Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Linearization of Newton's second law

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that Newton's second law for a particle on a line can be globally rewritten as the free-particle equation $\mathrm{d}^2X/\mathrm{d}T^2=0$ for exactly four potentials, using the Eisenhart lift to embed the system in a…

desk verdict A promising Eisenhart-lift classification that overclaims: the proof is missing and the Morse case is unconstructed, but the core idea is sound and worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05036 v1 pith:O5ZKBGPO submitted 2024-12-06 math-ph math.CAmath.MPphysics.class-ph

Andronikos Paliathanasis This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.CAmath.MPphysics.class-ph MSC 34A2634C14
keywords NewtonianmechanicsgeometriclinearizationEisenhartliftfreeparticleErmakovpotentialoscillatorMorseconformallyflatmetrics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that Newton's second law for a one-dimensional particle, $\ddot{x}-F(x)=0$, can be globally transformed into the free-particle equation $\mathrm{d}^2X/\mathrm{d}T^2=0$ for four specific potentials. These are the Ermakov potential $V_0/x^2$, the oscillator $\frac{\omega}{2}x^2$, the sum $\frac{\omega}{2}x^2+V_0/x^2$, and the Morse potential $V_1^0 e^{\lambda x}+V_2^0 e^{2\lambda x}$. The route is to lift the original Hamiltonian to a higher-dimensional geodesic Hamiltonian, the Eisenhart lift, and to demand that the lifted metric be flat or conformally flat so that its null geodesics are free-particle motion. The paper gives explicit point transformations that turn the lifted geodesic systems into straight-line motion, which means analytic solutions of the original nonlinear Newton equations follow by inverting those transformations. It matters because it shows geometric linearization can work without the equation being maximally symmetric.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the Eisenhart lift together with conformal-flatness conditions on the lifted metrics. The lift replaces $\ddot{x}-F(x)=0$ by geodesic equations for four extended Hamiltonians, $H_{1+1}$, $H_{1+2}$, $H_{1+3}$, and $\hat{H}_{1+3}$, whose extra momenta are conserved. For $H_{1+1}$ the two-dimensional metric $ds^2=dx^2+\frac{1}{\alpha V(x)}dz^2$ must have zero Ricci scalar, giving $2V_{,xx}V-3(V_{,x})^2=0$ and the Ermakov potential. For the null-geodesic cases, the metrics must be conformally flat, which imposes conditions such as $V_{,xxx}=0$ for the oscillator, a system of equations for $F_1,F_2$ that yields the Ermakov-plus-oscillator potential, and equations for $V_1,V_2$ that yield the Morse potential. Once these conditions hold, the paper's Corollary 4 applies: null geodesics of conformally flat spaces can be written as free-particle motion.

