REVIEW 1 cited by
SelfMatch: Combining Contrastive Self-Supervision and Consistency for Semi-Supervised Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper introduces SelfMatch, a semi-supervised learning method that combines the power of contrastive self-supervised learning and consistency regularization. SelfMatch consists of two stages: (1) self-supervised pre-training based on contrastive learning and (2) semi-supervised fine-tuning based on augmentation consistency regularization. We empirically demonstrate that SelfMatch achieves the state-of-the-art results on standard benchmark datasets such as CIFAR-10 and SVHN. For example, for CIFAR-10 with 40 labeled examples, SelfMatch achieves 93.19% accuracy that outperforms the strong previous methods such as MixMatch (52.46%), UDA (70.95%), ReMixMatch (80.9%), and FixMatch (86.19%). We note that SelfMatch can close the gap between supervised learning (95.87%) and semi-supervised learning (93.19%) by using only a few labels for each class.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Beyond Self-Consistency: Loss-Balanced Perturbation-Based Regularization Improves Industrial-Scale Ads Ranking
Adding low-weight noisy copies of training examples improves Meta's ads ranking by about 0.1% to 0.3% relative Normalized Entropy, and slightly outperforms self-consistency regularization.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.