Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 55 references

Dexterous Manipulation of Deformable Objects via Pneumatic Gripping: Lifting by One End

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A catenary-derived gripper path lets robots lift textiles by one edge, using 19-76% less supply pressure.

desk verdict A practical lift trajectory that likely works, but the paper's mechanistic claim is stronger than its measurements. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.05198 v1 pith:NV24EHM7 submitted 2025-01-09 cs.RO

Roman Mykhailyshyn , Jonathan Lee , Mykhailo Mykhailyshyn , Kensuke Harada , Ann Majewicz Fey This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.RO
keywords pneumaticgrippingdeformableobjectmanipulationtextileliftingcatenarytrajectoryone-edgegraspingplanningairflowvibrationpick-and-place
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Textile sheets are hard to lift with a pneumatic gripper because a plain vertical pull makes the material deform, slide, and peel away from the gripper. This paper claims that a gripper can lift a sheet by one edge reliably if the robot moves the gripper along a trajectory computed from the catenary curve the hanging part of the sheet adopts, keeping the gripper face tangent to the material and shifting the grasp point sideways so the sheet never has to slip on the table. On four fabrics of different mass, friction, and stiffness, the method reduced the minimum gripper supply pressure needed for a successful lift by 19% to 76% relative to the previous reorient-then-lift strategy, and also reduced vibration caused by the gripper's airflow. The practical payoff is that a single robot arm can pick one sheet off a conveyor or cutting table using only one exposed edge, without needles or high holding pressures.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a catenary-based trajectory generator. For a sheet of length $L$, weight per unit length $q$, and sliding-friction coefficient $k$ with the table, the hanging segment is modeled as an inextensible flexible cable whose lowest-point tension equals the friction of the table segment, $H = q(L-L_1)k$. The gripper orientation at the grasped edge is set to the catenary's tangent angle, $\alpha_t = \arctan\left(\sinh\left(\frac{l_1}{a}\right)\right)$ with $a = H/q$, and the horizontal coordinate of the grasp point is shifted by $x_{1A} = L - a\sinh\left(\frac{l_1}{a}\right) + l_1$ so that the material does not slide. The shifted tool center point on the gripper edge, together with a beveled anti-vibration grid that redirects airflow away from the material, completes the mechanism.

What would settle it

Track marked points on the fabric's lower surface during a T2 lift: if the material slides along the table (marks move horizontally) or detaches while the gripper is within the pressure predicted by the catenary model, the no-slip premise is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the limiting failure in one-edge pneumatic lifting is not the gripper's holding capacity but the kinematic mismatch between a vertical lift and the natural catenary shape of the suspended fabric. If the gripper's tool center point is placed at the edge of the gripper and its position and orientation are updated continuously so that the gripper stays parallel to the tangent of the catenary at the grasped edge, the fabric's table segment never has to slide, the gripper never loses sealing contact, and the airflow from the gripper passes to the side of the material instead of into it. The paper derives the trajectory from a catenary model with Coulomb friction at the table contact (Eqs. 10-12), implements it as Algorithm 1, and shows experimentally that on all four tested fabrics the minimum required supply pressure follows the order baseline-reorient greater than reorient-with-modified-gripper greater than catenary-with-original-gripper greater than catenary-with-modified-gripper, with the best method needing 19-76% less pressure than the baseline.

