Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 55 references

Josephson Traveling-Wave Parametric Amplifier with Inverse Kerr Phase Matching

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A superconducting amplifier demonstrates inverse Kerr phase matching, giving 20 dB gain over a 3 GHz band with 1.5 photons added noise.

desk verdict A credible experimental demonstration of inverse Kerr phase matching in a JTWPA; the headline numbers are real, but the no-free-parameter gain comparison sits right at the edge of the stiff-pump regime. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.17039 v1 pith:NMISDL4W submitted 2025-07-22 quant-ph cond-mat.supr-con

M. T. Bell This is my paper
classification quant-phcond-mat.supr-con PACS 85.25.Cp
keywords Josephsontraveling-waveparametricamplifierinverseKerrphasematchingasymmetricSQUIDfour-wavemixingquantum-limitednoisepumpdepletionfluxtunability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that inverse Kerr phase matching, first proposed for a chain of coupled asymmetric SQUIDs, works in a real Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier. The idea is to use a flux-tunable third-order nonlinearity whose sign is opposite to the ordinary Kerr effect so that its self- and cross-phase modulation cancels the chromatic phase mismatch, without adding resonant or bandgap dispersion-engineering structures. On two devices, the longer one delivers about 20 dB of gain over a 3 GHz instantaneous bandwidth with an 8 GHz in situ tunable pump range, minimal gain ripple, and near quantum-limited added noise of about 1.5 photons. The measured gain across frequency is reproduced by a calculation using only measured propagation constants and no free parameters, and the paper identifies pump depletion as the effect that caps gain when the pump is pushed harder.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the flux-tunable asymmetric SQUID unit cell, whose current-phase relation $I(\phi)=I_0[(r/2+2\cos(2\pi\Phi/\Phi_0))\phi - (1/3)(r/16+\cos(2\pi\Phi/\Phi_0))\phi^3]$ lets the linear inductance and the Kerr coefficient $\gamma$ be set by an external flux $\Phi$. Because $\gamma$ can be made negative while the second-order term stays zero, self- and cross-phase modulation ($\alpha_{\rm nl} = \alpha_s+\alpha_i-2\alpha_p$) opposes the chromatic mismatch $\Delta k = k_s+k_i-2k_p$, and the total mismatch $\kappa$ can vanish at frequencies far from the pump. The gain follows from the standard coupled-mode solution $G_s = \cosh^2(gz) + (\kappa^2/4g^2)\sinh^2(gz)$ with $g=\sqrt{\kappa_s\kappa_i-(\kappa/2)^2}$, so phase matching switches the length dependence from quadratic to exponential and positions the maximum-gain band away from $\omega_p$.

What would settle it

At the Kerr-free flux bias, where the third-order nonlinearity vanishes, the same pump should produce no phase-matched gain lobes away from the pump, so observing unchanged 3.1 and 8.1 GHz gain lobes at that bias would disprove the inverse-Kerr explanation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central experimental discovery is that a JTWPA built from coupled asymmetric SQUIDs can be phase-matched by inverting the sign of its Kerr nonlinearity. At a flux bias near half a flux quantum, the third-order coefficient $\gamma$ is negative while chromatic dispersion from the junction plasma frequency gives $\Delta k > 0$; tuning the pump power makes the nonlinear phase shift $\alpha_{\rm nl}$ balance $\Delta k$, so the total mismatch $\kappa = \Delta k + \alpha_{\rm nl}$ crosses zero at two signal frequencies, $\omega_s/2\pi \approx 3.1$ and $8.1$ GHz for a $6$ GHz pump. At those points the gain grows exponentially with length and pump power, while near the pump the gain stays quadratic. JTWPA A reaches about $20$ dB gain over $3$ GHz instantaneous bandwidth, tunable by changing the pump from $5$ to $9$ GHz, with gain ripple that stays small at the optimal bias $P_p = -78$ dBm and added noise near $1.5$ photons in the phase-matched regions. Calculations from measured dispersion and nonlinear phase shifts, with no free parameters, track the measured gain curves, and the paper shows that pumping above this point depletes the pump, reverts the gain to a quadratic dependence, and increases ripple and noise.

