A Concise Primer on Solid-State Quantum Emitters

Liang Zhai; Shicheng Yu; Xia Lei; Xiaojie Zhang

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 244 references

A Concise Primer on Solid-State Quantum Emitters

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review argues that epitaxial quantum dots, diamond defect centres, and silicon-carbide defect centres are the three leading solid-state quantum emitter platforms, and that a common metric set, summarised in Table I, shows a clear…

desk verdict A competent, well-organized review whose comparative table mixes incommensurable metrics; worth refereeing after the table is fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06684 v1 pith:NL6SZO7M submitted 2025-06-07 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics

Shicheng Yu , Xiaojie Zhang , Xia Lei , Liang Zhai This is my paper

classification quant-phcond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics

keywords quantumemitterssolid-statedotsdiamonddefectcentressiliconcarbidesingle-photonsourcesspin-photoninterfacenetworkszero-phononline

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a compact review that assembles three solid-state quantum emitter platforms—epitaxial quantum dots, defect centres in diamond, and defect centres in silicon carbide—and measures them against one set of quantum-optical criteria. Its working claim is that a fair comparison can be made using standard metrics: single-photon purity from Hanbury Brown–Twiss measurements, indistinguishability from Hong–Ou–Mandel interference, entanglement fidelity from state tomography, spin coherence from Ramsey and Hahn-echo sequences, plus brightness, zero-phonon-line fraction, and integration readiness. Read this way, quantum dots are the photonic workhorses, with near-unity purity, about 98% indistinguishability, and 71% end-to-end collection efficiency, but they carry limited spin coherence. Diamond and SiC defects are the spin-memory platforms, with NV centres reaching about one second of coherence under dynamical decoupling and SiC divacancies beyond five seconds, while their photons suffer large phonon sidebands and need filtering. The paper's contribution is an up-to-date, side-by-side map of what each platform can do today and where its bottleneck is.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is Table I, a cross-platform scorecard built from a standard metric set: $g^{(2)}(0)$ from Hanbury Brown–Twiss experiments, Hong–Ou–Mandel visibility, entanglement fidelity from tomography or witnesses, $T_2^*$ and $T_2$ from Ramsey and Hahn-echo sequences, zero-phonon-line fraction and linewidth, and collection efficiency. The table is the mechanism of the argument because it forces otherwise incommensurable experimental reports onto a shared scale, while the surrounding text records the conditions under which each number was obtained.

What would settle it

Run a head-to-head experiment in a single laboratory that measures, for one epitaxial quantum dot, one NV centre, and one silicon-vacancy centre in SiC under identical excitation, spectral filtering, and readout conditions, recording unfiltered Hong–Ou–Mandel visibility, zero-phonon-line fraction, and Hahn-echo $T_2$. If the observed ordering does not reproduce Table I—quantum dots near 98% indistinguishability without filtering, diamond and SiC needing narrow filtering to approach 90%, and spin coherence times separated by orders of magnitude—then the comparative claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central assertion is synthetic: if the three platforms are lined up by the same metrics, no material wins on every row. Epitaxial quantum dots deliver bright, fast, coherent photons on demand—single-photon purity above 99%, unfiltered indistinguishability around 98%, entangled-photon fidelity around 98%, and an end-to-end efficiency of 71.2%—but their electron-spin coherence is limited to the microsecond-to-sub-millisecond range by the surrounding nuclear-spin bath. Defect centres in diamond, especially NV centres, offer the longest spin coherence of the three, with room-temperature Ramsey $T_2^*$ beyond 1.5 ms and dynamical-decoupling $T_2$ around 1 s, while their photonic output is handicapped by a zero-phonon-line fraction of only about 3%. Defect centres in silicon carbide split the difference, with telecom-adjacent wavelengths, $T_2$ times beyond 5 s for divacancies, and spin-photon entanglement at 76% fidelity, but they are less developed as integrated devices. The comparison implies that the right platform depends on the application, and that the open engineering tasks are hybrid integration, cavity enhancement of the zero-phonon line, and wavelength conversion.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison assumes that performance figures reported by different research groups under different conditions—cryogenic versus room temperature, single defect versus ensemble, filtered versus unfiltered emission, different pulse and readout protocols—can be read directly against each other in one table.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the comparison is right, quantum dots are the near-term choice for deterministic photonic resource states: their 71.2% end-to-end single-photon efficiency already clears the loss-tolerant threshold for linear-optics quantum computing, and their few-photon cluster states feed fusion-based protocols.
Diamond NV and SiC defect centres are the practical route to long-distance quantum networks, because their electron and nuclear spin memories support demonstrated multi-node entanglement, quantum teleportation, and entanglement distillation, despite the need for spectral filtering and telecom conversion.
Silicon carbide, through wafer-scale silicon-carbide-on-insulator integration, is the platform most likely to combine spin-photon interfaces with CMOS-compatible nanophotonics, once its emitters are coupled to high-quality cavities.
No single platform satisfies all requirements, so near-term quantum devices will combine emitters with external quantum memories, frequency converters, and heterogeneous photonic integration.
The paper's metric table gives a working benchmark: any new emitter platform can be positioned against these three by reporting the same rows rather than a single headline number.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the headline numbers come from different groups and different measurement conditions, a single controlled head-to-head benchmark could reorder the table; this is an open test rather than a settled fact.
The same metric set could be applied to the emerging platforms the paper sets aside—defects in silicon, hexagonal boron nitride, transition-metal dichalcogenides, and rare-earth ions—making the primer a template rather than a closed list.
If quantum-dot spin coherence were extended beyond the current sub-millisecond ceiling by suppressing the nuclear-spin bath, the quantum-dot platform would begin to compete with defect centres for memory applications, changing the paper's central trade-off.
The review's observation that all three platforms face a photonic bottleneck suggests a testable design rule: pair each emitter with a cavity that suppresses its phonon sideband, or choose a host material without one, rather than searching for a single ideal emitter.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a competent review of three solid-state emitter platforms, and the literature synthesis is accurate enough that I'd trust it as an entry point. The main problem is Table I and the Section V ranking built on it: the table mixes apples and oranges. QD brightness is given as an end-to-end collection efficiency (71%) under pulsed resonant excitation, while diamond and SiC brightness are absolute CW saturated count rates in kHz. Those are different physical quantities, and the table gives no error bars or measurement conditions. Same for indistinguishability: the QD number is unfiltered, the diamond and SiC numbers are with narrow spectral filtering or temporal gating, which inflates visibility. The prose sometimes acknowledges these caveats (e.g., the scan-duration remark in III.B, the filtering discussion in III.B), but Table I and the conclusion do not. A reader using the table for the advertised cross-platform comparison will be misled.

What the paper does well: it is clearly organized, the metrics section is sensible, and the platform sections give a balanced view of fabrication, level structure, optical properties, spin coherence, and integration. Spot-checks of quoted numbers (NV zero-field splitting, SiV splittings, QD indistinguishability, T2 times) match the primary literature. The discussion of applications is reasonably current, and the authors are honest about limitations, e.g., that diamond defects emit outside telecom and that spectral filtering costs photons. Self-citation is present but not abusive; the cited own papers are published experimental results.

Soft spots beyond the table: some cited items are arXiv preprints, which is acceptable in a review but should be flagged. The review is not novel by design—it's a primer—so significance is capped. Also, the comparison section occasionally overreaches: 'less bright' is too casual a conclusion when the underlying numbers aren't commensurable. But the broad qualitative conclusion (QDs bright and fast with short spin coherence; defects long spin coherence with lower photon coherence) is supported by the literature and likely correct.

Who is this for: graduate students and researchers entering the field who want a structured overview. It does not replace the primary literature but serves as a reasonable map. It deserves a serious referee as a review article, with the condition that Table I be reworked to use comparable metrics or explicitly state the lack of comparability.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This review provides an accessible introduction to solid-state quantum emitters, focusing on three platforms: epitaxial quantum dots, defect centres in diamond, and defect centres in silicon carbide. It first lists and explains the key performance metrics (radiative rate, linewidth, quantum efficiency, purity, indistinguishability, entanglement fidelity, brightness, light-matter interface, scalability) and then devotes a section to each platform, covering fabrication, level structure, optical and spin properties, and integration into photonic devices. Applications in quantum key distribution, quantum networks, quantum computation, and sensing are summarized, and a comparative table (Table I) is provided in the conclusion, followed by an outlook. The manuscript is a literature survey, not a new derivation; its contribution is the up-to-date synthesis of results across these platforms.

