Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 67 references

Universal scalings and switching entropy in yield-stress fluids

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Yield-stress fluids under slow large-amplitude oscillation obey universal power-law master curves, with the dynamic yield stress fixed by a balance between recoverable elastic energy and switching entropy.

desk verdict Strong data collapse and a clean exponent derivation, but the 'thermomechanical identity' is a redefinition and the fragility map is hand-tuned; the paper deserves a serious referee, not as-is. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.11799 v2 pith:NSY6ARPD submitted 2026-07-13 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Rajam Elancheliyan , Jean Marc Fromental , Edouard Chauveau , Domenico Truzzolillo This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords yield-stressfluidslarge-amplitudeoscillatoryshearuniversalscalingswitchingentropyviscoplasticfragilityfluiditymodeldynamicyieldstress
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the yielding of yield-stress fluids under slow, large-amplitude oscillation is a universal symmetry-breaking phenomenon rather than a material-specific accident. It reports that, once scaled by the low-frequency shear modulus and the characteristic yield strain, the first-harmonic storage and loss moduli of many different soft materials collapse onto two master curves with fixed exponents −3/2 and −1. The authors capture this collapse with a bistable fluidity model in which the material's relaxation rate is a fast variable governed by a frozen-time potential; the same model produces a thermomechanical identity for the dynamic yield stress in terms of recoverable elastic energy, viscoplastic fragility, and a switching entropy generated during stress reversal. If the paper is right, the dynamic yield stress stops being an empirical fit parameter and becomes a predictable threshold set by how much entropic dissipation a material must pay to reverse its flow state.

What carries the argument

The Bistable Fluidity Framework (BFF). It couples a Maxwell-like stress equation dσ/dt=Gcγ̇−(Γ0+F)σ to a gradient-flow equation for the fluidity F, driven by the frozen-time potential V[θ]=½αθ²−|σθ|^λ, with θ=F/γ̇. The non-analytic term |σθ|^λ turns the single minimum at θ=0 into a double well once stress is nonzero, so the system switches between two stable fluidity states. In the overdamped limit (damping rate much larger than the oscillation frequency), a singular-perturbation tracking argument gives F∝|γ̇|, making the plateau stress amplitude-independent and yielding the universal moduli decays through the elastic-recoil/steady-stress approximation.

What would settle it

A decisive test is to repeat large-amplitude oscillatory sweeps at frequencies approaching the material's relaxation rate: the universal collapse and the amplitude-independent plateau stress should degrade and the exponent pair should deviate from (−3/2,−1) once the overdamped tracking condition fails. A complementary check would directly measure the heat generated during one stress reversal and compare it with TΔS_sw^(el) predicted from the yield-stress identity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, under low-frequency large-amplitude oscillatory shear, yield-stress fluids act as bistable oscillators: the fluidity (relaxation rate) jumps almost instantaneously between two steady states, keeping the intra-cycle stress at an amplitude-independent plateau σp. From this the paper derives the universal master curves G′/Gc=(9/4π)(γy/γ0)^{3/2} and G″/Gc=(9/4π)(γy/γ0), where γy=16σp/(9Gc). It also derives the identity σp=sqrt(2Gc TΔS_sw^(el)/f(λ)), which ties the dynamic yield stress to the elastic energy stored at the plateau, the entropy produced when the system switches from −σp to +σp, and the fragility factor f(λ)=2(2−λ)/(3−λ). The framework reproduces full stres

