BiFeO$_3$ nanoparticles at low-temperature using atomistic simulations -- surface charge distribution and terminations

Jiri Hlinka; Marek Pasciak; Mauro A. P. Goncalves; Monica Graf

REVIEW 4 major objections 8 minor 24 references

BiFeO$_3$ nanoparticles at low-temperature using atomistic simulations -- surface charge distribution and terminations

T0 review · 4 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Surface termination controls the ferroelectric texture of BiFeO3 nanoparticles.

desk verdict Termination engineering in BiFeO3 nanoparticles is a real step forward, but the stripe-phase claim needs unbiased initialization before it can be called stabilized. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00680 v1 pith:O4T3LSAB submitted 2024-12-31 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Mauro A. P. Goncalves , Monica Graf , Marek Pasciak , Jiri Hlinka This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall

keywords BiFeO3ferroelectricnanoparticlesshellmodelsurfaceterminationpolarizationdomainsoxygenoctahedrarotationatomisticsimulationspiezo-photocatalysis

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses atomistic simulations to ask how the way a BiFeO3 nanoparticle's surface is cut—terminating it in positively charged BiO layers, negatively charged FeO2 layers, or a neutral mix—changes the ferroelectric order inside. It finds that surface charge distribution is decisive: oppositely charged faces give a single $\langle 111\rangle$ polarization domain, a geometry with same-charge faces breaks the polarization into domains separated by $109^\circ$ and $71^\circ$ walls, and neutral mixed faces produce a globally unpolarized state with a large central $\langle 111\rangle$ domain surrounded by vortices and, in places, stripe-like domains. For the neutral termination, the simulations stabilize a non-rhombohedral BiFeO3 arrangement with in-phase oxygen-octahedra rotations and reduced polarization. The result matters because it shows surface termination alone can select the ferroelectric texture of a nanoparticle, which is the property thought to drive piezo-photocatalytic behavior.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the ab initio-fitted shell model of BiFeO3, in which every atom carries a core and a shell with separate charges so that atomic polarizability and anharmonic core–shell coupling can reproduce ferroelectricity. The paper uses it to relax 40×40×40-cell (320,000-atom) nanoparticles at 1 K, and then evaluates three local quantities per perovskite cell: dipole moment from core and shell charges, oxygen-octahedra rotation about the Fe center, and local cell volume. The decisive control variable is the surface termination pattern, because BiO faces are positively charged and FeO2 faces negatively charged, so different constructions impose different electrostatic boundary conditions on the same bulk potential. The stripe phase is obtained by an initial displacement pattern of Bi atoms along $\langle 111\rangle$ and $\langle \bar{1}\bar{1}\bar{1}\rangle$ directions, and the relaxation is what stabilizes it.

What would settle it

Relax the same mixed-termination nanoparticle with a first-principles density-functional-theory calculation and check whether the stripe-like domain pattern and the surface oxygen rotations above about 20° survive; if they do not, the predicted stripe phase is an artifact of the fitted interatomic potential.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in cubic BiFeO3 nanoparticles of about 16 Å, the electrostatic pattern imposed by surface termination dictates the domain structure of the ferroelectric and antiferrodistortive order parameters. With BiO faces opposite FeO2 faces, the relaxed nanoparticle keeps a homogeneous polarization of about 1 C/m² along $\langle 111\rangle$ and antiphase oxygen rotations near 13.4° inside, with rotations climbing to about 20° at the BiO surface. With BiO on both x faces and FeO2 on both y faces, the in-plane polarization splits into domains separated by $109^\circ$ and $71^\circ$ walls. With mixed neutral termination, the total polarization vanishes: a large central $\langle 111\rangle$ domain is surrounded by polarization vortices, and a separately constructed initial stripe-like pattern relaxes into a stable non-rhombohedral stripe phase with polarization modulated along x plus secondary modulations along y and z, in-phase oxygen rotations, and smaller polarization magnitude than all other configurations.