Significance. If the cross-platform comparison is made reliable, this primer would serve as a valuable entry point for researchers entering the field and as a compact reference for experts. It collects many recent results (e.g., 71% end-to-end efficiency for QD sources, 5 s spin coherence in SiC, telecom-band QKD demonstrations) and organizes them around clear metrics. The review is not burdened by heavy formalism and is generally accurate in its spot-checked statements. However, the main comparative table (Table I) currently compares non-commensurable quantities, which undermines the paper's central claim of providing a cross-platform comparison. Addressing this issue is essential before the paper can be recommended for publication.

major comments (2)

[Table I, Brightness and Indistinguishability rows] The Brightness row is not commensurable across platforms: the QD entry is a dimensionless end-to-end single-photon collection efficiency (71% [86]) measured under pulsed resonant excitation, whereas the diamond and SiC entries are absolute saturated count rates in kHz recorded under continuous-wave excitation [28, 147, 182, 184]. An absolute count rate depends on pump power, collection optics, detector efficiency, and integration time, so it cannot be compared with a per-pulse efficiency. Similarly, the Indistinguishability row mixes values obtained without spectral or temporal filtering for QDs (98% [10]) with values obtained after narrow filtering or temporal gating for diamond and SiC (90% [144, 145] and 90% [183]). Filtering removes photons and can inflate the measured visibility. Section V draws conclusions directly from this table, for example that QDs are 'coherent, bright, and on demand' while defect centres are 'less bright'. Please revise the table to use a common metric for brightness, or clearly label the differing definitions, and add explicit caveats about filtering to the indistinguishability entries and to the concluding ranking.
[Table I, Spin coherence rows] The T2 and T2* entries are measured under different decoupling protocols (Hahn echo vs dynamical decoupling), at different temperatures (room temperature, 4 K, 100 mK), and to a variable extent for single defects versus ensembles. For example, the QD T2 of 0.11 ms is obtained under dynamical decoupling [89], the NV T2 of ~1 s is also under dynamical decoupling [154], but the SiC V1 T2 of ~1 ms is from a Hahn echo [32, 173, 187]. The table does not indicate these conditions, so a reader cannot determine whether the reported differences reflect physical properties or measurement protocols. Please add protocol and temperature notes to each entry, or restructure the table so that values obtained under similar conditions are grouped.

minor comments (6)

[Section III.B] The statement 'approximately radiating at a rate of 2π×(13,90,28,32) MHz' is confusing and, as written, incorrect. The numbers 13, 90, 28, 32 MHz are the transform-limited linewidths for NV, SiV, GeV, and SnV respectively, not the radiative rates themselves (which are roughly the inverse lifetimes, e.g., ~80 MHz for NV). Please correct the sentence and clarify whether the quoted values are rates or linewidths.
[Section III.C] The V1 linewidth is described as 'about twice its inverse lifetime'; since the lifetime is 5.5 ns, the inverse lifetime is ~182 MHz, while the measured 60 MHz is about twice the transform limit (~29 MHz). Please correct this wording.
[Section III.C heading] The heading 'Opticlal Properties' contains a typo and should read 'Optical Properties'.
[Section II] In the bullet list, the phrase 'TheZPL portionwithin the emission spectrum' has spacing errors; please add spaces and check the formatting of similar inline equations.
[Section V] The text refers to 'vertical n-i-p diodes', while earlier sections use 'p-i-n diode'; please standardize the terminology.
[Figure 3] The labels 'ms = ±3/2' etc. would be clearer with proper subscripts (e.g., m_s) and a definition in the caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a literature survey that reports externally measured emitter metrics and offers no derivation that reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

This manuscript is a review, not a derivation. It introduces standard metrics (g(2)(0), HOM visibility, T2, fidelity), summarizes three emitter platforms, and compares them in Table I. No equation is derived from an input that is then renamed as a prediction. The authors' self-citations (Refs. 8, 10, 13, 41, 45, 238) support specific factual statements about GaAs and InGaAs quantum dots; these are primary experimental papers reporting measurements, and citing them is normal scholarly attribution rather than a circular step. There is no fitted parameter, no uniqueness theorem invoked from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz smuggled in via self-citation. The comparative claims in Table I may face a comparability caveat because brightness and indistinguishability are measured under different conditions across platforms, but the paper itself flags some of these issues (e.g., the scan-duration remark in Section III.B and the filtering/erasure caveat in Section V). Such caveats concern measurement commensurability and correctness risk, not circularity under the stated criteria. The strongest claim is simply that the review provides an accurate, current overview backed by the cited literature, which is exactly what the manuscript does; therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. It relies on two domain assumptions: that the chosen metrics are the right ones for comparison, and that scattered literature values are comparable across setups. These are standard but unstated simplifications.

assumptions (2)

domain assumption The metrics listed in Section II (g(2)(0), HOM visibility, entanglement fidelity, brightness, spin coherence times) are the relevant figures of merit for comparing quantum emitters.
The review builds its platform comparison on these metrics without justifying the choice against alternative characterizations; however, these metrics are standard in the field.
domain assumption Experimental results from different groups, samples, and setups (cryogenic vs room temperature, single defects vs ensembles, different pulse schemes) can be meaningfully compared in Table I.
The comparative table treats reported T2 and indistinguishability values as directly comparable platform properties, which is a simplification given protocol differences.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Concise Primer on Solid-State Quantum Emitters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NL6SZO7M

@misc{pith2026250606684,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Concise Primer on Solid-State Quantum Emitters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NL6SZO7M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06684}
}

read the original abstract

Quantum emitters serve as essential on-demand photonic resources, generating quantum states of light such as single photons and entangled photon pairs while serving as interfaces between light and matter. Buried in the solid state, quantum emitters enable a straightforward adoption of advanced nanofabrication techniques, facilitating precise engineering of their photonic environment for scalable quantum technologies. In this review, we introduce the fundamentals of quantum emitters and the key metrics characterising their performance. We highlight three material platforms: quantum dots, defect centres in diamond, and defect centres in silicon carbide. We summarise the recent developments of these platforms and discuss their advancements in quantum applications, including quantum communication, computation, and sensing. Finally, we provide a comparison across the three platforms, along with an outlook on future directions and potential challenges.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.06684 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** FIG. 1. An overview of quantum emitters, encompassing material platforms, quantum photonic resource generation, potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

244 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

[86]

Ding, X.et al.High-efficiency single-photon source above the loss-tolerant threshold for efficient linear opti- cal quantum computing.Nature Photonics1–5 (2025)

2025
[10]

Zhai, L.et al.Quantum interference of identical photons from remote GaAs quantum dots.Nature Nanotechnol- ogy17, 829–833 (2022)

2022
[183]

Morioka, N.et al.Spin-controlled generation of indis- tinguishable and distinguishable photons from silicon vacancy centres in silicon carbide.Nature Communica- tions11, 2516 (2020)

work page 2020
[89]

Zaporski, L.et al.Ideal refocusing of an optically active spin qubit under strong hyperfine interactions.Nature Nanotechnology18, 257–263 (2023)

2023
[154]

H.et al.One-second coherence for a sin- gle electron spin coupled to a multi-qubit nuclear-spin environment.Nature Communications9, 2552 (2018)

Abobeih, M. H.et al.One-second coherence for a sin- gle electron spin coupled to a multi-qubit nuclear-spin environment.Nature Communications9, 2552 (2018)

2018
[1]

C., Kuhn, A

Wilk, T., Webster, S. C., Kuhn, A. & Rempe, G. Single- atom single-photon quantum interface.Science317, 488–490 (2007)

2007
[2]

& Rempe, G

Pinkse, P., Fischer, T., Maunz, P. & Rempe, G. Trap- ping an atom with single photons.Nature404, 365–368 (2000)

2000
[3]

& DeMille, D

Barry, J., McCarron, D., Norrgard, E., Steinecker, M. & DeMille, D. Magneto-optical trapping of a diatomic molecule.Nature512, 286–289 (2014)