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that fluidity is a fast variable that adiabatically tracks the instantaneous strain rate, and that its dynamics are governed by the particular one-dimensional bistable potential V[θ]=½αθ²−|σθ|^λ; if real materials have slower, higher-dimensional, or differently shaped fluidity dynamics, the universal scalings and the yield-stress identity do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At low frequency and large amplitude, first-harmonic moduli of all tested yield-stress fluids collapse onto G′/Gc=(9/4π)(γy/γ0)^{3/2} and G″/Gc=(9/4π)(γy/γ0), independent of chemical composition.
  • The dynamic yield stress is a thermomechanical quantity: σp=sqrt(2Gc TΔS_sw^(el)/f(λ)), connecting recoverable energy, switching entropy, and yielding abruptness.
  • The single exponent λ classifies yielding from ductile to brittle; the viscoplastic fragility Φ diverges at λ=2 as |2−λ|^{−1/2}.
  • The ratio of entropy production at zero strain to peak entropy production rises from 0 to 1 across yielding, providing a thermodynamic fluidization marker.
  • The BFF fits full intra-cycle stress–strain loops and moduli sweeps with only two free parameters (λ and σc), with the damping rate fixed in the overdamped regime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the yield-stress identity holds, dynamic yield stress could be predicted from linear-response modulus plus an independently measurable switching entropy, turning a fit parameter into a verifiable material constant.
  • The λ=2 divergence suggests a genuine critical point; a dedicated set of materials tuned across the ductile–brittle boundary could test whether the −1/2 exponent is universal or an artifact of the mean-field potential.
  • The same frozen-time potential construction could transfer to other hysteretic soft materials (gels, pastes, granular media) by substituting a different scalar order parameter, predicting analogous master curves.
  • Because the moduli exponents are independent of λ, the universal collapse should survive even when yielding abruptness varies; this could be tested by changing crosslink density or volume fraction within a single system.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. Using large-amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS) experiments on two yield-stress systems (Ludox silica suspensions and jammed PNIPAM microgels) and reanalyzed literature data, the authors report universal power-law decays G′ ~ γ0^{-3/2} and G″ ~ γ0^{-1} in the fluidized regime, recast as master curves with γy = 16σp/(9Gc). They interpret this via an elastic-recoil + constant-stress approximation (ERSS) and propose a Bistable Fluidity Framework (BFF) in which a fast fluidity evolves by gradient descent on V[θ] = ½αθ² − |σθ|^λ. The model yields a stationary stress σp = σc^{λ/2} Gc^{1−λ/2} and a 'switching entropy' ΔS_sw^(el) claimed to determine σp through Eq. (14). The paper argues that the yield stress thus has a thermomechanical basis controlled by λ and recoverable elastic energy.

Significance. The empirical collapse of YSF moduli onto the ERSS master curves is a useful and likely influential result. The derivations in SI3 are transparent, and the predicted exponents (−3/2, −1) are consistent with the compiled dataset; this alone is a solid contribution. The BFF captures several qualitative features of intracycle response and entropy production, and the numerical implementation is described in enough detail to be reproduced. However, the paper's headline novelty — the 'thermomechanical foundation' for σp in Eqs. (13)–(14) — is as written a formal identity, not an independently testable prediction. Unless the switching entropy is measured independently or the claim is clearly reframed, the central theoretical advance is a model fit rather than a new thermodynamic law.