Load-bearing premise

The shell-model potential, fitted to bulk BiFeO3, stays accurate at nanoparticle surfaces where oxygen-octahedra rotations reach about twice their bulk value; if it does not, the stripe-like phase and surface relaxation patterns are artifacts of the potential.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the results are correct, the ferroelectric state of a BiFeO3 nanoparticle can be selected by its surface chemistry: neutral mixed terminations suppress net polarization, while oppositely charged faces preserve a monodomain.
The predicted non-rhombohedral stripe phase is a distinct low-temperature polarization texture with in-phase oxygen rotations and reduced polarization, extending the known phase behavior of BiFeO3 to the nanoscale.
Surface oxygen rotations reaching roughly 20° mean the surface layer is structurally very different from the bulk, which should affect surface chemistry and catalysis.
Volume changes of up to 6% near vertices and edges imply strong strain gradients at nanoparticle surfaces that could couple to piezocatalytic responses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The strong coupling between termination and domain pattern suggests that patterning mixed terminations on a surface could imprint domain walls and vortices at predetermined locations in a ferroelectric nanoparticle, an untested route to engineering catalytic hotspots.
Because the stripe-like phase has lower polarization and in-phase rotations, it may be the ground state only under neutral electrical boundary conditions; near-zero net polarization in small BiFeO3 nanoparticles could be experimental evidence for this phase.
If surface octahedra rotations reach about 20°, the local tilt pattern may alter the band edge alignment at the surface; computing the electronic structure of the relaxed surface could test whether this enhances charge separation for photocatalysis.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper is a genuine computational exploration of how surface termination shapes domain structures in BiFeO3 nanoparticles, and the mixed-termination results are interesting. The stripe-like non-rhombohedral phase, however, is not shown to emerge spontaneously — it is seeded by the initial condition, and at 1 K that is close to prescribing the answer.

What is new: three sets of charge-neutral nanoparticle constructions, with clean analysis of local polarization, octahedra rotations, and volume. The 109/71 domain walls and the central ⟨111⟩ domain surrounded by vortices in the mixed-termination case are physically sensible and worth reporting. The potential is not refitted here; it's the established Graf-Sepliarsky-Tinte shell model, which is appropriate for a first pass.

The main soft spot is Section 3.3. The authors observe stripe-like regions in an unbiased run, then build a new nanoparticle with Bi displacements already in a stripe pattern. Relaxing from there at 1 K for 20 ps shows that this pattern is a local minimum under the potential — not that it is the stable or spontaneously selected phase. There is no free-energy comparison with the vortex/central-domain configuration, no unbiased initialization, no replica runs. So 'stabilized' in the abstract overstates the evidence. This is the load-bearing issue for the headline claim.

Secondary issues: there are no error bars or independent trajectories for any of the three terminations; conclusions rest on single MD runs. The abstract says 16 Å but the simulation uses 40×40×40 unit cells, closer to 160 Å — a typo or inconsistency that needs fixing. The shell-model potential was fitted to bulk properties, and the surface rotations reach more than twice the bulk value (about 20° vs 13.8°). That transferability risk is real, though not disqualifying for a qualitative map. The references are relevant and include the earlier potential development papers, which is appropriate.

Overall, the central message that termination controls domain architecture is plausible and likely correct. The specific stripe-phase claim needs more work before it can be called a stabilized phase. The paper deserves a serious referee; with additions (unbiased MD or energy comparison, replica runs, fixing the size, discussing potential transferability) it could be a solid contribution.

Referee Report

4 major / 8 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents shell-model molecular dynamics simulations of BiFeO3 nanoparticles of about 40x40x40 perovskite cells with three surface-termination patterns: opposite BiO/FeO2 faces, orthogonal BiO/FeO2 faces, and a mixed neutral termination. For the first case a monodomain ⟨111⟩ polarization state is obtained; for the second, a multidomain state; for the mixed termination, the authors observe vortices around a central ⟨111⟩ domain and, after seeding an initial stripe-like displacement, a relaxed stripe-like configuration. The paper claims that a non-rhombohedral stripe-like phase is stabilized for neutral terminations.

Significance. The study provides detailed real-space maps of local polarization, oxygen octahedral rotations, and unit-cell volumes for large BiFeO3 nanoparticles, and it addresses a timely question about how surface terminations control domain patterns in multiferroic nanoparticles. The use of a previously fitted shell model and large-scale MD is appropriate for a first exploration. However, the headline claim of a stabilized stripe-like phase lacks the evidence needed to distinguish between a spontaneously formed phase and a metastable state that was imposed by the initial conditions; this must be addressed before the result can be accepted.

major comments (4)

