Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 75 references

This paper claims that natural-language prompts can drive one integrated pipeline that outputs a 3D-printable 2.5D tactile graphic — global relief, tiled surface texture, and compliant braille in a single watertight mesh — and that blind an

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A text-to-3D-print pipeline generates 2.5D tactile graphics with embossed geometry, tactile textures, and braille; printed objects were preferred by blind/low-vision and blindfolded users over text-to-3D baselines.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-02 challenge →

load-bearing objection A useful, well-executed systems paper for accessible tactile graphics with real physical validation, but the texture-fidelity link to prompts is unverified and the user study is thin; worth refereeing with requests for geometric validation and better statistics. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.22674 v1 pith:NY4KM7ZO submitted 2026-07-10 cs.GR cs.CVcs.HC

Text-based Tactile Graphics Generation for the Visually Impaired

Ruihan Gao , Joonghyuk Shin , Ava Pun , Jaesik Park , Wenzhen Yuan , Jun-Yan Zhu This is my paper
classification cs.GR cs.CVcs.HC
keywords tactile graphicsblind and low visiontext-to-3D generation2.5D reliefdiffusion modelstileable texturesbraille3D printing accessibility
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the missing step for tactile graphics is not more manual design but a fabrication-aware generative pipeline: given a text description of an object and its materials, one system can produce a physical 2.5D relief that combines readable global shape, fine tactile texture, and braille, ready to print without expert post-processing. It argues that text-to-image models fail on tactile outputs because they target screen realism, so it adds a dedicated text-to-tactile-texture module that creates tileable normal maps, and it enforces haptic constraints through template-guided relief, strict base flattening, and standard braille placement. The claim is supported by quantitative module evaluations and by an in-person study in which both blind/low-vision and blindfolded sighted participants rated the system's 3D-printed artifacts higher than those from a naive pipeline or from general 3D-generation baselines. If correct, the work turns tactile graphics from a scarce, expert-made resource into a prompt-driven, personalizable medium.

Core claim

The central discovery is a representation: a 2.5D height-field relief that fuses three layers — template-conditioned base geometry, high-frequency displacement from diffusion-generated tileable normal maps, and braille on a strictly flat plate — into one watertight mesh. Texture, the component that makes the output haptically interesting, is produced by a fine-tuned texture-to-image model whose RGB outputs are converted to normal maps by monocular estimation, high-pass filtered in the Fourier domain to remove low-frequency drift, made tileable by masked diffusion inpainting, and converted to 3–6 mm displacements along surface normals. The paper shows, through ablations and physical prints, t

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the text-to-tactile-texture module: a text-conditioned diffusion model fine-tuned on close-up texture images, followed by monocular normal estimation, center-crop and Fourier high-pass filtering to flatten low-frequency bias, and a tileable-patch stage that rearranges quadrants and inpaints seams so the normal map repeats seamlessly. That tileable patch becomes a displacement map that deforms the base relief only inside user-specified or automatically segmented regions, with 3–6 mm amplitude chosen for finger readability. Around this module, template-guided base generation stabilizes the global plate, and fabrication-aware flattening projects all plate vertices

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that off-the-shelf monocular normal estimation, applied to a generated RGB texture image, preserves enough genuine high-frequency surface detail to serve as the physical texture; if it smooths or invents micro-relief, the printed texture is not faithful to the prompt and the user-study preference could rest on base geometry, braille, or overall plate consistency instead.

What would settle it

Take one printed tactile tile (e.g., a sponge or crocodile-leather sample), scan it with a profilometer or high-resolution tactile sensor at sub-50µm resolution, and compare the measured height field against the displacement map computed from the predicted normals before printing. If local slopes and high-frequency amplitudes deviate systematically from the predicted normals — smoothing real ridges or manufacturing ones that were not in the normal map — the texture stage is not faithful. Exchanging the text-prompt texture for a sensor-measured texture and re-running the same preference study w