major comments (4)
  1. [Entropy production and switching entropy, Eq. (14) and SI9] Equation (14) is an identity, not a prediction. SI9 defines TΔS_sw^(el) = f(λ)E_el with E_el = σp²/(2Gc) (Eq. S40). Substituting this into Eq. (14) gives σp = σp. The only nontrivial content is the model-specific assertion that the elastic-recoil switching entropy equals f(λ) times the stored energy, which is already contained in Eqs. (12)–(13). No independent measurement of ΔS_sw^(el) is provided. As written, the conclusion that the yield stress is 'dictated by' switching entropy is unsupported. Please reframe Eqs. (13)–(14) as a definition of the switching entropy, or provide an independent calorimetric/thermodynamic test.
  2. [Fig. 4 and Methods: Fitting procedure] The BFF validation is in-sample. λ and σc are fitted to the same full intracycle stress–time series that are then used to compute G′, G″, and the entropy production rates in Fig. 4e–h. The reported R² > 0.97 measures self-consistency, not predictive power. A meaningful test would fix λ and σc from one amplitude (or from the steady-flow Herschel–Bulkley parameters) and predict all other amplitudes, or would validate against a system excluded from the fitting. Currently the agreement in Fig. 4 does not distinguish BFF from other two-parameter constitutive models.
  3. [SI12, Fig. S7d] The mapping of experimental viscoplastic fragilities onto the BFF Φ(λ) master curve is performed by 'manually adjusting λ' for each system. This procedure cannot provide quantitative support for the universality of Φ(λ) or for the claim that all investigated systems have λ ≥ 1. A quantitative inversion with uncertainties, preferably with a stated fitting criterion and leave-one-out validation, is required. Without it, the stated agreement with Fig. S7d is anecdotal.
  4. [Fig. 1b and ERSS, Eqs. (1)–(2)] The experimental collapse in Fig. 1b uses γy determined from the intersection of the two fitted power laws. This construction forces the two master branches to cross at x = 1 with a common prefactor 9/(4π); it tests the exponent pair (−3/2, −1) but not the absolute prefactor. The universal-curve claim would be substantially stronger if γy were predicted from independently measured σp and Gc for the literature systems, as is done for Ludox and MCr5. Please clarify which aspects of Eqs. (1)–(2) are falsifiable with the present data.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Main text, after Eq. (7)] 'Dumping factor' should be 'damping factor'; the phrase 'limit of larger(r→∞)' is ungrammatical and should read 'large r limit'.
  2. [SI12 caption, Fig. S7] The caption does not state whether error bars on Φ are included; please add numerical values and uncertainties for the extracted λ values.
  3. [SI10, footnote text] The sentence 'overlaid with the those reported in Fig. 2b' contains a typo; should read 'with those reported'.
  4. [Methods and availability] The Python acquisition code and the C solver are described but no public link or repository is given. Please provide the code or a clear availability statement to facilitate reproduction.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

Core 'thermomechanical identity' for the yield stress is a definitional rearrangement; the supporting Φ(λ) agreement is produced by manually fitted λ, though the ERSS universal scaling itself is data-supported.

  1. self definitional [Main text, 'Entropy production and switching entropy', Eqs. (13)–(14); SI9, Eq. (S40)]
    "Under these conditions, the switching entropy from −σp to +σp converges to a fraction of the recoverable energy dictated by the system fragility: T∆S(el)sw/Eel = f(λ), (13) which brings to the following expression for the stationary (dynamic yield) stress σp = sqrt(2Gc T∆S(el)sw / f(λ)) (14) ... SI9: T∆S(el)sw(σp) = f(λ)Eel (S40)."

    Equation (13) does not provide an independent empirical entropy: it defines/derives the elastic switching entropy as f(λ)Eel, with Eel = σp²/(2Gc). Substituting (13) into (14) gives σp = sqrt(2Gc·f(λ)σp²/(2Gc)/f(λ)) = σp. The 'thermomechanical identity' is therefore an algebraic tautology once the model's elastic-recoil switching entropy is defined; ΔS(el)sw carries no independent measured content, and the novel 'prediction' of the yield stress reduces to the definition of the switching entropy in terms of that same yield stress.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Main text, Fig. 4 comparison / fitting procedure]
    "λ and σc were the only free fitting parameters, which is equivalent to leaving free ∆S(el)sw and the recoverable energy Eel. We obtained an excellent agreement between the BFF model and experimental data for both systems..."

    The two free parameters λ and σc are fitted to the same intracycle LAOS stress–strain cycles from which σp, Eel, and hence f(λ) are extracted. The paper itself acknowledges that fitting (λ, σc) is equivalent to fitting ΔS(el)sw and Eel. Therefore the 'excellent agreement' in Fig. 4 cannot validate Eq. (14) or the claimed thermomechanical prediction: the predicted σp is the fitted σp, and the predicted entropy is the fitted entropy. This is a fit, not an independent prediction.

