central Gaussian core of variance $t^{2H}+v^2 t$ inside the moving interval $x=vt\pm t^{H+1/2}$, non-Gaussian tails outside that interval, broken left-right symmetry, and a kurtosis that converges to $3$ at long times despite the tails. For the special case $H=1/2$ the non-Gaussian tail is explicitly $a|x|^{t-1}e^{-b|x|}$, with $a$ and $b$ constants set by $v$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the central part of the internal-drift PDF is Gaussian: the paper assumes this from the process's moments rather than deriving it, so the claimed two-regime picture and the boundary $x=vt\pm t^{H+1/2}$ stand or fall with that assumption.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For $H<1/2$, an ensemble of internal-drift FLM particles shows a linear MSD at long times, so the process would be classified as ordinary diffusion if only the MSD is measured.
External drift leaves the MSD unchanged, so distinguishing drift from diffusion requires measuring the first moment rather than only the second.
A long-time kurtosis of 3 cannot be read as evidence of a Gaussian distribution, because the FLM PDF still carries non-Gaussian tails.
The central Gaussian region widens as $t^{H+1/2}$, so the probability mass in the non-Gaussian tails shrinks with time.
Internal drift breaks the PDF's symmetry about its mean, whereas external drift preserves it, making the two mechanisms distinguishable in a displacement histogram.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Equating $t^{2H}$ with $v^2t$ gives a crossover time $t\sim v^{-2/(1-2H)}$ at which the internal-drift MSD becomes effectively normal; the paper does not state this time scale explicitly.
Measuring skewness should cleanly separate the drift mechanisms: internal drift breaks left-right symmetry and should produce a nonzero third central moment, while external drift should not.
The same Gaussian-core/non-Gaussian-tail structure should appear in the increment statistics of the drifting process, with the lag time replacing $t$; this extension is not developed in the paper.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The short version: the moment calculations are right, the external-drift part is a clean Galilean shift, and the internal-drift MSD result (normal diffusion at long times for H < 1/2) is new and useful. The one load-bearing assumption is the Gaussian core Eq. (64), which is asserted rather than derived, but the stress-test note is right that a saddle-point expansion around s = t supplies the missing proof. So this is a paper with a presentation gap, not a detected mathematical error.

External drift acts as a trivial shift: PDF recentered, MSD unchanged, no surprises. Internal drift is the substance. The moment formulas (54), (55), (59), and (60) check out, and the kurtosis asymptotics agree with the simulations. The interesting picture is that the PDF has a central Gaussian region whose width grows as t^{H+1/2}, plus non-Gaussian tails that eventually do not affect the kurtosis. That is a genuinely useful observation for interpreting Brownian-yet-non-Gaussian data.

Soft spots, in proportion: Eq. (64) is assumed from moment information — the text literally says 'we can reasonably assume.' That is the weakest step. The authors should either derive it by Laplace/saddle-point around s = t, or state it as a conjecture with supporting numerics. The tail shape for internal drift is only worked out for H = 1/2; for other H they only assert non-Gaussianity. The simulations use N = 300 without error bars; for tail probabilities that is thin, though it is adequate for the central Gaussian and moments. The toy model in Sec. V is illustrative but not necessary. The relation to the same group's earlier SFBM-with-drift paper [41] could be clearer, but it is not a fatal omission.

The citation pattern is honest: the derivations build on prior FLM results [48,49] and standard special-function asymptotics. Nothing is fitted to data. This is a model paper, not an experimental breakthrough.

Who is this for? People working on anomalous diffusion, single-particle tracking, and hydrology/sediment transport models. It deserves a serious referee; a referee can ask for the derivation of Eq. (64) and larger ensembles with error bars. I would send it to review.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies fractional Laplace motion x(t)=B_H(s(t)) with a gamma subordinator, adding either an external drift acting on the composite process or an internal drift acting on the parent FBM. It derives exact moment formulas for the mean, MSD, fourth central moment, and kurtosis for both drift types, together with asymptotic PDF approximations based on Laplace's method. The central claims are that external drift only shifts the PDF and leaves the MSD unchanged, internal drift produces an additional linear-in-time contribution to the MSD so that normal diffusion dominates for H < 1/2, and in both cases the PDF develops a central Gaussian region with non-Gaussian tails while the kurtosis approaches the Gaussian value 3. Comparison with Monte Carlo simulations for H = 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 is presented.