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Text descriptions become a sufficient input for producing personalized, print-ready tactile graphics, removing the expert translation step that currently limits scale.
  • Because braille is integrated on a strictly flat base with standard dot geometry, the printed artifact is self-describing: without a label, recognition is only about 20%, but with braille it rises to nearly perfect.
  • The modular design lets texture type, scale, and spatial assignment be edited without regenerating global geometry, enabling interactive personalization by users or assistants.
  • Texture-rich, sub-millimeter relief is preserved through high-resolution resin printing, so the haptic experience is determined at generation time rather than lost in fabrication.
  • Standard-compliant, printable tactile graphics can be produced for custom objects — including materials a user may never have touched — extending generative AI beyond screens to a touchable medium.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves the fidelity of predicted normal maps unvalidated: a direct comparison of printed surface height fields against the pre-print displacement maps would show whether the texture preference comes from the monocular normal estimates or from the surrounding design choices.
  • Because the texture module derives geometry from RGB appearance, visually textured but haptically smooth prompts (e.g., glossy or metallic finishes) could produce spurious raised relief; a test on such materials would delimit the method's coverage.
  • The pipeline is object-centric; applying the same texture-and-braille machinery to maps, diagrams, or multi-object layouts would require a layout-conditioned base stage that the paper does not address.
  • If the sensor-input path — generating texture from real tactile measurements instead of text — is used as a ground-truth check, the framework itself supplies a natural way to test whether text-driven textures match physical materials.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a generative pipeline that takes natural-language prompts and produces 2.5D relief meshes with base geometry, surface texture, and braille, intended for 3D printing for blind and low-vision users. It uses a plate-template-conditioned text-to-image model for base geometry, a fine-tuned diffusion model for tileable normal-map textures (with optional tactile-sensor input), Fourier high-pass filtering, SDEdit/inpainting for tiling, and displacement mapping with explicit base flattening and braille placement. Evaluation includes module-level image-space metrics, qualitative comparisons, and an in-person study with 15 participants (8 BLV, 7 blindfolded sighted) who rated 3D-printed artifacts from three systems. The central claim is that this is the first integrated text-to-fabrication-ready tactile graphics system and that users prefer its outputs over current baselines.

