Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory of type-B Goldstone: near-diagonal geometry and Berry term

Mei Huang; Pei Zheng

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 81 references

Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory of type-B Goldstone: near-diagonal geometry and Berry term

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs a Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory for type-B Goldstone modes in which the Berry term is an exact transgression of the Berry curvature and is compatible with dynamical KMS symmetry at finite temperature.

desk verdict Near-diagonal geometry and the transgression Berry term are a genuine contribution, but the exact DKMS claim rests on a condition that generically fails, so the paper is not as clean as it presents itself. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09776 v1 pith:O7254B5I submitted 2026-08-10 hep-th hep-ph

Pei Zheng , Mei Huang This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thhep-ph

keywords Schwinger-Keldyshformalismtype-BGoldstonemodesBerrycurvaturetransgressiondynamicalKMSconditioncosetmanifolddissipativeeffectivefieldtheoryferromagneticmagnon

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Type-B Goldstone modes—like the ferromagnetic magnon—arise when two broken symmetry directions pair into one excitation, and their low-energy dynamics is governed by a Berry/symplectic term rather than an ordinary kinetic term. This paper tries to extend that structure to finite temperature by building a Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory in which the physical Goldstone field is a point on the coset manifold and the Keldysh 'a-type' field is a tangent vector at that point. The central move is to write the Berry term as an exact transgression of the Berry curvature, integrated over a strip connecting the two time contours, so no coordinate-dependent Berry connection is ever needed. The paper also argues that this exact Berry transgression satisfies the dynamical KMS condition up to a boundary term, and that all higher-order nonlinear Berry couplings are fixed by the curvature with no new Wilsonian coefficients. If correct, this gives a systematic, global-geometric way to combine dissipation and noise with Berry-phase dynamics in spontaneously broken phases.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the exact Berry transgression $I_B^{\mathrm{SK}} = \int dt\,d^d x \int_{-1/2}^{1/2} ds\, \Omega_{AB}(\Pi)\,\partial_s\Pi^A\,\partial_t\Pi^B$: a one-form action built from the gauge-independent Berry curvature two-form $\Omega$ by integrating over an auxiliary interpolation parameter $s$ along the geodesic strip $\Pi(s)=\exp_{\pi_r}(s\pi_a)$. This single construction replaces the gauge-dependent Berry potential, fixes the leading symplectic coupling $\Omega_{AB}\pi_a^A\partial_t\pi_r^B$, and determines all higher-order near-diagonal vertices without new Wilsonian coefficients; the Jacobi equation for $\partial_t\Pi$ supplies the covariant expansion in powers of $\pi_a$. Around this core, the globally invariant symmetric tensors $g$ and $G = -gJ^2$ organize the conservative, dissipative, and noise sectors, and the dynamical KMS condition is imposed as the operator-level relation $N = D_{\mathrm{sym}}$.

What would settle it

A direct calculation of the DKMS variation (Eq. B.8) for a coset manifold with nonzero first de Rham cohomology, or with a time-dependent thermal twist, would settle the claim: if no local $h_\pm$ exists making $\iota_{Y_\pm}\Omega = dh_\pm$, the exact transgression is not invariant up to a boundary term.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the Schwinger-Keldysh effective action for type-B Goldstone modes is organized by a near-diagonal geometry: the r-type field $\pi_r$ is a point in the coset manifold $M=G/H$, and the a-type field $\pi_a$ is a tangent vector in $T_{\pi_r}M$. The Berry term is the exact transgression $I_B^{\mathrm{SK}} = \int dt\,d^d x \int_{-1/2}^{1/2} ds\, \Omega_{AB}(\Pi)\,\partial_s \Pi^A\,\partial_t \Pi^B$, where $\Pi(s)=\exp_{\pi_r}(s\pi_a)$ interpolates between the two contour branches. This object is globally defined and gauge-independent; expanded near the diagonal it gives the leading coupling $\Omega_{AB}(\pi_r)\pi_a^A\,\partial_t\pi_r^B$ plus cubic terms built from covariant derivatives and curvature, all with coefficients fixed by $\Omega$. The paper further claims that the exact transgression is invariant under the dynamical KMS transformation up to a boundary term, relying on the local exactness condition $\iota_{Y_\pm}\Omega = dh_\pm$ and analytic continuation in the interpolation parameter. The conservative, dissipative, and noise sectors are then classified by the globally invariant tensors $g$ and $G = -gJ^2$; in the examples, the ferromagnet has a quadratic magnon with $\propto k^4$ attenuation, and the dissipative $SU(2)\times U(1)$ $\sigma$ model keeps the type-B mode propagating while the type-A mode becomes purely diffusive.