Significance. If the derivations are completed, the results give a useful two-drift-mechanism extension of FLM and strengthen its connection to Brownian-yet-non-Gaussian dynamics. The moment formulas are exact and contain no fitted parameters: Eqs. (38) and (55) for the MSD, and Eqs. (58)-(60) for the kurtosis, are checkable and appear correct. The model makes a falsifiable prediction that internal drift converts subdiffusive FLM into normal diffusion at long times for H < 1/2. The main weakness is the unproved Gaussian-core assumption for internal drift, Eq. (64), which is exactly the point that needs attention before the PDF claims are fully supported.

major comments (2)

[Section IV, Eq. (64)] The central Gaussian form of the internal-drift PDF is assumed rather than derived. The sentence 'according to the statistical properties of the process at long times, we can reasonably assume that the central portion of the PDF follows the Gaussian distribution' introduces Eq. (64) without proof, yet this equation is the basis for the central-Gaussian-region claim, the boundary estimate x = vt ± t^{H+1/2}, and the statement that the non-Gaussian tails do not affect the kurtosis. This is a load-bearing gap, but it is fixable: a saddle-point expansion of the integral representation (51) using phi(s) from Eq. (61), expanded around s = t for (x - vt)/t -> 0, yields exp(-(x - vt)^2/[2(t^{2H} + v^2 t)]) with the stated variance. I request that this derivation be supplied, or that an equally rigorous argument be given, before the PDF conclusions are stated as results.
[Section IV, Eq. (63)] The non-Gaussian tail for internal drift is derived explicitly only in the H = 1/2 case, Eq. (63). For general H the paper asserts that the PDF outside the central region is non-Gaussian, but no corresponding asymptotic expression is given. The exact kurtosis computation does not require this tail shape, so this gap does not undermine the moment results; however, the abstract and Section IV make a general PDF-structure claim, so the authors should either provide the H-general tail asymptotic from Eq. (51) or explicitly restrict the tail claim to the H = 1/2 case.

minor comments (5)

[Figure captions] The cross-references in the figure captions are incorrect: Figs. 1 and 2 refer to 'MSD (1)' and 'Kurtosis (1)', but the relevant equations are (18) and (22); this makes the captions hard to follow.
[Section III, around Eq. (43)] Equation (43) is cited as 'Eq. (43))' with a stray parenthesis, and the displayed text 'the function phi(s) in Eq. (43))' should be cleaned up.
[Figure 3 caption] In the caption of Fig. 3(b), the internal-drift increment is written as x_Delta(t) = B_H(s + s_Delta) - B_H(s + s_Delta), which is self-canceling and must be a typo; it should presumably read B_H(s + s_Delta) - B_H(s) or an equivalent parent-process increment.
[Section IV, before Eq. (62)] The phrase 'This leads is to the implicit equation' should read 'This leads to the implicit equation'.
[Reproducibility] No data or code availability statement is included; adding one would improve reproducibility, especially for the simulation figures.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central results follow from exact subordination integrals and standard asymptotics; the only flagged weakness is Eq. (64), which is an explicit assumption rather than a derived input, but not a circular one.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against its own inputs. Free-FLM properties are either standard results reproduced from the subordination integral (6) or new exact moment identities; the drifted versions follow by inserting the conditional mean into the same integrals: Eq. (34) is the free PDF shifted by vt, Eq. (38) is the unchanged central second moment, and Eqs. (54)-(55) and (58)-(59) are exact gamma-function evaluations of the subordination moments. The long-time scalings (40) and (57) are asymptotics of those exact expressions, not fitted inputs, and the Laplace-method Gaussian/non-Gaussian tails (46), (49), (63) are derived from saddle-point analysis of the same integrals. The one passage that deserves note is Section IV, Eq. (64), where the text says "according to the statistical properties of the process at long times ... we can reasonably assume that the central portion of the PDF follows the Gaussian distribution"; this is an unproved ansatz rather than a derivation, but it is not circular because the variance appearing in it is taken from the independently computed MSD and the kurtosis statement does not depend on it. Self-citations (e.g., Refs. [41], [43]) are contextual and not used to force any result.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data. The central claim rests on the model definition, standard special-function asymptotics, one assumed Gaussian center for the internal-drift PDF, and an unverified simulation resolution for rare tails.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The FBM parent process and the gamma subordinator are independent, so the subordination integral Eq. (6) is valid.
Model definition in Section II; all subsequent PDFs and moments assume this independence.
standard math Stirling, gamma-function, H-function, and Laplace-method asymptotic expansions are valid in the stated regimes.
Used to derive Eqs. (45), (46), (48), (49), (63), and Appendix B; standard results from Refs. [74,86].
ad hoc to paper For internal drift, the central portion of the PDF is Gaussian with variance t^{2H} + v^2 t, as stated in Eq. (64).
Section IV after Eq. (63): 'we can reasonably assume...'. This premise underlies the Gaussian-core claim and the boundary estimate.
domain assumption Simulated FLM trajectories with T=100, dt=0.1, N=300 faithfully represent the PDF tails shown in Figs. 6, 7, and 10.
No error bars or convergence checks are reported, and N=300 cannot resolve empirical tails at 1e-5 to 1e-6.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Paradoxical non-Gaussian behavior in fractional Laplace motion with drift." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NIOJCI33