Significance. If the texture-fidelity claim is supported, the system is a significant advance: it is the first integrated pipeline to combine global relief, tactile texture, and braille in a fabrication-ready mesh; it ships code and uses standard-compliant braille; and it reports a real user study with BLV participants on physical prints. The module-level ablations and comparisons against text-to-3D and texture-generation baselines are valuable. However, the main contribution hinges on an unvalidated mapping from RGB texture to physical micro-relief via monocular normal estimation, and several user-study analyses have caveats. The work is promising but needs additional evidence before the claims can be regarded as fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (1)-(2); Appendix A.5] The central texture-fidelity claim rests on the chain RGB-texture -> MoGE v2 normal map -> high-pass filter -> 3D displacement. The manuscript never validates the predicted normal maps against measured surface geometry. Table 1's metrics (CLIP, patch LPIPS, HF ratio, seam continuity) are all image-space surrogates; none measures whether the printed relief corresponds to the prompt's material. The user-study preference over Naive could be driven by the mere presence of raised texture or braille, not by semantic match. I recommend adding a geometric validation: scan the printed samples (e.g., GelSight or profilometer) and compare the measured height field to the displacement map predicted by Eq. (1)-(2), and/or add a control condition in the user study where the texture is intentionally mismatched to the prompt to test whether users can detect the mismatch.
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Table 2] The statistical significance claim rests on one-sided paired t-tests over pooled observations (240 = 16 prompts x 15 participants) with no correction for multiple comparisons or participant random effects. Cohen's d = 0.16 is small. Moreover, the 'Naive' baseline omits both the explicit texture module and braille, so the 0.32 preference does not isolate texture fidelity. Please report two-sided tests with participant-level clustering (e.g., mixed-effects model), apply multiple-comparison correction, and consider a factorial design with/without braille and with/without texture to separate contributions.
  3. [Appendix D.3, Table A5] The claim that our 3D prints outperform expert-designed swell paper is based on N=10 ratings from only 2 BLV participants, and the 'Ours' texture realism score is 5.00 +/- 0.00, a ceiling effect that indicates the test has low discriminative power. The comparison also conflates medium (3D-printed relief vs. heat-expanded ink) with texture-generation quality. Please enlarge the sample, use forced-choice or ranking tasks, and report per-participant data. Without this, the comparison cannot support the strong conclusion in the main text.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3.1] Typo: 'provideing' should be 'providing'.
  2. [Table 1] Module-level metrics are reported without error bars or significance tests; please report standard deviations or confidence intervals across prompts.
  3. [Sec. 4.3] Please report the actual object-recognition accuracies (e.g., ~20% without braille, nearly perfect with braille) in the main text rather than only in prose.
  4. [Fig. A5] The caption notes that backgrounds were manually removed for the chair; please state this explicitly in the main text when citing this comparison, as it changes the nature of the baseline.
  5. [Implementation Details] The monocular normal estimator is referred to as MoGE v2; please ensure the citation [58] appears consistently at first mention in Sec. 4.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation chain: the system is an empirical pipeline built on external off-the-shelf components and evaluated against external baselines and physical user studies; the only self-citations supply a sensor-texture library and are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that text prompts can be converted into fabrication-ready 2.5D tactile graphics. This is an empirical system contribution, not a mathematical derivation: base geometry is lifted with off-the-shelf monocular depth estimation (MoGE v2), textures come from a fine-tuned open-source diffusion model plus SDEdit-based tiling, and braille follows standard specs. No equation in the paper reduces a predicted quantity to a fitted parameter by construction. The base-geometry and texture modules are evaluated against external baselines (Qwen-Image, Nano Banana Pro, Hunyuan3D, Trellis, MatFuse, TexGaussian, TactileNet, and expert-designed swell paper) and, crucially, through in-person perceptual studies with 15 participants on physically 3D-printed artifacts. The only self-citations are [14] (TactileDreamFusion) and [15], used to source the TouchTexture tactile-sensor dataset and to position prior texture-synthesis work. This is an auxiliary sensor-input mode, not the main text-prompt pipeline, so it does not force the central result. The HF-ratio metric in Sec. 4.1/Appendix B is defined through the authors' own Gaussian high-pass filter and should be interpreted with caution, but it is one internal metric among several, and the main claims also rest on independent user studies and external comparisons; it does not constitute a derivation-to-fit circularity. The skeptic's concern that monocular normal maps are never validated against measured surface geometry is a legitimate external-validity/correctness risk, not a circularity under the stated rubric. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained against external evidence, with only a minor, non-load-bearing self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests mainly on off-the-shelf component assumptions rather than on fitted constants. The free parameters are the displacement magnitude λ (3–6 mm, tuned from pilot BLV feedback and printer resolution) and hand-chosen tiling hyperparameters (t0=0.9, 10 steps, 120 px HP cutoff). The key axioms concern the validity of monocular depth/normal estimation for tactile micro-relief, the proxy validity of image-statistics texture metrics, and SLA printing fidelity. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Texture displacement magnitude λ = 3–6 mm (user-adjustable)
    Controls physical relief depth of applied textures; tuned empirically from SLA printer feature size (~50 µm) and BLV pilot feedback (Appendix A.5). It directly sets the tactile amplitude of the central 'texture' contribution.
  • Tiling hyperparameters (t0, steps, HP cutoff) = t0 = 0.9, 10 steps, HP cutoff wavelength = 120 px
    Hand-chosen; ablation shows improvement but no sensitivity analysis, and the seam metrics are self-defined in the paper (Sec. 3.3, Table 1, Appendix B).
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption MoGE v2 monocular depth and normal estimates are faithful enough for tactile micro-relief after high-pass filtering
    Invoked in Sec. 3.1/3.2 and Appendix A.2; the entire 2.5D relief and texture displacement are derived from predicted depth/normals, with no ground-truth geometry validation.
  • domain assumption High-frequency normal variation (HF ratio, LPIPS patch self-similarity) is a valid proxy for haptic discriminability
    Used in Sec. 4.1 and Appendix B to score texture quality; the only touch-based check is the small user study, so metric validity is assumed.
  • domain assumption SLA printing at ~50 µm resolution reliably reproduces 0.5 mm braille dots and 3–6 mm displacement textures
    Relied on in Sec. 3.5 and Appendix A.5; all 48 samples passed slicer checks, but no independent dimensional metrology is reported.
  • domain assumption Generated RGB texture images, after MoGE v2 normal estimation and Fourier high-pass filtering, correspond to the material described by the text
    The fine-tuned Qwen-Image model is trained on ~70 real captures plus ~2500 VLM-generated prompts; generalization to arbitrary new materials is asserted and only spot-checked.