1 more flagged steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [SI12, Fig. S7(d), 'Viscoplastic fragility from dynamic strain sweeps']
    "The Φ values obtained for the diverse systems under study were subsequently mapped onto the universal Φ(λ) master curve predicted by the BFF model (reported in Fig. 2 of the main text) by manually adjusting the plasticity production exponent λ (Figure S8-d)."

    The main text presents the Φ(λ) comparison as corroboration ('corroborated by experimental data, Figure S7'), but the SI states that the experimental fragility points were placed on the model master curve by manually adjusting λ for each system. The agreement is therefore achieved by construction: λ is not independently measured for these systems. The apparent data collapse of experimental fragilities onto the BFF Φ(λ) curve is a re-plot of a manual fit, not a falsifiable prediction.

full rationale

The ERSS-derived universal scalings of Eqs. (1)–(2) and the exponent pair (−3/2, −1) are not circular: they follow from an explicit elastic-recoil/constant-stress-waveform ansatz and are checked against a data collapse across many systems. However, the paper's signature novelty—the 'thermomechanical identity' for the dynamic yield stress, Eqs. (13)–(14)—is definitional: TΔS(el)sw is introduced as f(λ)Eel, so Eq. (14) is a rearrangement of Eq. (13) and imposes no independent constraint. The model parameters λ and σc are fitted to the same LAOS cycles from which σp and Eel are obtained, and in the SI the experimental Φ(λ) agreement is created by manually adjusting λ. The main-text claim that the yield stress is 'predicted' by a thermomechanical foundation is therefore not supported by independent evidence; the central identity reduces to its own definitions, while the empirically valuable scaling exponents remain independent of that identity. Score 7 reflects partial circularity: the universal scaling is real, but the newly claimed thermomechanical prediction is a fitted/definitional restatement.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The 'predictions' are governed by the fitted pair (λ, σ_c); the model's functional form is chosen to deliver symmetry breaking. No independent physical constraint fixes the Lyapunov potential or the overdamped limit.

free parameters (4)
  • λ (plasticity production exponent) = Ludox ≈1.44–1.60, MCr5 ≈1 (amplitude-dependent); manual mapping for literature fragilities
    Central parameter in V and all thermodynamic identities; obtained by least-squares fitting of full stress cycles.
  • σ_c (characteristic stress) = Not tabulated; fitted per strain amplitude
    Second free fit parameter; enters σp = σ_c^{λ/2}G_c^{1−λ/2} and the switching-entropy expression.
  • r (damping factor) = 150 s⁻¹ (fixed)
    Chosen much larger than ω; authors state model output is insensitive to its precise value in the overdamped regime.
  • Power-law prefactors K1, K2 in moduli fits = Not reported numerically
    Empirical constants used to extract exponents and locate γ_y; not central to the BFF claim but part of the data analysis.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Generalized Maxwell evolution with a single scalar fluidity F(t): σ̇ = Gcγ̇ − σ(Γ0 + F).
    Captures linear viscoelasticity plus plastic relaxation; no microstructural derivation is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper F(t) obeys gradient flow on V = ½αθ² − |σθ|^λ with μ(γ̇) = μ2γ̇² + O(γ̇⁴).
    The specific Landau-like potential is chosen to produce bistability, symmetry breaking, and the observed exponent pair; it is not derived from microscopic physics.
  • ad hoc to paper 0 < λ ≤ 2, β reabsorbed to 1, σ_c = (α/λ)^{1/λ}.
    Stability and normalization constraints; λ is a free fit parameter and the functional form is not independently fixed.
  • ad hoc to paper Overdamped/fast-fluidity limit r ≫ ω, so F tracks the manifold ψ = 1.
    Inferred from the observed constant stress plateau and then used to derive the plateau and σp formula (Eqs. 7-9).
  • domain assumption Stress waveform in the fluidized regime is approximated as elastic recoil plus constant plateau (ERSS, Eqs. S1-S3).
    Used for Eqs. (1)-(2); validity condition Gcγ̇ ≫ σ(Γ0 + F) near reversal is stated but not systematically verified.
  • standard math Spatially uniform mean-field; standard irreversible thermodynamics TṠ = σγ̇ − Ė.
    Framework's thermodynamic starting point; spatial gradients are neglected and listed as a limitation.
invented entities (1)
  • Switching entropy ΔS_sw(σ)
    purpose: Quantifies entropy produced during stress inversion and anchors the claimed yield-stress identity.
    Computed from model with fitted σ(t), F(t), and λ; no calorimetric or protocol-independent measurement is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Universal scalings and switching entropy in yield-stress fluids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NSY6ARPD