2014

Show all 244 references

[4]

& Stobbe, S

Lodahl, P., Mahmoodian, S. & Stobbe, S. Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures.Reviews of Modern Physics87, 347 (2015)

2015
[5]

& Toth, M

Aharonovich, I., Englund, D. & Toth, M. Solid-state single-photon emitters.Nature Photonics10, 631–641 (2016)

2016
[6]

& Castel- letto, S

Lohrmann, A., Johnson, B., McCallum, J. & Castel- letto, S. A review on single photon sources in silicon carbide.Reports on Progress in Physics80, 034502 (2017)

2017
[7]

& Reitzenstein, S

Heindel, T., Kim, J.-H., Gregersen, N., Rastelli, A. & Reitzenstein, S. Quantum dots for photonic quantum information technology.Advances in Optics and Pho- tonics15, 613–738 (2023)

2023
[8]

& Liu, J

Zhou, X., Zhai, L. & Liu, J. Epitaxial quantum dots: a semiconductor launchpad for photonic quantum tech- nologies.Photonics Insights1, R07 (2023)

2023
[9]

V.et al.Transform-limited single pho- tons from a single quantum dot.Nature Communica- tions6, 8204 (2014)

Kuhlmann, A. V.et al.Transform-limited single pho- tons from a single quantum dot.Nature Communica- tions6, 8204 (2014)

2014
[11]

Iles-Smith, J., McCutcheon, D. P. S., Nazir, A. & Mørk, J. Phonon scattering inhibits simultaneous near- unity efficiency and indistinguishability in semiconduc- tor single-photon sources.Nature Photonics11, 521– 526 (2017)

2017
[12]

E.et al.Transform-limited photons from a coherent tin-vacancy spin in diamond.Physical Review Letters124, 023602 (2020)

Trusheim, M. E.et al.Transform-limited photons from a coherent tin-vacancy spin in diamond.Physical Review Letters124, 023602 (2020)

2020
[13]

Zhai, L.et al.Low-noise GaAs quantum dots for quantum photonics.Nature Communications11, 4745 (2020)

2020
[14]

R., Jiang, B., Day, A

Dietz, J. R., Jiang, B., Day, A. M., Bhave, S. A. & Hu, E. L. Spin-acoustic control of silicon vacancies in 4H silicon carbide.Nature Electronics6, 739–745 (2023)

2023
[15]

Esmann, M., Wein, S. C. & Ant´ on-Solanas, C. Solid- state single-photon sources: Recent advances for novel quantum materials.Advanced Functional Materials 2315936 (2024)

2024
[16]

Fl ˚ agan, S.et al.A diamond-confined open microcav- ity featuring a high quality-factor and a small mode- volume.Journal of Applied Physics131(2022)

2022
[17]

W.et al.On-chip single photon filtering and multiplexing in hybrid quantum photonic circuits

Elshaari, A. W.et al.On-chip single photon filtering and multiplexing in hybrid quantum photonic circuits. Nature Communications8, 379 (2017)

2017
[18]

O’brien, J. L. Optical quantum computing.Science 318, 1567–1570 (2007)

2007
[19]

Brown, R. H. & Twiss, R. Q. Correlation between pho- tons in two coherent beams of light.Nature177, 27–29 (1956)

1956
[20]

& Mandel, L

Hong, C.-K., Ou, Z.-Y. & Mandel, L. Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference.Physical Review Letters59, 2044 (1987)

1987
[21]

Bra´ nczyk, A. M. Hong-Ou-Mandel interference (2017). arXiv:1711.00080

2017 arXiv
[22]

James, D. F. V., Kwiat, P. G., Munro, W. J. & White, A. G. Measurement of qubits.Physical Review A64, 052312 (2001)

2001
[23]

& Pan, J.-W

G¨ uhne, O., Lu, C.-Y., Gao, W.-B. & Pan, J.-W. Tool- box for entanglement detection and fidelity estimation. Physical Review A76, 030305 (2007)

2007
[24]

Li, J.-P.et al.Multiphoton graph states from a solid- state single-photon source.ACS Photonics7, 1603–1610 (2020)

2020
[25]

Meng, Y.et al.Deterministic photon source of genuine three-qubit entanglement.Nature Communications15 (2024)

2024
[26]

H.et al.Fault-tolerant operation of a logi- cal qubit in a diamond quantum processor.Nature606, 884–889 (2022)

Abobeih, M. H.et al.Fault-tolerant operation of a logi- cal qubit in a diamond quantum processor.Nature606, 884–889 (2022)

2022
[27]

Tomm, N.et al.A bright and fast source of coher- ent single photons.Nature Nanotechnology16, 399–403 (2021)

2021
[28]

Herrmann, Y.et al.Coherent coupling of a diamond tin- vacancy center to a tunable open microcavity.Physical Review X14, 041013 (2024)

2024
[29]

Kimble, H. J. The quantum internet.Nature453, 1023– 1030 (2008)

2008
[30]

N.et al.All-optical control of the silicon- vacancy spin in diamond at millikelvin temperatures

Becker, J. N.et al.All-optical control of the silicon- vacancy spin in diamond at millikelvin temperatures. Physical Review Letters120, 053603 (2018)

2018
[31]

Wolfowicz, G.et al.Quantum guidelines for solid- state spin defects.Nature Reviews Materials6, 906–925 (2021)

2021
[32]

Babin, C.et al.Fabrication and nanophotonic waveg- uide integration of silicon carbide colour centres with preserved spin-optical coherence.Nature Materials21, 67–73 (2022)

2022
[33]

W.et al.High-Q cavity interface for color centers in thin film diamond.Nature Communications 15, 6358 (2024)

Ding, S. W.et al.High-Q cavity interface for color centers in thin film diamond.Nature Communications 15, 6358 (2024)

2024
[34]

& Reitzenstein, S

Bremer, L., Rodt, S. & Reitzenstein, S. Fiber-coupled quantum light sources based on solid-state quantum emitters.Materials for Quantum Technology2, 042002 (2022)

2022
[35]

Yu, Y.et al.Telecom-band quantum dot technologies for long-distance quantum networks.Nature Nanotech- nology18, 1389–1400 (2023)

2023
[36]

& Imamo˘ glu, A

H¨ ogele, A., Galland, C., Winger, M. & Imamo˘ glu, A. Photon antibunching in the photoluminescence spectra of a single carbon nanotube.Physical Review Letters 100, 217401 (2008)

2008
[37]

& Wrachtrup, J

Du, J., Shi, F., Kong, X., Jelezko, F. & Wrachtrup, J. Single-molecule scale magnetic resonance spectroscopy using quantum diamond sensors.Reviews of Modern Physics96, 025001 (2024)

2024
[38]

Borri, P.et al.Exciton dephasing via phonon interac- tions in InAs quantum dots: Dependence on quantum confinement.Physical Review B71, 115328 (2005). 15

2005
[39]

Das, S.et al.A wave-function ansatz method for cal- culating field correlations and its application to the study of spectral filtering and quantum dynamics of multi-emitter systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.08303 (2019)

2019 arXiv
[40]

A.et al.Signatures of two-photon pulses from a quantum two-level system.Nature Physics13, 649–654 (2017)

Fischer, K. A.et al.Signatures of two-photon pulses from a quantum two-level system.Nature Physics13, 649–654 (2017)

2017
[41]

Zhai, L.et al.Large-range frequency tuning of a narrow- linewidth quantum emitter.Applied Physics Letters 117, 083106 (2020)

2020
[42]

Wei, Y.et al.Tailoring solid-state single-photon sources with stimulated emissions.Nature Nanotechnology17, 470–476 (2022)

2022
[43]

Physical Review Letters128, 093603 (2022)

Sbresny, F.et al.Stimulated generation of indistin- guishable single photons from a quantum ladder system. Physical Review Letters128, 093603 (2022)

2022
[44]

Yan, J.et al.Double-pulse generation of indistinguish- able single photons with optically controlled polariza- tion.Nano Letters22, 1483–1490 (2022)

2022
[45]

& Javadi, A

Zhai, L. & Javadi, A. Harmonizing single photons with a laser pulse.Nature Nanotechnology17, 436–437 (2022)

2022
[46]

Wang, H.et al.Towards optimal single-photon sources from polarized microcavities.Nature Photonics13, 770–775 (2019)