Load-bearing premise

The central premise is that the pump amplitude stays effectively constant along the amplifier so the exponential gain formula applies at the operating point, an assumption the paper's own pump-depletion data only marginally satisfies.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Phase matching with $\kappa=0$ at signal frequencies several GHz away from the pump means the pump can be separated from the amplified band with filters instead of bulky isolators.
  • Because no resonant or photonic-bandgap dispersive feature is built into the line, the pump frequency can be tuned in situ over 8 GHz and the impedance mismatches that cause gain ripple are reduced.
  • The two phase-matched gain lobes at $\omega_s \approx 3.1$ and $8.1$ GHz for a 6 GHz pump show the usable amplifier band can be placed on both sides of the pump, not just on one side.
  • At the optimal bias the amplifier adds near 1.5 photons of noise, close to the quantum limit and appropriate for first-stage readout of superconducting qubits.
  • Pumping beyond the point where the pump phase shift becomes nonlinear does not buy exponential gain: it saturates the gain, adds ripple, and increases noise.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not test this, but the observed second-harmonic tone suggests a testable corollary: reducing critical-current spread in fabrication should push pump depletion to higher powers and raise the maximum phase-matched gain.
  • An extension the paper leaves implicit is that, because the maximum-gain bands sit several GHz away from the pump, the same device could be operated as a broadband two-mode squeezer with reduced pump leakage, a regime the paper mentions only as a future possibility.
  • A designer could use the paper's parameter-free gain-calculation recipe as a screening tool: measure $\Delta k$ and $\theta_{\rm NL}$ on a fabricated line and predict the phase-matched gain before committing to a full noise measurement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper reports experimental results for a Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier (JTWPA) that uses inverse Kerr phase matching: a chain of flux-tunable asymmetric SQUIDs provides a third-order nonlinearity whose sign and magnitude can be tuned to compensate the chromatic dispersion of the transmission line, achieving four-wave-mixing phase matching far from the pump frequency. The authors characterize two devices, JTWPA A (865 cells) and JTWPA B (350 cells), measuring transmission, pump-induced nonlinear phase shift, signal gain versus frequency and pump power, pump depletion, gain ripple, saturation power, and added noise. The headline results are about 20 dB gain over a 3 GHz instantaneous bandwidth at a 6 GHz pump, a tunable pump range of 8 GHz, minimal gain ripple, and near-quantum-limited noise with about 1.5 added photons. The gain data are compared with the analytical stiff-pump formula (Eq. 6) using measured dispersion and nonlinear phase, as well as with WRspice time-domain simulations.