What would settle it

Take the paper's own Hamiltonian $H_{1+2}$ and impose the stated recovery conditions $p_u^2=1$ and $p_u p_v-h_{1+2}=h$. Direct substitution gives $p_u p_v-h_{1+2}=-(\frac12 p_x^2+V(x))$, so the sign in equation (12) is opposite to what is needed to recover energy $h$. Repeating the calculation for equation (19) with $H_{1+3}$ shows whether the equivalence holds for all energies or only on the zero-energy null slice; if only the null slice works, the global arbitrary-energy claim is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, Theorem 5, is that the Newtonian system $\ddot{x}=F(x)$ with $F(x)=-V'(x)$ can be written as $\mathrm{d}^2X/\mathrm{d}T^2=0$ for the four potentials (A) $V_0/x^2$, (B) $\frac{\omega}{2}x^2$, (C) $\frac{\omega}{2}x^2+V_0/x^2$, and (D) $V_1^0 e^{\lambda x}+V_2^0 e^{2\lambda x}$, through the lifted Hamiltonians $H_{1+1}$, $H_{1+2}$, $H_{1+3}$, and $\hat{H}_{1+3}$. The discovery is that these nonlinear systems, which do not have the maximal symmetry normally required for linearization, become globally linearizable when their Eisenhart metrics are chosen to be flat or conformally flat. Linearizability is therefore transferred from the differential equation itself to the geometry of an extended space, and the force law is encoded in the curvature of that space.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, after fixing the conserved momenta and energy, the extended free-particle trajectories project exactly onto the original one-dimensional Newton equation with arbitrary nonzero energy; the recovery conditions in equations (12) and (19) appear to have the wrong sign for the energy, and the proof of Theorem 5 is announced for an appendix that is not present, so the claimed general equivalence is not fully supported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the four listed potentials, every solution of the original Newton equation can be obtained by applying the inverse point transformation to straight-line solutions of the free particle, giving the integration constants directly.
  • The equivalence supplies a geometric explanation of why the oscillator and Ermakov systems are tractable: their trajectories are shadows of geodesics in flat or conformally flat lifted spaces.
  • The result extends the known oscillator-free-particle equivalence to the Morse and Ermakov-plus-oscillator potentials through the new lifts $H_{1+3}$ and $\hat{H}_{1+3}$.
  • Because the lifted systems are geodesic flows, conserved quantities of the original system are encoded in isometries of the Eisenhart metrics, giving a geometric route to conservation laws.
  • The approach relaxes the usual requirement that a second-order ODE be maximally symmetric in order to be globally linearizable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A systematic scan of the constraint equations (36)-(39) could reveal additional one-dimensional potentials beyond the four listed; the paper does not claim to have exhausted them.
  • Because the Eisenhart lift also connects classical and quantum dynamics, the explicit coordinate transformations here are natural candidates for mapping the Schrödinger equation of these potentials to the free-particle Schrödinger equation, a step the paper leaves implicit.
  • If the apparent sign error in recovery conditions (12) and (19) is real, the cleanest repair would restrict the equivalence to zero-energy solutions; checking that restriction separates the geometric construction from the claim of arbitrary-energy equivalence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a geometric linearization scheme for the one-dimensional Newtonian system (1), ẍ − F(x) = 0, by embedding it into Eisenhart lifts on higher-dimensional manifolds. Four extended Hamiltonian systems, H1+1, H1+2, H1+3, and ˆH1+3, are introduced, and conformal-flatness conditions are derived for the associated Eisenhart metrics. From these conditions the author obtains four linearizable potentials: the Ermakov potential V0/x^2, the harmonic oscillator, the Ermakov-plus-oscillator potential, and the two-term Morse potential V10 e^{λx} + V20 e^{2λx}. The paper’s Theorem 5 asserts that, for these potentials, Newton’s second law can be written as the free-particle equation d^2X/dT^2 = 0. Explicit transformations are given for the Ermakov and oscillator cases and for a single-exponential Hamiltonian, while the proof of the general theorem is deferred to a nonexistent appendix.