@misc{pith2026241214674,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Paradoxical non-Gaussian behavior in fractional Laplace motion with drift},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NIOJCI33}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14674}
}

abstract

We study fractional Laplace motion (FLM) obtained from subordination of fractional Brownian motion to a gamma process, in the presence of an external drift that acts on the composite process or of an internal drift acting solely on the parental process. We derive the statistical properties of this FLM process and find that the external drift does not influence the mean-squared displacement (MSD), whereas the internal drift leads to normal diffusion, dominating at long times in the subdiffusive Hurst exponent regime. We also investigate the intricate properties of the probability density function (PDF), demonstrating that it possesses a central Gaussian region, whose expansion in time is influenced by FBM's Hurst exponent. Outside of this region the PDF follows a non-Gaussian pattern. The kurtosis of this FLM process converges toward the Gaussian limit at long times insensitive to the extreme non-Gaussian tails. Additionally, in the presence of the external drift, the PDF remains symmetric and centered at $x=vt$. In contrast, for the internal drift this symmetry is broken. The results of our computer simulations are fully consistent with the theoretical predictions. The FLM model is suitable for describing stochastic processes with a non-Gaussian PDF and long-ranged correlations of the motion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14674 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Kurtosis ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Trajectories of (a) the subordinator gamma process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (8 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Second moment and (b) MSD for FLM with ex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Kurtosis for FLM with external drift [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Simulations (symbols) for the PDF of free FLM at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Second moment and (b) MSD for FLM with in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Simulations (symbols) for the PDF of FLM with ex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. Simulations and theoretical results, Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10. Simulations (symbols) for the PDF ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12. Modified Bessel function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

[41]

Krapf, N

D. Krapf, N. Lukat, E. Marinari, R. Metzler, G. Oshanin, C. Selhuber-Unkel, A. Squarcini, L. Stadler, M. Weiss, and X. Xu, Spectral content of a single non-Brownian trajectory, Phys. Rev. X 9, 011019 (2019)

work page 2019
[1]

H. Shen, L. J. Tauzin, R. Baiyasi, W. Wang, N. Moringo, B. Shuang, and C. F. Landes, Single particle tracking: from theory to biophysical applications, Chem. Rev. 117, 7331 (2017)

2017
[2]

Manzo and M

C. Manzo and M. F. Garcia-Parajo, A review of progress in single particle tracking: From methods to biophysical insights, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 124601 (2015)

2015
[3]

Jaqaman, D

K. Jaqaman, D. Loerke, M. Mettlen, H. Kuwata, S. Grinstein, S. L. Schmid, and G. Danuser, Robust single- particle tracking in live-cell time-lapse sequences, Nat. Meth. 5, 695 (2008)

2008
[4]

J.-H. Jeon, M. Javanainen, H. Martinez-Seara, R. Met- zler, and I. Vattulainen, Protein crowding in lipid bilay- ers gives rise to non-Gaussian anomalous lateral diﬀusion of phospholipids and proteins, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021006 (2016)

2016
[5]

Figure 9 displays the analytical results and simulations for the kurtosis for FLM with internal drift as a func- tion of time, based on Eq

when v = 0. Figure 9 displays the analytical results and simulations for the kurtosis for FLM with internal drift as a func- tion of time, based on Eq. ( 58), showing good agreement. Compared to FLM without drift shown in Fig. 2, the kur- tosis for FLM with internal drift displays larger values at shorter times and approaches the Gaussian value of κ = 3 m...
[6]

M. J. Skaug, L. Wang, Y. Ding, and D. K. Schwartz, Hindered nanoparticle diﬀusion and void accessibility in a three-dimensional porous medium, ACS Nano 9, 2148 (2015)

2015
[7]

F. Etoc, E. Balloul, C. Vicario, D. Normanno, D. Lioe, A. Sittner, J. Piehler, M. Dahan and M. Coppey, Nonspe- ciﬁc interactions govern cytosolic diﬀusion of nanosized objects in mammalian cells, Nat. Mater. 17, 740 (2018)

2018

Show all 103 references

[8]

Scott, M

S. Scott, M. Weiss, C. Selhuber-Unkel, Y. F. Barooji, A. Sabri, J. T. Erler, R. Metzler and L. B. Oddershede, Extracting, quantifying, and comparing dynamical and biomechanical properties of living matter through single particle tracking, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 1513 (2023)

2023
[9]

Weiss, M

M. Weiss, M. Elsner, F. Kartberg, and T. Nilsson, Anomalous subdiﬀusion is a measure for cytoplasmic 13 crowding in living cells, Biophys. J. 87, 3518 (2004)

2004
[10]