reviewed 2026-08-02 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Text-based Tactile Graphics Generation for the Visually Impaired." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NY4KM7ZO

@misc{pith2026260722674,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Text-based Tactile Graphics Generation for the Visually Impaired},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NY4KM7ZO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22674}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Tactile graphics are a primary medium for blind and low-vision (BLV) individuals to access non-textual information. However, they are difficult to scale or personalize. While recent generative models have revolutionized visual content creation, they are optimized for screen-based visual realism and fail to satisfy the haptic perceptual and physical fabrication constraints required for touch. We present the first integrated generative system that produces fabrication-ready 2.5D tactile graphics directly from natural language prompts, jointly generating global base geometry, fine-grained tactile surface textures, and standard-compliant braille within a unified 3D-printable representation. Our approach introduces fabrication-aware techniques, including template-guided relief generation, a fast diffusion-based text-to-texture module for high-resolution tileable normal maps, and strict base flattening to ensure tactile readability and printability, while supporting both automatic generation and interactive texture control. Extensive evaluations, together with in-person user studies with BLV participants and blindfolded sighted participants using physically 3D-printed outputs, show that participants consistently prefer our results over baselines. By extending generative graphics beyond screens to touchable reliefs, our work broadens access to generative AI for the BLV community and beyond.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22674 by Ava Pun, Jaesik Park, Joonghyuk Shin, Jun-Yan Zhu, Ruihan Gao, Wenzhen Yuan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Given a text prompt describing an object and its surface textures, our method generates 3D-printable 2.5D tactile reliefs that integrate global base geometry, fine￾grained surface textures, and readable braille annotations. By jointly modeling geome￾try, texture, and braille within a unified fabrication-ready representation, our method produces perceptually salient tactile details and supports expressive, … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Method overview. Given a text prompt, we generate 3D-printable 2.5D tactile graphics that jointly encode geometry, surface texture, and braille. We first syn￾thesize a base image constrained by a plate template and lift it to 3D base relief via monocular geometry estimation. In parallel, a tactile texture module produces high￾resolution, tileable normal maps from either text prompts or tactile sensor captu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Texture data and tileable patch generation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Base-plate conditioning and text-to-texture generation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Tiling comparisons. Our center cropping and high-pass filtering steps make textures more consistent and suitable for application to 3D geometry. Compared to Tiled Diffusion [32], our method produces more seamless textures, with the intra-tile configuration having the best results. Best viewed zoomed in. achieves the most consistent plate geometry while producing richer and more se￾mantically aligned surfac… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative comparison of 2.5D reliefs. Given the same text prompt, our method produces consistent plate geometry with readable braille and fine-grained tex￾tures aligned with the prompt. In contrast, baselines often lack texture detail (overly smooth corals in Row 1), produce non-fabricable surfaces (fragmented surface of tele￾scope in Row 4 Col 1), or generate broken geometry (chair intersecting with the… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 11 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    American Printing House: APH tactile graphic image library.https : / / imagelibrary.aph.org/portals/aphb(2026), Accessed on 2026-06-28

    2026

  2. [2]

    Braille Authority of North America (2011)

    Braille Authority of North America, Canadian Braille Authority: Guidelines and Standards for Tactile Graphics, 2010. Braille Authority of North America (2011)

    2010

  3. [3]

    brick2face: seamless-tile-inpainting: An automatic1111 extension for making seam- less tiles using stable diffusion inpainting,https://github.com/brick2face/ seamless-tile-inpainting, Accessed on 2026-06-28

    2026

  4. [4]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.16719 (2025)

    Carion, N., Gustafson, L., Hu, Y.T., Debnath, S., Hu, R., Suris, D., Ryali, C., Alwala, K.V., Khedr, H., Huang, A., Lei, J., Ma, T., Guo, B., Kalla, A., Marks, M., Greer, J., Wang, M., Sun, P., Rädle, R., Afouras, T., Mavroudi, E., Xu, K., Wu, T.H., Zhou, Y., Momeni, L., Hazra, R., Ding, S., Vaze, S., Porcher, F., Li, F., Li, S., Kamath, A., Cheng, H.K., ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    What would I want to make? Probably everything

