Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CHOSEN: Contrastive Hypothesis Selection for Multi-View Depth Refinement

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.02225 v2 pith:NZIQ45DO submitted 2024-04-02 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords multi-viewchosendepthstereocapturecontrastivedifferenthypotheses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose CHOSEN, a simple yet flexible, robust and effective multi-view depth refinement framework. It can be employed in any existing multi-view stereo pipeline, with straightforward generalization capability for different multi-view capture systems such as camera relative positioning and lenses. Given an initial depth estimation, CHOSEN iteratively re-samples and selects the best hypotheses, and automatically adapts to different metric or intrinsic scales determined by the capture system. The key to our approach is the application of contrastive learning in an appropriate solution space and a carefully designed hypothesis feature, based on which positive and negative hypotheses can be effectively distinguished. Integrated in a simple baseline multi-view stereo pipeline, CHOSEN delivers impressive quality in terms of depth and normal accuracy compared to many current deep learning based multi-view stereo pipelines.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GNM Head: A Generative aNthropometric Model of the human head

    cs.CV 2026-07 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    GNM unifies face, eyes, teeth, and tongue in one linear 3D morphable model and reports lower scan-to-mesh error than FLAME on 15,000 held-out scans.

Pith tools