(34) 5 (a) 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 2.5 3 3.5 410-8 10-6 10-4 10-2 100 (b) 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 FIG

of free FLM, the PDF of FLM with external drift can be obtained as P (x, t ) = ∫ ∞ 0 st−H−1 √ 2π Γ( t) exp ( − (x − vt)2 2s2H − s ) ds = 1 2H √ 2π Γ( t) ×H 2, 0 0, 2 [ ( |x − vt|√ 2 ) 1/H ⏐ ⏐ ⏐ ⏐ (t − H, 1), (0, 1/ (2H)) ] . (34) 5 (a) 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 2.5 3 3.5 41...
[11]

I. Wong, M. Gardel, D. Reichman, E. Weeks, M. Valen- tine, A. Bausch, and D. Weitz, Anomalous diﬀusion probes microstructure dynamics of entangled F-actin net- works, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 178101 (2004)

2004
[12]

of the modiﬁed Bessel in Eq. ( 52). Unlike the PDF of FLM with external drift, which is symmetric and centered at x = vt, see Eq. ( 48), the non-Gaussian PDF of FLM with internal drift is not symmetric when v ⁄= 0, as shown in Fig. 10(a); and when v = 0 it is reduced to Eq. ( ...
[13]

J. Shin, A. G. Cherstvy, W. K. Kim, and R. Metzler, Facilitation of polymer looping and giant polymer dif- fusivity in crowded solutions of active particles, New J. Phys. 17, 113008 (2015)

2015
[14]

S. Yan, Y. Liang, and W. Xu, Characterization of chlo- ride ions diﬀusion in concrete using fractional Brownian motion run with power law clock, Fractals 30, 2250177 (2022)

2022
[15]

Yan and Y

S. Yan and Y. Liang, A space fractal derivative tempera- ture model in characterization of chloride ions superdiﬀu- sion in concrete in a marine environment, J. Build. Eng. 78, 107669 (2023)

2023
[16]

Rajyaguru, R

A. Rajyaguru, R. Metzler, I. Dror, D. Grolimund, and B. Berkowitz, Diﬀusion in porous rock is anomalous, Env. Sci. Technol. 58, 8946 (2024)

2024
[17]

Golding and E

I. Golding and E. C. Cox, Physical Nature of Bacterial Cytoplasm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 098102 (2006)

2006
[18]

P. G. Meyer, A. G. Cherstvy, H. Seckler, R. Hering, N. Blaum, F. Jeltsch, and R. Metzler, Directedness, corre- lations, and daily cycles in springbok motion: From data via stochastic models to movement prediction, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043129 (2023)

2023
[19]

Liang, Q

Y. Liang, Q. Y. Allen, W. Chen, R. G. Gatto, L. Colon- Perez, T. H. Mareci, and R. L. Magin, A fractal derivative model for the characterization of anomalous diﬀusion in magnetic resonance imaging, Commun. Nonl. Sci. 39, 529 (2016)

2016
[20]

Yu and Y

Y. Yu and Y. Liang, Fractal relaxation model with a non- linear diﬀusion coeﬃcient for ﬁtting anomalous diﬀusion data in magnetic resonance imaging, J. Magn. Reson. 355, 107558 (2023)

2023
[21]

Liang, S

Y. Liang, S. Yan, P. Tian, and W. Xu, Characteriza- tion of solute mixing in heterogeneous media by means of fractal dilution index, Transp. Porous Med. 148, 123 (2023)

2023
[22]

This equation cannot be solved exactly, except for the case H = 1 / 2, when the solution reads sm = 1 2 (t +√ t2 + 2x2)

for the process without drift. This equation cannot be solved exactly, except for the case H = 1 / 2, when the solution reads sm = 1 2 (t +√ t2 + 2x2). However, it is still possible to obtain an asymptotic solution under speciﬁc conditions. In Eq. ( 44), it is obvious that t/s...
[23]

E. W. Montroll and G. H. Weiss, Random walks on lat- tices. II, J. Math. Phys. 6, 167 (1965)

1965
[24]

N. E. Humphries et al., Environmental context explains Lévy and Brownian movement patterns of marine preda- tors, Nature 465, 1066 (2010)

2010
[25]

J. H. Schulz, E. Barkai, and R. Metzler, Aging renewal theory and application to random walks, Phys. Rev. X 4, 011028 (2014)

2014
[26]

Y. E. Litvinenko, H. Fichtner, and D. Walter, Anomalous transport of cosmic rays in a nonlinear diﬀusion model, Astrophys. J. 841, 57 (2017)

2017
[27]

J. F. Reverey, J.-H. Jeon, H. Bao, M. Leippe, R. Metzler, and C. Selhuber-Unkel, Superdiﬀusion dominates intra- cellular particle motion in the supercrowded cytoplasm of pathogenic Acanthamoeba castellanii. Sci. Rep. 5, 11690 (2017)