Significance. If the quantitative comparisons are properly qualified, this is a valuable experimental demonstration of an alternative phase-matching scheme for traveling-wave parametric amplifiers that avoids dispersion-engineered resonant features, with good bandwidth, tunability, and noise performance. The concept is drawn from the author's prior theoretical work (Refs. 35-38), and the new contribution here is the experimental implementation and characterization, including a useful consistency check between measured gain and a calculation based on measured dispersion and nonlinear phase. The paper also includes WRspice simulations and explicit measurements of pump depletion, which are strengths. The main significance lies in showing that inverse Kerr phase matching can work in practice, with performance competitive with other JTWPA approaches.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III, Fig. 3(a) and Table I] The claim that the gain calculation in Fig. 4(b) is "with no fitting parameters" is not supported by the manuscript's own description. The dashed line in Fig. 3(a) is a fit to Eq. 3 that is used to determine the circuit parameters in Table I, and the values in parentheses are explicitly labeled as obtained from fitting to experimental data. Since Eqs. (5)-(8) depend on these parameters, the gain curves in Figs. 4(b) and 5 are not parameter-free. Please either recompute the gain using only design values, or explicitly state that the comparison uses parameters adjusted to transmission data and discuss the sensitivity of the predicted gain to the fitted values.
  2. [§III, Figs. 3(c) and 6(a)-(c)] The operating pump power Pp = -78 dBm for JTWPA A sits at the onset of pump depletion: Fig. 3(c) shows θNL deviating from the linear prediction for Pp above -78 dBm, Fig. 6(b) shows output pump power saturating for Pp > -78 dBm, and Fig. 6(c) shows higher-order parametric products at -76 dBm. The stiff-pump approximation underlying Eqs. (4)-(6) is therefore only marginally satisfied at the bias used for the headline 20 dB gain. To substantiate the quantitative comparison, please either (i) include a gain calculation that accounts for pump depletion (e.g., numerical integration of the coupled-mode equations with a finite pump amplitude), or (ii) demonstrate that the same agreement holds at a lower pump power where the stiff-pump assumption is clearly satisfied, or (iii) quantify the uncertainty in the calculated gain arising from the onset of depletion.
  3. [§III, Fig. 4] The gain calculation uses the measured nonlinear phase shift αnl from the same device at the same pump power, so the dashed curves in Fig. 5 constitute a consistency check rather than an independent prediction of the model. This should be stated explicitly in the text, and the predictive claims should be qualified accordingly; the phrase "with no free parameters used" in Section III is misleading for this reason as well.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title] The title contains a typo: "Invers e" should be "Inverse".
  2. [Section I] In the Introduction, "Applifier" in "Josephson Junction Traveling-Wave Parametric Applifier" should be "Amplifier".
  3. [Section III, Fig. 3(a)] The text says "The dashed line is a fit to Eq. 3, which is used to determine the circuit parameters listed in Table I." This is fine, but the table caption should clarify which parameters are design values and which are fitted; currently the reader must infer that the parenthetical values are the fitted ones.
  4. [Figure 5 caption] The caption says "Dashed lines are calculations of the gain from Eq. 6. Dotted lines are WRspice simulations," but it does not specify the pump power and flux bias used for each trace; please provide these details or refer to the conditions stated in the text (e.g., Pp = -78 dBm, Φ/Φ0 = 0.475 for JTWPA A).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the gain calculation is a consistency check from measured dispersion and nonlinear phase shift, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative comparison is the dashed-line gain calculation in Figure 5, computed from Eq. 6 with inputs Delta-k from measured linear phase (fit to Eq. 3) and alpha_nl inferred from the measured pump phase shift theta_NL at the operating pump power. The measured signal gain is a separate observable; it is not used to set any parameter in the calculation. The parameters in Table I were fitted to linear transmission measurements, not to gain data, so the dashed curves are a model-based consistency check rather than a tautology. The inverse Kerr phase-matching concept is cited from the author's prior Ref. [35], but the present experiment provides independent falsifiable data that support the concept, so the citation is not load-bearing in the sense of substituting for evidence. The possible violation of the stiff-pump approximation at the chosen bias is a real experimental/correctness risk, which the paper itself acknowledges with pump-depletion data, but it is not a circularity. No step in the derivation reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claimed performance depends on the fitted circuit parameters and on the theoretical model of the nonlinear transmission line. No new physical entities are introduced. The main hidden assumptions are the cubic truncation of the SQUID nonlinearity and the stiff-pump approximation, both acknowledged to be imperfect by the observed pump depletion and harmonic generation.

free parameters (4)
  • r (junction area ratio) = 6.2 (design 6)
    Fitted to dispersion measurement; used in Eqs. 1-8 for gain calculation.
  • I0 (small junction critical current) = 1.25 µA (design 1.2 µA)
    Fitted to transmission dispersion; enters the nonlinearity and impedance.
  • C0 (shunt capacitance per small junction) = 45 fF (design 40 fF)
    Fitted to dispersion; determines plasma frequency and phase mismatch.
  • Cgnd (ground capacitance) = 115 fF (design 110 fF)
    Fitted to dispersion; sets characteristic impedance and dispersion relation.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The current-phase relation of the asymmetric SQUID unit cell can be truncated at cubic order (Eq. 1), giving a flux-tunable Kerr coefficient γ whose sign can be inverted.
    Used to derive the wave equation and phase matching; the paper observes second harmonic generation, suggesting higher-order terms are not entirely negligible.
  • domain assumption The pump is stiff: its amplitude remains constant along the transmission line, so the linearized coupled-mode equations (Eq. 4) apply.
    This is the basis for exponential gain Eq. 6; the paper reports pump depletion at high Pp, so the assumption holds only below saturation.
  • standard math Standard coupled-mode theory for four-wave mixing (using energy and momentum conservation) applies to this transmission line.
    Used to derive the gain expression Eq. 6 from the coupled-mode equations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Josephson Traveling-Wave Parametric Amplifier with Inverse Kerr Phase Matching." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NMISDL4W

@misc{pith2026250717039,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Josephson Traveling-Wave Parametric Amplifier with Inverse Kerr Phase Matching},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NMISDL4W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.17039}
}
read the original abstract