@misc{pith2026260711799,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Universal scalings and switching entropy in yield-stress fluids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NSY6ARPD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.11799}
}
read the original abstract

Yield-stress fluids transition from solid-like to liquid-like behavior at a critical stress threshold, governing phenomena from industrial processing to geological flows. While predominantly investigated under steady shear, large-amplitude oscillatory tests force these materials to cyclically navigate between arrested and fluidized states. Here, we discover a hidden universal behavior where the dynamic viscoelastic moduli of yield-stress fluids collapse onto master curves, revealing that these materials rearrange almost instantaneously to maintain a constant intra-cycle stress state. We fully capture this behavior using a novel theoretical framework based on the minimization of a governing function that exhibits symmetry breaking. Our findings reveal that recoverable elastic energy, yielding abruptness, and entropy production during stress inversion are fundamentally intertwined. This connection provides a unified physical picture for the dynamic yield stress, offering a novel thermomechanical foundation to define and predict this threshold across soft matter physics and materials science.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2023 , month = nov, journal =

    A Unified State Diagram for the Yielding Transition of Soft Colloids , author =. 2023 , month = nov, journal =. doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02153-w , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02153-w 2023

  2. [2]

    2020 , month = may, journal =

    Landau Theory for Non-Equilibrium Steady States , author =. 2020 , month = may, journal =. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.5.074 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.8.5.074 2020

  3. [3]

    Nonanalytic Nonequilibrium Field Theory:

    Aron, Camille and Kulkarni, Manas , year =. Nonanalytic Nonequilibrium Field Theory:. Phys. Rev. Research , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043390 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043390

  4. [4]

    2023 , month = mar, journal =

    Continuum Modeling of Soft Glassy Materials under Shear , author =. 2023 , month = mar, journal =. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/acbc47 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/acbc47 2023

  5. [5]

    Benzi, Roberto and Divoux, Thibaut and Barentin, Catherine and Manneville, S. Unified. 2019 , month = dec, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.248001 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.248001 2019

  6. [6]

    2014 , month = may, journal =

    Phase Separation in Lava Flow , author =. 2014 , month = may, journal =. doi:10.1016/j.euromechflu.2013.12.002 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.euromechflu.2013.12.002 2014

  7. [7]

    Bocquet, Lyd. Kinetic. 2009 , month = jul, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.036001 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.036001 2009

  8. [8]

    2009 , month = jul, journal =

    A Kinetic Theory of Plastic Flow in Soft Glassy Materials , author =. 2009 , month = jul, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.036001 , urldate =. arXiv , langid =:0903.0439 , primaryclass =

    arXiv 2009

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    and Berthier, Ludovic and Divoux, Thibaut and Manneville, S

    Bonn, Daniel and Denn, Morton M. and Berthier, Ludovic and Divoux, Thibaut and Manneville, S. Yield. 2017 , month = aug, journal =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035005 , urldate =. arXiv , langid =:1502.05281 , primaryclass =

    2017 arXiv

  2. [10]

    2011 , month = jun, journal =

    Shear-Transformation-Zone Theory of Linear Glassy Dynamics , author =. 2011 , month = jun, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.83.061503 , urldate =

    2011 doi

  3. [11]

    2009 , month = mar, journal =

    Nonlinear Rheology of Colloidal Glasses of Soft Thermosensitive Microgel Particles , author =. 2009 , month = mar, journal =. doi:10.1122/1.3045803 , urldate =