2017
[28]

A. N. Kolmogorov, Wienersche Spiralen und einige an- dere interessante Kurven im Hilbertschen Raum, C. R. (doklady), Acad. Sci. URSS (NS) 26, 115 (1940)

1940
[29]

Liang, Z

Y. Liang, Z. Dou, L. Wu, and Z. Zhou, Fast mixing in heterogeneous media characterized by fractional deriva- tive model, Transp. Porous Med. 134, 387 (2020)

2020
[30]

Scher and E

H. Scher and E. W. Montroll, Anomalous transit-time dispersion in amorphous solids, Phys. Rev. B 12, 2455 (1975)

1975
[31]

Mura and G

A. Mura and G. Pagnini, Characterizations and simula- tions of a class of stochastic processes to model anoma- lous diﬀusion, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 285003 (2008)

2008
[32]

J.-H. Jeon, V. Tejedor, S. Burov, E. Barkai, C. Selhuber- Unkel, K. Berg-Sørensen, L. Oddershede, and R. Metzler, In vivo anomalous diﬀusion and weak ergodicity breaking of lipid granules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 048103 (2011)

2011
[33]

Metzler, J.-H

R. Metzler, J.-H. Jeon, A. G. Cherstvy, and E. Barkai, Anomalous diﬀusion models and their properties: Non- stationarity, non-ergodicity, and ageing at the centenary of single particle tracking, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 24128 (2014)

2014
[34]

W. Wang, R. Metzler, and A. G. Cherstvy, Anoma- lous diﬀusion, aging, and nonergodicity of scaled Brow- nian motion with fractional Gaussian noise: Overview of related experimental observations and models, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 18482 (2022)

2022
[35]

Janušonis, N

S. Janušonis, N. Detering, R. Metzler, and T. Vojta, Serotonergic axons as fractional Brownian motion paths: Insights into the self-organization of regional densities , Front. Comput. Neurosci. 14, 56 (2020)

2020
[36]

B. B. Mandelbrot and J. W. van Ness, Fractional Brow- nian motions, fractional noises and applications, SIAM Rev. 10, 422 (1968)

1968
[37]

The external drift results i n ballistic motion in the second moment at long times and has no impact on the MSD

and ( 38) nicely match the simulations results. The external drift results i n ballistic motion in the second moment at long times and has no impact on the MSD. 10-1 100 101 102 t 100 101 102 Kurtosis Simulation (H = 0.2) Theory (H = 0.2) Simulation (H = 0.5) Theory (H = 0.5) ...
[38]

Sabri, X

A. Sabri, X. Xu, D. Krapf, and M. Weiss, Elucidating the origin of heterogeneous anomalous diﬀusion in the cyto- plasm of mammalian cells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 058101 (2020)

2020
[39]

As the external drift has no eﬀect on the central mo- ments, the kurtosis κ of FLM with external drift has the same form as unbiased FLM, as given in Eq

which dominates at long times, while the external drift is subtracted out in the MSD ( 40). As the external drift has no eﬀect on the central mo- ments, the kurtosis κ of FLM with external drift has the same form as unbiased FLM, as given in Eq. ( 22). Fig- ure 5 shows simulat...
[40]

J.-H. Jeon, H. Martinez-Seara Monne, M. Javanainen, and R. Metzler, Anomalous diﬀusion of phospholipids and cholesterols in a lipid bilayer and its origins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 188103 (2012)

2012
[42]

W. Wang, A. G. Cherstvy, X. Liu, and R. Metzler, Anomalous diﬀusion and nonergodicity for heterogeneous diﬀusion processes with fractional Gaussian noise, Phys. Rev. E 102, 012146 (2020)

2020
[43]

Di Pierro, D

M. Di Pierro, D. A. Potoyan, P. G. Wolynes, and J. N. Onuchic, Anomalous diﬀusion, spatial coherence, and viscoelasticity from the energy landscape of human chro- mosomes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 7753 (2018)

2018
[44]

C. Ayaz, L. Tepper, F. N. Brünig, J. Kappler, J. O. Daldrop, and R. R. Netz, Non-Markovian modeling of protein folding, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2023856118 (2021)

2021
[45]

N. A. Bustos, C. M. Saad-Roy, A. G. Cherstvy, and C. E. Wagner, Distributed medium viscosity yields quasi- exponential step-size probability distributions in heter o- geneous media, Soft Matter 18, 8572 (2022)

2022
[46]

C. E. Wagner, M. Krupkin, K. B. Smith-Dupont, Ch. M. Wu, N. A. Bustos, J. Witten, and K. Ribbeck, Compar- ison of physicochemical properties of native mucus and reconstituted mucin gels, Biomacromol. 24, 628 (2023)