Superconducting traveling-wave parametric amplifiers (TWPA) have emerged as highly versatile devices, offering broadband amplification with quantum-limited noise performance. They hold significant potential for addressing the readout bottleneck in prototype quantum computers, enabling scalability. Key challenges with this technology include achieving sufficient gain with minimal gain ripple while maintaining low noise performance. Efficient phase matching between a weak signal and a strong pump over the entire length of the TWPA is critical to overcoming these challenges. We present an experimental demonstration of the inverse Kerr phase matching technique in a TWPA, first proposed in Ref. Phys. Rev. Appl. 4, 024014. This method addresses several limitations of conventional dispersion engineering approaches of phase matching in the four-wave mixing parametric process in TWPAs. Most notably the existence of an unusable region of gain near the pump frequency which typically corresponds to the region of most optimal phase matching and maximum gain. The inverse Kerr phase matching approach, allows for greater frequency separation between the region of optimal gain and pump, \textit{in situ} tunability of the pump, minimal gain ripple, and a compact footprint which reduces losses. A TWPA employing the inverse Kerr phase matching technique experimentally demonstrated 20 dB of gain over a 3 GHz instantaneous bandwidth, with a tunable bandwidth of 8 GHz, minimal gain ripple, and near quantum-limited noise performance, with 1.5 photons of added noise.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.17039 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) An optical microscope image showing the begin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Transmission [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Calculation of the phase mismatch and the gain ver [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Measured chromatic dispersion of JTWPA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Measured gain for JTWPA A (a) and B (b) for dif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) JTWPA A Gain versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Measured gain versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Measurements of the saturation power in the phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Characteristic impedance of JTWPA A versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Noise measurements: (a) Effective HEMT noise [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aumentado, Superconducting parametric amplifiers: The state of the art in josephson parametric amplifiers, IEEE Microwave Magazine 21, 45 (2020)

    J. Aumentado, Superconducting parametric amplifiers: The state of the art in josephson parametric amplifiers, IEEE Microwave Magazine 21, 45 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Esposito, A

    M. Esposito, A. Ranadive, L. Planat, and N. Roch, Per- spective on traveling wave microwave parametric ampli- fiers, Applied Physics Letters 119, 120501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Macklin, K

    C. Macklin, K. O’Brien, D. Hover, M. E. Schwartz, V. Bolkhovsky, X. Zhang, W. D. Oliver, and I. Sid- diqi, A near–quantum-limited josephson traveling- wave parametric amplifier, Science 350, 307 (2015), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aaa8525

    doi:10.1126/science.aaa8525 2015

  4. [4]

    Yaakobi, L

    O. Yaakobi, L. Friedland, C. Macklin, and I. Siddiqi, Parametric amplification in josephson junction embed- ded transmission lines, Phys. Rev. B 87, 144301 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    O’Brien, C

    K. O’Brien, C. Macklin, I. Siddiqi, and X. Zhang, Resonant phase matching of josephson junc- tion traveling wave parametric amplifiers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 157001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    For both JTWPAs, under phase-matching conditions at low Pp the gain increases with a quadratic like depen- dence. For larger θNL, the signal gain follows an expo- nential trend up to θNL = 3 .1 radians ( Pp = −78 dBm) for JTWPA A (blue arrow) and θNL = 2.1 radians ( Pp = −75 dBm) for JTWPA B (orange arrow). Beyond these values, the signal gain reverts to ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    T. C. White, J. Y. Mutus, I.-C. Hoi, R. Barends, B. Campbell, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, E. Jeffrey, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, C. Neill, P. J. J. O’Malley, P. Roushan, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, S. Chaudhuri, J. Gao, and J. M. Marti- nis, Traveling wave parametric amplifier with Joseph- son junctions using minimal resonator phase matchi...