[Section 3.3, Abstract] The abstract and Conclusion state that a non-rhombohedral stripe-like phase 'was stabilized' for neutral terminations, but the simulation protocol in Section 3.3 constructs a new nanoparticle by explicitly displacing Bi atoms in a stripe pattern (Fig. 5a) and then relaxes it at 1 K. The resulting configuration (Fig. 5b) therefore only demonstrates that this prescribed pattern is a local minimum of the shell-model potential; it does not demonstrate that the stripe-like arrangement arises spontaneously or that it is thermodynamically preferred over the vortex/central-domain configuration of Fig. 4. To support the central claim, the authors should (i) verify the stripe-like state emerges from unbiased or random initial conditions, (ii) compare free energies or at least relaxed energies of the stripe-like and vortex configurations, and (iii) test stability with respect to different initial stripe periods and orientations.
[Abstract and Section 2] There is a factor-of-ten inconsistency in the nanoparticle size: the abstract states a size of approximately 16 Å, while the simulations use 40×40×40 BiFeO3 cubic cells (320,000 atoms), which corresponds to an edge length of about 160 Å given a lattice parameter near 4 Å. This inconsistency obscures which length scale is being modeled and should be corrected.
[Section 2, Sections 3.1-3.3] All reported conclusions are based on a single molecular dynamics trajectory per termination, run at 1 K for 20 ps (10 ps thermalization plus 10 ps averaging). No error bars, replica runs, or sensitivity checks are reported. Given that the system is deeply trapped at 1 K and that the domain structures are the main results, the robustness of the observed configurations to initial velocities, thermostat/barostat details, and small variations in the initial displacements should be demonstrated.
[Sections 2 and 3.3] The shell-model potential was fitted to bulk BiFeO3 properties (refs [21,22]) and is applied here to nanoparticles with surface oxygen octahedra rotations exceeding twice the bulk value (Section 3.3) and with large surface relaxations. The paper does not assess the transferability of the potential in this regime, e.g., by comparing to ab initio calculations of surface or high-rotation configurations. Since the predicted stripe-like phase and surface patterns could be artifacts of the potential's bulk-fitted form, the authors should either provide a validation or clearly state this limitation as a caveat on the conclusions.

minor comments (8)

[Figure 5] Figure 5 caption and in-text references are inconsistent: the text refers to panels 5a (initial configuration), 5b (relaxed polarization), 5c (rotation map), and 5d (volume), but the caption only lists panels a, b, and c. The caption should be updated and the panel labels clarified.
[Section 3.3] The text uses both 'strip-like' and 'stripe-like'; the terminology should be consistent.
[Section 2] The number '320.000 atoms' uses a period as thousands separator, which is confusing in English; use '320,000' instead.
[Section 2] Section 2 reports the simulation temperature and duration but does not state the MD time step, thermostat type, or ensemble parameters; these details should be provided for reproducibility.
[Section 3.2] In Section 3.2, the domain walls are described as 109° and 71°; a brief explanation of how these angles are measured would help.
[References] References [11] and [12] appear to be the same paper (Lebeugle et al.) with different volume/page details; the duplication should be resolved.
[Section 1] In Section 1, 'photo-exited electrons' should be 'photo-excited electrons'.
[Section 3.3] In Section 3.3, the statement that the oxygen octahedra rotations increase 'to more than twice' the bulk value would be more informative with a quantitative maximum.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Partial circularity in the 'stabilized' stripe phase: the stripe pattern is placed in the initial configuration and then reported as surviving relaxation 'as prescribed', so the stabilization claim is partly an input/output identity rather than an unbiased prediction.

self definitional [Section 3.3, Figs. 5a–5b; Abstract (stripe-phase claim)]
"To stabilize this arrangement of the polarization we construct a new nanoparticle, with the same termination at the surface, but displacing the Bi atoms along the ⟨111⟩ and ⟨¯1¯1¯1⟩ directions forming a stripe-like structure, as shown in Fig. 5a. Fig. 5b shows the relaxed arrangement of the polarization, with the stripe-like domains modulated along x, as prescribed in the initial configuration."

