Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

GENIE: Watermarking Graph Neural Networks for Link Prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.04805 v3 pith:NPL5VUQP submitted 2024-06-07 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords geniegraphwatermarkingattacksnetworksneuralwatermarkgnns
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have become invaluable intellectual property in graph-based machine learning. However, their vulnerability to model stealing attacks when deployed within Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) necessitates robust Ownership Demonstration (OD) techniques. Watermarking is a promising OD framework for Deep Neural Networks, but existing methods fail to generalize to GNNs due to the non-Euclidean nature of graph data. Previous works on GNN watermarking have primarily focused on node and graph classification, overlooking Link Prediction (LP). In this paper, we propose GENIE (watermarking Graph nEural Networks for lInk prEdiction), the first-ever scheme to watermark GNNs for LP. GENIE creates a novel backdoor for both node-representation and subgraph-based LP methods, utilizing a unique trigger set and a secret watermark vector. Our OD scheme is equipped with Dynamic Watermark Thresholding (DWT), ensuring high verification probability (>99.99%) while addressing practical issues in existing watermarking schemes. We extensively evaluate GENIE across 4 model architectures (i.e., SEAL, GCN, GraphSAGE and NeoGNN) and 7 real-world datasets. Furthermore, we validate the robustness of GENIE against 11 state-of-the-art watermark removal techniques and 3 model extraction attacks. We also show GENIE's resilience against ownership piracy attacks. Finally, we discuss a defense strategy to counter adaptive attacks against GENIE.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Intellectual Property in Graph-Based Machine Learning as a Service: Attacks and Defenses

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic review that organizes graph-ML IP protection into model-level and data-level attacks and defenses, and ships a benchmark library, PyGIP.

  2. A Systematic Survey of Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper classifies model extraction attacks and defenses into attack, defense, and computing environment categories and surveys their current state.

Pith tools