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Fadavi Roudsari, D

    A. Fadavi Roudsari, D. Shiri, H. Renberg Nilsson, G. Tancredi, A. Osman, I.-M. Svensson, M. Kudra, M. Rommel, J. Bylander, V. Shumeiko, and P. Dels- ing, Three-wave mixing traveling-wave parametric am- plifier with periodic variation of the circuit parameters, Applied Physics Letters 122, 052601 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Miano and O

    A. Miano and O. A. Mukhanov, Sym- metric traveling wave parametric amplifier, IEEE Trans. on Appl. Super. 29, 1 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Krantz, M

    P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Or- lando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, A quan- tum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits, Applied Physics Reviews 6, 021318 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Ranzani, M

    L. Ranzani, M. Bal, K. C. Fong, G. Ribeill, X. Wu, J. Long, H.-S. Ku, R. P. Erickson, D. Pappas, and T. A. Ohki, Kinetic inductance traveling-wave amplifiers for multiplexed qubit readout, Applied Physics Letters 113, 242602 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Krinner, S

    S. Krinner, S. Storz, P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, J. Heinso o, R. Keller, J. L¨ utolf, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Engineer- ing cryogenic setups for 100-qubit scale superconducting circuit systems, EPJ Quantum Technology 6, 2 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Heinsoo, C

    J. Heinsoo, C. K. Andersen, A. Remm, S. Krinner, T. Walter, Y. Salath´ e, S. Gasparinetti, J.-C. Besse, A. Potoˇ cnik, A. Wallraff,et al. , Rapid high-fidelity mul- tiplexed readout of superconducting qubits, Physical Re- view Applied 10, 034040 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Schaal, I

    S. Schaal, I. Ahmed, J. A. Haigh, L. Hutin, B. Bertrand, S. Barraud, M. Vinet, C.-M. Lee, N. Stelmashenko, J. W. A. Robinson, J. Y. Qiu, S. Hacohen-Gourgy, I. Siddiqi, M. F. Gonzalez-Zalba, and J. J. L. Morton, Fast gate-based readout of silicon quan- tum dots using josephson ...

    2020

  7. [15]

    Esposito, A

    M. Esposito, A. Ranadive, L. Planat, S. Leger, D. Fraudet, V. Jouanny, O. Buisson, W. Guichard, C. Naud, J. Aumentado, F. Lecocq, and N. Roch, Obser- vation of two-mode squeezing in a traveling wave para- metric amplifier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 153603 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    J. Y. Qiu, A. Grimsmo, K. Peng, B. Kannan, B. Lienhard, Y. Sung, P. Krantz, V. Bolkhovsky, G. Calusine, D. Kim, A. Melville, B. M. Niedziel- ski, J. Yoder, M. E. Schwartz, T. P. Orlando, I. Sid- diqi, S. Gustavsson, K. P. O’Brien, and W. D. Oliver, Broadband squeezed microwave...

    2023

  9. [17]

    A. L. Grimsmo and A. Blais, Squeezing and quantum state engineering with josephson travelling wave ampli- fiers, npj Quantum Information 3, 20 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Perelshtein, K

    M. Perelshtein, K. Petrovnin, V. Vesterinen, S. Hamedani Raja, I. Lilja, M. Will, A. Savin, S. Sim- bierowicz, R. Jabdaraghi, J. Lehtinen, L. Gr¨ onberg, J. Hassel, M. Prunnila, J. Govenius, G. Paraoanu, and P. Hakonen, Broadband continuous-variable en- tanglement generation u...

    2022

  11. [19]

    Ramanathan, N

    K. Ramanathan, N. Klimovich, R. Basu Thakur, B. H. Eom, H. G. Leduc, S. Shu, A. D. Beyer, and P. K. Day, Wideband direct detection constraints on hidden photon dark matter with the qualiphide experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 231001 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Bartram, T

    C. Bartram, T. Braine, R. Cervantes, N. Crisosto, N. Du, G. Leum, P. Mohapatra, T. Nitta, L. J. Rosenberg, G. Rybka, J. Yang, J. Clarke, I. Siddiqi, A. Agrawal, A. V. Dixit, M. H. Awida, A. S. Chou, M. Hollister, S. Knirck, A. Sonnenschein, W. Wester, J. R. Glea- son, A. T. Hi...

    2023

  13. [21]

    Di Vora, A

    R. Di Vora, A. Lombardi, A. Ortolan, R. Pengo, G. Ruoso, C. Braggio, G. Carugno, L. Taffarello, G. Cappelli, N. Crescini, M. Esposito, L. Planat, A. Ranadive, N. Roch, D. Alesini, D. Babusci, A. D’Elia, D. Di Gioacchino, C. Gatti, C. Ligi, G. Maccarrone, A. Rettaroli, S. Tocci,...