Load-bearing premise

The plan assumes the fabric is a perfectly flexible, inextensible cable whose resistance to sliding is pure Coulomb friction, so real bending stiffness, stretch, or non-Coulomb friction will make the computed positions and angles only approximate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single-arm robot can pick a flat textile from a conveyor or cutting table when only one edge is exposed, a case that previously required two arms or a different gripper type.
  • The minimum gripper supply pressure drops by 19-76% across the tested materials, so each pick-and-place operation consumes less compressed air.
  • With known material length, friction coefficient, and weight per unit length, the trajectory can be planned offline; no force feedback or vision is required for the tested sheet-like materials.
  • The beveled-edge anti-vibration grid further reduces force spikes and residual vibration during lifting, making the grasp more stable immediately after the lift.
  • Lifting is most improved for heavy, high-friction materials (65-76% pressure reduction), which are exactly the textiles for which reorientation-based lifting fails dramatically.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same catenary recipe should transfer to other sheet-like porous materials such as nonwoven fabrics, paper, and thin films, provided their friction and weight parameters are measured; the paper only demonstrates four textiles.
  • Modeling each gripper as an independent two-dimensional catenary section suggests a direct extension to wide sheets with multiple grippers: plan each gripper's path from the local sheet length and friction rather than treating the sheet as one cable.
  • A closed-loop version that estimates $k$ and $q$ from the observed drape angle at the gripper would remove the need for offline material data and is the natural next step toward arbitrary shapes, which the authors list as future work.
  • Because the paper's four experimental conditions vary trajectory and gripper design simultaneously, the individual contribution of the trajectory alone versus the airflow-redirecting grid could be separated by testing each gripper with both trajectories; the observed ordering already suggests the trajectory dominates, but this would quantify it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a method for lifting a textile deformable object by one edge using a previously developed pneumatic gripper. The authors model the hanging part of the fabric as a catenary (Eqs. 1-12), with the horizontal tension at the table contact set equal to the maximum friction of the remaining lying segment (Eq. 5). From this model they derive a trajectory T2, in which the gripper's TCP is shifted to the edge of the gripper and both position and orientation are updated continuously. The method is compared experimentally against a baseline T1 (reorientation to vertical, then lift) using two gripper variants (G1 and G2) on four textile materials. The main reported outcomes are a 19-76% reduction in minimum required gripper supply pressure and reduced vibration under T2 with G2.

Significance. If the model and experiments are properly validated, the paper would offer a simple, useful trajectory-planning rule for one-edge pneumatic lifting of textiles, with practical relevance to automated cutting, sorting, and assembly cells. The derivation is first-principles and contains no fitted parameters: the trajectory is computed from measured L, k, and q, and the reported pressure reductions are experimental outcomes rather than optimized fits. The experimental protocol for minimum pressure uses repeated checks, and the four materials span a useful range of mass, friction, and flexibility. The paper also includes a video supplement. However, the central mechanism is not directly verified: no measurement of the fabric edge position or slip is reported, the predicted catenary shape is never compared with measured material shape, and the force/vibration conclusions rest on single representative traces. These gaps currently limit the strength of the claims and the generalizability of the method.