Significance. If the main theorem were fully established, the paper would provide a useful and nontrivial connection between Eisenhart lifts, conformal geometry, and the linearization of one-dimensional Newtonian systems. The derivation of the conformal-flatness conditions (34)–(39) is concrete and checkable, and the identified potentials are physically relevant. However, as it stands, the central claim is not proven: the proof of Theorem 5 is missing, the recovery conditions contain sign errors, and the Morse-potential case is demonstrated only for a single exponential via a complex-valued transformation. The approach is promising and the gaps appear repairable, but substantial revision is needed before the result can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Theorem 5] The proof of Theorem 5 is stated as 'presented in Appendix ??', but no such appendix exists in the manuscript. Moreover, the subsequent examples supply explicit linearizing transformations only for H1+1 (Ermakov potential) and H1+2 (oscillator), and for a single-exponential variant of ˆH1+3. No transformation is given for the H1+3 case (Ermakov with oscillator, potential C) or for the two-term Morse potential of case (D). Thus the central theorem is unproven as written.
  2. [Section 2, equations (12) and (19)] The recovery conditions for the original Hamiltonian contain sign errors. For H1+2 in equation (9), setting p_u^2 = 1 gives H1+2 = (1/2)p_x^2 + V(x) + p_u p_v, so matching the original energy h = (1/2)p_x^2 + V(x) requires h_{1+2} − p_u p_v = h, not p_u p_v − h_{1+2} = h as stated in (12). Similarly, with V(x) defined by (18), H1+3 equals (1/2)p_x^2 + V(x), so condition (19) is inconsistent with arbitrary h. These errors affect the claim that the linearization works for arbitrary energy; although they appear correctable by sign flips, the reduction is not reliably established as written.
  3. [Section 3, equations (46)–(50)] The explicit transformation for the ˆH1+3 Hamiltonian (46) uses V1(x) = V10 e^{λx} and V2(x) = V20 e^{λx}, i.e., a single exponential, not the two-term Morse potential V10 e^{λx} + V20 e^{2λx} claimed in Theorem 5(D). In addition, equations (47) imply z = −ix identically, so the transformation is complex-valued and cannot be a real point transformation on the real extended phase space. No transformation covering the e^{2λx} term is supplied, and the passage from the conformally multiplied Hamiltonian (49) to the free-particle equations (50) is not justified. Consequently, case (D) of Theorem 5 is unsupported.
  4. [Abstract and Section 3, transformation (41)] The paper claims the linearization is 'global', but the explicit transformations are local in character. For instance, (41) is a polar-coordinate-type map with a branch cut and a degeneracy at X = Y = 0; it is not a global diffeomorphism on the extended phase space. The paper should specify the domain of validity and clarify what 'global' means for each transformation, or qualify the statement accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'This study open new directions' should read 'This study opens new directions'.
  2. [Equation (36)] In the displayed system (36), the first equation is written as '2F1,xx F − 3 (F1,x)^2 = 0'; the second argument should be F1, not F, so that it reads '2F1,xx F1 − 3 (F1,x)^2 = 0'.
  3. [Section 2, notation] The notation for the Hamiltonian values is inconsistent: h_{n+2} appears in (9) while h_{1+2} is used in (12); similarly h_{n+3} and h_{1+3} are used interchangeably. Please standardize.
  4. [References] Reference [29] is incomplete: it lacks journal, volume, and year. Reference [46] is also incomplete, as it gives only a title and year.
  5. [Appendix A] Appendix A claims that an arbitrary potential V can be linearized via null geodesics of the two-dimensional metric (5). This is not reconciled with the main text, where the non-null H1+1 case requires flatness condition (34). Moreover, for a positive-definite signature metric (5), the null condition V(...)(p_X^2 + (1/α)p_z^2)=0 forces the momenta to vanish, making the claimed free-particle description trivial. The role and validity of this appendix should be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: potentials are derived from conformal-flatness conditions, not from fitting or self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained: the linearizable potentials are obtained by imposing flatness or conformal flatness on the Eisenhart-lift metrics and solving the resulting differential equations (34)-(39), then substituting the solutions into the recovery relations (18) and (26). The potentials are outputs of these conditions, not inputs fitted to the claimed result. The recovery of the original Newtonian system from the extended Hamiltonians is stated through explicit momentum/energy constraints, and although there are sign inconsistencies in equations (12) and (19) and the demonstration of the Morse case is incomplete, those are correctness/completeness issues, not circularity. The transformation for the Ermakov case is attributed to the author's prior work [52], but the coordinate change is written out explicitly and can be verified independently; it is not load-bearing in deriving the potential classification. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation, and no renaming of a known result is presented as a derivation. Thus the claimed derivation chain does not reduce to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; the constants appearing in the potentials are inputs, not free parameters. The main assumptions are standard geometric linearization theorems, the recovery of the original system from the extended Hamiltonians, completeness of the classification, and global validity of the coordinate transformations.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Null geodesics of conformally flat pseudo-Riemannian spaces can be mapped to straight lines (free particle motion) by a suitable coordinate and time reparameterization.
    Invoked via Lemma 2 and Corollary 4 in Section 3; this is the bridge from conformal flatness to linearization.
  • domain assumption The extended Hamiltonian systems (4), (9), (14), and (21), with fixed conserved momenta, reproduce the original Hamiltonian system (3) on a constraint surface.
    This recovery is assumed throughout Section 2; equations (12) and (19) appear to contain sign inconsistencies, so the assumption is not fully established.
  • domain assumption Solving the conformal flatness conditions (34)-(39) exhausts all force functions linearizable by the four lifts.
    The paper treats the solutions of these ODE systems as the complete classification without proving that no additional cases arise from different choices of the lift parameters.
  • ad hoc to paper The coordinate transformations (41), (44), and (47) are globally valid, including the complex-valued transformation for the Morse potential.
    Global validity is asserted in the theorem and examples, but the transformations contain logarithms, an undefined symbol R in (44), and complex exponentials that may only be local.
invented entities (1)
  • Auxiliary Eisenhart coordinates z, u, and v (additional dimensions in the extended metrics)
    purpose: Encoding the potential as geometry so the original second-order equation becomes geodesic equations in a higher-dimensional space.
    The extra dimensions are introduced to build the extended Hamiltonians H1+1, H1+2, H1+3, and \hat H1+3; they are not claimed to be physical, but the central linearization relies on them.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Linearization of Newton's second law." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O5ZKBGPO

