Pith. sign in

REVIEW

RDF Stream Taxonomy: Systematizing RDF Stream Types in Research and Practice

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.14540 v3 pith:NNXIQYET submitted 2023-11-24 cs.DB cs.AI

RDF Stream Taxonomy: Systematizing RDF Stream Types in Research and Practice

classification cs.DB cs.AI
keywords streamstreamingontologypracticeresearchtaxonomynovelpresented
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Over the years, RDF streaming was explored in research and practice from many angles, resulting in a wide range of RDF stream definitions. This variety presents a major challenge in discussing and integrating streaming systems, due to the lack of a common language. This work attempts to address this critical research gap, by systematizing RDF stream types present in the literature in a novel taxonomy. The proposed RDF Stream Taxonomy (RDF-STaX) is embodied in an OWL 2 DL ontology that follows the FAIR principles, making it readily applicable in practice. Extensive documentation and additional resources are provided, to foster the adoption of the ontology. Three use cases for the ontology are presented with accompanying competency questions, demonstrating the usefulness of the resource. Additionally, this work introduces a novel nanopublications dataset, which serves as a collaborative, living state-of-the-art review of RDF streaming. The results of a multifaceted evaluation of the resource are presented, testing its logical validity, use case coverage, and adherence to the community's best practices, while also comparing it to other works. RDF-STaX is expected to help drive innovation in RDF streaming, by fostering scientific discussion, cooperation, and tool interoperability.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.