2023
[47]

Z. R. Fox, E. Barkai, and D. Krapf, Aging power spec- trum of membrane protein transport and other subordi- nated random walks, Nat. Commun. 12, 6162 (2021)

2021
[48]

Liang, W

Y. Liang, W. Wang, and R. Metzler, Anomalous dif- fusion, non-Gaussianity, and nonergodicity for subordi- nated fractional Brownian motion with a drift, Phys. Rev. E 108, 024143 (2023)

2023
[49]

M. M. Meerschaert, T. J. Kozubowski, F. J. Molz, and S. Lu, Fractional Laplace model for hydraulic conductivity, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L08501 (2004)

2004
[50]

Liang, W

Y. Liang, W. Wang, R. Metzler, and A. G. Cherstvy, Anomalous diﬀusion, nonergodicity, non-Gaussianity, and aging of fractional Brownian motion with nonlinear 14 clocks, Phys. Rev. E 108, 034113 (2023)

2023
[51]

W. Wang, F. Seno, I. M. Sokolov, A.V. Chechkin, R. Metzler, Unexpected crossovers in correlated random dif- fusivity processes, New J. Phys. 2222, 083041 (2020)

2020
[52]

Pacheco-Pozo and D

A. Pacheco-Pozo and D. Krapf, Fractional Brownian mo- tion with ﬂuctuating diﬀusivities, Phys. Rev. E 110, 014105 (2024)

2024
[53]

D. Han, N. Korabel, R. Chen, M. Johnston, A.Gavrilova, V. J. Allan, S. Fedotov, and T. A. Waigh, Decipher- ing anomalous heterogeneous intracellular transport with neural networks, elife 9, e52224 (2020)

2020
[54]

Balcerek, K

M. Balcerek, K. Burnecki, S. Thapa, A. Wyłomańska, and A. Chechkin, Fractional Brownian motion with ran- dom Hurst exponent: Accelerating diﬀusion and persis- tence transitions, Chaos 32, 093114 (2022)

2022
[55]

T. J. Kozubowski, M. M. Meerschaert, and K. Podgorski, Fractional Laplace motion. Adv. Appl. Probab. 38, 451 (2006)

2006
[56]

Bochner, Subordination of non-Gaussian stochastic processes, Proc

S. Bochner, Subordination of non-Gaussian stochastic processes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 48, 19 (1962)

1962
[57]

Ganti, A

V. Ganti, A. Singh, P. Passalacqua, E. Foufoula- Georgiou, Subordinated Brownian motion model for sed- iment transport, Phys. Rev. E 80, 011111 (2009)

2009
[58]

Gajda, A

J. Gajda, A. Wyłomańska, and A. Kumar, Generalized fractional Laplace motion, Stat. Probabil. Lett. 124, 101 (2017)

2017
[59]

J. M. van Noortwijk, A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 94, 2 (2009)

2009
[60]

Lawless and M

J. Lawless and M. Crowder, Covariates and random ef- fects in a gamma process model with application to degradation and failure, Lifetime Data Anal. 10, 213 (2004)

2004
[61]

This leads is to the implicit equation t sn + Hx 2 s2H+1n + (1 − 2H)vx s2Hn + (H − 1)v2 s2H−1n = 1

assumes a minimum at s = sn, where φ ′(sn) = 0 . This leads is to the implicit equation t sn + Hx 2 s2H+1n + (1 − 2H)vx s2Hn + (H − 1)v2 s2H−1n = 1. (62) This relation can be solved exactly when H = 1 / 2, with the solution sn = ( t + √ t2 + (2 + v2)x2) / (2 + v2). In addition...
[62]

D. B. Madan, P. P. Carr, and E. C. Chang, The variance gamma process and option pricing, Rev. Financ. 2, 79 (1998)

1998
[63]

T. B. Mitchell, A method of estimating the approximate yield of multiple dams using the Moran model, J. Hydrol. 37, 67 (1978)

1978
[64]

F. J. Molz, T. J. Kozubowski, K. Podgórski, and J. W. Castle, A generalization of the fractal/facies model, Hy- drogeol. J. 15, 809 (2007)

2007
[65]

F. J. Molz and P. D. Hyden, A new type of stochastic fractal for application in subsurface hydrology, Geoderma 134, 274 (2006)

2006
[66]

Kubala, M

P. Kubala, M. Cieśla, and B. Dybiec, Diﬀusion in crowded environments: Trapped by the drift, Phys. Rev. E 104, 044127 (2021)

2021
[67]

Krasowska, A

M. Krasowska, A. Strzelewicz, G. Dudek, and M. Cieśla, Numerical study of drift inﬂuence on diﬀusion trans- port through the hybrid membrane, Membranes 12 788 (2022)