@misc{pith2026241205036,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Linearization of Newton's second law},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O5ZKBGPO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05036}
}
read the original abstract

The geometric linearization of nonlinear differential equation is a robust method for the construction of analytic solutions. The method is related to the existence of Lie symmetries which can be used to determine point transformations such that to write the given differential equation in a linear form. In this study we employ another geometric approach and we utilize the Eisenhart lift to geometric linearize the Newtonian system describing the motion of a particle in a line under the application of an autonomous force. Our findings reveal that for the oscillator, the Ermakov potential with or without the oscillator term, and the Morse potential, Newton's second law can be globally expressed in the form of that of a free particle. This study open new directions for the geometric linearization of differential equations via equivalent dynamical systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [47]

    Dhasmana, A

    S. Dhasmana, A. Sen, Z.K. Silagadze, Equivalence of a harmonic o scillator to a free particle and Eisenhart lift, Ann. Phys. 434, 168623 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [51]

    Sarlet, F.M

    W. Sarlet, F.M. Mahomed and P.G.L Leach, Symmetries of non-linea r differential equations and linearisation, J. Phys A.: Math. Gen. 20, 277 (1987)

    work page 1987

  3. [1]

    Lie,Theorie der Transformationsgrupprn: Vol I, Chelsea, Ne w York (1970)

    S. Lie,Theorie der Transformationsgrupprn: Vol I, Chelsea, Ne w York (1970)

    work page 1970

  4. [2]

    Lie, Theorie der Transformationsgrupprn: Vol II, Chelsea, New York (1970)

    S. Lie, Theorie der Transformationsgrupprn: Vol II, Chelsea, New York (1970)

    work page 1970

  5. [3]

    Lie,Theorie der Transformationsgrupprn: Vol III, Chelsea, New York (1970)

    S. Lie,Theorie der Transformationsgrupprn: Vol III, Chelsea, New York (1970)

    work page 1970

  6. [4]

    Ibragimov, CRC Handbook of Lie Group Analysis of Differential Equations, Volume I: Symmetries, Exact Solutions, and Conservation Laws, CR S Press LLC, Florida (2000)

    N.H. Ibragimov, CRC Handbook of Lie Group Analysis of Differential Equations, Volume I: Symmetries, Exact Solutions, and Conservation Laws, CR S Press LLC, Florida (2000)

    work page 2000

  7. [5]

