Reaction mechanism of quasi-free knockout processes in exotic RI beam era

Junki Tanaka; Kazuki Yoshida

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 150 references

Reaction mechanism of quasi-free knockout processes in exotic RI beam era

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Quasi-free knockout reactions are a quantitative microscope for nuclear structure.

desk verdict A competent field review of quasi-free knockout that is worth refereeing, despite a real internal contradiction in the low-energy section and a heavy reliance on the authors' own prior work. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16649 v2 pith:NRXGPP6H submitted 2024-12-21 nucl-th nucl-ex

Kazuki Yoshida , Junki Tanaka This is my paper · ORCID

classification nucl-thnucl-ex

keywords quasi-freeknockoutdistorted-waveimpulseapproximationCDCCIAcontinuum-discretizedcoupledchannelsalphaclusteringnucleon-nucleoncorrelationsradioactiveisotopebeamsshellevolution

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that quasi-free knockout reactions—where a fast proton knocks a single nucleon or an alpha cluster out of an exotic nucleus—are now understood well enough to serve as quantitative probes of nuclear structure. The standard distorted-wave impulse approximation (DWIA) reads the struck particle's momentum distribution off the measured distribution and its single-particle occupancy off the cross-section magnitude, and this has become a workhorse for mapping shell evolution in neutron-rich nuclei. The new findings concern the edges of that picture: at low beam energy the knockout mechanism is contaminated by transfer and inelastic-decay channels, and for fragile clusters such as deuterons the simple single-channel DWIA is not enough. To meet that need the paper introduces CDCCIA, which couples DWIA with continuum-discretized coupled channels so that breakup and reformation of a two-nucleon pair are treated explicitly. If the framework holds, the same reaction can be used to connect alpha clustering and nucleon-nucleon correlations to measured cross sections across much of the nuclear chart.

What carries the argument

The engine is the distorted-wave impulse approximation (DWIA): a transition amplitude of the form $T=\langle\chi_1\chi_2\Phi_1\Phi_2\Phi_B|t_{01}|\chi_0\Phi_0\Phi_A\rangle$, where $t_{01}$ is the free-space (or effective) two-body transition matrix and the $\chi$'s are distorted waves produced by optical potentials. Its power is the factorization: in the plane-wave limit the triple differential cross section becomes proportional to $|\tilde{\varphi}_2(k_2)|^2$, the momentum-space overlap of the struck particle with the target, which is what turns a measured momentum distribution into an orbital assignment. The paper's new machinery, CDCCIA, is a marriage of DWIA with the continuum-discretized coupled channels (CDCC) method; it builds the final $p$+$n$+$B$ three-body wave function from CDCC so that transitions between the deuteron ground state and the $p$-$n$ continuum, and the breakup and reformation of the pair, are included in the same calculation. That is the piece that lets two-nucleon correlations, rather than only single-particle overlaps, be connected to knockout observables.

What would settle it

Measure the $(p,2p)$ longitudinal momentum distribution from one well-understood nucleus (for example $^{12}$C) at beam energies from roughly $50A$ to $400A$ MeV, and extract the spectroscopic factor with the same DWIA/CDCCIA inputs at every energy; if the extracted factor drifts with beam energy by more than the stated uncertainties, or if the transfer and decay corrections needed at $100A$ MeV do not vanish smoothly at higher energy, then the impulse approximation's neglect of the binding interaction is doing more work than the paper assumes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the quasi-free knockout reaction is a controlled microscope for nuclear structure, not just a rough tool. In the plane-wave limit the knockout amplitude factorizes into a free nucleon-nucleon (or proton-$\alpha$) transition matrix times the Fourier transform of the overlap function between the target and the residual nucleus plus knocked-out particle, so the measured momentum distribution names the orbital of the struck nucleon and the cross-section magnitude names the spectroscopic factor. With distorted waves the same factorization survives approximately, with absorption making the reaction surface-sensitive; this is what lets $(p,pN)$ data at roughly $250A$ MeV identify, for example, the $p$-wave character of the valence neutron in $^{54}$Ca. The paper's newer claim is that the mechanism has limits and extensions: near $100A$ MeV the $(p,2p)$ and $(p,pn)$ momentum distributions of $^{14}$O are asymmetric in a separation-energy-dependent way, and transfer plus inelastic contributions must be added to DWIA to reproduce them, while the $(p,p\alpha)$ cross section on Sn isotopes tracks the predicted surface $\alpha$ formation probability. For two-nucleon knockout the paper advances CDCCIA, which includes the breakup and reformation of a fragile $p$-$n$ pair and is intended to connect correlated pairs to $(p,pd)$, $(p,ppn)$, and ultimately $(p,3p)$ and $(p,pnn)$ observables.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis rests on the impulse approximation: at the beam energies used, the force that binds the struck nucleon or cluster to the rest of the nucleus can be neglected during the collision, so the knockout is essentially a free scattering of the incoming proton off that one particle, with the rest of the nucleus only distorting the incoming and outgoing waves.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At beam energies near $250A$ MeV, $(p,pN)$ momentum distributions directly test shell evolution, as shown by the $p$-wave assignment for the valence neutron in $^{54}$Ca.
At lower energies, the shape asymmetry of the longitudinal momentum distribution encodes the nucleon separation energy, and calculations must add $(p,d)$ transfer and $(p,p')$ decay channels to DWIA before comparing to data.
Alpha knockout cross sections from Sn isotopes track the surface alpha formation probability, including its suppression as the neutron skin develops.
CDCCIA provides the first framework in which the breakup and reformation of a fragile $p$-$n$ pair are treated consistently, opening $(p,pd)$, $(p,ppn)$, $(p,3p)$, and $(p,pnn)$ reactions as probes of short-range pair correlations.
Missing-mass reconstruction from inverse-kinematics knockout gives a model-independent excitation spectrum of the residual nucleus, which is why the same reaction can locate four-neutron and alpha-cluster states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If CDCCIA reproduces $(p,pd)$ data with realistic two-nucleon amplitudes, the same machinery could be used to extract pair correlation functions from measured $(p,pd)$ angular distributions, effectively making the reaction a pair-momentum microscope.
The low-energy asymmetry mechanism suggests a practical diagnostic: comparing the same knockout reaction at two beam energies could separate quasi-free knockout from transfer and decay contamination purely from the shape of the momentum distribution.
If alpha knockout cross sections really are proportional to the reduced alpha width, the reaction becomes a way to measure alpha formation in nuclei that cannot alpha decay, and the same logic should carry over to triton and $^3$He clusters in the planned systematic cluster-knockout survey.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a review, not a research paper. It contains no new technical result, and its value is synthesis of the quasi-free knockout field around the MINOS/SEASTAR/RIBF program. The one thing that needs fixing before publication is a direct internal contradiction in Sec. 3.2. The text first says the 14O(p,p')+proton-decay and 14O(p,d) transfer contributions are non-negligible at ~100 MeV and must be added to the DWIA to reproduce the data. Then the closing paragraph says those same contributions are negligible at ~100 MeV. The surrounding discussion makes clear the intended meaning is 'non-negligible at ~100 MeV, negligible at ~250A MeV,' but as written the sentence says the opposite and undermines the low-energy story. That is a real error, not a manufactured one.