    Clepper, G., McDonnell, E.J., Findlater, L., Peek, N.: “What would I want to make? Probably everything”: Practices and speculations of blind and low vision tactile graphics creators. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2025)

    2025

  6. [6]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)22(3), 287–294 (2003)

    Cohen, M.F., Shade, J., Hiller, S., Deussen, O.: Wang tiles for image and texture generation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)22(3), 287–294 (2003)

    2003

  7. [7]

    In: International Workshop of IT Professionals on Artificial Intelligence (2024)

    Dzhurynskyi, Y., Mayik, V., Mayik, L.: Artificial intelligence-driven text-to-tactile graphics generation for visual impaired people. In: International Workshop of IT Professionals on Artificial Intelligence (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    In: ACM SIGGRAPH Conference Papers (2001)

    Efros, A.A., Freeman, W.T.: Image quilting for texture synthesis and transfer. In: ACM SIGGRAPH Conference Papers (2001)

    2001

  9. [9]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2024)

    Esser, P., Kulal, S., Blattmann, A., Entezari, R., Müller, J., Saini, H., Levi, Y., Lorenz, D., Sauer, A., Boesel, F., Podell, D., Dockhorn, T., English, Z., Rom- bach, R.: Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. In: International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    In: Proceedings of the International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) (2013)

    Ferro, T.J., Pawluk, D.T.V.: Automatic image conversion to tactile graphic. In: Proceedings of the International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) (2013)

    2013

  11. [11]

    Fortin, A., Cobo, L., Vernade, G.: Introducing Veo 3.1 and new creative capabilities in the Gemini API.https://developers.googleblog.com/introducing-veo-3- 1-and-new-creative-capabilities-in-the-gemini-api/(2025), Accessed on 2026-06-28

    2025

  12. [12]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)38(4), 1–11 (2019)

    Frühstück, A., Alhashim, I., Wonka, P.: TileGAN: synthesis of large-scale non- homogeneous textures. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)38(4), 1–11 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics31(10), 7986–7997 (2025)

    Gao, L., Zhang, Y.W., Wei, M., Liu, H., Chen, Y., Qiu, H., Zhang, C.: MonoRelief: Recovering 2.5D relief from a single image. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics31(10), 7986–7997 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2024)

    Gao, R., Deng, K., Yang, G., Yuan, W., Zhu, J.Y.: Tactile DreamFusion: Exploiting tactile sensing for 3D generation. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    In: IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (2023)

    Gao, R., Yuan, W., Zhu, J.Y.: Controllable visual-tactile synthesis. In: IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    Information Tech- nology and Disabilities3(4) (1996) Text-based Tactile Graphics Generation for the Visually Impaired 17

    Gardner, J.A.: Tactile graphics: an overview and resource guide. Information Tech- nology and Disabilities3(4) (1996) Text-based Tactile Graphics Generation for the Visually Impaired 17

    1996

  17. [17]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2014)

    Goodfellow, I.J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., Bengio, Y.: Generative adversarial nets. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2014)

    2014

  18. [18]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.07009 (2024)

    Google Imagen Team: Imagen 3. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.07009 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2020)

    Ho, J., Jain, A., Abbeel, P.: Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    In: ACM SIGGRAPH Conference Papers (2024)

    Hu, A., Desai, N., Abu Alhaija, H., Kim, S.W., Shugrina, M.: Diffusion texture painting. In: ACM SIGGRAPH Conference Papers (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Computer-Aided Design130, 102928 (2021)

    Ji, Z., Feng, W., Sun, X., Qin, F., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y.W., Ma, W.: ReliefNet: Fast bas-relief generation from 3D scenes. Computer-Aided Design130, 102928 (2021)

    2021

  22. [22]

    In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2019)

    Karras, T., Laine, S., Aila, T.: A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2019)

    2019

  23. [23]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.04722 (2025)

    Khan, A., Choubineh, A., Shaaban, M.A., Akkasi, A., Komeili, M.: TactileNet: Bridging the accessibility gap with AI-generated tactile graphics for individuals with vision impairment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.04722 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114 (2013)