major comments (4)
  1. [II, Eqs. (5) and (11)] The boundary condition H = q(L-L1)k places the table-contact tension exactly at the maximum friction of the lying segment, and the horizontal compensation x1A = L - L1 + l1 is derived to keep the free edge fixed. The paper reports no measurement of the free-edge position or of any slip during T2; the success data in Fig. 12 and the force traces in Fig. 15 show only that the grasp sometimes succeeds. If the edge slides during T2, the model's key premise is violated, and the observed pressure reduction could instead be due to the gradual orientation change or to the G2 airflow redirection. Please add a direct measurement of the edge position versus time during T2 (for example, an overhead camera or a draw-wire sensor) and compare it with the predicted l1 and x1A. This verification is load-bearing for both the stated mechanism and any claim that the method transfers to other materials, sizes, or coverings.
  2. [II, Eqs. (1)-(12)] The catenary model assumes the textile is a perfectly flexible, inextensible cable. Real fabrics have bending stiffness and extensibility, and the model's predictions for the hanging shape (L1, l1, alpha_t) are never compared with the measured material shape. Without such a comparison, the trajectory is validated only through a success/failure criterion, and the claim that the method generalizes to other materials, sizes, or coverings is not supported. Please include a shape-validation experiment (for example, a side camera tracking the fabric edge and silhouette) at several z1 values and quantify the error between the predicted and observed alpha_t and edge position.
  3. [III, Fig. 15] The total-force traces in Fig. 15 appear to be single representative runs; the text does not state how many trials were recorded or whether the plotted trace is typical. The conclusions about vibration ("residual vibration is practically absent" for T2) and the relative smoothness of methods A-D rest entirely on these traces. Please report repeated trials with mean and spread (at least n=5 per condition) and a quantitative vibration metric, such as RMS or peak-to-peak force during the holding stage.
  4. [II-B and Table I] The friction coefficient k used in Eq. (5) is listed as 1.38-1.71 for the covering, but the measurement procedure (static versus kinetic, pull direction, normal load, sample size) is not described. Because the trajectory depends directly on k through H = q(L-L1)k, this omission makes the experiments difficult to reproduce, and the sensitivity of the minimum-pressure results to uncertainty in k is unknown. Please document the friction measurement protocol and include a sensitivity analysis for the four materials.
minor comments (5)
  1. [II-A, Algorithm 1] Line 3 of Algorithm 1 says "Solve (9) numerically for l1/a", but Eq. (9) is a definition of tg alpha; the equation to solve for l1/a is Eq. (8). Lines 6 and 7 also describe direct substitutions as "solve".
  2. [II-A, Algorithm 1] The input list of Algorithm 1 labels q with units "kg", but q is used as weight per unit length; please use consistent units (N/m) or specify the mass-per-unit-length conversion.
  3. [III, text near Fig. 11] The text repeatedly uses "dextrose" where "dexterous" is meant; please correct these typographical errors.
  4. [III, Figs. 12 and 15] The captions and axes of Figs. 12 and 15 should include clear labels and units, and Fig. 15 should define the "total force" (for example, the Euclidean norm of the measured force vector).
  5. [II-B] The determination of P0 is referred to reference [29] but not restated; please provide the procedure in enough detail for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the catenary-based trajectory is derived from first-principles mechanics with independently measured material parameters, and the claimed pressure reductions are experimental outcomes rather than fitted outputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain in Section II computes the lifting trajectory from the catenary equations (1)-(12) using measured inputs L, k, and q from Table I without fitting any parameter to the success criterion. The compensating horizontal position x1A = L - L1 + l1 (Eq. 11) follows algebraically from the catenary length L1 = a·sh(l1/a) and the no-slip condition H = q(L-L1)k (Eq. 5); it is a designed trajectory, not a post hoc fit to the measured minimum pressure. The pressure reductions in Fig. 12 and force traces in Fig. 15 are experimental comparisons between T1 and T2, so the central claim is not equivalent to the model inputs. The two self-citations ([21] for the gripper and [29] for tangential-orientation holding force and the P0 protocol) are prior independent hardware and experimental results rather than load-bearing equations; even if [29] were set aside, Eqs. (8)-(12) still determine alpha_t and x1A from catenary statics. The reviewer's concern that the no-slip premise H = q(L-L1)k is not directly verified by free-edge position measurements is a correctness and generalization risk, not circularity, because the reported result is an empirical outcome rather than the model's own output.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model uses measured inputs (length L, friction coefficient k, weight per unit length q) and no fitted constants. The central assumptions are the catenary idealization, the maximum-friction condition at the contact point, the 2D single-gripper simplification, and the prior finding that tangential orientation maximizes pneumatic holding force. No new physical entities are postulated; the G2 gripper is a design modification of the existing gripper [21], not a new force, particle, or conserved quantity.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The hanging portion of the material deforms as an ideal catenary with uniform weight per unit length and negligible bending stiffness.
    Invoked in Eq. (1), Section II, to derive the trajectory (Eqs. 11-12).
  • domain assumption The tension at the lowest point O of the catenary equals the maximum sliding friction of the lying segment, H = q(L-L1)k.
    Eq. (5) in Section II; this ties the catenary parameter a to the measured friction coefficient k and is used to solve for l1/a in Eq. (8).
  • domain assumption The 3D problem with multiple grippers can be reduced to a 2D problem with a single gripper.
    Section II, paragraph after Fig. 3c; required to apply the 2D catenary equations.
  • domain assumption Holding force of the pneumatic gripper is maximized when the gripper is oriented parallel to the tension force at the grasped edge.
    Section II, 'the gripper must be oriented tangentially...' relies on prior work [29]; it justifies the orientation theta_t from Eq. (10).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dexterous Manipulation of Deformable Objects via Pneumatic Gripping: Lifting by One End." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NV24EHM7

@misc{pith2026250105198,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dexterous Manipulation of Deformable Objects via Pneumatic Gripping: Lifting by One End},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NV24EHM7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.05198}
}
read the original abstract