Load-bearing premise

The claim fails if the Appendix B assumptions—the local exactness condition $\iota_{Y_\pm}\Omega = dh_\pm$ and the analytic continuation of the interpolation integral to $\alpha=i$—do not hold for a generic coset manifold or field configuration, because then the exact Berry transgression would not be DKMS invariant and could not appear in a finite-temperature Schwinger-Keldysh action; the paper also restricts to the classical DKMS limit and stationary thermal twist.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The leading Berry coupling in any type-B SK action is fixed to $\Omega_{AB}(\pi_r)\pi_a^A\,\partial_t\pi_r^B$, with all nonlinear near-diagonal vertices determined by covariant derivatives and curvature of $\Omega$.
The Berry sector does not mix directly with the dissipative and noise sectors under DKMS and does not generate entropy production; it affects correlation functions only through the retarded kernel.
For the ferromagnet, the framework reproduces the quadratic magnon dispersion and predicts an attenuation $\propto k^4$ in the spin-conserving case, consistent with model-J scaling.
In the dissipative $SU(2)\times U(1)$ linear sigma model, the type-B Goldstone mode remains propagating with a $k^2$ dispersion and finite lifetime, while the type-A mode is purely diffusive, $\omega_A = -i k^2/\gamma_1$.
The classical DKMS constraints reduce to a local operator-level fluctuation-dissipation relation $N = D_{\mathrm{sym}}$, so noise and dissipation are controlled by the same invariant geometric tensors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper leaves implicit that the tangent-bundle reading of the Keldysh rotation should apply to any nonlinearly realized symmetry, so the same transgression construction may extend to type-B sectors in spatially broken phases or open quantum systems whose coset carries a symplectic structure.
Because the DKMS proof relies on the local exactness $\iota_{Y_\pm}\Omega = dh_\pm$, a direct test is to study coset manifolds with nontrivial first de Rham cohomology, where the Berry transgression may acquire an obstruction that reshapes the fluctuation-dissipation structure.
The restriction to Gaussian noise suggests a concrete extension: imposing the full quantum DKMS transformation on the transgression would fix or forbid non-Gaussian Berry vertices, a step the authors explicitly leave open.
Since $G = -gJ^2$ is proportional to $g$ exactly when $J$ is an almost complex structure, in Kähler-type cosets the dissipative/noise basis collapses to one tensor, whereas in other geometries the extra tensor yields potentially observable anisotropy in damping rates.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The genuinely new thing here is the near-diagonal geometry: the r-field as a point on the coset manifold and the a-field as the tangent vector at that point. That is a clean way to complete the Keldysh rotation nonlinearly, and the transgression construction of the Berry term is a real improvement over the naive doubled Berry potential. It produces covariant higher-order vertices without new Wilsonian coefficients, which is useful and non-obvious. The two examples are worked carefully, the dispersion relations and two-point correlators are correct, and the comparison with known results is honest.

The soft spot is the central DKMS claim. Appendix B shows the exact transgression is a total derivative only if Eq. (B.10) holds: ι_{Y±}Ω = dh± on a local patch, which forces Y± to be symplectic vector fields locally. The stress-test example is convincing: for a ferromagnet with D_t π_r = ∂_θ and ξ=0, Y± = ±∂_θ/2, and L_{∂_θ}(M sinθ dθ∧dφ) ≠ 0. So Eq. (B.10) fails for generic allowed configurations. The analytic continuation in α to α=i is another unjustified step. The authors do state limitations—classical DKMS, no non-Gaussian sectors—but the exact proof gap is separate and more serious: the claim is not merely unproven for generic cosets, it is false in a simple uniform configuration.