    Kingma, D.P., Welling, M.: Auto-encoding variational Bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114 (2013)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  25. [25]

    Behaviour & Information Technology25(4), 297–311 (2006)

    Krufka, S.E., Barner, K.E.: A user study on tactile graphic generation methods. Behaviour & Information Technology25(4), 297–311 (2006)

    2006

  26. [26]

    iScience28(5) (2025)

    Kuroki, S., Hamazaki, T., Kajimoto, H., Nishida, S.: Passive human touch cannot recognize the shape of a pattern imprinted on the fingertip. iScience28(5) (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.16504 (2025)

    Lai, Z., Zhao, Y., Liu, H., Zhao, Z., Lin, Q., Shi, H., Yang, X., Yang, M., Yang, S., Feng, Y., et al.: Hunyuan3D 2.5: Towards high-fidelity 3D assets generation with ultimate details. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.16504 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    In: Com- puter Graphics Forum (2025)

    Levin, E., Fried, O.: Differential Diffusion: Giving each pixel its strength. In: Com- puter Graphics Forum (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2023)

    Lin, C.H., Gao, J., Tang, L., Takikawa, T., Zeng, X., Huang, X., Kreis, K., Fidler, S., Liu, M.Y., Lin, T.Y.: Magic3D: High-resolution text-to-3D content creation. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2019)

    Loshchilov, I., Hutter, F.: Decoupled weight decay regularization. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2019)

    2019

  31. [31]

    In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2021)

    Luo, S., Hu, W.: Diffusion probabilistic models for 3D point cloud generation. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2021)

    2021

  32. [32]

    In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2025)

    Madar, O., Fried, O.: Tiled diffusion. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    In: Computer graphics forum

    Memery, S., Cedron, O., Subr, K.: Generating parametric brdfs from natural lan- guage descriptions. In: Computer graphics forum. Wiley Online Library (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2022)

    Meng, C., He, Y., Song, Y., Song, J., Wu, J., Zhu, J.Y., Ermon, S.: SDEdit: Guided image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equations. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    eNeuro9(3) (2022)

    Miller, R.L., Sheinberg, D.L.: Evidence for independent processing of shape by vision and touch. eNeuro9(3) (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    OpenAI: Sora 2 is here.https://openai.com/index/sora-2(2025), Accessed on 2026-06-28

    2025

  37. [37]

    In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embod- ied Interaction (TEI) (2024) 18 R

    Pakenaite, K., Kamperou, E., Proulx, M.J., Sharma, A., Hall, P.: Pic2Tac: Cre- ating accessible tactile images using semantic information from photographs. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embod- ied Interaction (TEI) (2024) 18 R. Gao et al

    2024

  38. [38]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)39(4), 89–1 (2020)

    Panotopoulou, A., Zhang, X., Qiu, T., Yang, X.D., Whiting, E.: Tactile line draw- ings for improved shape understanding in blind and visually impaired users. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)39(4), 89–1 (2020)

    2020

  39. [39]

    Perkins: Tactile graphics library (2026)

    2026

  40. [40]

    Eye (Lond)38(11), 2156–2172 (2024)

    Pesudovs, K., Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study, GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators: Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by cataract: a meta-analysis from 2000 to 2020. Eye (Lond)38(11), 2156–2172 (2024)

    2019

  41. [41]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2023)

    Poole, B., Jain, A., Barron, J.T., Mildenhall, B.: DreamFusion: Text-to-3D using 2D diffusion. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2021)

    Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., Krueger, G., Sutskever, I.: Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In: International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2021)

    2021

  43. [43]

    google / innovation-and-ai/products/nano-banana-pro/(2025), Accessed on 2026-06- 28

    Raisinghani, N.: Introducing Nano Banana Pro.https : / / blog . google / innovation-and-ai/products/nano-banana-pro/(2025), Accessed on 2026-06- 28

    2025

  44. [44]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125 (2022)

    Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C., Chen, M.: Hierarchical text- conditional image generation with CLIP latents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125 (2022)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH)4(2) (2011)

    Reichinger, A., Maierhofer, S., Purgathofer, W.: High-quality tactile paintings. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH)4(2) (2011)