Manipulating deformable objects in robotic cells is often costly and not widely accessible. However, the use of localized pneumatic gripping systems can enhance accessibility. Current methods that use pneumatic grippers to handle deformable objects struggle with effective lifting. This paper introduces a method for the dexterous lifting of textile deformable objects from one edge, utilizing a previously developed gripper designed for flexible and porous materials. By precisely adjusting the orientation and position of the gripper during the lifting process, we were able to significantly reduce necessary gripping force and minimize object vibration caused by airflow. This method was tested and validated on four materials with varying mass, friction, and flexibility. The proposed approach facilitates the lifting of deformable objects from a conveyor or automated line, even when only one edge is accessible for grasping. Future work will involve integrating a vision system to optimize the manipulation of deformable objects with more complex shapes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.05198 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Dexterous lifting of the textile object by one end with pneumatic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Failing classical vertical lifting using a pneumatic gripping device [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Existing and studied methods of grasping/manipulating deformable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Scheme of the vertical lifting of the object (View A in Fig. 3c): [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Changing the position and shape of the deformable material as it [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Scheme of dexterous manipulation of deformable objects. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Microscopy x20 and x150 of the studied textile materials: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_9.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Position and orientation of the pneumatic gripper tool center point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Diagram of the studied trajectories: Trajectory 1 ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_10.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Additional forces arising when lifting deformable materials by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Failing vertical lifting material №3 using method A (T1, G1): (a) influence of the coefficient of friction between the covering and the textile on the sliding of the material along the gripper; (b) effect of the interaction of airflow from the gripper on the textile a…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The minimum necessary gripper supply pressure that is necessary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_12.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Successful dexterous lifting of deformable material [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_16.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Change in the total force acting on the gripping device during [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Co-manipulation of soft- materials estimating deformation from depth images,

    G. Nicola, E. Villagrossi, and N. Pedrocchi, “Co-manipulation of soft- materials estimating deformation from depth images,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 85, p. 102630, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Robotic manipulation of cloth: mechanical mod- eling and perception,

    F. Coltraro Ianniello, “Robotic manipulation of cloth: mechanical mod- eling and perception,” Ph.D. dissertation, Universitat Polit `ecnica de Catalunya, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Grasp Failure Constraints for Fast and Reliable Pick-and-Place Using Multi-Suction-Cup Grippers

    J.-e. Lee, R. Sun, A. Bylard, and L. Sentis, “Grasp failure constraints for fast and reliable pick-and-place using multi-suction-cup grippers,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03498 , 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Unfolding the Literature: A Review of Robotic Cloth Manipulation

    A. Longhini, Y . Wang, I. Garcia-Camacho, D. Blanco-Mulero, M. Mo- letta, M. Welle, G. Aleny `a, H. Yin, Z. Erickson, D. Held, et al. , “Unfolding the literature: A review of robotic cloth manipulation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01361, 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Benchmarking the sim-to-real gap in cloth manipulation,

    D. Blanco-Mulero, O. Barbany, G. Alcan, A. Colom ´e, C. Torras, and V . Kyrki, “Benchmarking the sim-to-real gap in cloth manipulation,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 2981–2988, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    On deformable object handling: multi- tool end-effector for robotized manipulation and layup of fabrics and composites,

    G. Papadopoulos, D. Andronas, E. Kampourakis, N. Theodoropoulos, P. S. Kotsaris, and S. Makris, “On deformable object handling: multi- tool end-effector for robotized manipulation and layup of fabrics and composites,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 128, no. 3-4, pp. 1675–1687, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Design, modelling, and experi- mental verification of passively adaptable roller gripper for separating stacked fabric,

    J. Unde, J. Colan, and Y . Hasegawa, “Design, modelling, and experi- mental verification of passively adaptable roller gripper for separating stacked fabric,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , pp. 1–8, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Fibers for technical textiles,

    S. Ahmad, T. Ullah, et al. , “Fibers for technical textiles,” in Fibers for technical textiles. Springer, 2020, pp. 21–47

    work page 2020

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Model predictive control for dynamic cloth manipulation: Parameter learning and experimental validation,

    A. Luque, D. Parent, A. Colom ´e, C. Ocampo-Martinez, and C. Torras, “Model predictive control for dynamic cloth manipulation: Parameter learning and experimental validation,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1254–1270, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Robotic manipulation and sensing of deformable objects in domestic and in- dustrial applications: a survey,

    J. Sanchez, J.-A. Corrales, B.-C. Bouzgarrou, and Y . Mezouar, “Robotic manipulation and sensing of deformable objects in domestic and in- dustrial applications: a survey,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 688–716, 2018

    2018

  3. [11]

    Model-driven feedforward prediction for manipulation of deformable objects,

    Y . Li, Y . Wang, Y . Yue, D. Xu, M. Case, S.-F. Chang, E. Grinspun, and P. K. Allen, “Model-driven feedforward prediction for manipulation of deformable objects,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1621–1638, 2018

    2018

  4. [12]