2019
[47]

E.et al.Bright polarized single-photon source based on a linear dipole.Physical Review Let- ters126, 233601 (2021)

Thomas, S. E.et al.Bright polarized single-photon source based on a linear dipole.Physical Review Let- ters126, 233601 (2021)

2021
[48]

Wu, B.et al.Mollow triplets under few-photon excita- tion.Optica10, 1118–1123 (2023)

2023
[49]

He, Y.-M.et al.Coherently driving a single quantum two-level system with dichromatic laser pulses.Nature Physics15, 941–946 (2019)

2019
[50]

X.et al.Coherent dynamics in quantum emitters under dichromatic excitation.Physical Review Letters126, 047403 (2021)

Koong, Z. X.et al.Coherent dynamics in quantum emitters under dichromatic excitation.Physical Review Letters126, 047403 (2021)

2021
[51]

Karli, Y.et al.SUPER scheme in action: Experimental demonstration of red-detuned excitation of a quantum emitter.Nano Letters22, 6567–6572 (2022)

2022
[52]

C.et al.Deterministic delivery of re- mote entanglement on a quantum network.Nature558, 268–273 (2018)

Humphreys, P. C.et al.Deterministic delivery of re- mote entanglement on a quantum network.Nature558, 268–273 (2018)

2018
[53]

Heyn, C.et al.Regimes of GaAs quantum dot self- assembly by droplet epitaxy.Physical Review B76, 075317 (2007)

2007
[54]

& San- guinetti, S

Gurioli, M., Wang, Z., Rastelli, A., Kuroda, T. & San- guinetti, S. Droplet epitaxy of semiconductor nanos- tructures for quantum photonic devices.Nature Mate- rials18, 799–810 (2019)

2019
[55]

G.et al.Charge tunable GaAs quantum dots in a photonic nip diode.Nanomaterials11, 2703 (2021)

Babin, H. G.et al.Charge tunable GaAs quantum dots in a photonic nip diode.Nanomaterials11, 2703 (2021)

2021
[56]

H., Rastelli, A

Huo, Y. H., Rastelli, A. & Schmidt, O. G. Ultra-small excitonic fine structure splitting in highly symmetric quantum dots on GaAs (001) substrate.Applied Physics Letters102, 152105 (2013)

2013
[57]

Xin, K.et al.Epitaxial growth of quantum dots on van der Waals surfaces.Nature Synthesis3, 1176–1183 (2024)

2024
[58]

& Chamarro, M

Testelin, C., Bernardot, F., Eble, B. & Chamarro, M. Hole–spin dephasing time associated with hyperfine in- teraction in quantum dots.Physical Review B79, 195440 (2009)

2009
[59]

C.et al.Radiative Auger process in the single-photon limit.Nature Nanotechnology15, 558– 562 (2020)

L¨ obl, M. C.et al.Radiative Auger process in the single-photon limit.Nature Nanotechnology15, 558– 562 (2020)

2020
[60]

Spinnler, C.et al.Optically driving the radiative auger transition.Nature Communications12, 6575 (2021)

2021
[61]

Yan, J.-Y.et al.All-optical ultrafast arbitrary rotation of hole orbital qubits with direct phase control.Physical Review Letters133, 203603 (2024)

2024
[62]

Bayer, M.et al.Fine structure of neutral and charged excitons in self-assembled In(Ga)As/(Al)GaAs quan- tum dots.Physical Review B65, 195315 (2002)

2002
[63]

Nature Communications15, 5792 (2024)

Chen, C.et al.Wavelength-tunable high-fidelity en- tangled photon sources enabled by dual stark effects. Nature Communications15, 5792 (2024)

2024
[64]

Chen, Y.et al.Wavelength-tunable entangled photons from silicon-integrated III–V quantum dots.Nature Communications7, 10387 (2016)

2016
[65]

Nature Communications8, 15506 (2017)

Huber, D.et al.Highly indistinguishable and strongly entangled photons from symmetric GaAs quantum dots. Nature Communications8, 15506 (2017)

2017
[66]

Liu, F.et al.High Purcell factor generation of indistin- guishable on-chip single photons.Nature Nanotechnol- ogy13, 835–840 (2018)

2018
[67]

Science Advances6, eabc8268 (2020)

Uppu, R.et al.Scalable integrated single-photon source. Science Advances6, eabc8268 (2020)

2020
[68]

D.et al.On-demand generation of entangled photon pairs in the telecom C-band with InAs quantum dots.ACS Photonics8, 2337–2344 (2021)

Zeuner, K. D.et al.On-demand generation of entangled photon pairs in the telecom C-band with InAs quantum dots.ACS Photonics8, 2337–2344 (2021)

2021
[69]

Nanoscale Research Letters12, 378 (2017)

Chen, Z.-S.et al.Bright single-photon source at 1.3 µm based on InAs bilayer quantum dot in micropillar. Nanoscale Research Letters12, 378 (2017)

2017
[70]

Spitzer, N.et al.Telecom O-band quantum dots fabri- cated by droplet etching.Crystals14, 1014 (2024)

2024
[71]

A.et al.On-demand generation of indistin- guishable photons in the telecom C-band using quantum dot devices.ACS Photonics11, 339–347 (2024)

Vajner, D. A.et al.On-demand generation of indistin- guishable photons in the telecom C-band using quantum dot devices.ACS Photonics11, 339–347 (2024)

2024
[72]

Somaschi, N.et al.Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state.Nature Photonics10, 340–345 (2016)

2016
[73]

Nano Letters19, 2404–2410 (2019)

Sch¨ oll, E.et al.Resonance fluorescence of GaAs quan- tum dots with near-unity photon indistinguishability. Nano Letters19, 2404–2410 (2019)

2019
[74]

Schweickert, L.et al.On-demand generation of background-free single photons from a solid-state source.Applied Physics Letters112(2018)

2018
[75]

Hanschke, L.et al.Quantum dot single-photon sources with ultra-low multi-photon probability.npj Quantum Information4, 43 (2018)

2018
[76]

Wang, H.et al.Near-Transform-limited single photons from an efficient solid-state quantum emitter.Physical Review Letters116, 213601 (2016)

2016
[77]

Thoma, A.et al.Exploring dephasing of a solid-state quantum emitter via time- and temperature-dependent Hong-Ou-Mandel experiments.Physical Review Letters 116, 033601 (2016)

2016
[78]

Huber, D.et al.Strain-tunable GaAs quantum dot: A nearly dephasing-free source of entangled photon pairs on demand.Physical Review Letters121, 033902 (2018)

2018
[79]

Ou, W.et al.Strain tuning self-assembled quantum dots for energy-tunable entangled-photon sources using a photolithographically fabricated microelectromechan- ical system.ACS Photonics9, 3421–3428 (2022)

2022
[80]

Zhang, J.et al.Electric-field-induced energy tun- ing of on-demand entangled-photon emission from self- assembled quantum dots.Nano Letters17, 501–507 (2017). 16

2017
[81]

T.et al.On-demand source of dual-rail pho- ton pairs based on chiral interaction in a nanophotonic waveguide.PRX Quantum3(2022)

Østfeldt, F. T.et al.On-demand source of dual-rail pho- ton pairs based on chiral interaction in a nanophotonic waveguide.PRX Quantum3(2022)

2022
[82]

Siampour, H.et al.Observation of large spontaneous emission rate enhancement of quantum dots in a broken- symmetry slow-light waveguide.npj Quantum Informa- tion9, 15 (2023)

2023
[83]

Prilm¨ uller, M.et al.Hyperentanglement of photons emitted by a quantum dot.Physical Review Letters121, 110503 (2018)

2018
[84]

Fischbach, S.et al.Single quantum dot with mi- crolens and 3d-printed micro-objective as integrated bright single-photon source.ACS Photonics4, 1327– 1332 (2017)

2017
[85]

Maring, N.et al.A versatile single-photon-based quan- tum computing platform.Nature Photonics18, 603–609 (2024)

2024
[87]

Warburton, R. J. Single spins in self-assembled quan- tum dots.Nature Materials12, 483 (2013)

2013
[88]

Bodey, J.et al.Optical spin locking of a solid-state qubit.npj Quantum Information5, 95 (2019)