2022
[68]

Compte, R

A. Compte, R. Metzler, and J. Camacho, Biased contin- uous time random walks between parallel plates, Phys. Rev. E 56, 1445 (1997)

1997
[69]

Metzler, J

R. Metzler, J. Klafter, and I. M. Sokolov, Anomalous transport in external ﬁelds: Continuous time random walks and fractional diﬀusion equations extended, Phys. Rev. E 58, 1621 (1998)

1998
[70]

A. I. Rudenko and V. I. Arkhipov, Trap-controlled tran- sient current injection in amorphous materials, J. Non- Cryst. Solids 30, 163-189 (1978)

1978
[71]

Z. Xiao, D. Yang, Y. Yuan, B. Yang, and X Liu, Fractal pore network simulation on the drying of porous media, Dry. Technol. 26, 651-665 (2008)

2008
[72]

Yarmola, P

E. Yarmola, P. P. Calabrese, A. Chrambach, and G. H. Weiss, Interaction with the matrix: the dominant factor in macromolecular band spreading in gel electrophoresis, J. Phys. Chem. B, 101, 2381-2387 (1997)

1997
[73]

Redner, J

S. Redner, J. Koplik, and D. Wilkinson, Hydrodynamic dispersion in a self-similar geometry, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 20, 1543 (1987)

1987
[74]

Mishura, Stochastic calculus for fractional Brownian motion and related processes, Lecture notes in mathe- matics 1929 (Springer, Berlin 2008)

Y. Mishura, Stochastic calculus for fractional Brownian motion and related processes, Lecture notes in mathe- matics 1929 (Springer, Berlin 2008)

1929
[75]

Y. Chen, X. Wang, and W. Deng, Subdiﬀusion in an external force ﬁeld, Phys. Rev. E 99, 042125 (2019)

2019
[76]

Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications (Wiley, New York, 1971)

W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications (Wiley, New York, 1971)

1971
[77]

H. C. Fogedby, Langevin equations for continuous time Lévy ﬂights Phys. Rev. E 50, 1657 (1994)

1994
[78]

Barkai, Fractional Fokker-Planck equation, solution, and application, Phys

E. Barkai, Fractional Fokker-Planck equation, solution, and application, Phys. Rev. E 63, 046118 (2001)

2001
[79]

Gorenﬂo and F

R. Gorenﬂo and F. Mainardi, Parametric subordination in fractional diﬀusion processes, in Fractional Dynamics, Recent Advances, edited by S. C. Lim, J. Klafter, and R. Metzler (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 2012), Ch. 10, pp. 229-263

2012
[80]

A. V. Chechkin and I. M. Sokolov, Relation between gen- eralized diﬀusion equations and subordination schemes, Phys. Rev. E 103, 032133 (2021)

2021
[81]

A. M. Mathai, R. K. Saxena, and H. J. Haubold, The H-Function: Theory and Applications (Springer, Berlin 2009)

2009
[82]

K. A. Penson and K. Górska, Exact and explicit prob- ability densities for one-sided Lévy stable distributions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 210604 (2010)

2010
[83]

M. V. Chubynsky and G. W. Slater, Diﬀusing diﬀusivity: a model for anomalous, yet Brownian, diﬀusion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 098302 (2014)

2014
[84]

A. V. Chechkin, F. Seno, R. Metzler, and I. M. Sokolov, Brownian yet Non-Gaussian Diﬀusion: From Superstatis- tics to Subordination of Diﬀusing Diﬀusivities, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021002 (2017)

2017
[85]

Jain and K

R. Jain and K. L. Sebastian, Diﬀusion in a Crowded, Rearranging Environment, J. Phys. Chem. B 120, 3988 (2016)

2016
[86]

B. Wang, J. Kuo, S. C. Bae, and S. Granick, When Brownian diﬀusion is not Gaussian, Nat. Mater. 11, 481 (2012)

2012
[87]

B. Wang, S. M. Anthony, S. C. Bae, and S. Granick, Anomalous yet Brownian, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 15160 (2009)

2009
[88]

J. M. Miotto, S. Pigolotti, A. V. Chechkin, and S. Roldán-VargasLength, Length scales in Brownian yet non-Gaussian dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031002 (2021)

2021
[89]

Rusciano, R

F. Rusciano, R. Pastore, and F. Greco, Fickian Non- Gaussian diﬀusion in glass-forming liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 168001 (2022)

2022
[90]

Jeon and R

J.-H. Jeon and R. Metzler, Fractional Brownian motion and motion governed by the fractional Langevin equation in conﬁned geometries, Phys. Rev. E 81, 021103 (2010)

2010
[91]