    Estimating model utility for de- formable object manipulation using multiarmed bandit methods,

    D. McConachie and D. Berenson, “Estimating model utility for de- formable object manipulation using multiarmed bandit methods,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering , vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 967–979, 2018

    2018

  5. [13]

    Modeling of deformable objects for robotic manipulation: A tutorial and review,

    V . E. Arriola-Rios, P. Guler, F. Ficuciello, D. Kragic, B. Siciliano, and J. L. Wyatt, “Modeling of deformable objects for robotic manipulation: A tutorial and review,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI , p. 82, 2020

    2020

  6. [14]

    A review of gripping devices for fabric handling,

    P. Koustoumpardis and N. Aspragathos, “A review of gripping devices for fabric handling,” Hand, vol. 19, p. 20, 2004

    2004

  7. [15]

    Carbone, Grasping in robotics

    G. Carbone, Grasping in robotics . Springer, 2012, vol. 10

    2012

  8. [16]

    Grasping devices and methods in automated production processes,

    G. Fantoni, M. Santochi, G. Dini, K. Tracht, B. Scholz-Reiter, J. Fleis- cher, T. K. Lien, G. Seliger, G. Reinhart, J. Franke, et al. , “Grasping devices and methods in automated production processes,” CIRP Annals, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 679–701, 2014

    2014

  9. [17]

    Three-dimensional printing of cylindrical nozzle elements of bernoulli gripping devices for industrial robots,

    R. Mykhailyshyn, F. Ducho ˇn, M. Mykhailyshyn, and A. Majewicz Fey, “Three-dimensional printing of cylindrical nozzle elements of bernoulli gripping devices for industrial robots,” Robotics, vol. 11, no. 6, p. 140, 2022. 3[Online]. Available: https://youtu.be/ZD-lK-SoFko

    2022

  10. [18]

    A grasping-centered analysis for cloth manipulation,

    J. Borr `as, G. Aleny `a, and C. Torras, “A grasping-centered analysis for cloth manipulation,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics , vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 924–936, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    A systematic review on pneumatic gripping devices for industrial robots,

    R. Mykhailyshyn, V . Savkiv, P. Maruschak, and J. Xiao, “A systematic review on pneumatic gripping devices for industrial robots,” Transport, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    Single-grasp object classification and feature extraction with simple robot hands and tactile sensors,

    A. J. Spiers, M. V . Liarokapis, B. Calli, and A. M. Dollar, “Single-grasp object classification and feature extraction with simple robot hands and tactile sensors,” IEEE transactions on haptics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 207–220, 2016

    2016

  13. [21]

    Gripping device for flexible and porous materials,

    R. Mykhailyshyn, V . Savkiv, A. M. Fey, and J. Xiao, “Gripping device for flexible and porous materials,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering , vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2397–2408, 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Finite element modeling of grasping porous materials in robotics cells,

    R. Mykhailyshyn, A. Majewicz Fey, and J. Xiao, “Finite element modeling of grasping porous materials in robotics cells,” Robotica, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 3485–3500, 2023

    2023

  15. [23]

    A versatile gripper for cloth manipulation,

    S. Donaire, J. Borras, G. Alenya, and C. Torras, “A versatile gripper for cloth manipulation,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 6520–6527, 2020

    2020

  16. [24]

    Optimization of outer diameter bernoulli gripper with cylindrical nozzle,

    R. Mykhailyshyn, F. Ducho ˇn, I. Virgala, P. J. Sin ˇc´ak, and A. Ma- jewicz Fey, “Optimization of outer diameter bernoulli gripper with cylindrical nozzle,” Machines, vol. 11, no. 6, p. 667, 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    An electrostatic gripper for flexible objects,

    E. W. Schaler, D. Ruffatto, P. Glick, V . White, and A. Parness, “An electrostatic gripper for flexible objects,” in 2017 IEEE/RSJ Interna- tional Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, 2017, pp. 1172–1179

    2017

  18. [26]

    Model-based design and simulation of a soft robotic gripper for fabric material handling,

    B. Wang and R. J. Urbanic, “Model-based design and simulation of a soft robotic gripper for fabric material handling,” 2021

    2021

  19. [27]

    Fabric manipulation by pulling- driven soft hand with closing-approaching coupling,

    K. Hanamura, Z. Wang, and S. Hirai, “Fabric manipulation by pulling- driven soft hand with closing-approaching coupling,” in2024 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 239–244