What the paper does well: the reaction theory review is accurate. The DWIA equations, missing-mass formula, and the impulse-approximation discussion are standard and correctly stated. The survey of SEASTAR results, the 54Ca momentum distributions, the alpha knockout work (8He, 10Be, Sn, Po), and the two-nucleon correlation measurements (11Li, 81Ga(p,3p)) is faithful to the cited literature. The authors are transparent that CDCCIA was introduced in Ref. [114] and is not yet extended beyond (p,pd); the summary says so explicitly. For a review, the citation pattern is fine—self-citation is heavy, but the cited results are the relevant ones.

Soft spots: novelty is zero as a research contribution, but the paper does not seriously claim otherwise; it is a review. The heavier concern is the Sec. 3.2 contradiction, which should be corrected by reversing the sentence to say the non-quasi-free contributions are non-negligible at ~100 MeV and negligible at ~250A MeV. That is the only load-bearing flaw I see. The impulse-approximation caveats in Sec. 2.1 are appropriate, and the paper itself flags the fragility at low energy.

Who this is for: experimentalists and theorists working with MINOS/SEASTAR/ONOKORO, and anyone wanting a compact entry point into momentum distributions, spectroscopic factors, alpha knockout, and pair knockout. I would not cite it in my own work beyond a possible review pointer, but I would send it to a referee. Accept after minor revision, provided the Sec. 3.2 sentence is fixed.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. This review article surveys the reaction mechanism of quasi-free knockout processes in inverse kinematics, with an emphasis on results from the SEASTAR project using the MINOS system. It introduces the DWIA formalism and its inputs (Sec. 2), reviews the interpretation of longitudinal momentum distributions in nucleon knockout (Sec. 3), discusses alpha knockout as a probe of alpha clustering (Sec. 4), and outlines extensions to two-nucleon and cluster knockout, including the new CDCCIA framework (Sec. 5). The paper also presents new findings on low-energy nucleon knockout from 14O at ~100 MeV/nucleon and on alpha knockout from Sn isotopes. The central themes are the connection between knockout observables and single-particle structure, nucleon-nucleon correlations, and alpha clustering.

Significance. The review is timely and useful, collecting recent experimental and theoretical developments in quasi-free knockout reactions with radioactive beams. The standard formulas for the DWIA T-matrix, cross sections, and missing mass are correctly stated, and the descriptions of the experimental results are faithful to the cited literature. The discussion of the asymmetry of momentum distributions and the explicit role of non-quasi-free channels such as transfer and proton decay at low incident energy is a valuable contribution, as is the introduction of CDCCIA for pair knockout. The paper is generally well organized and the literature coverage is broad. However, the internal inconsistency in Sec. 3.2 regarding the size of non-quasi-free contributions is a load-bearing presentation issue that should be corrected before publication.

major comments (1)

[Sec. 3.2 (final paragraph)] The final paragraph of Sec. 3.2 states: "It is also shown that the transfer and the proton decay contributions are negligible at around ~100 MeV incident energy." This directly contradicts the preceding discussion and Fig. 3. For 14O(p,2p)13N, the text states that the inelastic 14O(p,p') reaction followed by one-proton emission is non-negligible and must be added to the DWIA cross section to reproduce the data; for 14O(p,pn)13O, it states that the 14O(p,d)13O transfer component is essential. The sentence as written would imply that a DWIA-only quasi-free calculation describes the low-energy data, which the paper's own analysis shows it does not. The likely intended meaning is that these contributions are non-negligible at ~100 MeV but negligible at ~250A MeV; please rewrite this sentence to be unambiguous and consistent with the data presented.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract] The first sentence is grammatically incomplete: "The quasi-free nucleon knockout reaction has been revealed the single-particle nature of nuclei" should be rephrased, e.g., "The quasi-free nucleon knockout reaction has revealed the single-particle nature of nuclei."
[Sec. 2.3] There is a typo in "effective filed theory" (should be "effective field theory"); the same phrase appears in the discussion of Ref. [100].
[Sec. 3.2] The energy units are used inconsistently: "~100 MeV" and "250A MeV" are used interchangeably. Please specify "MeV/nucleon" or "A MeV" consistently, and clarify the beam energy in the 14O experiment.
[Sec. 5.3] The description of CDCCIA is entirely qualitative. Since the framework is a central new element of the paper, consider at least writing the defining coupled-channel structure or explicitly stating that full details are given in Ref. [114]; as written, a reader cannot assess the scope of the claims beyond the reference.
[References] There are typographical errors in the reference list, e.g., "F. Brawne" (Ref. [63]) and several instances of "Caroll" instead of "Carroll" (e.g., Refs. [17], [37]). These should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Review is self-contained summary; no circular derivation found, though Sec. 3.2 contains an internal inconsistency that is not a circularity.

full rationale

This manuscript is a review article, not a derivation of new results from first principles. The DWIA formalism in Sec. 2 is standard multiple-scattering theory (Refs. [69-72]) with the impulse approximation stated explicitly (Eqs. (4)-(6)); the momentum-distribution relation follows from the plane-wave limit of the T-matrix (Eq. (9)) and is the model's content, not a circular input. The low-energy 14O results, the Sn(p,pα) isotope trend, the 10Be(p,pα) comparison, and the CDCCIA framework are all explicitly attributed to prior published papers ([120], [9], [47], [114], etc.), several of which are co-authored by the present authors. That self-citation is transparent and not load-bearing: no parameter is fitted to data and then renamed a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' earlier work. The only notable flaw is non-circular: Sec. 3.2 first states that the 14O(p,p')+proton-decay and 14O(p,d) contributions must be added to reproduce the ~100 MeV data, then concludes that they are 'negligible at around ~100 MeV incident energy,' which is internally inconsistent; this is a wording/consistency error, not a circular step, and does not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review's central content rests on standard reaction-theory assumptions (impulse approximation, semiclassical reduction, inertness of the alpha) and on phenomenological inputs such as Woods-Saxon bound-state parameters and optical potentials. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced by this review; the fitted inputs are inherited from the cited analyses.

free parameters (3)