2019
[90]

De Greve, K.et al.Quantum-dot spin–photon entan- glement via frequency downconversion to telecom wave- length.Nature491, 421–425 (2012)

2012
[91]

Coste, N.et al.High-rate entanglement between a semi- conductor spin and indistinguishable photons.Nature Photonics17, 582–587 (2023)

2023
[92]

M.et al.Optimal purification of a spin ensemble by quantum-algorithmic feedback.Physical Review X12, 031014 (2022)

Jackson, D. M.et al.Optimal purification of a spin ensemble by quantum-algorithmic feedback.Physical Review X12, 031014 (2022)

2022
[93]

N.et al.Enhanced electron-spin coherence in a GaAs quantum emitter.Physical Review Letters 131, 210805 (2023)

Nguyen, G. N.et al.Enhanced electron-spin coherence in a GaAs quantum emitter.Physical Review Letters 131, 210805 (2023)

2023
[94]

Stockill, R.et al.Quantum dot spin coherence governed by a strained nuclear environment.Nature Communi- cations7, 12745 (2016)

2016
[95]

R., Han, I

Wang, Y. R., Han, I. S., Jin, C.-Y. & Hopkinson, M. Precise arrays of epitaxial quantum dots nucleated by in situ laser interference for quantum information tech- nology applications.ACS Applied Nano Materials3, 4739–4746 (2020)

2020
[96]

Chanana, A.et al.Ultra-low loss quantum photonic circuits integrated with single quantum emitters.Nature Communications13, 7693 (2022)

2022
[97]

Ju, Z., Lin, J., Shen, S., Wu, B. & Wu, E. Preparations and applications of single color centers in diamond.Ad- vances in Physics: X6, 1858721 (2021)

2021
[98]

A.et al.Optical parametric oscillation in silicon carbide nanophotonics.Optica7, 1139–1142 (2020)

Guidry, M. A.et al.Optical parametric oscillation in silicon carbide nanophotonics.Optica7, 1139–1142 (2020)

2020
[99]

Nature Photonics18, 625–631 (2024)

Chen, B.et al.Integrated optical vortex microcomb. Nature Photonics18, 625–631 (2024)

2024
[100]

Optica6, 524–530 (2019)

Papon, C.et al.Nanomechanical single-photon routing. Optica6, 524–530 (2019)

2019
[101]

Nature575, 622–627 (2019)

Najer, D.et al.A gated quantum dot far in the strong- coupling regime of cavity-QED at optical frequencies. Nature575, 622–627 (2019)

2019
[102]

Zhang, W.et al.In-situ laser nano-patterning for or- dered InAs/GaAs (001) quantum dot growth.Applied Physics Letters112, 153108 (2018)

2018
[103]

& Reitzenstein, S

Große, J., von Helversen, M., Koulas-Simos, A., Her- mann, M. & Reitzenstein, S. Development of site- controlled quantum dot arrays acting as scalable sources of indistinguishable photons.APL Photonics5(2020)

2020
[104]

Liu, S.et al.Super-resolved snapshot hyperspec- tral imaging of solid-state quantum emitters for high- throughput integrated quantum technologies.Nature Photonics18, 967–974 (2024)

2024
[105]

Schnauber, P.et al.Deterministic integration of quan- tum dots into on-chip multimode interference beam- splitters using in situ electron beam lithography.Nano Letters18, 2336–2342 (2018)

2018
[106]

Javadi, A.et al.Single-photon non-linear optics with a quantum dot in a waveguide.Nature Communications 6, 8655 (2015)

2015
[107]

Thyrrestrup, H.et al.Quantum optics with near lifetime-limited quantum-dot transitions in a nanopho- tonic waveguide.Nano Letters18, 1801–1806 (2017)

2017
[108]

Sun, S.et al.Cavity-enhanced raman emission from a single color center in a solid.Physical Review Letters 121, 083601 (2018)

2018
[109]

Kim, J.-H.et al.Hybrid integration of solid-state quan- tum emitters on a silicon photonic chip.Nano Letters 17, 7394–7400 (2017)

2017
[110]

Pholsen, N.et al.Nanocavity-based quantum-dot single-photon source on a SiN waveguide integrated by transfer printing.Optics Express33, 252–262 (2025)

2025
[111]

Aghaeimeibodi, S.et al.Integration of quantum dots with lithium niobate photonics.Applied Physics Letters 113(2018)

2018
[112]

Zhu, Y.et al.Hybrid integration of deterministic quantum dot-based single-photon sources with cmos- compatible silicon carbide photonics.Laser & Photonics Reviews16, 2200172 (2022)

2022
[113]

Sipahigil, A.et al.An integrated diamond nanopho- tonics platform for quantum-optical networks.Science 354, 847–850 (2016)

2016
[114]

Schr¨ oder, T.et al.Scalable focused ion beam creation of nearly lifetime-limited single quantum emitters in dia- mond nanostructures.Nature Communications8, 15376 (2017)

2017
[115]

H.et al.Large-scale integration of artificial atoms in hybrid photonic circuits.Nature583, 226–231 (2020)

Wan, N. H.et al.Large-scale integration of artificial atoms in hybrid photonic circuits.Nature583, 226–231 (2020)

2020
[116]

E.et al.Generation of tin-vacancy centers in diamond via shallow ion implantation and subse- quent diamond overgrowth.Nano Letters20, 1614–1619 (2020)

Rugar, A. E.et al.Generation of tin-vacancy centers in diamond via shallow ion implantation and subse- quent diamond overgrowth.Nano Letters20, 1614–1619 (2020)

2020
[117]

Physical Review X9, 031022 (2019)

Machielse, B.et al.Quantum interference of electrome- chanically stabilized emitters in nanophotonic devices. Physical Review X9, 031022 (2019)

2019
[118]

M., Weis, C

Toyli, D. M., Weis, C. D., Fuchs, G. D., Schenkel, T. & Awschalom, D. D. Chip-scale nanofabrication of single spins and spin arrays in diamond.Nano Letters10, 3168–3172 (2010)

2010
[119]

Zhang, X.et al.Highly coherent nitrogen-vacancy cen- ters in diamond via rational high-pressure and high- temperature synthesis and treatment.Advanced Func- tional Materials33, 2309586 (2023)

2023
[120]

Tang, Y.-H.et al.Optically coherent nitrogen-vacancy centers in HPHT treated diamonds.arXiv preprint 17 arXiv:2409.17442(2024)

2024
[121]

& Fu, K.-M

Chakravarthi, S., Pederson, C., Kazi, Z., Ivanov, A. & Fu, K.-M. C. Impact of surface and laser-induced noise on the spectral stability of implanted nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond.Physical Review B104, 085425 (2021)

2021
[122]

Nano Letters19, 3987–3992 (2019)

Ruf, M.et al.Optically coherent nitrogen-vacancy cen- ters in micrometer-thin etched diamond membranes. Nano Letters19, 3987–3992 (2019)

2019
[123]

Yurgens, V.et al.Low-charge-noise nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond created using laser writing with a solid-immersion lens.ACS Photonics8, 1726–1734 (2021)

2021
[124]

Chen, Y.-C.et al.Laser writing of individual nitrogen- vacancy defects in diamond with near-unity yield.Op- tica6, 662–667 (2019)

2019
[125]

Rong, Y.et al.Bright near-surface silicon vacancy cen- ters in diamond fabricated by femtosecond laser abla- tion.Optics Letters44, 3793–3796 (2019)

2019
[126]

Santori, C.et al.Nanophotonics for quantum optics using nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond.Nanotech- nology21, 274008 (2010)

2010
[127]

Fuchs, G.et al.Excited-state spectroscopy using single spin manipulation in diamond.Physical Review Letters 101, 117601 (2008)

2008
[128]

M¨ uller, T.et al.Optical signatures of silicon-vacancy spins in diamond.Nature Communications5, 3328 (2014)

2014
[129]

Sohn, Y.-I.et al.Controlling the coherence of a dia- mond spin qubit through its strain environment.Nature Communications9, 2012 (2018)

2018
[130]

Guo, X.et al.Microwave-based quantum control and coherence protection of tin-vacancy spin qubits in a strain-tuned diamond-membrane heterostructure.Phys- ical Review X13, 041037 (2023)