    2011

  46. [46]

    In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2024)

    Rodriguez-Pardo, C., Casas, D., Garces, E., Lopez-Moreno, J.: TexTile: A differen- tiable metric for texture tileability. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29(6), 2914–2925 (2022)

    Rodriguez-Pardo, C., Garces, E.: SeamlessGAN: Self-supervised synthesis of tileable texture maps. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29(6), 2914–2925 (2022)

    2022

  48. [48]

    In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2022)

    Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., Ommer, B.: High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2022)

    2022

  49. [49]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)43(6) (2024)

    Sartor, S., Peers, P.: Content-aware tile generation using exterior boundary in- painting. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)43(6) (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2023)

    Shue, J.R., Chan, E.R., Po, R., Ankner, Z., Wu, J., Wetzstein, G.: 3D neural field generation using triplane diffusion. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2024)

    Siddiqui, Y., Alliegro, A., Artemov, A., Tommasi, T., Sirigatti, D., Rosov, V., Dai, A., Nießner, M.: MeshGPT: Generating triangle meshes with decoder-only trans- formers. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2024)

    2024

  52. [52]

    Journal of Visual Impair- ment & Blindness106(9), 543–554 (2012)

    Smith, D.W., Smothers, S.M.: The role and characteristics of tactile graphics in secondary mathematics and science textbooks in Braille. Journal of Visual Impair- ment & Blindness106(9), 543–554 (2012)

    2012

  53. [53]

    In: Proceedings of the International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) (2025)

    Tanaka, K., Tsutsui, A., Ochiai, Y.: A comparative evaluation of GenAI-assisted tactile graphics from the perspective of totally blind professionals in tactile graphic supervision. In: Proceedings of the International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) (2025)

    2025

  54. [54]

    tjm35: asymmetric-tiling-sd-webui: Asymmetric tiling for stable-diffusion-webui, https://github.com/tjm35/asymmetric- tiling- sd- webui, Accessed on 2026- 06-28 Text-based Tactile Graphics Generation for the Visually Impaired 19

    2026

  55. [55]

    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology pp

    Tovar-Batista, B.M., Abellán-Nebot, J.V., Gual-Ortí, J., Serrano, J.: Geometrical evaluation of additive manufacturing techniques for tactile graphic production. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology pp. 1–14 (2025)

    2025

  56. [56]

    In: CVPR (2024)

    Vecchio, G., Sortino, R., Palazzo, S., Spampinato, C.: Matfuse: controllable mate- rial generation with diffusion models. In: CVPR (2024)

    2024

  57. [57]

    ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information8(7) (2019)

    Wabiński, J., Mościcka, A.: Automatic (tactile) map generation—a systematic lit- erature review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information8(7) (2019)

    2019

  58. [58]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02546 (2025)

    Wang, R., Xu, S., Dong, Y., Deng, Y., Xiang, J., Lv, Z., Sun, G., Tong, X., Yang, J.: MoGe-2: Accurate monocular geometry with metric scale and sharp details. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02546 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    In: International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2021)

    Wang, S., She, Y., Romero, B., Adelson, E.: GelSight wedge: Measuring high- resolution 3D contact geometry with a compact robot finger. In: International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2021)

    2021

  60. [60]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics25(4), 1651–1665 (2019)

    Wei,M.,Tian,Y.,Pang,W.M.,Wang,C.C.L.,Pang,M.Y.,Wang,J.,Qin,J.,Heng, P.A.: Bas-relief modeling from normal layers. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics25(4), 1651–1665 (2019)

    2019

  61. [61]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)26(3), 32–es (2007)

    Weyrich, T., Deng, J., Barnes, C., Rusinkiewicz, S., Finkelstein, A.: Digital bas- relief from 3D scenes. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)26(3), 32–es (2007)

    2007

  62. [62]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02324 (2025)

    Wu, C., Li, J., Zhou, J., Lin, J., Gao, K., Yan, K., ming Yin, S., Bai, S., Xu, X., Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Tang, Z., Zhang, Z., Wang, Z., Yang, A., Yu, B., Cheng, C., Liu, D., Li, D., Zhang, H., Meng, H., Wei, H., Ni, J., Chen, K., Cao, K., Peng, L., Qu, L., Wu, M., Wang, P., Yu, S., Wen, T., Feng, W., Xu, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhu, Y., Wu, Y., Cai, Y., L...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2016)