Woods-Saxon potential radius and diffuseness for the struck-nucleon bound state = not specified (fitted to momentum distributions in cited analyses)
Sec. 2.2: the overlap function is an input to DWIA; the parameters are determined from experimental momentum distributions in the cited analyses, affecting the extracted single-particle orbitals and spectroscopic factors.
Alpha-target optical potential parameters = not specified (global parametrization or double folding)
Sec. 2.4: the alpha distorted wave is generated from a global alpha optical potential or double folding; this affects (p,pα) cross sections used for alpha-cluster conclusions.
Nucleon optical potential parameters = from Koning-Delaroche or Dirac phenomenology
Sec. 2.2: the distorted waves of incident and emitted nucleons depend on these standard parametrizations, which are taken from prior global fits.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Impulse approximation: V1B (binding interaction of struck nucleon) is negligible and the Green's operator reduces to the free one (Eqs. 4-6).
Sec. 2.1, used for all DWIA calculations; known to break down at lower beam energies, as the review itself notes in Sec. 3.2.
domain assumption The alpha particle has no bound excited state and little contribution from excited states, so (p,pα) events can be regarded as quasi-free alpha knockout.
Sec. 1, used to interpret (p,pα) data including 8He(p,pα)4n and Sn(p,pα).
domain assumption The semiclassical approximation of Koshel (Eq. 8): -ℏ² ∇1·∇2/mB ≈ ℏ² K1·K2/mB is valid for finite mB.
Sec. 2.2, reduces the three-body final-state wave function to a product of two-body scattering waves χ1χ2.
standard math Standard quantum mechanical many-body scattering theory and non-relativistic kinematics.
Background for the three-body reaction formalism and the cross-section formulas.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reaction mechanism of quasi-free knockout processes in exotic RI beam era." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NRXGPP6H

@misc{pith2026241216649,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reaction mechanism of quasi-free knockout processes in exotic RI beam era},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NRXGPP6H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16649}
}

abstract

The quasi-free nucleon knockout reaction has been revealed the single-particle nature of nuclei. Thanks to the advances in experimental techniques and reaction theory, various new aspects of nuclei are being revealed by knockout reactions. In this article, we review the basic concept of the quasi-free knockout reaction, and recent achievements in the SEASTAR project using the MINOS system. We also present our new findings on the low-energy nucleon knockout reaction and the $\alpha$ knockout reaction. The combination of the (microscopic) structure theory, reaction theory and experiments will be the key to a complete understanding of the $\alpha$ formation and its universality in the coming decades. Noble clusters, e.g., $d$, $t$, $^{3}$He, etc. are in the scope of the ONOKORO project. The implementation of the two (and more) nucleon correlation in the reaction theory is essential to connect the properties of such clusters and the reaction observables. A new framework, CDCCIA, is introduced for this purpose, which will also be applicable to the two-nucleon knockout reactions, e.g., $(p,3p)$, $(p,2pn)$, and $(p,p2n)$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16649 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

150 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

[114]

Yoshiki Chazono, Kazuki Yoshida, and Kazuyuki Ogata, Phys. Rev. C,106, 064613 (12 2022)

work page 2022
[1]

Gerhard Jacob and TH. A. J. Maris, Rev. Mod. Phys.,38, 121–142 (01 1966)

1966
[2]

Gerhard Jacob and TH. A. J. Maris, Rev. Mod. Phys.,45, 6–21 (01 1973)

1973
[3]

N. S. Chant and P. G. Roos, Phys. Rev. C,15, 57–68 (01 1977)

1977
[4]

N. S. Chant and P. G. Roos, Phys. Rev. C,27, 1060–1072 (03 1983)

1983
[5]

T. A. Carey, P. G. Roos, N. S. Chant, A. Nadasen, and H. L. Chen, Phys. Rev. C,23, 576–579 (01 1981)

1981
[6]

T. A. Carey, P. G. Roos, N. S. Chant, A. Nadasen, and H. L. Chen, Phys. Rev. C,29, 1273–1288 (04 1984)

1984
[7]

Typel, Phys

S. Typel, Phys. Rev. C,89, 064321 (06 2014)

2014

Show all 150 references

[8]

Kazuki Yoshida, Kosho Minomo, and Kazuyuki Ogata, Phys. Rev. C,94, 044604 (10 2016)

2016
[9]

Junki Tanaka, Zaihong Yang, Stefan Typel, Satoshi Adachi, Shiwei Bai, Patrik van Beek, Didier Beaumel, Yuki Fujikawa, Jiaxing Han, Sebastian Heil, Siwei Huang, Azusa Inoue, Ying Jiang, Marco Knösel, Nobuyuki Kobayashi, Yuki Kubota, Wei Liu, Jianling Lou, Yukie Maeda, Yohei Mat...

2021
[10]

Kazuki Yoshida and Junki Tanaka, Phys. Rev. C,106, 014621 (07 2022)

2022
[11]

Comprehensive research of cluster formation in nuclear matter

JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Specially Promoted Research “Comprehensive research of cluster formation in nuclear matter”, Tomohiro Uesaka, Kazuyuki Ogata, Juzo Zenihiro, and Shunsuke Kurosawa (2021–2026) ()

2021
[12]

Santamaria, C

C. Santamaria, C. Louchart, A. Obertelli, V. Werner, P. Doornenbal, F. Nowacki, G. Authelet, H. Baba, D. Calvet, F. Château, A. Corsi, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Gillibert, T. Isobe, V. Lapoux, M. Matsushita, S. Momiyama, T. Motobayashi, M. Niikura, H. Otsu, C. Péron, A. Pe...

2015
[13]

N. Paul, A. Corsi, A. Obertelli, P. Doornenbal, G. Authelet, H. Baba, B. Bally, M. Bender, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, J.-P. Delaroche, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. Gillibert, M. Girod, P.- H. Heenen, V. Lapoux, J. Libert, T. Motobayashi, M. Niikura, T. Otsuka...

2017
[14]

Flavigny, P

F. Flavigny, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, J.-P. Delaroche, M. Girod, J. Libert, T. R. Rodriguez, G. Authelet, H. Baba, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, A. Corsi, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. Gillibert, V. Lapoux, T. Motobayashi, M. Niikura, N. Paul, J.-Y. Roussé, H...

2017
[15]

S. Chen, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, T. R. Rodríguez, G. Authelet, H. Baba, D. Calvet, F. Château, A. Corsi, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. Gillibert, V. Lapoux, T. Motobayashi, M. Niikura, N. Paul, J.-Y. Roussé, H. Sakurai, C. Santamaria, D. Steppenbeck, R. Taniuc...

2017
[16]

Lettmann, V

M. Lettmann, V. Werner, N. Pietralla, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, T. R. Rodríguez, K. Sieja, G. Authelet, H. Baba, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, A. Corsi, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. Gillibert, V. Lapoux, T. Motobayashi, M. Niikura, N. Paul, J.-Y. Roussé, H. S...

2017
[17]

Shand, Zs

C.M. Shand, Zs. Podolyák, M. Górska, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, F. Nowacki, T. Otsuka, K. Sieja, J.A. Tostevin, Y. Tsunoda, G. Authelet, H. Baba, D. Calvet, A. Château, S. Chen, A. Corsi, A. Delbart, J.M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. Gillibert, T. Isobe, V. Lapoux, M. Matsushita,...