The abstract's headline finding—that a stripe-like polarization arrangement 'was stabilized' for neutral terminations—is evidenced by a simulation whose initial condition already contains that exact stripe arrangement. The relaxed map is described as reproducing the pattern 'as prescribed in the initial configuration,' so the output is an input/output identity rather than an independent prediction. The preceding text records that stripes 'emerged' in some regions of the unseeded run, giving partial independent indication, but the global stabilization claim is not compared with the vortex/central-domain configuration or tested by free-energy differences, and a 1 K, 20 ps relaxation can remain trapped near the prescribed pattern.

full rationale

The interatomic shell-model potential is taken from previous work (refs. [21,22]) and is not refitted to any nanoparticle or stripe-phase data in this paper; it is an external, independently fitted input, so the bulk-fit-to-nanoparticle transferability concern is a correctness risk, not circularity. The other reported multidomain structures (vortices, 109/71-degree walls, surface-enhanced octahedra rotations) emerge from MD relaxation of generic ⟨111⟩ initial displacements and are not forced by construction. The single load-bearing input/output identity is the stripe-like configuration: to 'stabilize' the stripes the authors deliberately seed a new nanoparticle with stripe-patterned Bi displacements, and Fig. 5b explicitly says the relaxed domains follow the prescribed initial configuration. Because the same pattern also appeared spontaneously 'in some regions' of the preceding unseeded run, the paper does not reduce entirely to its input; the stripe state has some independent basis. Overall the derivation is largely self-contained, but the central 'stabilized stripe phase' claim is partly circular, giving a moderate partial-circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new fitted parameters or physical entities. It builds on an existing classical potential, which itself contains fitted parameters from prior publications. The central claims depend on the potential's accuracy at surfaces and the simulation's sampling of low-energy states.

free parameters (1)

Shell model potential parameters = from refs [21,22]
The entire simulation relies on these parameters, which were fitted to DFT and bulk BiFeO3 properties in prior work; their transferability to nanoparticle surfaces and large rotations is assumed.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The shell model potential accurately represents BiFeO3 including surfaces and oxygen-octahedra rotations up to 20 degrees.
The potential was fitted to bulk properties, but the paper applies it to small nanoparticles with strong surface relaxations and rotations exceeding bulk values, as shown in Sections 3.1 and 3.3.
domain assumption Molecular dynamics at 1 K with 10 ps thermalization and 10 ps averaging reaches a representative low-temperature state.
A single trajectory with no replica sampling is used; there is no evidence of ergodicity or convergence to the ground state, which is assumed in Section 2.
domain assumption Local dipoles computed from core and shell positions are a good proxy for local polarization.
This is a standard method in shell-model simulations, but it is not validated against DFT for the specific domain configurations reported here.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of BiFeO$_3$ nanoparticles at low-temperature using atomistic simulations -- surface charge distribution and terminations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O4T3LSAB

@misc{pith2026250100680,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: BiFeO$_3$ nanoparticles at low-temperature using atomistic simulations -- surface charge distribution and terminations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O4T3LSAB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00680}
}

abstract

This paper analyzes how the ferroelectric properties of cubic-like BiFeO$_3$ nanoparticles are affected by different terminations and charge distributions at the surface using ab-initio-based atomistic computational experiments. Our findings unveil multiple multidomain configurations and illustrate how the different order parameters evolve towards the surface. Interestingly, for neutral terminations, a non-rhombohedral phase of BiFeO$_3$ with a stripe-like polarization arrangement was stabilized. We evaluate the polarization, oxygen octahedra rotation, and volume variation for all the configurations obtained, taking advantage of the atomic-scale details provided by the methods used in this study.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

[1]

Amdouni, W., Fricaudet, M., Otoniˇ car, M., Garcia, V., Fusil, S., Kreisel, J., Maghraoui-Meherzi, H., Dkhil, B.: Bifeo3 nanoparticles: The ’holy-grail’ of piezo- photocatalysts? Advanced Materials 10(6), 2301841 (2023)

work page 2023
[2]

Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 35, 108571 (2022)

Kalhori, H., Youssef, A.H., Ruediger, A., Pignolet, A.: Competing contributions to the catalytic activity of barium titanate nanoparticles in the decomposition of organic pollutants. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 35, 108571 (2022)

work page 2022
[3]

Xian, T., Yang, H., Dai, J., Wei, Z., Ma, J., Feng, W.: Photocatalytic properties of bifeo3 nanoparticles with different sizes. Mater. Lett. 65, 1573–1575 (2011)

work page 2011
[4]

iScience 4, 236–246 (2018)