    2023

  14. [22]

    Bockstiegel, J

    C. Bockstiegel, J. Gao, M. R. Vissers, M. Sandberg, S. Chaudhuri, A. Sanders, L. R. Vale, K. D. Irwin, and D. P. Pappas, Development of a broadband nbtin traveling wave parametric amplifier for mkid readout, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 176, 476 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    Zobrist, B

    N. Zobrist, B. H. Eom, P. Day, B. A. Mazin, S. R. Meeker, B. Bumble, H. G. LeDuc, G. Coiffard, P. Szypryt, N. Fruitwala, et al. , Wide-band parametric amplifier readout and resolution of optical microwave kinetic in- 12 ductance detectors, Applied Physics Letters 115 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Pozar, Microwave Engineering (Wiley, 2012)

    D. Pozar, Microwave Engineering (Wiley, 2012)

    2012

  17. [25]

    Malnou, B

    M. Malnou, B. T. Miller, J. A. Estrada, K. Genter, K. Cicak, J. D. Teufel, J. Aumentado, and F. Lecocq, A traveling-wave parametric amplifier and converter, ArXiv e-prints (2024), arXiv:2406.19476 [quant-ph]

    2024

  18. [26]

    Ranadive, B

    A. Ranadive, B. Fazliji, G. L. Gal, G. Cappelli, G. Butseraen, E. Bonet, E. Eyraud, S. B¨ ohling, L. Planat, A. Metelmann, and N. Roch, A traveling wave parametric amplifier isolator, ArXiv e-prints (2024), arXiv:2406.19752 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Praquin, V

    M. Praquin, V. Lienhard, A. Giraudo, A. Vanselow, Z. Leghtas, and P. Campagne-Ibarcq, Mixing of counter- propagating signals in a traveling-wave josephson device, ArXiv e-prints (2024), arXiv:2406.19751 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Lecocq, L

    F. Lecocq, L. Ranzani, G. A. Peterson, K. Ci- cak, R. W. Simmonds, J. D. Teufel, and J. Au- mentado, Nonreciprocal microwave signal process- ing with a field-programmable josephson amplifier, Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 024028 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics , Optics and Photon- ics (Elsevier Science, 2013)

    G. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics , Optics and Photon- ics (Elsevier Science, 2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    Boyd and D

    R. Boyd and D. Prato, Nonlinear Optics (Elsevier Sci- ence, 2008)

    2008

  23. [31]

    C. Kow, V. Podolskiy, and A. Kamal, Self phase- matched broadband amplification with a left-handed josephson transmission line, ArXiv e-prints (2024), arXiv:2201.04660 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Planat, A

    L. Planat, A. Ranadive, R. Dassonneville, J. Puer- tas Mart ´ ınez, S. L´ eger, C. Naud, O. Buisson, W. Hasch- Guichard, D. M. Basko, and N. Roch, Photonic- crystal josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021021 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Ranadive, M

    A. Ranadive, M. Esposito, L. Planat, E. Bonet, C. Naud, O. Buisson, W. Guichard, and N. Roch, Kerr reversal in josephson meta-material and traveling wave parametric amplification, Nature Communications 13, 1737 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Malnou, M

    M. Malnou, M. Vissers, J. Wheeler, J. Aumen- tado, J. Hubmayr, J. Ullom, and J. Gao, Three- wave mixing kinetic inductance traveling-wave am- plifier with near-quantum-limited noise performance, PRX Quantum 2, 010302 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Ho Eom, P

    B. Ho Eom, P. K. Day, H. G. LeDuc, and J. Zmuidzinas, A wideband, low-noise superconducting amplifier with high dynamic range, Nature Physics 8, 623 (2012)

    2012

  28. [36]

    M. T. Bell and A. Samolov, Traveling-wave parametric amplifier based on a chain of coupled asymmetric squids, Phys. Rev. Appl. 4, 024014 (2015)

    2015

  29. [37]

    M. T. Bell and A. Samalov, Squid-based traveling wave parametric amplifier (2022), uS Patent US11277107B2

    2022

  30. [38]

    Zhang, W

    W. Zhang, W. Huang, M. E. Gershenson, and M. T. Bell, Josephson metamaterial with a widely tunable positive or negative kerr constant, Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 051001 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    M. T. Bell, I. A. Sadovskyy, L. B. Ioffe, A. Y. Kitaev, and M. E. Gershenson, Quantum superinductor with tunable nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 137003 (2012)

    2012

  32. [40]