2017
[18]

Olivier, S

L. Olivier, S. Franchoo, M. Niikura, Z. Vajta, D. Sohler, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, Y. Tsunoda, T. Otsuka, G. Authelet, H. Baba, D. Calvet, F. Chateau, A. Corsi, A. Delbart, J. M. Gheller, A. Gillibert, T. Isobe, V. Lapoux, M. Matsushita, S. Momiyama, T. Motobayashi, H. Ots...

2017
[19]

M. L. Cortés, P. Doornenbal, M. Dupuis, S. M. Lenzi, F. Nowacki, A. Obertelli, S. Péru, N. Pietralla, V. Werner, K. Wimmer, G. Authelet, H. Baba, D. Calvet, F. Château, A. Corsi, A. Delbart, J-M. Gheller, A. Gillibert, T. Isobe, V. Lapoux, C. Louchart, M. Matsushita, S. Momiya...

2018
[20]

X. Y. Liu, Z. Liu, B. Ding, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, S.M. Lenzi, P.M. Walker, L.X. Chung, B.D. Linh, G. Authelet, H. Baba, D. Calvet, F. Château, A. Corsi, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Gillibert, T. Isobe, V. Lapoux, M. Matsushita, S. Momiyama, T. Motobayashi, M. Niikura,...

2018
[21]

H. N. Liu, A. Obertelli, P. Doornenbal, C. A. Bertulani, G. Hagen, J. D. Holt, G. R. Jansen, T. D. Morris, A. Schwenk, R. Stroberg, N. Achouri, H. Baba, F. Browne, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, N. Chiga, A. Corsi, M. L. Cortés, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. Gilli...

2019
[22]

Calvet, F

N.Paul,A.Obertelli,C.A.Bertulani,A.Corsi,P.Doornenbal,J.L.Rodriguez-Sanchez,G.Authelet,H.Baba, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. Gillibert, T. Isobe, V. Lapoux, M. Matsushita, S. Momiyama, T. Motobayashi, M. Niikura, H. Otsu, C. Péron, A...

2019
[23]

Taniuchi, C

R. Taniuchi, C. Santamaria, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, K. Yoneda, G. Authelet, H. Baba, D. Calvet, F. Château, A. Corsi, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Gillibert, J. D. Holt, T. Isobe, V. Lapoux, M. Matsushita, J.Menéndez,S.Momiyama,T.Motobayashi,M.Niikura,F.Nowacki,K.Ogata,H...

2019
[24]

Elekes, Á

Z. Elekes, Á. Kripkó, D. Sohler, K. Sieja, K. Ogata, K. Yoshida, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, G. Authelet, H. Baba, D. Calvet, F. Château, A. Corsi, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Gillibert, T. Isobe, V. Lapoux, M. Matsushita, S. Momiyama, T. Motobayashi, H. Otsu, C. Péron, A. ...

2019
[25]

S. Chen, J. Lee, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, C. Barbieri, Y. Chazono, P. Navrátil, K. Ogata, T. Otsuka, F. Raimondi, V. Somà, Y. Utsuno, K. Yoshida, H. Baba, F. Browne, D. Calvet, F. Château, N. Chiga, A. Corsi, M. L. Cortés, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. Gilliber...

2019
[26]

M. L. Cortés, W. Rodriguez, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, J.D. Holt, S.M. Lenzi, J. Menéndez, F. Nowacki, K. Ogata, A. Poves, T.R. Rodriguez, A. Schwenk, J. Simonis, S.R. Stroberg, K. Yoshida, L. Achouri, H. Baba, F. Browne, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, N. Chiga, A. Corsi, A...

2020
[27]

M. L. Cortés, W. Rodriguez, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, J. D. Holt, J. Menéndez, K. Ogata, A. Schwenk, N. Shimizu, J. Simonis, Y. Utsuno, K. Yoshida, L. Achouri, H. Baba, F. Browne, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, N. Chiga, A. Corsi, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. ...

2020
[28]

Y.L. Sun, A. Obertelli, P. Doornenbal, C. Barbieri, Y. Chazono, T. Duguet, H.N. Liu, P. Navrátil, F. Nowacki, K. Ogata, T. Otsuka, F. Raimondi, V. Somà, Y. Utsuno, K. Yoshida, N. Achouri, H. Baba, F. Browne, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, N. Chiga, A. Corsi, M.L. Cortés, A. D...

2020
[29]

Lokotko, S

T. Lokotko, S. Leblond, J. Lee, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, A. Poves, F. Nowacki, K. Ogata, K. Yoshida, G. Authelet, H. Baba, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, A. Corsi, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Gillibert, T. Isobe, V. Lapoux, M. Matsushita, S. Momiyama, T. Motobayashi, M....

2020
[30]

Lizarazo, P.-A

C. Lizarazo, P.-A. Söderström, V. Werner, N. Pietralla, P. M. Walker, G. X. Dong, F. R. Xu, T. R. Rodríguez, F. Browne, P. Doornenbal, S. Nishimura, C. R. Niţă, A. Obertelli, T. Ando, T. Arici, G. Authelet, H. Baba, A. Blazhev, A. M. Bruce, D. Calvet, R. J. Caroll, F. Château,...

2020
[31]

Frotscher, M

A. Frotscher, M. Gómez-Ramos, A. Obertelli, P. Doornenbal, G. Authelet, H. Baba, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, A. Corsi, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. Gillibert, T. Isobe, V. Lapoux, M. Matsushita, S. Momiyama, T. Motobayashi, M. Niikura, H. Otsu, N. Paul, C. Pér...

2020
[32]

M. M. Juhász, Z. Elekes, D. Sohler, Y. Utsuno, K. Yoshida, T. Otsuka, K. Ogata, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, H. Baba, F. Browne, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, N. Chiga, A. Corsi, M.L. Cortés, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. Gillibert, C. Hilaire, T. Isobe, T. Kobay...

2021
[33]

M. M. Juhász, Z. Elekes, D. Sohler, K. Sieja, K. Yoshida, K. Ogata, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, H. Baba, F. Browne, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, N. Chiga, A. Corsi, M. L. Cortés, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A.Giganon,A.Gillibert,C.Hilaire,T.Isobe,T.Kobayashi,Y.Kubota,V.Lapo...

2021
[34]

Browne, S

F. Browne, S. Chen, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, K. Ogata, Y. Utsuno, K. Yoshida, N. L. Achouri, H. Baba, D. Calvet, F. Château, N. Chiga, A. Corsi, M. L. Cortés, A. Delbart, J-M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. Gillibert, C. Hilaire, T. Isobe, T. Kobayashi, Y. Kubota, V. Lapoux, H. N...