There are also minor mechanical issues: an empty citation in Section 4.2 (around Eq. (4.39)) and a transformation-law coefficient that looks off in Eq. (3.13). These are easily fixed and do not affect the main construction.

Who is this for? Anyone working on non-equilibrium EFTs of spontaneously broken symmetries, especially type-B Goldstones in condensed matter or dense QCD. The framework and examples are worth having even if the DKMS proof needs repair or the claim is weakened to classical leading order. I would send it to a serious referee: the geometric construction is solid enough to warrant the referee time, and the DKMS issue is exactly the kind of thing an expert should probe. If the authors can either prove Eq. (B.10) under physically stated conditions or soften the claim, the paper would be a solid publication.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper constructs a Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory for type-B Goldstone modes using a geometric description in which the r-type Goldstone field is a point on the coset manifold G/H and the a-type field is a tangent vector at that point. The central object is the Berry term, built as an exact transgression of the Berry curvature, Eq. (3.44), rather than from a coordinate-dependent Berry connection. The authors show that the leading Berry term reproduces the standard symplectic coupling, that higher-order terms are fixed by the Berry curvature without new Wilsonian coefficients, and they propose a classification of conservative, dissipative, and noise sectors using globally invariant tensors. They then apply the formalism to a ferromagnet and to a dissipative SU(2)xU(1) linear sigma model, deriving quadratic effective actions, dispersion relations, and two-point correlators. A central advertised result is that the exact Berry transgression is compatible with the dynamical KMS condition up to a boundary term, proved in Appendix B under the local exactness condition (B.10) and an analytic continuation to α=i.

Significance. If the construction is correct, it offers a clean and largely parameter-free geometric route to the Berry sector of SK effective theories for type-B Goldstone modes: the leading kinetic term, the nonlinear interactions, and their compatibility with thermal equilibrium are all controlled by the Berry curvature. The paper also provides a useful framework for organizing dissipative and noise terms through invariant tensors on the coset manifold, and the two worked examples give concrete, checkable predictions for dispersion relations and fluctuation-dissipation relations. The quadratic effective actions and correlators appear internally consistent, and I find no circularity: the Berry curvature is input data, while dispersions and correlators are derived consequences. The main weakness is that the advertised proof of DKMS invariance for the exact transgression rests on assumptions that are not established for generic allowed field configurations, which is load-bearing because the abstract and Section 5 present this compatibility as a central result.

major comments (4)

