REVIEW 1 cited by
Generalized Optimistic Methods for Convex-Concave Saddle Point Problems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The optimistic gradient method has seen increasing popularity for solving convex-concave saddle point problems. To analyze its iteration complexity, a recent work [arXiv:1906.01115] proposed an interesting perspective that interprets this method as an approximation to the proximal point method. In this paper, we follow this approach and distill the underlying idea of optimism to propose a generalized optimistic method, which includes the optimistic gradient method as a special case. Our general framework can handle constrained saddle point problems with composite objective functions and can work with arbitrary norms using Bregman distances. Moreover, we develop a backtracking line search scheme to select the step sizes without knowledge of the smoothness coefficients. We instantiate our method with first-, second- and higher-order oracles and give best-known global iteration complexity bounds. For our first-order method, we show that the averaged iterates converge at a rate of $O(1/N)$ when the objective function is convex-concave, and it achieves linear convergence when the objective is strongly-convex-strongly-concave. For our second- and higher-order methods, under the additional assumption that the distance-generating function has Lipschitz gradient, we prove a complexity bound of $O(1/\epsilon^\frac{2}{p+1})$ in the convex-concave setting and a complexity bound of $O((L_pD^\frac{p-1}{2}/\mu)^\frac{2}{p+1}+\log\log\frac{1}{\epsilon})$ in the strongly-convex-strongly-concave setting, where $L_p$ ($p\geq 2$) is the Lipschitz constant of the $p$-th-order derivative, $\mu$ is the strong convexity parameter, and $D$ is the initial Bregman distance to the saddle point. Moreover, our line search scheme provably only requires a constant number of calls to a subproblem solver per iteration on average, making our first- and second-order methods particularly amenable to implementation.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Accelerating Trust-Region Methods: An Attempt to Balance Global and Local Efficiency
An accelerated trust-region method with a dual-variable local detector claims O~(ε^{-1/3}) global oracle complexity with quadratic local convergence, but the key estimate-sequence inequality is off by a factor of 8.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.