2021
[35]

B. D. Linh, A. Corsi, A. Gillibert, A. Obertelli, P. Doornenbal, C. Barbieri, S. Chen, L. X. Chung, T. Duguet, M. Gómez-Ramos, J. D. Holt, A. Moro, P. Navrátil, K. Ogata, N. T. T. Phuc, N. Shimizu, V. Somà, Y. Utsuno, N. L. Achouri, H. Baba, F. Browne, D. Calvet, F. Château, N...

2021
[36]

Koiwai, K

T. Koiwai, K. Wimmer, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, C. Barbieri, T. Duguet, J.D. Holt, T. Miyagi, P. Navrátil, K. Ogata, N. Shimizu, V. Somà, Y. Utsuno, K. Yoshida, N.L. Achouri, H. Baba, F. Browne, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, N. Chiga, A. Corsi, M.L. Cortés, A. Delbart, J....

2022
[37]

Gerst, A

R.-B. Gerst, A. Blazhev, K. Moschner, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, K. Nomura, J.-P. Ebran, S. Hilaire, J. Lib- ert, G. Authelet, H. Baba, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, A. Corsi, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. Gillibert, V. Lapoux, T. Motobayashi, M. Niikura, N. Pa...

2022
[38]

Enciu, H

M. Enciu, H. N. Liu, A. Obertelli, P. Doornenbal, F. Nowacki, K. Ogata, A. Poves, K. Yoshida, N. L. Achouri, H. Baba, F. Browne, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, N. Chiga, A. Corsi, M. L. Cortés, A. Delbart, J-M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. Gillibert, C. Hilaire, T. Isobe, T. Kobay...

2022
[39]

Elekes, M

Z. Elekes, M. M. Juhász, D. Sohler, K. Sieja, K. Yoshida, K. Ogata, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, N. L. Achouri, H. Baba, F. Browne, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, N. Chiga, A. Corsi, M. L. Cortés, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. Gillibert, C. Hilaire, T. Isobe, T. K...

2022
[40]

S. Chen, F. Browne, P. Doornenbal, J. Lee, A. Obertelli, Y. Tsunoda, T. Otsuka, Y. Chazono, G. Hagen, J. D. Holt, G. R. Jansen, K. Ogata, N. Shimizu, Y. Utsuno, K. Yoshida, N. L. Achouri, H. Baba, D. Calvet, F. Château, N. Chiga, A. Corsi, M. L. Cortés, A. Delbart, J.-M. Ghell...

2023
[41]

B. D. Linh, A. Corsi, A. Gillibert, A. Obertelli, P. Doornenbal, C. Barbieri, T. Duguet, M. Gómez-Ramos, J. D. Holt, B. S. Hu, T. Miyagi, A. M. Moro, P. Navrátil, K. Ogata, S. Péru, N. T. T. Phuc, N. Shimizu, V. Somà, Y. Utsuno, N. L. Achouri, H. Baba, F. Browne, D. Calvet, F....

2024
[42]

Enciu, A

M. Enciu, A. Obertelli, P. Doornenbal, M. Heinz, T. Miyagi, F. Nowacki, K. Ogata, A. Poves, A. Schwenk, K. Yoshida, N. L. Achouri, H. Baba, F. Browne, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, N. Chiga, A. Corsi, M. L. Cortés, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. Gillibert, C. Hila...

2024
[43]

P. J. Li, J. Lee, P. Doornenbal, S. Chen, S. Wang, A. Obertelli, Y. Chazono, J.D. Holt, B.S. Hu, K. Ogata, Y. Utsuno, K. Yoshida, N.L. Achouri, H. Baba, F. Browne, D. Calvet, F. Château, N. Chiga, A. Corsi, M.L. Cortés, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. Gillibert, C. H...

2024
[44]

SEASTAR project webpage: https://www.nishina.riken.jp/collaboration/SUNFLOWER/experiment/ seastar/index.php ()
[45]

Obertelli, A

A. Obertelli, A. Delbart, S. Anvar, L. Audirac, G. Authelet, H. Baba, B. Bruyneel, D. Calvet, F. Château, A. Corsi, P. Doornenbal, J. M. Gheller, A. Giganon, C. Lahonde-Hamdoun, D. Leboeuf, D. Loiseau, A. Mohamed, J. Ph. Mols, H. Otsu, C. Péron, A. Peyaud, E. C. Pollacco, G. P...

2014
[46]

Tomohiro Uesaka, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics,2024(8), 083D01 (01 2024)

2024
[47]

P. J. Li, D. Beaumel, J. Lee, M. Assié, S. Chen, S. Franchoo, J. Gibelin, F. Hammache, T. Harada, Y. Kanada- En’yo, Y. Kubota, S. Leblond, P. F. Liang, T. Lokotko, M. Lyu, F. M. Marqués, Y. Matsuda, K. Ogata, H. Otsu, E. Rindel, L. Stuhl, D. Suzuki, Y. Togano, T. Tomai, X. X. ...

2023
[48]

Kazuyuki Ogata, Kazuki Yoshida, and Yoshiki Chazono, Comput. Phys. Commun.,297, 109058 (2024)

2024
[49]

H. H. Heckman, D. E. Greiner, P. J. Lindstrom, and F. S. Bieser, Phys. Rev. Lett.,28, 926–929 (04 1972)

1972
[50]

Tanihata, H

I. Tanihata, H. Hamagaki, O. Hashimoto, Y. Shida, N. Yoshikawa, K. Sugimoto, O. Yamakawa, T. Kobayashi, and N. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. Lett.,55, 2676–2679 (12 1985)

1985
[51]

Goldhaber, Physics Letters B,53(4), 306–308 (1974)

A.S. Goldhaber, Physics Letters B,53(4), 306–308 (1974). 29

1974
[52]

Feshbach and K

H. Feshbach and K. Huang, Physics Letters B,47(4), 300–302 (1973)

1973
[53]

Bieser, B

F. Bieser, B. Cork, D. Greiner, H. Heckman, and P. Lindstrom, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California, report to Second Summer Study of Relativistic Heavy Ions (1974)

1974
[54]

Metropolis, R

N. Metropolis, R. Bivins, M. Storm, Anthony Turkevich, J. M. Miller, and G. Friedlander, Phys. Rev.,110, 185–203 (04 1958)

1958
[55]

Metropolis, R

N. Metropolis, R. Bivins, M. Storm, J. M. Miller, G. Friedlander, and Anthony Turkevich, Phys. Rev.,110, 204–219 (04 1958)

1958
[56]

Bertini, Phys

Hugo W. Bertini, Phys. Rev.,131, 1801–1821 (08 1963)

1963
[57]

K. Chen, Z. Fraenkel, G. Friedlander, J. R. Grover, J. M. Miller, and Y. Shimamoto, Phys. Rev.,166, 949–967 (02 1968)

1968
[58]