W. Wang, A. G. Cherstvy, H. Kantz, R. Metzler, and I. M. Sokolov, Time averaging and emerging nonergodicity upon resetting of fractional Brownian motion and het- 15 erogeneous diﬀusion processes, Phys. Rev. E 104, 024105 (2021)

2021
[92]

A. P. Prudnikov, and O. I. Marichev, Integrals and Se- ries: More special functions (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1986)

1986
[93]

Abramowitz and I

M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Math- ematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathe- matical Tables (Dover, New York, 1972)

1972
[94]

A. A. Kilbas, and M. Saigo. H-transforms: Theory and Applications (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2004)

2004
[95]

A. A. Kilbas, and M. Saigo. On the H-function, J. Appl. Math. Stoch. Anal. 12, 191 (1999)

1999
[96]

A. G. Cherstvy, O. Nagel, C. Beta, and R. Metzler, Non- Gaussianity, population heterogeneity, and transient su- perdiﬀusion in the spreading dynamics of amoeboid cells, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 23034 (2018)

2018
[97]

Großmann, L

R. Großmann, L. S. Bort, T. Moldenhawer, M. Stange, S. S. Panah, R. Metzler, and C. Beta, Non-Gaussian dis- placements in active transport on a carpet of motile cells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 088301 (2024)

2024
[98]

D. Wang, R. Hu, M. J. Skaug, and D. K. Schwartz, Tem- porally anticorrelated motion of nanoparticles at a liquid interface, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 54, (2014)

2014
[99]

K. C. Leptos, J. S. Guasto, J. P. Gollub, A. I. Pesci, and R. E. Goldstein, Dynamics of Enhanced Tracer Diﬀusion in Suspensions of Swimming Eukaryotic Microorganisms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 198103 (2009)

2009
[100]

Oberhettinger, Tables of Mellin transforms (Springer, Berlin, 2012)

F. Oberhettinger, Tables of Mellin transforms (Springer, Berlin, 2012)

2012
[101]

N. G. Van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry (Elsevier,1992)

1992
[102]

Chechkina, V

A. Chechkina, V. Gonchar, J. Klafter, R. Metzler, and L. Tanatarova, Stationary states of non-linear oscillator s driven by Lévy noise, Chem. Phys. 284, 233 (2002)

2002
[103]

S. Eule, V. Zaburdaev, R. Friedrich, and T. Geisel, Langevin description of superdiﬀusive Lévy processes, Phys. Rev. E 86, 041134 (2012)

2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [41]

Krapf, N

D. Krapf, N. Lukat, E. Marinari, R. Metzler, G. Oshanin, C. Selhuber-Unkel, A. Squarcini, L. Stadler, M. Weiss, and X. Xu, Spectral content of a single non-Brownian trajectory, Phys. Rev. X 9, 011019 (2019)

work page 2019

[2] [1]

H. Shen, L. J. Tauzin, R. Baiyasi, W. Wang, N. Moringo, B. Shuang, and C. F. Landes, Single particle tracking: from theory to biophysical applications, Chem. Rev. 117, 7331 (2017)

2017

[3] [2]

Manzo and M

C. Manzo and M. F. Garcia-Parajo, A review of progress in single particle tracking: From methods to biophysical insights, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 124601 (2015)

2015

[4] [3]

Jaqaman, D

K. Jaqaman, D. Loerke, M. Mettlen, H. Kuwata, S. Grinstein, S. L. Schmid, and G. Danuser, Robust single- particle tracking in live-cell time-lapse sequences, Nat. Meth. 5, 695 (2008)

2008

[5] [4]

J.-H. Jeon, M. Javanainen, H. Martinez-Seara, R. Met- zler, and I. Vattulainen, Protein crowding in lipid bilay- ers gives rise to non-Gaussian anomalous lateral diﬀusion of phospholipids and proteins, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021006 (2016)

2016

[6] [5]

Figure 9 displays the analytical results and simulations for the kurtosis for FLM with internal drift as a func- tion of time, based on Eq

when v = 0. Figure 9 displays the analytical results and simulations for the kurtosis for FLM with internal drift as a func- tion of time, based on Eq. ( 58), showing good agreement. Compared to FLM without drift shown in Fig. 2, the kur- tosis for FLM with internal drift displays larger values at shorter times and approaches the Gaussian value of κ = 3 m...

[7] [6]

M. J. Skaug, L. Wang, Y. Ding, and D. K. Schwartz, Hindered nanoparticle diﬀusion and void accessibility in a three-dimensional porous medium, ACS Nano 9, 2148 (2015)

2015

[8] [7]

F. Etoc, E. Balloul, C. Vicario, D. Normanno, D. Lioe, A. Sittner, J. Piehler, M. Dahan and M. Coppey, Nonspe- ciﬁc interactions govern cytosolic diﬀusion of nanosized objects in mammalian cells, Nat. Mater. 17, 740 (2018)

2018