Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1607.04311 v1 pith:NTODIGS6 submitted 2016-07-14 cs.CR cs.CV

Defensive Distillation is Not Robust to Adversarial Examples

Nicholas Carlini , David Wagner This is my paper
classification cs.CR cs.CV
keywords defensivedistillationadversarialattacksexamplesmisclassificationnetworksneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We show that defensive distillation is not secure: it is no more resistant to targeted misclassification attacks than unprotected neural networks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Low Rank Adaptation for Adversarial Perturbation

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Adversarial perturbations possess an inherently low-rank structure that enables more efficient and effective black-box adversarial attacks via subspace projection.