Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The brain is a computer is a brain: neuroscience's internal debate and the social significance of the Computational Metaphor

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.14042 v1 pith:NYR4RBQ2 submitted 2021-07-18 cs.CY cs.AI

classification cs.CYcs.AI
keywords metaphorcomputationalbrainneuroscienceartificialcomputerintelligenceparticularly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Computational Metaphor, comparing the brain to the computer and vice versa, is the most prominent metaphor in neuroscience and artificial intelligence (AI). Its appropriateness is highly debated in both fields, particularly with regards to whether it is useful for the advancement of science and technology. Considerably less attention, however, has been devoted to how the Computational Metaphor is used outside of the lab, and particularly how it may shape society's interactions with AI. As such, recently publicized concerns over AI's role in perpetuating racism, genderism, and ableism suggest that the term "artificial intelligence" is misplaced, and that a new lexicon is needed to describe these computational systems. Thus, there is an essential question about the Computational Metaphor that is rarely asked by neuroscientists: whom does it help and whom does it harm? This essay invites the neuroscience community to consider the social implications of the field's most controversial metaphor.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Governance of Generative AI in Creative Work: Consent, Credit, Compensation, and Beyond

    cs.HC 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Creative workers see consent, credit, and compensation as necessary but imperfect tools for governing generative AI, and report a wide gap between the governance they want and what employers, platforms, and government...

Pith tools