    2024

  20. [28]

    Achieving autonomous cloth manipulation with optimal control via differentiable physics-aware regu- larization and safety constraints,

    Y . Zhang, F. Liu, X. Liang, and M. Yip, “Achieving autonomous cloth manipulation with optimal control via differentiable physics-aware regu- larization and safety constraints,” in2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 9931–9938

    2024

  21. [29]

    Toward novel grasp- ing of nonrigid materials through robotic end-effector reorientation,

    R. Mykhailyshyn, A. Majewicz Fey, and J. Xiao, “Toward novel grasp- ing of nonrigid materials through robotic end-effector reorientation,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics , vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 2614– 2624, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Elongatable gripper fingers with integrated stretchable tactile sensors for underactuated grasping and dexterous manipulation,

    S. J. Yoon, M. Choi, B. Jeong, and Y .-L. Park, “Elongatable gripper fingers with integrated stretchable tactile sensors for underactuated grasping and dexterous manipulation,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics , 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Textile taxonomy and classification using pulling and twisting,

    A. Longhini, M. C. Welle, I. Mitsioni, and D. Kragic, “Textile taxonomy and classification using pulling and twisting,” in 2021 IEEE/RSJ Inter- national Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 7564–7571

    2021

  24. [32]

    Efficient experimental characterisation of the permeability of fibrous textiles,

    E. E. Swery, T. Allen, S. Comas-Cardona, Q. Govignon, C. Hickey, J. Timms, L. Tournier, A. Walbran, P. Kelly, and S. Bickerton, “Efficient experimental characterisation of the permeability of fibrous textiles,” Journal of composite materials , vol. 50, no. 28, pp. 4023–4038, 2016

    2016

  25. [33]

    Influence of textile parameters on the in-plane permeability,

    G. Rieber, J. Jiang, C. Deter, N. Chen, and P. Mitschang, “Influence of textile parameters on the in-plane permeability,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing , vol. 52, pp. 89–98, 2013

    2013

  26. [34]

    Model-based robot control for human-robot flexible material co-manipulation,

    D. Andronas, E. Kampourakis, K. Bakopoulou, C. Gkournelos, P. An- gelakis, and S. Makris, “Model-based robot control for human-robot flexible material co-manipulation,” in 2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETF A). IEEE, 20...

    2021

  27. [35]

    Cooperative dynamic manipulation of unknown flexible objects,

    P. Donner, F. Christange, J. Lu, and M. Buss, “Cooperative dynamic manipulation of unknown flexible objects,” International Journal of Social Robotics , vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 575–599, 2017

    2017

  28. [36]

    Dynamic manipulation of flexible objects with torque sequence using a deep neural network,

    K. Kawaharazuka, T. Ogawa, J. Tamura, and C. Nabeshima, “Dynamic manipulation of flexible objects with torque sequence using a deep neural network,” in 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 2139–2145

    2019

  29. [37]

    Three-dimensional deformable object ma- nipulation using fast online gaussian process regression,

    Z. Hu, P. Sun, and J. Pan, “Three-dimensional deformable object ma- nipulation using fast online gaussian process regression,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 979–986, 2018

    2018

  30. [38]

    Modeling, learning, perception, and control methods for deformable object manipulation,

    H. Yin, A. Varava, and D. Kragic, “Modeling, learning, perception, and control methods for deformable object manipulation,” Science Robotics, vol. 6, no. 54, p. eabd8803, 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    A geometric approach to robotic laundry folding,

    S. Miller, J. Van Den Berg, M. Fritz, T. Darrell, K. Goldberg, and P. Abbeel, “A geometric approach to robotic laundry folding,” The International Journal of Robotics Research , vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 249– 267, 2012. 9

    2012

  32. [40]

    Dynamic modeling and control of deformable linear objects for single-arm and dual-arm robot manipulations,

    N. Lv, J. Liu, and Y . Jia, “Dynamic modeling and control of deformable linear objects for single-arm and dual-arm robot manipulations,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics , vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 2341–2353, 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    Study of dexterous robotic grasping for deformable objects manipulation,

    D. Mira, A. Delgado, C. M. Mateo, S. Puente, F. A. Candelas, and F. Torres, “Study of dexterous robotic grasping for deformable objects manipulation,” in 2015 23rd Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED) . IEEE, 2015, pp. 262–266