[Appendix B, Eq. (B.10)] The DKMS proof for the exact transgression is not valid for generic field configurations because the assumption iota_{Y±}Omega|_U = dh± is much stronger than the conditions used in the leading-order argument. Since dOmega=0, the displayed equality implies L_{Y±}Omega = d iota_{Y±}Omega = 0 on U, so Y± must be local symplectic vector fields. For the ferromagnet example of Section 4.1, take a local patch with D_t pi_r = partial_theta and xi=0; then at alpha=0, Y± = ±(beta/2) partial_theta, and L_{partial_theta}(M sin theta dtheta and dphi) = M cos theta dtheta and dphi is not zero. Hence no local h± exists for this allowed configuration, and Eq. (B.17) is not established. The central claim that the exact Berry transgression is DKMS compatible therefore needs either a proof under hypotheses that are actually satisfied by the configurations treated in the paper, or a restriction of the claim to those configurations.
[Appendix B, Eq. (B.16)] The analytic continuation from real alpha to alpha=i is unjustified. The interpolation field Pi_alpha(s,x) = exp_{pi_r(x)}(s(xi+alpha K_beta)) is defined through the real exponential map on the coset manifold, and for a generic coset manifold and generic pi_r this expression has no canonical extension to complex alpha. The integrand defining B_ex(alpha) is an integral of geometric quantities whose analyticity in alpha is not established, so the sentence in the text that the right-hand side is analytic in the near-diagonal region does not suffice. Since Eq. (B.17) requires evaluation at alpha=i, an independent justification or a different argument is needed.
[Section 3.4 and Eq. (3.66)] The leading-order DKMS invariance argument also relies on the local exactness condition iota_{k_I}Omega = d mu_I, whose global obstruction is the de Rham cohomology H^1(M). The paper acknowledges that this holds only locally, but it does not state whether this condition is an assumption of the theorem or a consequence of the coset geometry, nor does it identify which of the examples satisfy it globally. Because this condition is load-bearing for the claim that the Berry term is DKMS invariant, the precise hypotheses of the result should be stated explicitly before Eq. (3.68) and used in the formulation of the main claim.
[Section 5 and Abstract] The authors explicitly restrict the analysis to the classical limit of DKMS, as stated in Section 5 and in the closing comments of Section 3.3. This is a legitimate limitation, but the abstract and Section 3.4 present the DKMS compatibility of the exact transgression without this qualification. Since the exact transgression is an all-orders object in the a-type field and is meant to appear in a finite-temperature SK action, the abstract should state that the DKMS compatibility is established only in the classical DKMS limit and under the additional assumptions identified above.

minor comments (4)

[Section 4.2, near Eq. (4.39)] There is an empty citation for example just before Eq. (4.39); please fill in the missing reference.
[Appendix B, Eq. (B.13)] The quantity b_alpha is introduced as the integrand of the alpha-integral, but it is not defined as a function on spacetime with an explicit derivative structure; please state its domain and regularity assumptions.
[Section 3.5, Eq. (3.87)] The index symmetrization notation in the definition of Z^{ell m}_{AB} is hard to parse; please spell out the conventions explicitly or use a less compressed notation.
[Section 3.4, Eq. (3.56)] The cubic term involving the Riemann tensor in Eq. (3.56) depends on the sign convention stated in Eq. (3.50); please add a one-line comment identifying this convention when the term is first displayed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Berry action and dispersion relations are derived from stated inputs (Berry curvature matched to charge density, Wilsonian coefficients), with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction; the unverified geometric assumption in Appendix B is a proof gap, not a loop.

full rationale

The derivation chain is input-driven throughout. The Berry transgression (Eq. 3.44) is an explicit construction: the SK Berry action is defined by integrating the input Berry curvature Ω over the interpolation strip, with Ω normalized by matching to the charge-density matrix via Ω_ab(0) = ρ_ab (Eq. 2.10, computed from |π⟩ = U(π)|0⟩ in Appendix A). The local vertices (Eqs. 3.54–3.56) are Taylor expansions of this defining integral, so 'no new Wilsonian coefficients' is true by construction; the paper presents this as a self-consistent construction, not as an independent prediction, so it is not harmful circularity. Dispersion relations and correlators (Eqs. 4.25–4.28, 4.44–4.47) are computed outputs with M, ρ_s, λ_s, γ₀, μ entering as explicit inputs; no parameter is fitted to an observable and then renamed a prediction. The DKMS claim is conditional on stated assumptions (Eq. B.1 eigenvalue condition, local exactness ι_{Y±}Ω|_U = dh± in Eq. B.10, analytic continuation to α = i in Eq. B.16); the paper explicitly labels Eq. (B.10) an assumption ('Now we need to assume that the following condition holds'). The skeptic's counterexample is a genuine but non-circular gap: Eq. (B.10) requires Y± to be symplectic vector fields, and for the ferromagnet with a uniformly growing θ_r(t), Y± ∝ ∂_θ while L_{∂θ}(M sinθ dθ∧dφ) = M cosθ dθ∧dφ ≠ 0, so the proof does not cover generic allowed configurations; this is a correctness/scope limitation, and Section 5's stated limitations ('only the classical limit of DKMS', higher orders untreated) do not explicitly list this failure mode. Crucially, the Berry coefficient is never fixed by demanding DKMS invariance — DKMS is checked after construction — so no output is recycled as input. The framework citations (Glorioso-Liu [35,36], HLR [38,39], Hongo et al. [67,70], Akyuz-Goon-Penco [69], Minami-Hidaka [27,67], Bott-Tu transgression [73]) are external, with no load-bearing self-citation or imported-uniqueness argument; note also a drafting-level missing reference (Section 4.2, 'for example []'). Overall no step reduces a prediction to a fitted quantity or to a self-citation; score 1 reflects only the by-construction vertex claim and the unverified conditional proof, which are scope issues rather than circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests mainly on the Berry-curvature/charge-density relation (input), the tangent-vector interpretation of the a-field, and the classical DKMS approximation. The DKMS invariance proof adds two further assumptions: local exactness of a contracted curvature and analytic continuation to α=i. Wilsonian coefficients are treated as inputs, not fitted to the target results.