Yariv and Z

Y. Yariv and Z. Fraenkel, Phys. Rev. C,20, 2227–2243 (12 1979)

1979
[59]

Kodama, S

T. Kodama, S. B. Duarte, K. C. Chung, and R. A. M. S. Nazareth, Phys. Rev. Lett.,49, 536–539 (08 1982)

1982
[60]

Jose Luis Rodríguez-Sánchez, Jean-Christophe David, Davide Mancusi, Alain Boudard, Joseph Cugnon, and Sylvie Leray, Phys. Rev. C,96, 054602 (11 2017)

2017
[61]

Taniuchi, Competition of the shell closure and deformations across the doubly magic78Ni (2025), article expected to be published in this Special Section

R. Taniuchi, Competition of the shell closure and deformations across the doubly magic78Ni (2025), article expected to be published in this Special Section

2025
[62]

Yang and Y

Z. Yang and Y. Kubota, Neutron correlations and clustering in neutron-rich nuclear systems (2025), article expected to be published in this Special Section

2025
[63]

S. Chen, F. Brawne, T. R. Rodríguez, and V. Werner, Deformation from zinc to zirconium (2025), article expected to be published in this Special Section

2025
[64]

Kahlbow, The southern shore of the island of inversion studied via quasi-free scattering (2025), article expected to be published in this Special Section

J. Kahlbow, The southern shore of the island of inversion studied via quasi-free scattering (2025), article expected to be published in this Special Section

2025
[65]

M. L. Cortés, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, page ptaf062 (04 2025)

2025
[66]

H. Liu, S. Chen, and F. Browne, Shell Migration atN = 32, 34 around Ca Region (2025), article expected to be published in this Special Section

2025
[67]

Tanaka, M

J. Tanaka, M. L. Cortés, H. Liu, and R. Taniuchi, Detectors for next-generation quasi-free scattering experiments at the RIBF (2025), article expected to be published in this Special Section

2025
[68]

C. A. Bertulani, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, and T. Uesaka, Direct Reactions and Spectroscopy with Hydrogen Targets at the RIBF (2025), article expected to be published in this Special Section

2025
[69]

Watson, Phys

Kenneth M. Watson, Phys. Rev.,89, 575–587 (02 1953)

1953
[70]

N. C. Francis and K. M. Watson, Phys. Rev.,92, 291–303 (10 1953)

1953
[71]

W. B. Riesenfeld and K. M. Watson, Phys. Rev.,102, 1157–1163 (05 1956)

1956
[72]

A.K Kerman, H McManus, and R.M Thaler, Annals of Physics,8(4), 551–635 (1959)

1959
[73]

Wakasa, K

T. Wakasa, K. Ogata, and T. Noro, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.,96, 32 (2017)

2017
[74]

Koshel, Nucl

Richard D. Koshel, Nucl. Phys. A,260(3), 401–412 (1976)

1976
[75]

Koning and J.P

A.J. Koning and J.P. Delaroche, Nucl. Phys. A,713(3), 231–310 (2003)

2003
[76]

S. Hama, B. C. Clark, E. D. Cooper, H. S. Sherif, and R. L. Mercer, Phys. Rev. C,41, 2737–2755 (06 1990)

1990
[77]

E. D. Cooper, S. Hama, B. C. Clark, and R. L. Mercer, Phys. Rev. C,47, 297–311 (01 1993)

1993
[78]

E. D. Cooper, S. Hama, and B. C. Clark, Phys. Rev. C,80, 034605 (09 2009)

2009
[79]

W. G. Love and M. A. Franey, Phys. Rev. C,24, 1073–1094 (09 1981)

1981
[80]

M. A. Franey and W. G. Love, Phys. Rev. C,31, 488–498 (02 1985)

1985
[81]

Woods and David S

Roger D. Woods and David S. Saxon, Phys. Rev.,95, 577–578 (07 1954)

1954
[82]

Noritaka Shimizu, Takahiro Mizusaki, Yutaka Utsuno, and Yusuke Tsunoda, Computer Physics Communica- tions, 244, 372–384 (2019)

2019
[83]

Ragnar Stroberg, Heiko Hergert, Scott K

S. Ragnar Stroberg, Heiko Hergert, Scott K. Bogner, and Jason D. Holt, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 69(Volume 69, 2019), 307–362 (2019)

2019
[84]

Somà, Front

V. Somà, Front. Phys.,8, 340 (2020)

2020
[85]

Bennaceur and J

K. Bennaceur and J. Dobaczewski, Computer Physics Communications,168(2), 96–122 (2005)

2005
[86]

Bertulani and A

C.A. Bertulani and A. Gade, Computer Physics Communications,175(5), 372–380 (2006)

2006
[87]

Glauber, Lecture Notes on Theoretical Physics, Vol I, Interscience, New York (1959)

R.J. Glauber, Lecture Notes on Theoretical Physics, Vol I, Interscience, New York (1959)

1959
[88]

Hussein, R.A

M.S. Hussein, R.A. Rego, and C.A. Bertulani, Physics Reports,201(5), 279–334 (1991)

1991
[89]

A. M. Moro, Phys. Rev. C,92, 044605 (10 2015)

2015
[90]

Gómez-Ramos, J

M. Gómez-Ramos, J. Casal, and A.M. Moro, Phys. Lett. B,772, 115–120 (2017)

2017
[91]

Gómez-Ramos and A.M

M. Gómez-Ramos and A.M. Moro, Physics Letters B,785, 511–516 (2018)

2018
[92]

Austern, Y

N. Austern, Y. Iseri, M. Kamimura, M. Kawai, G. Rawitscher, and M. Yahiro, Physics Reports,154(3), 125–204 (1987)

1987
[93]

Crespo, A

R. Crespo, A. Deltuva, E. Cravo, M. Rodríguez-Gallardo, and A. C. Fonseca, Phys. Rev. C,77, 024601 (02 2008). 30

2008
[94]

Crespo, A

R. Crespo, A. Deltuva, M. Rodríguez-Gallardo, E. Cravo, and A. C. Fonseca, Phys. Rev. C,79, 014609 (01 2009)

2009
[95]

Crespo, A

R. Crespo, A. Deltuva, and E. Cravo, Phys. Rev. C,90, 044606 (10 2014)

2014
[96]

Cravo, R

E. Cravo, R. Crespo, and A. Deltuva, Phys. Rev. C,93, 054612 (05 2016)

2016
[97]

Gómez-Ramos, A

M. Gómez-Ramos, A. Deltuva, and A. M. Moro, Phys. Rev. C,102, 064613 (12 2020)

2020
[98]

Yoshida, M

K. Yoshida, M. Gómez-Ramos, K. Ogata, and A. M. Moro, Phys. Rev. C,97, 024608 (02 2018)

2018
[99]