Mushtaq, F., Chen, X., Hoop, M., Torlakcik, H., Pellicer, E., Sort, J., Gattinoni, C., Nelson, B., Pan´ e, S.: Piezoelectrically enhanced photocatalysis with bifeo 3 nanostructures for efficient water remediation. iScience 4, 236–246 (2018)

work page 2018
[5]

Paillard, C., Bai., X., Infante, I.C., Guennou, M., Geneste, G., Alexe, M., Kreisel, J., Dkhil, B.: Photovoltaics with ferroelectrics: Current status and beyond. Adv. Mater 28, 5153 (2016)

work page 2016
[6]

Lu, L., Liang, N., Sun, H., Zhang, Q., Hao, X.: Highly efficient sono-piezo-photo synergistic catalysis in bismuth layered ferroelectrics via finely distinguishing sonochemical and electromechanochemical processes. J. Mater. 8, 47 (2022)

work page 2022
[7]

Nano Energy 96, 107141 (2022)

Zhou, X., Shen., B., Lyubartsev, A., Zhai, J., Hedin, N.: Semiconducting piezo- electric heterostructures for piezo- and piezophotocatalysis. Nano Energy 96, 107141 (2022)

work page 2022
[8]

Zhang, Y., Wang., S., Zhao, Y., Ding, Y., Zhang, Z., Jiang, T., Wang, Z.L., Li, L.: Piezo-phototronic effect boosted catalysis in plasmonic bimetallic zno het- erostructure with guided fermi level alignment. Mater. Today Nano 18, 100177 (2022)

work page 2022

Show all 24 references

[9]

Nano-Micro Letters 12(1), 81 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-020-00420-6

Wang, N., Luo, X., Han, L., Zhang, Z., Zhang, R., Olin, H., Yang, Y.: Struc- ture, performance, and application of BiFeO3 nanomaterials. Nano-Micro Letters 12(1), 81 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-020-00420-6

2020 doi
[10]

Nature Materials 23, 905–911 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41563-024-01890-4

Chaudron, A., Li, Z., Finco, A., Marton, P., Dufour, P., Abdelsamie, A., Fis- cher, J., Collin, S., Dkhil, B., Hlinka, J., Jacques, V., Chauleau, J.-Y., Viret, M., Bouzehouane, K., Fusil, S., Garcia, V.: Electric-field-induced multiferroic topo- logical solitons. Nature Materi...

2024
[11]

Applied Physics Letters 91(2), 022907 (2007) https://doi

Lebeugle, D., Colson, D., Forget, A., Viret, M.: Very large spontaneous electric polarization in BiFeO 3 single crystals at room temperature and its evolution 9 under cycling fields. Applied Physics Letters 91(2), 022907 (2007) https://doi. org/10.1063/1.2753390

2007 doi
[12]

Lebeugle, D., Colson., D., Forget, A., Viret, M.: Very large spontaneous electric polarization in bifeo3 single crystals at room temperature and its evolution under cycling fields. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 022907 (2007)

2007
[13]

Nano Res

Mushtaq, F., Chen, X., Torlakcik, H., Nelson., B.J., Pan´ e, S.: Enhanced cat- alytic degradation of organic pollutants by multi-stimuli activated multiferroic nanoarchitectures. Nano Res. 13, 2183 (2020)

2020
[14]

Nano Energy 66, 104083 (2019)

Li., S., Zhao, Z., Yu, D., Zhao, J.-Z., Su, Y., Liu, Y., Lin, Y., Liu, W., Xu, H., Zhang, Z.: Few-layer transition metal dichalcogenides (mos 2, ws2, and wse 2) for water splitting and degradation of organic pollutants: Understanding the piezocatalytic effect. Nano Energy 66, ...

2019
[15]

Nano Energy 98, 107247 (2022)

Xie, Z., Tang, X., Shi, J., Wang, Y., Yuan, G.-L., Liu, J.-M.: Excellent piezo- photocatalytic performance of bi 4ti3o12 nanoplates synthesized by molten-salt method. Nano Energy 98, 107247 (2022)

2022
[16]

Wu, C.M., Chen, W.J., Zheng, Y., Ma, D.C., Wang, B., Liu, J.Y., Woo, C.H.: Con- trollability of vortex domain structure in ferroelectric nanodot: Fruitful domain patterns and transformation paths. Sci. Rep. 4, 3946 (2015)

2015
[17]