2023
[131]

Kuruma, K.et al.Controlling interactions between high-frequency phonons and single quantum systems us- ing phononic crystals.Nature Physics(2024)

2024
[132]

Nature Communications15, 7251 (2024)

Tzeng, Y.-K.et al.Improving the creation of SiV cen- ters in diamond via sub-µs pulsed annealing treatment. Nature Communications15, 7251 (2024)

2024
[133]

Siyushev, P.et al.Optical and microwave control of germanium-vacancy center spins in diamond.Physical Review B96, 081201 (2017)

2017
[134]

G¨ orlitz, J.et al.Spectroscopic investigations of neg- atively charged tin-vacancy centres in diamond.New Journal of Physics22, 013048 (2020)

2020
[135]

E.et al.Scalable fabrication of high pu- rity diamond nanocrystals with long-spin-coherence ni- trogen vacancy centers.Nano Letters14, 32–36 (2014)

Trusheim, M. E.et al.Scalable fabrication of high pu- rity diamond nanocrystals with long-spin-coherence ni- trogen vacancy centers.Nano Letters14, 32–36 (2014)

2014
[136]

Sipahigil, A.et al.Indistinguishable photons from sep- arated silicon-vacancy centers in diamond.Physical Re- view Letters113, 113602 (2014)

2014
[137]

K.et al.Quantum nonlinear optics with a germanium-vacancy color center in a nanoscale diamond waveguide.Physical Review Letters118, 223603 (2017)

Bhaskar, M. K.et al.Quantum nonlinear optics with a germanium-vacancy color center in a nanoscale diamond waveguide.Physical Review Letters118, 223603 (2017)

2017
[138]

E.et al.Narrow-linewidth tin-vacancy cen- ters in a diamond waveguide.ACS Photonics7, 2356– 2361 (2020)

Rugar, A. E.et al.Narrow-linewidth tin-vacancy cen- ters in a diamond waveguide.ACS Photonics7, 2356– 2361 (2020)

2020
[139]

Chen, Y.-C.et al.Laser writing of coherent colour cen- tres in diamond.Nature Photonics11, 77–80 (2017)

2017
[140]

A.et al.Shallow silicon vacancy centers with lifetime-limited optical linewidths in diamond nanos- tructures.Nano Letters23, 10901–10907 (2023)

Zuber, J. A.et al.Shallow silicon vacancy centers with lifetime-limited optical linewidths in diamond nanos- tructures.Nano Letters23, 10901–10907 (2023)

2023
[141]

Wang, M.et al.Self-aligned patterning technique for fabricating high-performance diamond sensor arrays with nanoscale precision.Science Advances8, eabn9573 (2022)

2022
[142]

Chen, D.et al.Quantum interference of resonance flu- orescence from germanium-vacancy color centers in di- amond.Nano Letters22, 6306–6312 (2022)

2022
[143]

Physical Review Letters129, 173603 (2022)

Arjona Mart ´ ınez, J.et al.Photonic indistinguishability of the tin-vacancy center in nanostructured diamond. Physical Review Letters129, 173603 (2022)

2022
[144]

Bersin, E.et al.Telecom networking with a diamond quantum memory.PRX Quantum5, 010303 (2024)

2024
[145]

Pompili, M.et al.Realization of a multinode quantum network of remote solid-state qubits.Science372, 259– 264 (2021)

2021
[146]

Stolk, A.et al.Telecom-band quantum interference of frequency-converted photons from remote detuned NV centers.PRX Quantum3, 020359 (2022)

2022
[147]

Yurgens, V.et al.Cavity-assisted resonance fluores- cence from a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond.npj Quantum Information10, 112 (2024)

2024
[148]

& Wrachtrup, J

Atat¨ ure, M., Englund, D., Vamivakas, N., Lee, S.-Y. & Wrachtrup, J. Material platforms for spin-based pho- tonic quantum technologies.Nature Reviews Materials 3, 38–51 (2018)

2018
[149]

Pingault, B.et al.Coherent control of the silicon- vacancy spin in diamond.Nature Communications8, 15579 (2017)

2017
[150]

N., G¨ orlitz, J., Arend, C., Markham, M

Becker, J. N., G¨ orlitz, J., Arend, C., Markham, M. & Becher, C. Ultrafast all-optical coherent control of sin- gle silicon vacancy colour centres in diamond.Nature Communications7, 13512 (2016)

2016
[151]

Maity, S.et al.Coherent acoustic control of a single sil- icon vacancy spin in diamond.Nature Communications 11, 193 (2020)

2020
[152]

Stas, P.-J.et al.Robust multi-qubit quantum net- work node with integrated error detection.Science378, 557–560 (2022)

2022
[153]

Herbschleb, E.et al.Ultra-long coherence times amongst room-temperature solid-state spins.Nature communications10, 3766 (2019)

2019
[155]

D.et al.Silicon-vacancy spin qubit in diamond: a quantum memory exceeding 10 ms with single-shot state readout.Physical Review Letters119, 223602 (2017)

Sukachev, D. D.et al.Silicon-vacancy spin qubit in diamond: a quantum memory exceeding 10 ms with single-shot state readout.Physical Review Letters119, 223602 (2017)

2017
[156]

H., Siyushev, P

Senkalla, K., Genov, G., Metsch, M. H., Siyushev, P. & Jelezko, F. Germanium vacancy in diamond quantum memory exceeding 20 ms.Physical Review Letters132, 026901 (2024)

2024
[157]

E., Santori, C., Fu, K.-M

Faraon, A., Barclay, P. E., Santori, C., Fu, K.-M. C. & Beausoleil, R. G. Resonant enhancement of the zero- phonon emission from a colour centre in a diamond cav- ity.Nature Photonics5, 301–305 (2011)

2011
[158]

& Lonˇ car, M

Hausmann, B., Bulu, I., Venkataraman, V., Deotare, P. & Lonˇ car, M. Diamond nonlinear photonics.Nature Photonics8, 369–374 (2014)

2014
[159]

K.et al.Diamond integrated quantum nanophotonics: spins, photons and phonons.Journal of Lightwave Technology40, 7538–7571 (2022)

Shandilya, P. K.et al.Diamond integrated quantum nanophotonics: spins, photons and phonons.Journal of Lightwave Technology40, 7538–7571 (2022)

2022
[160]

Reindl, M.et al.Phonon-assisted two-photon interfer- ence from remote quantum emitters.Nano Letters17, 18 4090–4095 (2017)

2017
[161]

Kuruma, K.et al.Controlling interactions between high-frequency phonons and single quantum systems us- ing phononic crystals.Nature Physics1–6 (2024)

2024
[162]

Li, L.et al.Heterogeneous integration of spin–photon interfaces with a cmos platform.Nature630, 70–76 (2024)

2024
[163]

Guo, X.et al.Direct-bonded diamond membranes for heterogeneous quantum and electronic technologies.Na- ture Communications15, 8788 (2024)

2024
[164]

& Mat- sunami, H

Kimoto, T., Nakazawa, S., Hashimoto, K. & Mat- sunami, H. Reduction of doping and trap concentrations in 4H–SiC epitaxial layers grown by chemical vapor de- position.Applied Physics Letters79, 2761–2763 (2001)

2001
[165]

& Boretti, A

Castelletto, S. & Boretti, A. Silicon carbide color centers for quantum applications.Journal of Physics: Photon- ics2, 022001 (2020)

2020
[166]

J.et al.Isolated electron spins in silicon carbide with millisecond coherence times.Nature Ma- terials14, 160–163 (2014)

Christle, D. J.et al.Isolated electron spins in silicon carbide with millisecond coherence times.Nature Ma- terials14, 160–163 (2014)

2014
[167]

L.et al.Polytype control of spin qubits in silicon carbide.Nature Communications4, 1819 (2013)

Falk, A. L.et al.Polytype control of spin qubits in silicon carbide.Nature Communications4, 1819 (2013)

2013
[168]

Wang, J.et al.Efficient generation of an array of sin- gle silicon-vacancy defects in silicon carbide.Physical Review Applied7, 064021 (2017)

2017
[169]

Nature Communications15, 10256 (2024)

Hu, H.et al.Room-temperature waveguide integrated quantum register in a semiconductor photonic platform. Nature Communications15, 10256 (2024)