Aumann, C

T. Aumann, C. Barbieri, D. Bazin, C. A. Bertulani, A. Bonaccorso, W. H. Dickhoff, A. Gade, M. Gómez- Ramos, B. P. Kay, A. M. Moro, T. Nakamura, A. Obertelli, K. Ogata, S. Paschalis, and T. Uesaka, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.,118, 103847 (2021)

2021
[100]

Furnstahl and H.-W

R.J. Furnstahl and H.-W. Hammer, Physics Letters B,531(3), 203–208 (2002)

2002
[101]

R J Furnstahl and A Schwenk, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics,37(6), 064005 (03 2010)

2010
[102]

A. M. Mukhamedzhanov and A. S. Kadyrov, Phys. Rev. C,82, 051601 (11 2010)

2010
[103]

B. K. Jennings, arXiv:1102.3721 (2011)

2011 arXiv
[104]

Duguet, H

T. Duguet, H. Hergert, J. D. Holt, and V. Somà, Phys. Rev. C,92, 034313 (09 2015)

2015
[105]

Lapikás, Nucl

L. Lapikás, Nucl. Phys. A,553, 297–308 (1993)

1993
[106]

A. Gade, P. Adrich, D. Bazin, M. D. Bowen, B. A. Brown, C. M. Campbell, J. M. Cook, T. Glasmacher, P. G. Hansen, K. Hosier, S. McDaniel, D. McGlinchery, A. Obertelli, K. Siwek, L. A. Riley, J. A. Tostevin, and D. Weisshaar, Phys. Rev. C,77, 044306 (04 2008)

2008
[107]

J. A. Tostevin and A. Gade, Phys. Rev. C,103, 054610 (05 2021)

2021
[108]

Nolte, H

M. Nolte, H. Machner, and J. Bojowald, Phys. Rev. C,36, 1312–1316 (10 1987)

1987
[109]

Avrigeanu, P

V. Avrigeanu, P. E. Hodgson, and M. Avrigeanu, Phys. Rev. C,49, 2136–2141 (04 1994)

1994
[110]

Kei Egashira, Kosho Minomo, Masakazu Toyokawa, Takuma Matsumoto, and Masanobu Yahiro, Phys. Rev. C, 89, 064611 (06 2014)

2014
[111]

T Furumoto, K Tsubakihara, S Ebata, and W Horiuchi, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.,2024(1), 013D01 (12 2023)

2024
[112]

Masakazu Toyokawa, Kosho Minomo, and Masanobu Yahiro, Phys. Rev. C,88, 054602 (11 2013)

2013
[113]

Kazuki Yoshida, Yohei Chiba, Masaaki Kimura, Yasutaka Taniguchi, Yoshiko Kanada-En’yo, and Kazuyuki Ogata, Phys. Rev. C,100, 044601 (10 2019)

2019
[115]

Alex Brown, Michio Honma, and Takahiro Mizusaki, Phys

Takaharu Otsuka, Rintaro Fujimoto, Yutaka Utsuno, B. Alex Brown, Michio Honma, and Takahiro Mizusaki, Phys. Rev. Lett.,87, 082502 (08 2001)

2001
[116]

Takaharu Otsuka, Toshio Suzuki, Rintaro Fujimoto, Hubert Grawe, and Yoshinori Akaishi, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 232502 (11 2005)

2005
[117]

A. Gade, D. Bazin, C. A. Bertulani, B. A. Brown, C. M. Campbell, J. A. Church, D. C. Dinca, J. Enders, T. Glasmacher, P. G. Hansen, Z. Hu, K. W. Kemper, W. F. Mueller, H. Olliver, B. C. Perry, L. A. Riley, B. T. Roeder, B. M. Sherrill, J. R. Terry, J. A. Tostevin, and K. L. Yu...

2005
[118]

Nakamura, N

T. Nakamura, N. Kobayashi, Y. Kondo, Y. Satou, J. A. Tostevin, Y. Utsuno, N. Aoi, H. Baba, N. Fukuda, J. Gibelin, N. Inabe, M. Ishihara, D. Kameda, T. Kubo, T. Motobayashi, T. Ohnishi, N. A. Orr, H. Otsu, T. Otsuka, H. Sakurai, T. Sumikama, H. Takeda, E. Takeshita, M. Takechi,...

2014
[119]

Kazuyuki Ogata, Kazuki Yoshida, and Kosho Minomo, Phys. Rev. C,92, 034616 (09 2015)

2015
[120]

T. Pohl, Y. L. Sun, A. Obertelli, J. Lee, M. Gómez-Ramos, K. Ogata, K. Yoshida, B. S. Cai, C. X. Yuan, B. A. Brown, H. Baba, D. Beaumel, A. Corsi, J. Gao, J. Gibelin, A. Gillibert, K. I. Hahn, T. Isobe, D. Kim, Y.Kondo,T.Kobayashi,Y.Kubota,P.Li,P.Liang,H.N.Liu,J.Liu,T.Lokotko,...

2023
[121]

Gottschalk and S

B. Gottschalk and S. L. Kannenberg, Phys. Rev. C,2, 24–40 (07 1970)

1970
[122]

Bachelier, M

D. Bachelier, M. Bernas, O. M. Bilaniuk, J. L. Boyard, J. C. Jourdain, and P. Radvanyi, Phys. Rev. C,7, 165–169 (01 1973)

1973
[123]

Bachelier, J.L

D. Bachelier, J.L. Boyard, T. Hennino, H.D. Holmgren, J.C. Jourdain, P. Radvanyi, P.G. Roos, and M. Roy- Stephan, Nucl. Phys. A,268(3), 488–512 (1976)

1976
[124]

P. G. Roos, N. S. Chant, A. A. Cowley, D. A. Goldberg, H. D. Holmgren, and R. Woody, Phys. Rev. C,15, 69–83 (01 1977)

1977
[125]

Landaud, A

G. Landaud, A. Devaux, P. Delpierre, J. Kahane, R. Sené, J. Yonnet, and R. Anne, Phys. Rev. C, 18, 1776–1780 (10 1978)

1978
[126]

Nadasen, N

A. Nadasen, N. S. Chant, P. G. Roos, T. A. Carey, R. Cowen, C. Samanta, and J. Wesick, Phys. Rev. C,22, 1394–1400 (10 1980). 31

1980
[127]

C. W. Wang, P. G. Roos, N. S. Chant, G. Ciangaru, F. Khazaie, D. J. Mack, A. Nadasen, S. J. Mills, R. E. Warner, E. Norbeck, F. D. Becchetti, J. W. Janecke, and P. M. Lister, Phys. Rev. C,31, 1662–1672 (05 1985)

1985
[128]

Nadasen, P

A. Nadasen, P. G. Roos, N. S. Chant, C. C. Chang, G. Ciangaru, H. F. Breuer, J. Wesick, and E. Norbeck, Phys. Rev. C,40, 1130–1135 (09 1989)