    Bluman and S

    G.W. Bluman and S. Kumei, Symmetries of Differential Equations, Sp ringer-Verlag, New York, (1989)

    work page 1989

  8. [6]

    Stephani, Differential Equations: Their Solutions Using Symmet ry, Cambridge University Press, New York, (1989)

    H. Stephani, Differential Equations: Their Solutions Using Symmet ry, Cambridge University Press, New York, (1989)

    work page 1989

Show all 52 references
  1. [7]

    Olver, Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, Sp ringer-Verlag, New York, (1993)

    P.J. Olver, Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, Sp ringer-Verlag, New York, (1993)

    1993

  2. [8]

    K. S. Chou and C. Z. Qu, Optimal Systems and Group Classification of (1+2)- Dimensional Heat Equation, Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 83, 257 (2004)

    2004

  3. [9]

    F.M. Mahomed. Symmetry group classification of ordinary differen tial equations, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 30, 1995 (2007)

    2007

  4. [10]

    Meleshko and V.P

    S.V. Meleshko and V.P. Shapeev, Nonisentropic solutions of simple wave type of the gas dynamics equations, J. Nonl. Math. Phys. 18, 195 (2011)

    2011

  5. [11]

    Mahomed and P.G.L

    F.M. Mahomed and P.G.L. Leach, The Lie Algebra SL (3,R) and Linear ization, Quaestiones Mathematicae 12, 121 (1989) 13

    1989

  6. [12]

    Moyo and P.G.L

    S. Moyo and P.G.L. Leach, Symmetry Properties of Autonomous Integrating Factors, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 252, 840 (2000)

    2000

  7. [13]

    Leach, Sl(3,R) and the repulsive oscillator, J

    P.G.L. Leach, Sl(3,R) and the repulsive oscillator, J. Phys. A: Mat h. Gen. 13, 1991 (1980)

    1980

  8. [14]

    Paliathanasis, M

    A. Paliathanasis, M. Tsamparlis and M.T. Mustafa, Classification o f the Lie and Noether point symmetries for the Wave and the Klein-Gordon equat ions in pp-wave spacetimes, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 12, 1550033 (2015)

    2015

  9. [15]

    Kara and F.M

    A.H. Kara and F.M. Mahomed, Classification of first-order Lagra ngians on the line, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 34, 2267 (1995)

    1995

  10. [16]

    Chesnokov, Symmetries and exact solutions of the shallow w ater equations for a two-dimensional shear flow, J

    A.A. Chesnokov, Symmetries and exact solutions of the shallow w ater equations for a two-dimensional shear flow, J. Appl. Mech. Techn. Phys. 49, 737 (2008)

    2008

  11. [17]

    Chesnokov, Symmetries and exact solutions of the rotatin g shallow-water equa- tions, Eur

    A.A. Chesnokov, Symmetries and exact solutions of the rotatin g shallow-water equa- tions, Eur. J. Appl. Math. 20, 461 (2009)

    2009

  12. [18]

    Paliathanasis, One-Dimensional Optimal System for 2D Rotat ing Ideal Gas, Sym- metry 11, 1115 (2019)

    A. Paliathanasis, One-Dimensional Optimal System for 2D Rotat ing Ideal Gas, Sym- metry 11, 1115 (2019)

    2019

  13. [19]

    X. Xin, L. Zhang, Y. Xia and H. Liu, Nonlocal symmetries and exac t solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional generalized variable coefficient shallow water wave equation, Comm. Nonl. Sci. Num. Sim. 90, 105337 (2020)Appl. Math. Lett. 94, 112 (2019)

    2020

  14. [20]

    Dorodintsyn and E.I

    V.A. Dorodintsyn and E.I. Kaptsov, Invariant conservative diff erence schemes for shallow water equations in Eulerian and Lagrangian coordinates, J. M ath. Phys. 62, 083508 (2021)