    Wu, J., Zhang, C., Xue, T., Freeman, B., Tenenbaum, J.: Learning a probabilistic latent space of object shapes via 3D generative-adversarial modeling. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2016)

    2016

  64. [64]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.14692 (2025)

    Xiang, J., Chen, X., Xu, S., Wang, R., Lv, Z., Deng, Y., Zhu, H., Dong, Y., Zhao, H., Yuan, N.J., others: Native and compact structured latents for 3D generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.14692 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2025)

    Xiang, J., Lv, Z., Xu, S., Deng, Y., Wang, R., Zhang, B., Chen, D., Tong, X., Yang, J.: Structured 3D latents for scalable and versatile 3D generation. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2025)

    2025

  66. [66]

    In: CVPR (2025)

    Xiong, B., Liu, J., Hu, J., Wu, C., Wu, J., Liu, X., Zhao, C., Ding, E., Lian, Z.: Texgaussian: Generating high-quality pbr material via octree-based 3d gaussian splatting. In: CVPR (2025)

    2025

  67. [67]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15442 (2025)

    Yang, S., Yang, M., Feng, Y., Huang, X., Zhang, S., He, Z., Luo, D., Liu, H., Zhao, Y., Lin, Q., Lai, Z., Yang, X., Shi, H., Zhao, Z., Zhang, B., Yan, H., Wang, L., Liu, S., Zhang, J., Chen, M., Dong, L., Jia, Y., Cai, Y., Yu, J., Tang, Y., Guo, D., Yu, J., Zhang, H., Ye, Z., He, P., Wu, R., Wei, S., Zhang, C., Tan, Y., Sun, Y., Niu, L., Huang, S., Zheng,...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.02293 (2024)

    Yang, X., Shi, H., Zhang, B., Yang, F., Wang, J., Zhao, H., Liu, X., Wang, X., Lin, Q., Yu, J., et al.: Hunyuan3D 1.0: A unified framework for text-to-3D and image-to-3D generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.02293 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    In: IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2024) 20 R

    Yin, T., Gharbi, M., Zhang, R., Shechtman, E., Durand, F., Freeman, W.T., Park, T.: One-step diffusion with distribution matching distillation. In: IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2024) 20 R. Gao et al

    2024

  70. [70]

    Sensors (2017)

    Yuan, W., Dong, S., Adelson, E.H.: GelSight: High-resolution robot tactile sensors for estimating geometry and force. Sensors (2017)

    2017

  71. [71]

    In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2018)

    Zhang, R., Isola, P., Efros, A.A., Shechtman, E., Wang, O.: The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2018)

    2018

  72. [72]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics29(12), 5008–5019 (2023)

    Zhang, Y.W., Luo, P., Zhou, H., Ji, Z., Liu, H., Chen, Y., Zhang, C.: Neural modeling of portrait bas-relief from a single photograph. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics29(12), 5008–5019 (2023)

    2023

  73. [73]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics21(3), 328–338 (2015)

    Zhang, Y.W., Zhou, Y.Q., Li, X.L., Liu, H., Zhang, L.L.: Bas-relief generation and shape editing through gradient-based mesh deformation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics21(3), 328–338 (2015)

    2015

  74. [74]

    TOG43(4), 1–18 (2024)

    Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Xie, Z., Yang, L., Liu, Z., Yang, M., Zhang, R., Kou, Q., Lin, C., Wang, W., et al.: Dreammat: High-quality pbr material generation with geometry-and light-aware diffusion models. TOG43(4), 1–18 (2024)

    2024

  75. [75]

    A white marble stone relief sculpture of:

    Zhao, Z., Lai, Z., Lin, Q., Zhao, Y., Liu, H., Yang, S., Feng, Y., Yang, M., Zhang, S., Yang, X., et al.: Hunyuan3D 2.0: Scaling diffusion models for high resolution textured 3D assets generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12202 (2025) Text-based Tactile Graphics Generation for the Visually Impaired 1 Appendix Overview This appendix provides additional te...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 2, 2026.