free parameters (7)

M (magnetization density) = input (M > 0)
Ground-state magnetization in the ferromagnet; sets the Berry curvature via Ω_AB(0) = ρ_AB.
ρ_s (spin stiffness) = input
Wilsonian coefficient for the gradient energy in the ferromagnet.
λ_s (dissipative coefficient) = input (λ_s ≥ 0)
Wilsonian coefficient for the ferromagnet dissipative kernel.
v (symmetry breaking scale) = input
Normalization of the sigma model metric in the SU(2)×U(1) model.
μ (chemical potential) = input
Chemical potential; the Berry curvature is set to μ v^2 sinθ dθ∧dφ through the matching condition n0 = 2 μ v^2.
γ_0 (local relaxation rate) = input (γ_0 ≥ 0)
Wilsonian coefficient for the type-B local relaxation in the sigma model.
γ_1 (type-A relaxation rate) = input (γ_1 ≥ 0)
Wilsonian coefficient for the type-A diffusive sector in the sigma model.

assumptions (6)

standard math Berry curvature at the origin equals the charge density commutator: Ω_ab(0) = ρ_ab (Eq. 2.10).
Derived in Appendix A from the family of Goldstone states |π⟩ = U(π)|0⟩; relies on the standard Berry curvature identity and group commutator.
domain assumption The a-type field is a tangent vector at π_r: π_a(x) ∈ T_{π_r(x)}M (Eq. 3.15).
Postulated from the transformation law (3.13) and used to define the exponential map (3.20). If wrong, the near-diagonal geometry and transgression construction fail.
domain assumption Classical DKMS transformation: π_{a,β} ≈ π_a + i K_β[π_r] (Eq. 3.33).
Standard leading-order thermal-shift approximation; the paper restricts to this classical limit and notes the full quantum DKMS is not treated.
ad hoc to paper Local exactness of the interior product ι_{Y±}Ω|_U = dh± (Eq. B.10).
Required for the DKMS invariance proof of the exact transgression; stated as an assumption, with a global obstruction noted.
ad hoc to paper Analytic continuation of the interpolation integral to α=i (Eq. B.16).
The proof evaluates the α-integral at α=i without justifying holomorphicity of the exponential map and integrand on the complexified tangent space.
domain assumption Stationary thermal twist: D_t ν^I = 0 (below Eq. 3.69).
Required for the leading-order Berry term to be DKMS invariant; non-stationary twist is postponed to future work.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory of type-B Goldstone: near-diagonal geometry and Berry term." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O7254B5I