    2009 doi

  4. [12]

    2010 , publisher =

    Rheometry of Pastes, Suspensions, and Granular Materials: Applications in Industry and Environment , shorttitle =. 2010 , publisher =

    2010

  5. [13]

    2003 , month = jun, journal =

    Aging and Nonlinear Rheology in Suspensions of Polyethylene Oxide--Protected Silica Particles , author =. 2003 , month = jun, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.67.061403 , urldate =

    2003 doi

  6. [14]

    and Ajdari, A

    Derec, C. and Ajdari, A. and Lequeux, F. , year =. Rheology and Aging:. The European Physical Journal E , volume =. doi:10.1007/s101890170118 , urldate =

    doi

  7. [15]

    Ductile-to-Brittle Transition and Yielding in Soft Amorphous Materials: Perspectives and Open Questions , shorttitle =

    Divoux, Thibaut and Agoritsas, Elisabeth and Aime, Stefano and Barentin, Catherine and Barrat, Jean-Louis and Benzi, Roberto and Berthier, Ludovic and Bi, Dapeng and Biroli, Giulio and Bonn, Daniel and Bourrianne, Philippe and Bouzid, Mehdi and Del Gado, Emanuela and. Ductile-...

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    and Singh, Piyush K

    Donley, Gavin J. and Singh, Piyush K. and Shetty, Abhishek and Rogers, Simon A. , year =. Elucidating the. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , volume =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2003869117 , urldate =

    doi

  9. [17]

    Impact of Polyelectrolyte Adsorption on the Rheology of Concentrated Poly(

    Elancheliyan, Rajam and Chauveau, Edouard and Truzzolillo, Domenico , year =. Impact of Polyelectrolyte Adsorption on the Rheology of Concentrated Poly(. Soft Matter , volume =. doi:10.1039/D3SM00317E , urldate =

    doi

  10. [18]

    2008 , month = nov, journal =

    New Measures for Characterizing Nonlinear Viscoelasticity in Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear , author =. 2008 , month = nov, journal =. doi:10.1122/1.2970095 , urldate =

    2008 doi

  11. [19]

    , year =

    Fuchs, Matthias and Cates, Michael E. , year =. Theory of. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.248304 , urldate =

    doi

  12. [20]

    1971 , publisher =

    Thermodynamic Theory of Structure, Stability and Fluctuations , author =. 1971 , publisher =

    1971

  13. [21]

    Griffiths, R. W. , year =. The. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , volume =. doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.477 , urldate =

    doi

  14. [22]

    Continuum

    Haupt, Peter , year =. Continuum. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-04775-0 , urldate =

    doi

  15. [23]

    and Cho, Kwang Soo and Nam, Jung Gun and Ahn, Kyung Hyun and Lee, Seung Jong and Ewoldt, Randy H

    Hyun, Kyu and Wilhelm, Manfred and Klein, Christopher O. and Cho, Kwang Soo and Nam, Jung Gun and Ahn, Kyung Hyun and Lee, Seung Jong and Ewoldt, Randy H. and McKinley, Gareth H. , year =. A Review of Nonlinear Oscillatory Shear Tests:. Progress in Polymer Science , volume =. ...

    2011 doi

  16. [24]

    2012 , month = jul, journal =

    Unified Study of Glass and Jamming Rheology in Soft Particle Systems , author =. 2012 , month = jul, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.018301 , urldate =

    2012 doi

  17. [25]

    2025 , journal =

    Linking Structural and Rheological Memory in Disordered Soft Materials , author =. 2025 , journal =. doi:10.1039/D4SM00953C , urldate =

    2025 doi

  18. [26]

    and Rogers, Simon A

    Kamani, Krutarth and Donley, Gavin J. and Rogers, Simon A. , year =. Unification of the. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.218002 , urldate =

    doi

  19. [27]

    and Nikoumanesh, Elnaz and Kamani, Krutarth M

    Keane, Daniel P. and Nikoumanesh, Elnaz and Kamani, Krutarth M. and Rogers, Simon A. and. Universal. 2025 , month = may, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.208202 , urldate =