2024
[170]

Chen, Y.-C.et al.Laser writing of scalable single color centers in silicon carbide.Nano Letters19, 2377–2383 (2019)

2019
[171]

M., Dietz, J

Day, A. M., Dietz, J. R., Sutula, M., Yeh, M. & Hu, E. L. Laser writing of spin defects in nanophotonic cav- ities.Nature Materials22, 696–702 (2023)

2023
[172]

Widmann, M.et al.Coherent control of single spins in silicon carbide at room temperature.Nature Materials 14, 164–168 (2015)

2015
[173]

Nagy, R.et al.High-fidelity spin and optical control of single silicon-vacancy centres in silicon carbide.Nature Communications10, 1–8 (2019)

2019
[174]

He, Z.-X.et al.Robust single modified divacancy color centers in 4H-SiC under resonant excitation.Nature Communications15, 10146 (2024)

2024
[175]

Soltamov, V. A.et al.Optically addressable silicon vacancy-related spin centers in rhombic silicon carbide with high breakdown characteristics and endor evidence of their structure.Physical Review Letters115(2015)

2015
[176]

C.et al.Electrically driven optical interfer- ometry with spins in silicon carbide.Science Advances 5, eaay0527 (2019)

Miao, K. C.et al.Electrically driven optical interfer- ometry with spins in silicon carbide.Science Advances 5, eaay0527 (2019)

2019
[177]

Wang, J.et al.Bright room temperature single photon source at telecom range in cubic silicon carbide.Nature Communications9, 4106 (2018)

2018
[178]

Nagy, R.et al.Quantum properties of dichroic silicon vacancies in silicon carbide.Physical Review Applied9, 034022 (2018)

2018
[179]

L.et al.Check-probe spectroscopy of lifetime-limited emitters in bulk-grown silicon carbide

van de Stolpe, G. L.et al.Check-probe spectroscopy of lifetime-limited emitters in bulk-grown silicon carbide. npj Quantum Information11, 31 (2025)

2025
[180]

J.et al.Isolated spin qubits in sic with a high-fidelity infrared spin-to-photon interface.Physical Review X7, 021046 (2017)

Christle, D. J.et al.Isolated spin qubits in sic with a high-fidelity infrared spin-to-photon interface.Physical Review X7, 021046 (2017)

2017
[181]

P.et al.Electrical and optical control of single spins integrated in scalable semiconductor de- vices.Science366, 1225–1230 (2019)

Anderson, C. P.et al.Electrical and optical control of single spins integrated in scalable semiconductor de- vices.Science366, 1225–1230 (2019)

2019
[182]

Li, Q.et al.Room-temperature coherent manipulation of single-spin qubits in silicon carbide with a high read- out contrast.National Science Review9(2021)

2021
[184]

Castelletto, S.et al.A silicon carbide room-temperature single-photon source.Nature Materials13, 151–156 (2014)

2014
[185]

Fang, R.-Z.et al.Experimental generation of spin- photon entanglement in silicon carbide.Physical Review Letters132, 160801 (2024)

2024
[186]

P.et al.Five-second coherence of a single spin with single-shot readout in silicon carbide.Science Advances8, eabm5912 (2022)

Anderson, C. P.et al.Five-second coherence of a single spin with single-shot readout in silicon carbide.Science Advances8, eabm5912 (2022)

2022
[187]

Simin, D.et al.Locking of electron spin coherence above 20 ms in natural silicon carbide.Physical Review B95 (2017)

2017
[188]

M.et al.4H-silicon-carbide-on-insulator for integrated quantum and nonlinear photonics.Nature Photonics14, 330–334 (2020)

Lukin, D. M.et al.4H-silicon-carbide-on-insulator for integrated quantum and nonlinear photonics.Nature Photonics14, 330–334 (2020)

2020
[189]

Song, B.-S.et al.Ultrahigh-Q photonic crystal nanocav- ities based on 4H silicon carbide.Optica6, 991–995 (2019)

2019
[190]

Light: Science & Applications10, 139 (2021)

Wang, C.et al.High-Q microresonators on 4H-silicon- carbide-on-insulator platform for nonlinear photonics. Light: Science & Applications10, 139 (2021)

2021
[191]

Powell, K.et al.Integrated silicon carbide electro-optic modulator.Nature Communications13, 1851 (2022)

2022
[192]

Minder, M.et al.Experimental quantum key distribu- tion beyond the repeaterless secret key capacity.Nature Photonics13, 334–338 (2019)

2019
[193]

Cao, Y.et al.Long-distance free-space measurement- device-independent quantum key distribution.Physical Review Letters125(2020)

2020
[194]

Zhang, W.et al.A device-independent quantum key distribution system for distant users.Nature607, 687– 691 (2022)

2022
[195]

& Yuan, Z

Zhou, L., Lin, J., Jing, Y. & Yuan, Z. Twin-field quan- tum key distribution without optical frequency dissem- ination.Nature Communications14, 928 (2023)

2023
[196]

Applied Physics Reviews9(2022)

Gao, T.et al.A quantum key distribution testbed using a plug&play telecom-wavelength single-photon source. Applied Physics Reviews9(2022)

2022
[197]

Yang, J.et al.High-rate intercity quantum key distribu- tion with a semiconductor single-photon source.Light: Science & Applications13(2024)

2024
[198]

arXiv:2406.02045

Zhang, Y.et al.Experimental single-photon quantum key distribution surpassing the fundamental coherent- state rate limit (2024). arXiv:2406.02045

2024 arXiv
[199]

Science Advances7, eabe8905 (2021)

Schimpf, C.et al.Quantum cryptography with highly entangled photons from semiconductor quantum dots. Science Advances7, eabe8905 (2021)

2021
[200]

B.et al.Quantum key distribution with en- tangled photons generated on demand by a quantum dot.Science Advances7, eabe6379 (2021)

Basset, F. B.et al.Quantum key distribution with en- tangled photons generated on demand by a quantum dot.Science Advances7, eabe6379 (2021)

2021
[201]

Zopf, M.et al.Entanglement swapping with semiconductor-generated photons violates Bell’s in- equality.Physical Review Letters123, 160502 (2019)

2019
[202]

Basso Basset, F.et al.Entanglement swapping with photons generated on demand by a quantum dot.Phys- ical Review Letters123, 160501 (2019). 19

2019
[203]

npj Quantum Information6, 14 (2020)

Anderson, M.et al.Quantum teleportation using highly coherent emission from telecom C-band quantum dots. npj Quantum Information6, 14 (2020)

2020
[204]

L.et al.Single-emitter quantum key dis- tribution over 175 km of fibre with optimised finite key rates.Nature Communications14, 3573 (2023)

Morrison, C. L.et al.Single-emitter quantum key dis- tribution over 175 km of fibre with optimised finite key rates.Nature Communications14, 3573 (2023)

2023
[205]

Knaut, C.et al.Entanglement of nanophotonic quan- tum memory nodes in a telecom network.Nature629, 573–578 (2024)

2024
[206]

& Gao, W

Jiang, Z., Cai, H., Cernansky, R., Liu, X. & Gao, W. Quantum sensing of radio-frequency signal with NV cen- ters in SiC.Science Advances9, eadg2080 (2023)

2023
[207]

Kalb, N.et al.Entanglement distillation between solid- state quantum network nodes.Science356, 928–932 (2017)

2017
[208]

Hermans, S. L. N.et al.Qubit teleportation between non-neighbouring nodes in a quantum network.Nature 605, 663–668 (2022)

2022
[209]

Jing, B.et al.Entanglement of three quantum mem- ories via interference of three single photons.Nature Photonics13, 210–213 (2019)

2019
[210]

Liu, X.et al.Nonlocal photonic quantum gates over 7.0 km.Nature Communications15, 8529 (2024)

2024
[211]

Liu, J.-L.et al.Creation of memory–memory entangle- ment in a metropolitan quantum network.Nature629, 579–585 (2024)

2024
[212]

V., Seri, A

Lago-Rivera, D., Grandi, S., Rakonjac, J. V., Seri, A. & de Riedmatten, H. Telecom-heralded entanglement be- tween multimode solid-state quantum memories.Nature 594, 37–40 (2021)

2021
[213]