@misc{pith2026260809776,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory of type-B Goldstone: near-diagonal geometry and Berry term},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O7254B5I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09776}
}

read the original abstract

In this work, we formulate a finite temperature Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory for type-B Goldstone modes. In particular, we organize the required two time contour structure by a near-diagonal geometry in which the r-type field is interpreted as the physical Goldstone configuration and the a-type field is identified as corresponding tangent displacement. Within this geometric viewpoint, the Berry term essential for type-B Goldstones is obtained directly through the transgression of the Berry curvature. Moreover, we show that this exact Berry transgression is compatible with dynamical KMS condition. In order to construct the conservative, dissipative and noise sectors, we classify possible tensors globally defined on the coset manifold. Based on this framework, we discuss in detail two concrete model examples. The dispersion relations of the Goldstone modes and the associated two-point correlation functions are calculated in the presence of dissipation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

[1]

superconductor

J. Goldstone,Field theories with “superconductor” solutions,Nuovo Cim.19(1961) 154

1961
[2]

Goldstone, A

J. Goldstone, A. Salam and S. Weinberg,Broken Symmetries,Phys. Rev.127(1962) 965

work page 1962
[3]

Low and A.V

I. Low and A.V. Manohar,Spontaneously broken spacetime symmetries and Goldstone’s theorem,Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2002) 101602 [hep-th/0110285]

arXiv 2002
[4]

Watanabe and H

H. Watanabe and H. Murayama,Redundancies in Nambu–Goldstone bosons,Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(2013) 181601 [1302.4800]

arXiv 2013
[5]

Nicolis, R

A. Nicolis, R. Penco and R.A. Rosen,Relativistic fluids, superfluids, solids, and supersolids from a coset construction,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 045002 [1307.0517]

arXiv 2014
[6]

Nicolis, R

A. Nicolis, R. Penco, F. Piazza and R. Rattazzi,Zoology of condensed matter: framids, ordinary stuff, extra-ordinary stuff,JHEP06(2015) 155 [1501.03845]

arXiv 2015
[7]

Nielsen and S

H.B. Nielsen and S. Chadha,On how to count Goldstone bosons,Nucl. Phys. B105(1976) 445. – 43 –

work page 1976
[8]

Leutwyler,Nonrelativistic effective Lagrangians,Phys

H. Leutwyler,Nonrelativistic effective Lagrangians,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 3033

work page 1994

Show all 81 references

[9]

Watanabe and T

H. Watanabe and T. Brauner,On the number of Nambu–Goldstone bosons and its relation to charge densities,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 125013 [1109.6327]

2011 arXiv
[10]

Watanabe and H

H. Watanabe and H. Murayama,Unified description of Nambu–Goldstone bosons without Lorentz invariance,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 251602 [1203.0609]

2012 arXiv
[11]

Hidaka,Counting rule for Nambu–Goldstone modes in nonrelativistic systems,Phys

Y. Hidaka,Counting rule for Nambu–Goldstone modes in nonrelativistic systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 091601 [1203.1494]

2013 arXiv
[12]

Watanabe and H

H. Watanabe and H. Murayama,Effective Lagrangian for nonrelativistic systems,Phys. Rev. X4(2014) 031057 [1402.7066]

2014 arXiv
[13]

Brauner,Goldstone boson counting in linear sigma models with chemical potential,Phys

T. Brauner,Goldstone boson counting in linear sigma models with chemical potential,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 076002 [hep-ph/0508011]

2005 arXiv
[14]

Brauner,Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and Nambu-Goldstone Bosons in Quantum Many-Body Systems,Symmetry2(2010) 609 [1001.5212]

T. Brauner,Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and Nambu-Goldstone Bosons in Quantum Many-Body Systems,Symmetry2(2010) 609 [1001.5212]

2010 arXiv
[15]

Brauner,Effective Field Theory for Spontaneously Broken Symmetry,Lect

T. Brauner,Effective Field Theory for Spontaneously Broken Symmetry,Lect. Notes Phys. 1023(2024) pp. [2404.14518]

2024 arXiv
[16]

Watanabe, T

H. Watanabe, T. Brauner and H. Murayama,Massive Nambu-Goldstone Bosons,Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013) 021601 [1303.1527]

2013 arXiv
[17]

Brauner and S

T. Brauner and S. Moroz,Topological interactions of Nambu-Goldstone bosons in quantum many-body systems,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 121701 [1405.2670]

