REVIEW 2 cited by
Continual Learning in Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Continual learning in task-oriented dialogue systems can allow us to add new domains and functionalities through time without incurring the high cost of a whole system retraining. In this paper, we propose a continual learning benchmark for task-oriented dialogue systems with 37 domains to be learned continuously in four settings, such as intent recognition, state tracking, natural language generation, and end-to-end. Moreover, we implement and compare multiple existing continual learning baselines, and we propose a simple yet effective architectural method based on residual adapters. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed architectural method and a simple replay-based strategy perform comparably well but they both achieve inferior performance to the multi-task learning baseline, in where all the data are shown at once, showing that continual learning in task-oriented dialogue systems is a challenging task. Furthermore, we reveal several trade-offs between different continual learning methods in term of parameter usage and memory size, which are important in the design of a task-oriented dialogue system. The proposed benchmark is released together with several baselines to promote more research in this direction.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Continual Learning for Generative AI: From LLMs to MLLMs and Beyond
A survey that categorizes continual learning methods for generative models into architecture-based, regularization-based, and replay-based paradigms across four model families.
-
Minimally Supervised Hierarchical Domain Intent Learning for CRS
A hierarchical intent clustering algorithm is reported to stabilize on about 20,400 of 44,112 food-domain questions, but the supporting metrics are self-defined and not externally validated.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.