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    , year =

    Khalil, Hassan K. , year =. Nonlinear Systems

  21. [29]

    2012 , journal =

    Direct Comparison of the Rheology of Model Hard and Soft Particle Glasses , author =. 2012 , journal =. doi:10.1039/c2sm07113d , urldate =

    2012 doi

  22. [30]

    2007 , month = aug, journal =

    An Elastic, Plastic, Viscous Model for Slow Shear of a Liquid Foam , author =. 2007 , month = aug, journal =. doi:10.1140/epje/i2006-10193-x , urldate =

    2007 doi

  23. [31]

    and Bibette, J

    Mason, T.G. and Bibette, J. and Weitz, D.A. , year =. Yielding and. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science , volume =. doi:10.1006/jcis.1996.0235 , urldate =

    1996

  24. [32]

    Mayr, S. G. , year =. Activation. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.195501 , urldate =

    doi

  25. [33]

    2013 , series =

    Colloidal Suspension Rheology , author =. 2013 , series =

    2013

  26. [34]

    2006 , month = sep, journal =

    Nonlinear Viscoelasticity of Metastable Complex Fluids , author =. 2006 , month = sep, journal =. doi:10.1209/epl/i2006-10203-9 , urldate =

    2006 doi

  27. [35]

    Marginal

    M. Marginal. 2015 , month = mar, journal =. doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014614 , urldate =

    2015 doi

  28. [36]

    2018 , month = dec, journal =

    On the Stability of a Class of Slowly Varying Systems , author =. 2018 , month = dec, journal =. doi:10.1186/s13660-018-1934-1 , urldate =

    2018 doi

  29. [37]

    and Martens, Kirsten and Barrat, Jean-Louis , year =

    Nicolas, Alexandre and Ferrero, Ezequiel E. and Martens, Kirsten and Barrat, Jean-Louis , year =. Deformation and Flow of Amorphous Solids:. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.045006 , urldate =

    doi

  30. [38]

    2018 , month = jun, journal =

    Random Critical Point Separates Brittle and Ductile Yielding Transitions in Amorphous Materials , author =. 2018 , month = jun, journal =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1806156115 , urldate =

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    2018 , month = apr, journal =

    Glass Transition of Soft Colloids , author =. 2018 , month = apr, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.97.040601 , urldate =

    2018 doi

  32. [40]

    and Renou, Fr

    Poulos, Andreas S. and Renou, Fr. Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear (. 2015 , month = aug, journal =. doi:10.1007/s00397-015-0865-8 , urldate =

    2015 doi

  33. [41]

    Nonanalytic

    Ptaszynski, Krzysztof and Esposito, Massimiliano , year =. Nonanalytic. Phys. Rev. E , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.111.044142 , urldate =. arXiv , langid =:2502.06226 , primaryclass =

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    and Erwin, Brian M

    Rogers, Simon A. and Erwin, Brian M. and Vlassopoulos, Dimitris and Cloitre, Michel , year =. A Sequence of Physical Processes Determined and Quantified in. Journal of Rheology , volume =. doi:10.1122/1.3544591 , urldate =

    doi

  35. [43]

    1999 , month = nov, journal =

    Vanishing Elasticity for Wet Foams:. 1999 , month = nov, journal =. doi:10.1122/1.551052 , urldate =

    1999 doi

  36. [44]

    and Richtering, W

    Senff, H. and Richtering, W. , year =. Temperature Sensitive Microgel Suspensions:. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. doi:10.1063/1.479430 , urldate =

    doi

  37. [45]

    2011 , month = nov, journal =

    A Micromechanical Model to Predict the Flow of Soft Particle Glasses , author =. 2011 , month = nov, journal =. doi:10.1038/nmat3119 , urldate =

    2011 doi

  38. [46]

    1998 , month = jul, journal =

    Rheological Constitutive Equation for a Model of Soft Glassy Materials , author =. 1998 , month = jul, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.58.738 , urldate =

