REVIEW 2 cited by
StenUNet: Automatic Stenosis Detection from X-ray Coronary Angiography
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Coronary angiography continues to serve as the primary method for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD), which is the leading global cause of mortality. The severity of CAD is quantified by the location, degree of narrowing (stenosis), and number of arteries involved. In current practice, this quantification is performed manually using visual inspection and thus suffers from poor inter- and intra-rater reliability. The MICCAI grand challenge: Automatic Region-based Coronary Artery Disease diagnostics using the X-ray angiography imagEs (ARCADE) curated a dataset with stenosis annotations, with the goal of creating an automated stenosis detection algorithm. Using a combination of machine learning and other computer vision techniques, we propose the architecture and algorithm StenUNet to accurately detect stenosis from X-ray Coronary Angiography. Our submission to the ARCADE challenge placed 3rd among all teams. We achieved an F1 score of 0.5348 on the test set, 0.0005 lower than the 2nd place.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Diffusion-Based User-Guided Data Augmentation for Coronary Stenosis Detection
A user-guided diffusion inpainting pipeline synthesizes coronary angiograms with controlled stenosis severity, improving downstream lesion detection and severity classification over training on real data alone.
-
Segmentation of Coronary Artery Stenosis in X-ray Angiography using Mamba Models
On the public ARCADE coronary stenosis segmentation benchmark, the U-Mamba BOT model achieves an F1 score of 68.79%, the highest reported to date.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.