REVIEW 1 cited by
Training Data Attribution (TDA): Examining Its Adoption & Use Cases
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Training Data Attribution (TDA): Examining Its Adoption & Use Cases
read the original abstract
This report investigates Training Data Attribution (TDA) and its potential importance to and tractability for reducing extreme risks from AI. First, we discuss the plausibility and amount of effort it would take to bring existing TDA research efforts from their current state, to an efficient and accurate tool for TDA inference that can be run on frontier-scale LLMs. Next, we discuss the numerous research benefits AI labs will expect to see from using such TDA tooling. Then, we discuss a key outstanding bottleneck that would limit such TDA tooling from being accessible publicly: AI labs' willingness to disclose their training data. We suggest ways AI labs may work around these limitations, and discuss the willingness of governments to mandate such access. Assuming that AI labs willingly provide access to TDA inference, we then discuss what high-level societal benefits you might see. We list and discuss a series of policies and systems that may be enabled by TDA. Finally, we present an evaluation of TDA's potential impact on mitigating large-scale risks from AI systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Influence Dynamics and Stagewise Data Attribution
Using Bayesian influence functions and singular learning theory, the authors show that a sample's influence on a model varies non-monotonically over training, peaking and flipping sign at phase transitions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.