    1998 doi

  39. [47]

    Rheology of

    Sollich, Peter and Lequeux, Francois and H. Rheology of. 1997 , journal =

    1997

  40. [48]

    2010 , series =

    Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , author =. 2010 , series =

    2010

  41. [49]

    2025 , month = feb, publisher =

    Granular Hydrogels as Brittle Yield Stress Fluids , author =. 2025 , month = feb, publisher =. doi:10.1101/2025.02.22.639638 , urldate =

    2025 doi

  42. [50]

    1985 , series =

    Differential Equations , author =. 1985 , series =

    1985

  43. [51]

    2015 , month = may, journal =

    Bulk and Interfacial Stresses in Suspensions of Soft and Hard Colloids , author =. 2015 , month = may, journal =. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/27/19/194103 , urldate =

    2015 doi

  44. [52]

    2013 , month = mar, journal =

    Rheological Detection of Caging and Solid--Liquid Transitions in Soft Colloid--Polymer Mixtures , author =. 2013 , month = mar, journal =. doi:10.1016/j.jnnfm.2012.03.010 , urldate =

    2013 doi

  45. [53]

    2011 , month = sep, journal =

    Yield Stresses and Flow Curves in Metallic Glass Formers and Granular Systems , author =. 2011 , month = sep, journal =. doi:10.1140/epje/i2011-11106-8 , urldate =

    2011 doi

  46. [54]

    , year =

    Wapperom, Peter and Hulsen, Martien A. , year =. Thermodynamics of Viscoelastic Fluids:. Journal of Rheology , volume =. doi:10.1122/1.550922 , urldate =

    doi

  47. [55]

    Campbell, S. L. and Gear, C. W. The index of general nonlinear D A E S. Numer. M ath. 1995

    1995

  48. [56]

    Slifka, M. K. and Whitton, J. L. Clinical implications of dysregulated cytokine production. J. M ol. M ed. 2000. doi:10.1007/s001090000086

    2000 doi

  49. [57]

    Quasimonotonicity, regularity and duality for nonlinear systems of partial differential equations

    Hamburger, C. Quasimonotonicity, regularity and duality for nonlinear systems of partial differential equations. Ann. Mat. Pura. Appl. 1995

    1995

  50. [58]

    Geddes, K. O. and Czapor, S. R. and Labahn, G. Algorithms for C omputer A lgebra. 1992

    1992

  51. [59]

    Software engineering---from auxiliary to key technologies

    Broy, M. Software engineering---from auxiliary to key technologies. Software Pioneers. 1992

    1992

  52. [60]

    Conductive P olymers. 1981

    1981

  53. [61]

    Smith, S. E. Neuromuscular blocking drugs in man. Neuromuscular junction. H andbook of experimental pharmacology. 1976

    1976

  54. [62]

    Chung, S. T. and Morris, R. L. Isolation and characterization of plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid from Streptomyces fradiae. 1978

    1978

  55. [63]

    and AghaKouchak, A

    Hao, Z. and AghaKouchak, A. and Nakhjiri, N. and Farahmand, A. Global integrated drought monitoring and prediction system (GIDMaPS) data sets. 2014

    2014

  56. [64]

    Babichev, S. A. and Ries, J. and Lvovsky, A. I. Quantum scissors: teleportation of single-mode optical states by means of a nonlocal single photon. 2002

    2002

  57. [65]

    and Buchalla, G

    Beneke, M. and Buchalla, G. and Dunietz, I. Mixing induced CP asymmetries in inclusive B decays. Phys. L ett. 1997. arXiv:0707.3168

    1997 arXiv

  58. [66]

    deep SIP : deep learning of S upernova I a P arameters

    Stahl, B. deep SIP : deep learning of S upernova I a P arameters. 2020. ascl:2006.023

    2020

  59. [67]

    Abbott, T. M. C. and others. Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.123505. arXiv:1810.02499

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.