Rino, F.D., Sepliarsky, M., Stachiotti, M.G.: Topology of the polarization field in pbtio 3 nanoparticles of different shapes by atomic-level simulations. J. Appl. Phys. 127, 144101 (2020)

2020
[18]

Nature 432, 737 (2004)

Naumov, I.I., Bellaiche, L., Fu, H.: Unusual phase transitions in ferroelectric nanodisks and nanorods. Nature 432, 737 (2004)

2004
[19]

Stachiotti, M.G., Sepliarsky, M.: Toroidal ferroelectricity in pbtio 3 nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137601 (2011)

2011
[20]

Nat Commun 11, 2433 (2020)

Lukyanchuk, I., Tikhonov, Y., Razumnaya, A.: Hopfions emerge in ferroelectrics. Nat Commun 11, 2433 (2020)

2020
[21]

Graf, M.S

M. Graf, M.S. M. Sepliarsky, Tinte, S.: Development of an atomic level model for bifeo3from first-principles. Ferroelectrics 461(1), 61–67 (2014) https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00150193.2014.889905

2014
[22]

Graf, M., Sepliarsky, M., Tinte, S., Stachiotti, M.G.: Phase transitions and anti- ferroelectricity in BiFeo3 from atomic-level simulations. Phys. Rev. B 90, 184108 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.184108

2014 doi
[23]

Tinte, S., Stachiotti, M.G., Phillpot, S.R., Sepliarsky, M., Wolf, D., Migoni, R.L.: Ferroelectric properties of baxsr1−xtio3 solid solutions obtained by molecular 10 dynamics simulation. J. Phys.: Condens Matter 16, 3495 (2004)

2004
[24]

Todorov, I.T., Smith, W., Trachenko, K., Dove, M.T.: Dl poly 3: new dimensions in molecular dynamics simulations via massive parallelism. J. Mater. Chem. 16, 1911 (2006) 11

2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Amdouni, W., Fricaudet, M., Otoniˇ car, M., Garcia, V., Fusil, S., Kreisel, J., Maghraoui-Meherzi, H., Dkhil, B.: Bifeo3 nanoparticles: The ’holy-grail’ of piezo- photocatalysts? Advanced Materials 10(6), 2301841 (2023)

work page 2023

[2] [2]

Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 35, 108571 (2022)

Kalhori, H., Youssef, A.H., Ruediger, A., Pignolet, A.: Competing contributions to the catalytic activity of barium titanate nanoparticles in the decomposition of organic pollutants. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 35, 108571 (2022)

work page 2022

[3] [3]

Xian, T., Yang, H., Dai, J., Wei, Z., Ma, J., Feng, W.: Photocatalytic properties of bifeo3 nanoparticles with different sizes. Mater. Lett. 65, 1573–1575 (2011)

work page 2011

[4] [4]

iScience 4, 236–246 (2018)

Mushtaq, F., Chen, X., Hoop, M., Torlakcik, H., Pellicer, E., Sort, J., Gattinoni, C., Nelson, B., Pan´ e, S.: Piezoelectrically enhanced photocatalysis with bifeo 3 nanostructures for efficient water remediation. iScience 4, 236–246 (2018)

work page 2018

[5] [5]

Paillard, C., Bai., X., Infante, I.C., Guennou, M., Geneste, G., Alexe, M., Kreisel, J., Dkhil, B.: Photovoltaics with ferroelectrics: Current status and beyond. Adv. Mater 28, 5153 (2016)

work page 2016

[6] [6]

Lu, L., Liang, N., Sun, H., Zhang, Q., Hao, X.: Highly efficient sono-piezo-photo synergistic catalysis in bismuth layered ferroelectrics via finely distinguishing sonochemical and electromechanochemical processes. J. Mater. 8, 47 (2022)

work page 2022

[7] [7]

Nano Energy 96, 107141 (2022)

Zhou, X., Shen., B., Lyubartsev, A., Zhai, J., Hedin, N.: Semiconducting piezo- electric heterostructures for piezo- and piezophotocatalysis. Nano Energy 96, 107141 (2022)

work page 2022

[8] [8]

Zhang, Y., Wang., S., Zhao, Y., Ding, Y., Zhang, Z., Jiang, T., Wang, Z.L., Li, L.: Piezo-phototronic effect boosted catalysis in plasmonic bimetallic zno het- erostructure with guided fermi level alignment. Mater. Today Nano 18, 100177 (2022)

work page 2022