1989
[129]

Yoshimura, A

T. Yoshimura, A. Okihana, R.E. Warner, N.S. Chant, P.G. Roos, C. Samanta, S. Kakigi, N. Koori, M. Fujiwara, N. Matsuoka, K. Tamura, E. Kubo, and K. Ushiro, Nucl. Phys. A,641(1), 3–20 (1998)

1998
[130]

Neveling, A

R. Neveling, A. A. Cowley, Z. Buthelezi, S. V. Förtsch, H. Fujita, G. C. Hillhouse, J. J. Lawrie, G. F. Steyn, F. D. Smit, S. M. Wyngaardt, N. T. Botha, L. Mudau, and S. S. Ntshangase, Phys. Rev. C,77, 037601 (03 2008)

2008
[131]

A. A. Cowley, J. Mabiala, E. Z. Buthelezi, S. V. Förtsch, R. Neveling, F. D. Smit, G. F. Steyn, and J. J. van Zyl, Europhysics Letters,85(2), 22001 (01 2009)

2009
[132]

Mabiala, A

J. Mabiala, A. A. Cowley, S. V. Förtsch, E. Z. Buthelezi, R. Neveling, F. D. Smit, G. F. Steyn, and J. J. Van Zyl, Phys. Rev. C,79, 054612 (05 2009)

2009
[133]

M. Duer, T. Aumann, R. Gernhäuser, V. Panin, S. Paschalis, D. M. Rossi, N. L. Achouri, D. Ahn, H. Baba, C. A. Bertulani, M. Böhmer, K. Boretzky, C. Caesar, N. Chiga, A. Corsi, D. Cortina-Gil, C. A. Douma, F. Dufter, Z. Elekes, J. Feng, B. Fernández-Domínguez, U. Forsberg, N. F...

2022
[134]

Tohsaki, H

A. Tohsaki, H. Horiuchi, P. Schuck, and G. Röpke, Phys. Rev. Lett.,87, 192501 (10 2001)

2001
[135]

Mengjiao Lyu, Zhongzhou Ren, Bo Zhou, Yasuro Funaki, Hisashi Horiuchi, Gerd Röpke, Peter Schuck, Akihiro Tohsaki, Chang Xu, and Taiichi Yamada, Phys. Rev. C,93, 054308 (05 2016)

2016
[136]

Mengjiao Lyu, Kazuki Yoshida, Yoshiko Kanada-En’yo, and Kazuyuki Ogata, Phys. Rev. C,97, 044612 (04 2018)

2018
[137]

Yoshiko Kanada-En’yo, Phys. Rev. C,91, 014315 (01 2015)

2015
[138]

Yoshiko Kanada-En’yo, Phys. Rev. C,93, 024322 (02 2016)

2016
[139]

A. N. Andreyev, M. Huyse, P. Van Duppen, C. Qi, R. J. Liotta, S. Antalic, D. Ackermann, S. Franchoo, F. P. Heßberger, S. Hofmann, I. Kojouharov, B. Kindler, P. Kuusiniemi, S. R. Lesher, B. Lommel, R. Mann, K. Nishio, R. D. Page, B. Streicher, Š. Šáro, B. Sulignano, D. Wiseman,...

2013
[140]

C. Qi, A. N. Andreyev, M. Huyse, R. J. Liotta, P. Van Duppen, and R. A. Wyss, Phys. Rev. C,81, 064319 (06 2010)

2010
[141]

Takashi Nakatsukasa and Nobuo Hinohara, Phys. Rev. C,108, 014318 (07 2023)

2023
[142]

MasaakiKimuraandYasutakaTaniguchi,ProgressofTheoreticalandExperimentalPhysics, 2024(9),093D01 (08 2024)

2024
[143]

Yuma Kikuchi, Kazuyuki Ogata, Yuki Kubota, Masaki Sasano, and Tomohiro Uesaka, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics,2016(10), 103D03 (10 2016)

2016
[144]

Kubota, A

Y. Kubota, A. Corsi, G. Authelet, H. Baba, C. Caesar, D. Calvet, A. Delbart, M. Dozono, J. Feng, F. Flavigny, J.-M. Gheller, J. Gibelin, A. Giganon, A. Gillibert, K. Hasegawa, T. Isobe, Y. Kanaya, S. Kawakami, D. Kim, Y. Kikuchi, Y. Kiyokawa, M. Kobayashi, N. Kobayashi, T. Kob...

2020
[145]

Akaike, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,19(6), 716–723 (1974)

H. Akaike, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,19(6), 716–723 (1974)

1974
[146]

X. L. Tu, X. G. Zhou, D. J. Vieira, J. M. Wouters, Z. Y. Zhou, H. L. Seifert, and V. G. Lind, Zeitschrift für Physik A Atomic Nuclei,337(4), 361–366 (12 1990)

1990
[147]

Madland and J.Rayford Nix, Nuclear Physics A,476(1), 1–38 (1988)

David G. Madland and J.Rayford Nix, Nuclear Physics A,476(1), 1–38 (1988)

1988
[148]

Pastore, J

A. Pastore, J. Margueron, P. Schuck, and X. Viñas, Phys. Rev. C,88, 034314 (09 2013)

2013
[149]

Masayasu Kamimura, Masanobu Yahiro, Yasunori Iseri, Yukinori Sakuragi, Hirofumi Kameyama, and Mitsuji Kawai, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.,89, 1–10 (1986). 32

1986
[150]

Masanobu Yahiro, Kazuyuki Ogata, Takuma Matsumoto, and Kosho Minomo, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys., 2012(1), 01A206 (2012). 33

2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [114]

Yoshiki Chazono, Kazuki Yoshida, and Kazuyuki Ogata, Phys. Rev. C,106, 064613 (12 2022)

work page 2022

[2] [1]

Gerhard Jacob and TH. A. J. Maris, Rev. Mod. Phys.,38, 121–142 (01 1966)

1966

[3] [2]

Gerhard Jacob and TH. A. J. Maris, Rev. Mod. Phys.,45, 6–21 (01 1973)

1973

[4] [3]

N. S. Chant and P. G. Roos, Phys. Rev. C,15, 57–68 (01 1977)

1977

[5] [4]

N. S. Chant and P. G. Roos, Phys. Rev. C,27, 1060–1072 (03 1983)

1983

[6] [5]

T. A. Carey, P. G. Roos, N. S. Chant, A. Nadasen, and H. L. Chen, Phys. Rev. C,23, 576–579 (01 1981)

1981

[7] [6]

T. A. Carey, P. G. Roos, N. S. Chant, A. Nadasen, and H. L. Chen, Phys. Rev. C,29, 1273–1288 (04 1984)

1984

[8] [7]

Typel, Phys

S. Typel, Phys. Rev. C,89, 064321 (06 2014)

2014