Delteil, A.et al.Generation of heralded entanglement between distant hole spins.Nature Physics12, 218–223 (2016)

2016
[214]

E.et al.A ten-qubit solid-state spin regis- ter with quantum memory up to one minute.Physical Review X9, 031045 (2019)

Bradley, C. E.et al.A ten-qubit solid-state spin regis- ter with quantum memory up to one minute.Physical Review X9, 031045 (2019)

2019
[215]

& Kosaka, H

Sekiguchi, Y., Matsushita, K., Kawasaki, Y. & Kosaka, H. Optically addressable universal holonomic quantum gates on diamond spins.Nature Photonics16, 662–666 (2022)

2022
[216]

Xie, T.et al.99.92%-fidelity CNOT gates in solids by noise filtering.Physical Review Letters130, 030601 (2023)

2023
[217]

H.et al.A many-body quantum register for a spin qubit.Nature Physics21, 368–373 (2025)

Appel, M. H.et al.A many-body quantum register for a spin qubit.Nature Physics21, 368–373 (2025)

2025
[218]

C.et al.Boson sampling with single-photon fock states from a bright solid-state source.Physical Review Letters118, 130503 (2017)

Loredo, J. C.et al.Boson sampling with single-photon fock states from a bright solid-state source.Physical Review Letters118, 130503 (2017)

2017
[219]

Wang, H.et al.Boson sampling with 20 input pho- tons and a 60-mode interferometer in a 1014-dimensional Hilbert space.Physical Review Letters123, 250503 (2019)

2019
[220]

Bartolucci, S.et al.Fusion-based quantum computa- tion.Nature Communications14, 912 (2023)

2023
[221]

H.et al.Entangling a hole spin with a time- bin photon: a waveguide approach for quantum dot sources of multiphoton entanglement.Physical Review Letters128, 233602 (2022)

Appel, M. H.et al.Entangling a hole spin with a time- bin photon: a waveguide approach for quantum dot sources of multiphoton entanglement.Physical Review Letters128, 233602 (2022)

2022
[222]

& Gershoni, D

Cogan, D., Su, Z.-E., Kenneth, O. & Gershoni, D. De- terministic generation of indistinguishable photons in a cluster state.Nature Photonics17, 324–329 (2023)

2023
[223]

Istrati, D.et al.Sequential generation of linear cluster states from a single photon emitter.Nature Communi- cations11(2020)

2020
[224]

L., Reinhard, F

Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F. & Cappellaro, P. Quantum sensing.Reviews of Modern Physics89(2017)

2017
[225]

B.et al.Nanotesla magnetometry with the silicon vacancy in silicon carbide.Physical Review Applied15, 064022 (2021)

Abraham, J. B.et al.Nanotesla magnetometry with the silicon vacancy in silicon carbide.Physical Review Applied15, 064022 (2021)

2021
[226]

Xie, Y.et al.A hybrid magnetometer towards fem- totesla sensitivity under ambient conditions.Science Bulletin66, 127–132 (2021)

2021
[227]

Rovny, J.et al.Nanoscale diamond quantum sensors for many-body physics.Nature Reviews Physics1–16 (2024)

2024
[228]

Thiel, L.et al.Probing magnetism in 2D materials at the nanoscale with single-spin microscopy.Science364, 973–976 (2019)

2019
[229]

Zhou, Y.et al.Self-protected thermometry with in- frared photons and defect spins in silicon carbide.Phys- ical Review Applied8, 044015 (2017)

2017
[230]

Dolde, F.et al.Electric-field sensing using single dia- mond spins.Nature Physics7, 459–463 (2011)

2011
[231]

L.et al.Electrically and mechanically tunable electron spins in silicon carbide color centers.Physical Review Letters112, 187601 (2014)

Falk, A. L.et al.Electrically and mechanically tunable electron spins in silicon carbide color centers.Physical Review Letters112, 187601 (2014)

2014
[232]

R., Gehring, T., Weedbrook, C

Pirandola, S., Bardhan, B. R., Gehring, T., Weedbrook, C. & Lloyd, S. Advances in photonic quantum sensing. Nature Photonics12, 724–733 (2018)

2018
[233]

Couteau, C.et al.Applications of single photons in quantum metrology, biology and the foundations of quantum physics.Nature Reviews Physics5, 354–363 (2023)

2023
[234]

Cosacchi, M.et al.Schr¨ odinger cat states in quantum- dot-cavity systems.Physical Review Research3, 023088 (2021)

2021
[235]

& McCutcheon, D

Iles-Smith, J., Nazir, A. & McCutcheon, D. P. Vibra- tional enhancement of quadrature squeezing and phase sensitivity in resonance fluorescence.Nature Communi- cations10, 3034 (2019)

2019
[236]

Applied Physics Reviews9(2022)

Yi, A.et al.Silicon carbide for integrated photonics. Applied Physics Reviews9(2022)

2022
[237]

M., Guidry, M

Lukin, D. M., Guidry, M. A. & Vuˇ ckovi´ c, J. Integrated quantum photonics with silicon carbide: challenges and prospects.PRX quantum1, 020102 (2020)

2020
[238]

& Zhai, L

Lei, X. & Zhai, L. A central spin coordinates a nuclear crowd.Nature Physics21, 334–335 (2025)

2025
[239]

Jing, B.et al.Approaching scalable quantum memory with integrated atomic devices.Applied Physics Reviews 11(2024)

2024
[240]

& Treutlein, P

Mottola, R., Buser, G. & Treutlein, P. Optical mem- ory in a microfabricated rubidium vapor cell.Physical Review Letters131, 260801 (2023)

2023
[241]

arXiv:2501.15663

Maaß, B.et al.On-demand storage and retrieval of single photons from a semiconductor quantum dot in a room-temperature atomic vapor memory (2025). arXiv:2501.15663

2025 arXiv
[242]

M.et al.Control and single-shot readout of an ion embedded in a nanophotonic cavity.Nature580, 201–204 (2020)

Kindem, J. M.et al.Control and single-shot readout of an ion embedded in a nanophotonic cavity.Nature580, 201–204 (2020)

2020
[243]

B.et al.Optical observation of single spins in silicon.Nature607, 266–270 (2022)

Higginbottom, D. B.et al.Optical observation of single spins in silicon.Nature607, 266–270 (2022)

2022
[244]

L.et al.A quantum coherent spin in hexagonal boron nitride at ambient conditions.Nature Materials 1379–1385 (2024)

Stern, H. L.et al.A quantum coherent spin in hexagonal boron nitride at ambient conditions.Nature Materials 1379–1385 (2024)

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [86]

Ding, X.et al.High-efficiency single-photon source above the loss-tolerant threshold for efficient linear opti- cal quantum computing.Nature Photonics1–5 (2025)

2025

[2] [10]

Zhai, L.et al.Quantum interference of identical photons from remote GaAs quantum dots.Nature Nanotechnol- ogy17, 829–833 (2022)

2022

[3] [183]

Morioka, N.et al.Spin-controlled generation of indis- tinguishable and distinguishable photons from silicon vacancy centres in silicon carbide.Nature Communica- tions11, 2516 (2020)

work page 2020

[4] [89]

Zaporski, L.et al.Ideal refocusing of an optically active spin qubit under strong hyperfine interactions.Nature Nanotechnology18, 257–263 (2023)

2023

[5] [154]

H.et al.One-second coherence for a sin- gle electron spin coupled to a multi-qubit nuclear-spin environment.Nature Communications9, 2552 (2018)

Abobeih, M. H.et al.One-second coherence for a sin- gle electron spin coupled to a multi-qubit nuclear-spin environment.Nature Communications9, 2552 (2018)

2018

[6] [1]

C., Kuhn, A

Wilk, T., Webster, S. C., Kuhn, A. & Rempe, G. Single- atom single-photon quantum interface.Science317, 488–490 (2007)

2007

[7] [2]

& Rempe, G

Pinkse, P., Fischer, T., Maunz, P. & Rempe, G. Trap- ping an atom with single photons.Nature404, 365–368 (2000)

2000

[8] [3]

& DeMille, D

Barry, J., McCarron, D., Norrgard, E., Steinecker, M. & DeMille, D. Magneto-optical trapping of a diatomic molecule.Nature512, 286–289 (2014)

2014