    2021

  15. [21]

    Jamal and A.H

    S. Jamal and A.H. Kara, New higher-order conservation laws of some classes of wave and Gordon-type equations, Nonlinear Dynamics 57, 97 (2012)

    2012

  16. [22]

    Camci, S

    U. Camci, S. Jamal and A.H. Kara, Invariances and conservatio n laws based on some FR W universes, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53, 1483 (2014)

    2014

  17. [23]

    Gwaxa, S Jamal and A.G

    B. Gwaxa, S Jamal and A.G. Johnpillai, On the conservation laws, L ie symmetry analysis and power series solutions of a class of third-order polynom ial evolution equations, Arabian Journal of Mathematics 12, 553 (2023) 14

    2023

  18. [24]

    Bokhari, F.M

    A.H. Bokhari, F.M. Mahomed and F.D. Zaman, Symmetries and integ rability of a fourth-order Euler–Bernoulli beam equation, J. Math. Phys. 51, 053517 (2010)

    2010

  19. [25]

    Ahmada, A.H

    A. Ahmada, A.H. Bokhari, A.H. Kara and F.D. Zaman, Symmetry cla ssifications and reductions of some classes of (2+1)-nonlinear heat equation, J. M ath. Anal. Appl. 339, 175 (2008)

    2008

  20. [26]

    Andriopoulos, P.G.L

    K. Andriopoulos, P.G.L. Leach, G.P. Flessas, Complete Symmetry Groups of Or- dinary Differential Equations and Their Integrals: Some Basic Consid erations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 262, 256 (2001)

    2001

  21. [27]

    Waho Soh and F.M

    C. Waho Soh and F.M. Mahomed, Linearization criteria for a syste m of second order ordinary differential equations, Int. J. Non-Linear Mechanics 36, 671 (2001)

    2001

  22. [28]

    Qadir, Linearization of ordinary differential equations by usin g geometry, Sigma 3, 1 (2007)

    A. Qadir, Linearization of ordinary differential equations by usin g geometry, Sigma 3, 1 (2007)

    2007

  23. [29]

    Dutt, and A

    H.M. Dutt, and A. Qadir, Classification of scalar third order ordin ary differential equations linearizable via generalized contact transformations,

  24. [30]

    Ali, F.M

    S. Ali, F.M. Mahomed and A. Qadir, Linearizability criteria for syste ms of two second-order differential equations by complex methods, Nonlinea r Dynamics 66, 77 (2011)

    2011

  25. [31]

    Qadir, Linearization: Geometric, Complex, and Conditional, Jo urnal of Applied Mathematics 2012, 303960 (2012)

    A. Qadir, Linearization: Geometric, Complex, and Conditional, Jo urnal of Applied Mathematics 2012, 303960 (2012)

    2012

  26. [32]

    A. V. Aminova and N. A.-M. Aminov, Projective geometry of syst ems of differential equations: general conceptions, Tensor N.S. 62. 65 (2000)

    2000

  27. [33]

    A. V. Aminova and N. A.-M. Aminov, Projective geometry of syst ems of second-order differential equations, Sbornik Math. 197, 951 (2006)

    2006

  28. [34]

    Feroze, F

    T. Feroze, F. M. Mahomed, and A. Qadir, The connection betwe en isometries and symmetries of geodesic equations of the underlying spaces, Nonline ar Dynamics 45, 65 (2006)

    2006

  29. [35]

    Tsamparlis and A

    M. Tsamparlis and A. Paliathanasis, Lie symmetries of geodesic eq uations and pro- jective collineations, Nonlinear Dynamics 62, 203 (2010) 15

    2010

  30. [36]

    Morozov, Classification of six-dimensional nilpotent Lie algeb ras, Izvestia Vysshikh Uchebn Zavendeni ˘ ı Matematika, 5 161 (1958)