    SEEQC: Digital Quantum Computing - Chip Foundry, https://seeqc.com/ (2024), [Online; accessed 22- September-2024]

    2024

  33. [41]

    Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity , Dover Books on Physics Series (Dover Publications, 2004)

    M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity , Dover Books on Physics Series (Dover Publications, 2004)

    2004

  34. [42]

    S. O. Peatain, T. Dixon, P. J. Meeson, J. M. Williams, S. Kafanov, and Y. A. Pashkin, Simulating the ef- fects of fabrication tolerance on the performance of josephson travelling wave parametric amplifiers, Superconductor Science and Technology 36, 045017 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Kissling, V

    C. Kissling, V. Gaydamachenko, F. Kaap, M. Khabipov, R. Dolata, A. B. Zorin, and L. Gr¨ unhaupt, Vulnerability to parameter spread in josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifiers, IEEE Trans. on Appl. Super. 33, 1 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Zheng, K

    Y. Zheng, K. Xiong, J. Feng, and H. Yang, Har- monic balance simulation of the influence of com- ponent uniformity and reliability on the performance of a josephson traveling wave parametric amplifier, Chinese Physics B 33, 040401 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Dixon, J

    T. Dixon, J. Dunstan, G. Long, J. Williams, P. Meeson, and C. Shelly, Capturing complex behav- ior in josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifiers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 034058 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    A. Y. Levochkina, H. G. Ahmad, P. Mastrovito, I. Chatterjee, D. Massarotti, D. Montemurro, F. Tafuri, G. Pepe, and M. Esposito, Numerical simulations of josephson traveling wave parametric amplifiers (jtwpas): Comparative study of open-source tools, IEEE Trans. on Appl. Super. ...

    2024

  39. [47]

    K. Peng, R. Poore, P. Krantz, D. E. Root, and K. P. O’Brien, X-parameter based design and simulation of josephson traveling-wave paramet- ric amplifiers for quantum computing applications, in 2022 IEEE Int Conf on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE ) (2022) pp. 331–340

    2022

  40. [48]

    Gaydamachenko, C

    V. Gaydamachenko, C. Kissling, R. Dolata, and A. B. Zorin, Numerical analysis of a three- wave-mixing Josephson traveling-wave paramet- ric amplifier with engineered dispersion loadings, Journal of Applied Physics 132, 154401 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    A. Y. Levochkina, H. G. Ahmad, P. Mastrovito, I. Chat- terjee, G. Serpico, L. D. Palma, R. Ferroiuolo, R. Satari- ano, P. Darvehi, A. Ranadive, G. Cappelli, G. L. Gal, L. Planat, D. Montemurro, D. Massarotti, F. Tafuri, N. Roch, G. P. Pepe, and M. Esposito, Investigat- ing pum...

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Guarcello, G

    C. Guarcello, G. Avallone, C. Barone, M. Borghesi, S. Capelli, G. Carapella, A. P. Caricato, I. Caru- sotto, A. Cian, D. Di Gioacchino, E. Enrico, P. Falferi, L. Fasolo, M. Faverzani, E. Ferri, G. Filatrella, C. Gatti, A. Giachero, D. Giubertoni, V. Granata, A. Greco, D. Labra...

    2023

  43. [51]

    Renberg Nilsson, D

    H. Renberg Nilsson, D. Shiri, R. Rehammar, A. Fa- davi Roudsari, and P. Delsing, Peripheral circuits for ideal performance of a traveling-wave parametric ampli- fier, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 064062 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Whiteley, Josephson junctions in spice3, IEEE Trans - actions on Magnetics 27, 2902 (1991)

    S. Whiteley, Josephson junctions in spice3, IEEE Trans - actions on Magnetics 27, 2902 (1991)

    1991

  45. [53]

    Whiteley, Wrspice circuit simulator (2017)

    S. Whiteley, Wrspice circuit simulator (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    Hatridge, R

    M. Hatridge, R. Vijay, D. H. Slichter, J. Clarke, and I. Siddiqi, Dispersive magnetometry with 13 a quantum limited squid parametric amplifier, Phys. Rev. B 83, 134501 (2011)

    2011

  47. [55]

    K. Peng, M. Naghiloo, J. Wang, G. D. Cunningham, Y. Ye, and K. P. O’Brien, Floquet-mode traveling-wave parametric amplifiers, PRX Quantum 3, 020306 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.