    2015

  34. [42]

    Dexterous manipulation of cloth,

    Y . Bai, W. Yu, and C. K. Liu, “Dexterous manipulation of cloth,” in Computer Graphics F orum, vol. 35, no. 2. Wiley Online Library, 2016, pp. 523–532

    2016

  35. [43]

    On the perception and handling of deformable objects–a robotic cell for white goods industry,

    D. Andronas, Z. Arkouli, N. Zacharaki, G. Michalos, A. Sardelis, G. Papanikolopoulos, and S. Makris, “On the perception and handling of deformable objects–a robotic cell for white goods industry,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing , vol. 77, p. 102358, 2022

    2022

  36. [44]

    On deformable ob- ject handling: Model-based motion planning for human-robot co- manipulation,

    S. Makris, E. Kampourakis, and D. Andronas, “On deformable ob- ject handling: Model-based motion planning for human-robot co- manipulation,” CIRP Annals , 2022

    2022

  37. [45]

    Dexterous textile manip- ulation using electroadhesive fingers,

    K. M. Digumarti, V . Cacucciolo, and H. Shea, “Dexterous textile manip- ulation using electroadhesive fingers,” in 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, pp. 6104– 6109

    2021

  38. [46]

    Rbo hand 3: A platform for soft dexterous manipulation,

    S. Puhlmann, J. Harris, and O. Brock, “Rbo hand 3: A platform for soft dexterous manipulation,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics , 2022

    2022

  39. [47]

    Influence of inlet parameters on power characteristics of bernoulli gripping devices for industrial robots,

    R. Mykhailyshyn and J. Xiao, “Influence of inlet parameters on power characteristics of bernoulli gripping devices for industrial robots,” Ap- plied Sciences , vol. 12, no. 14, p. 7074, 2022

    2022

  40. [48]

    Sustainable manufacturing through energy efficient handling processes,

    J. Fleischer, F. F ¨orster, and J. Gebhardt, “Sustainable manufacturing through energy efficient handling processes,” Procedia CIRP , vol. 40, pp. 574–579, 2016

    2016

  41. [49]

    Flexible gripping technology for the automated handling of limp technical textiles in composites industry,

    G. Reinhart and G. Straßer, “Flexible gripping technology for the automated handling of limp technical textiles in composites industry,” Production Engineering, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 301–306, 2011

    2011

  42. [50]

    A versatile end-effector for pick-and-release of fabric parts,

    K. Yamazaki and T. Abe, “A versatile end-effector for pick-and-release of fabric parts,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1431–1438, 2021

    2021

  43. [51]

    Universal gripper for fabrics–design, validation and integration,

    Y . Ebraheem, E. Drean, and D. C. Adolphe, “Universal gripper for fabrics–design, validation and integration,” International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology , vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 643–663, 2021

    2021

  44. [52]

    Orien- tation modeling of bernoulli gripper device with off-centered masses of the manipulating object,

    V . Savkiv, R. Mykhailyshyn, O. Fendo, and M. Mykhailyshyn, “Orien- tation modeling of bernoulli gripper device with off-centered masses of the manipulating object,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 187, pp. 264–271, 2017

    2017

  45. [53]

    Modeling of bernoulli gripping device orientation when manipulating objects along the arc,

    V . Savkiv, R. Mykhailyshyn, F. Duchon, and M. Mikhalishin, “Modeling of bernoulli gripping device orientation when manipulating objects along the arc,” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems , vol. 15, no. 2, p. 1729881418762670, 2018

    2018

  46. [54]

    Analysis of frontal resistance force influence during manipulation of dimensional objects,

    R. Mykhailyshyn, V . Savkiv, F. Duchon, V . Koloskov, and I. M. Diahovchenko, “Analysis of frontal resistance force influence during manipulation of dimensional objects,” in 2018 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Energy and Power Systems (IEPS) . IEEE, 2018, pp. 301–305

    2018

  47. [55]

    Ex- perimental research of the manipulatiom process by the objects using bernoulli gripping devices,

    R. Mykhailyshyn, V . Savkiv, M. Mikhalishin, and F. Duchon, “Ex- perimental research of the manipulatiom process by the objects using bernoulli gripping devices,” in 2017 IEEE International Young Scientists F orum on Applied Physics and Engineering (YSF) . IEEE, 2017, pp. 8–11

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.