Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

"My Kind of Woman": Analysing Gender Stereotypes in AI through The Averageness Theory and EU Law

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.17474 v1 pith:O6JLJRYA submitted 2024-06-27 cs.CY cs.AI

classification cs.CYcs.AI
keywords genderhumanattractivenesssystemsclassificationdatastereotypestheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This study delves into gender classification systems, shedding light on the interaction between social stereotypes and algorithmic determinations. Drawing on the "averageness theory," which suggests a relationship between a face's attractiveness and the human ability to ascertain its gender, we explore the potential propagation of human bias into artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Utilising the AI model Stable Diffusion 2.1, we have created a dataset containing various connotations of attractiveness to test whether the correlation between attractiveness and accuracy in gender classification observed in human cognition persists within AI. Our findings indicate that akin to human dynamics, AI systems exhibit variations in gender classification accuracy based on attractiveness, mirroring social prejudices and stereotypes in their algorithmic decisions. This discovery underscores the critical need to consider the impacts of human perceptions on data collection and highlights the necessity for a multidisciplinary and intersectional approach to AI development and AI data training. By incorporating cognitive psychology and feminist legal theory, we examine how data used for AI training can foster gender diversity and fairness under the scope of the AI Act and GDPR, reaffirming how psychological and feminist legal theories can offer valuable insights for ensuring the protection of gender equality and non-discrimination in AI systems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Filters of Identity: AR Beauty and the Algorithmic Politics of the Digital Body

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    AR beauty filters function as technologies of algorithmic governance that enforce racialized, gendered, and ableist beauty standards while concealing their own influence.

Pith tools