Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Boundary IoU: Improving Object-Centric Image Segmentation Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.16562 v1 pith:NOBXUG5P submitted 2021-03-30 cs.CV

Boundary IoU: Improving Object-Centric Image Segmentation Evaluation

classification cs.CV
keywords boundaryevaluationqualitysegmentationmetricsmeasureacrosserrors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We present Boundary IoU (Intersection-over-Union), a new segmentation evaluation measure focused on boundary quality. We perform an extensive analysis across different error types and object sizes and show that Boundary IoU is significantly more sensitive than the standard Mask IoU measure to boundary errors for large objects and does not over-penalize errors on smaller objects. The new quality measure displays several desirable characteristics like symmetry w.r.t. prediction/ground truth pairs and balanced responsiveness across scales, which makes it more suitable for segmentation evaluation than other boundary-focused measures like Trimap IoU and F-measure. Based on Boundary IoU, we update the standard evaluation protocols for instance and panoptic segmentation tasks by proposing the Boundary AP (Average Precision) and Boundary PQ (Panoptic Quality) metrics, respectively. Our experiments show that the new evaluation metrics track boundary quality improvements that are generally overlooked by current Mask IoU-based evaluation metrics. We hope that the adoption of the new boundary-sensitive evaluation metrics will lead to rapid progress in segmentation methods that improve boundary quality.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Automated Radiographic Total Sharp Score (ARTSS) in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Solution to Reduce Inter-Intra Reader Variation and Enhancing Clinical Practice

    cs.CV 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0

    ARTSS, a deep learning pipeline for automated Sharp/van der Heijde rheumatoid arthritis scoring from hand X-rays, reports MAE 0.95 and 99% joint detection, but its key results table contains a mathematically impossibl...

  2. ToonOut: Fine-tuned Background-Removal for Anime Characters

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0

    Fine-tuning BiRefNet on a small synthetic anime dataset lifts their test-set pixel accuracy from 95.3% to 99.5%, but the test set is curated from the same distribution.