    V.V. Morozov, Classification of six-dimensional nilpotent Lie algeb ras, Izvestia Vysshikh Uchebn Zavendeni ˘ ı Matematika, 5 161 (1958)

    1958

  31. [37]

    G.M., Mubarakzyanov, On solvable Lie algebras, Izvestia Vysshik h Uchebn Zaven- deni ˘ ı Matematika, 32 114 (1963)

    1963

  32. [38]

    Mubarakzyanov, Classification of real structures of five -dimensional Lie alge- bras, Izvestia Vysshikh Uchebn Zavendeni ˘ ı Matematika, 34 99 (1963)

    G.M. Mubarakzyanov, Classification of real structures of five -dimensional Lie alge- bras, Izvestia Vysshikh Uchebn Zavendeni ˘ ı Matematika, 34 99 (1963)

    1963

  33. [39]

    Mubarakzyanov, Classification of solvable six-dimensional L ie algebras with one nilpotent base element, Izvestia Vysshikh Uchebn Zavendeni ˘ ı Matematika, 35 104 (1963)

    G.M. Mubarakzyanov, Classification of solvable six-dimensional L ie algebras with one nilpotent base element, Izvestia Vysshikh Uchebn Zavendeni ˘ ı Matematika, 35 104 (1963)

    1963

  34. [40]

    L. P. Eisenhart, Dynamical Trajectories and Geodesics, Anna ls. Math. 30, 591 (1928)

    1928

  35. [41]

    Cariglia, A

    M. Cariglia, A. Galajinsky, G.W. Gibbons and P.A. Horvathy, Cosmo logical aspects of the Eisenhart–Duval lift, EPJC 78, 314 (2018)

    2018

  36. [42]

    N. Kan, T. Aoyama, T. Hasegawa and K. Shiraishi, Eisenhart–Du val lift for minisu- perspace quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 104, 086001 (2021)

    2021

  37. [43]

    Sen, B.K

    A. Sen, B.K. Parida, S. Dhasmana and Z.K. Silagadze , Eisenhart lif t of Koopman- von Neumann mechanics, J. Geom. Phys. 185, 104732 (2023)

    2023

  38. [44]

    Cariglia and F.K

    M. Cariglia and F.K. Alves, The Eisenhart lift: a didactical introduc tion of modern geometrical concepts from Hamiltonian dynamics, Eur. J. Phys. 36 , 025018 (2015)

    2015

  39. [45]

    Cariglia, C

    M. Cariglia, C. Duval, G.W. Gibbons and P.A. Horvathy, Eisenhart lif ts and sym- metries of time-dependent systems, Ann. Phys. 373, 631 (2016)

    2016

  40. [46]

    Paliathanasis, Classical and Quantum solutions in Scalar field co smology via the Eisenhart lift and linearization (2024)

    A. Paliathanasis, Classical and Quantum solutions in Scalar field co smology via the Eisenhart lift and linearization (2024)

    2024

  41. [48]

    Duval, G

    C. Duval, G. Burdet, H.P. Kunzle and M. Perrin, Bargmann struc tures and Newton- Cartan theory, Phys. Rev. D 1841, 31 (1985) 16

    1985

  42. [49]

    Duval, P.A

    C. Duval, P.A. Horv´ athy and L. Palla, Conformal Properties of Chern-Simons Vor- tices in External Fields, Phys. Rev. D 50, 6658 (1994)

    1994

  43. [50]

    Zhang, M

    P.M. Zhang, M. Elbistan and P.A. Horv´ athy, Particle motion in circ ularly polarized vacuum pp waves, Class. Quantum Grav. 39, 035008 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Paliathanasis, Solving Nonlinear Second-Order ODEs via the Eis enhart Lift and Linearization, Axioms 13, 331 (2024) 17

    A. Paliathanasis, Solving Nonlinear Second-Order ODEs via the Eis enhart Lift and Linearization, Axioms 13, 331 (2024) 17

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.