pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.02429 · v1 · pith:NRX2TYJYnew · submitted 2024-10-31 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI· cs.CE

IdeaBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Research Idea Generation

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CE
keywords llmsresearchideasevaluationframeworkdiscoverygenerationprocess
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed how people interact with artificial intelligence (AI) systems, achieving state-of-the-art results in various tasks, including scientific discovery and hypothesis generation. However, the lack of a comprehensive and systematic evaluation framework for generating research ideas using LLMs poses a significant obstacle to understanding and assessing their generative capabilities in scientific discovery. To address this gap, we propose IdeaBench, a benchmark system that includes a comprehensive dataset and an evaluation framework for standardizing the assessment of research idea generation using LLMs. Our dataset comprises titles and abstracts from a diverse range of influential papers, along with their referenced works. To emulate the human process of generating research ideas, we profile LLMs as domain-specific researchers and ground them in the same context considered by human researchers. This maximizes the utilization of the LLMs' parametric knowledge to dynamically generate new research ideas. We also introduce an evaluation framework for assessing the quality of generated research ideas. Our evaluation framework is a two-stage process: first, using GPT-4o to rank ideas based on user-specified quality indicators such as novelty and feasibility, enabling scalable personalization; and second, calculating relative ranking based "Insight Score" to quantify the chosen quality indicator. The proposed benchmark system will be a valuable asset for the community to measure and compare different LLMs, ultimately advancing the automation of the scientific discovery process.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. InquiTree: Evaluating AI Agents in the Scientific Inquiry Loop with Paper-Derived Research Trees

    cs.DB 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    InquiTree shows LLM agents suffer from degrading critical capabilities during extended scientific interactions and perform worse on papers published after their training cutoffs.

  2. Matter to Mechanism: A Benchmark for AI Co-Scientists in Materials and Battery Research

    cs.CE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces the Matter to Mechanism benchmark of 2,645 structured instances and a composite metric suite for evaluating AI co-scientists on problem-to-hypothesis reasoning in battery materials research.

  3. IDRBench: Understanding the Capability of Large Language Models on Interdisciplinary Research

    cs.CL 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    IDRBench is presented as the first benchmark framework consisting of datasets and three evaluation tasks to measure LLMs' ability to perform interdisciplinary research.

  4. Graph2Idea:Retrieval-Augmented Scientific Idea Generation with Graph-Structured Contexts

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Graph2Idea builds dynamic knowledge graphs from retrieved literature to supply compact, relational contexts that guide LLMs in generating novel, feasible, and high-quality scientific ideas, outperforming flat-text bas...

  5. Evolving Roles of LLMs in Scientific Innovation: Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator

    cs.DL 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper proposes a four-role framework for LLMs in scientific innovation and reviews methods, benchmarks, and limitations across Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator roles.