2014 arXiv
[18]

Nicolis, R

A. Nicolis, R. Penco, F. Piazza and R.A. Rosen,More on gapped Goldstones at finite density: more gapped Goldstones,JHEP11(2013) 055 [1306.1240]

2013 arXiv
[19]

Weinberg,Nonlinear realizations of chiral symmetry,Phys

S. Weinberg,Nonlinear realizations of chiral symmetry,Phys. Rev.166(1968) 1568

1968
[20]

Weinberg,Phenomenological Lagrangians,Physica A96(1979) 327

S. Weinberg,Phenomenological Lagrangians,Physica A96(1979) 327

1979
[21]

Coleman, J

S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino,Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. I,Phys. Rev.177(1969) 2239

1969
[22]

Callan, Jr., S.R

C.G. Callan, Jr., S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino,Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. II,Phys. Rev.177(1969) 2247

1969
[23]

Witten,Global aspects of current algebra,Nucl

E. Witten,Global aspects of current algebra,Nucl. Phys. B223(1983) 422

1983
[24]

D’Hoker and S

E. D’Hoker and S. Weinberg,General effective actions,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) R6050 [hep-ph/9409402]

1994 arXiv
[25]

Delacrétaz, A

L.V. Delacrétaz, A. Nicolis, R. Penco and R.A. Rosen,Wess–Zumino terms for relativistic fluids, superfluids, solids, and supersolids,Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 091601 [1403.6509]

2015 arXiv
[26]

Hohenberg and B.I

P.C. Hohenberg and B.I. Halperin,Theory of dynamic critical phenomena,Rev. Mod. Phys. 49(1977) 435

1977
[27]

Minami and Y

Y. Minami and Y. Hidaka,Spontaneous symmetry breaking and Nambu–Goldstone modes in dissipative systems,Phys. Rev. E97(2018) 012130 [1509.05042]

2018 arXiv
[28]

Schwinger,Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator,J

J.S. Schwinger,Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator,J. Math. Phys.2(1961) 407

1961
[29]

Keldysh,Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes,Zh

L.V. Keldysh,Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.47 (1964) 1515. – 44 –

1964
[30]

Martin and J.S

P.C. Martin and J.S. Schwinger,Theory of many-particle systems. I,Phys. Rev.115(1959) 1342

1959
[31]

Chou, Z.-b

K.-c. Chou, Z.-b. Su, B.-l. Hao and L. Yu,Equilibrium and nonequilibrium formalisms made unified,Phys. Rept.118(1985) 1

1985
[32]

Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems, Cambridge University Press (2011), 10.1017/CBO9781139003667

A. Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems, Cambridge University Press (2011), 10.1017/CBO9781139003667

2011 doi
[33]

Calzetta and B.-L.B

E.A. Calzetta and B.-L.B. Hu,Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (2023)

2023
[34]

Haag,Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2 ed

R. Haag,Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2 ed. (1996), 10.1007/978-3-642-61458-3

1996 doi
[35]

Crossley, P

M. Crossley, P. Glorioso and H. Liu,Effective field theory of dissipative fluids,JHEP09 (2017) 095 [1511.03646]

2017 arXiv
[36]

Glorioso, M

P. Glorioso, M. Crossley and H. Liu,Effective field theory of dissipative fluids (II): classical limit, dynamical KMS symmetry and entropy current,JHEP09(2017) 096 [1701.07817]

2017 arXiv
[37]

Haehl, R

F.M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam and M. Rangamani,The eightfold way to dissipation,Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 201601 [1412.1090]

2015 arXiv
[38]

Haehl, R

F.M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam and M. Rangamani,Schwinger–Keldysh formalism. Part I: BRST symmetries and superspace,JHEP06(2017) 069 [1610.01940]

2017 arXiv
[39]

Haehl, R

F.M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam and M. Rangamani,Schwinger–Keldysh formalism. Part II: thermal equivariant cohomology,JHEP06(2017) 070 [1610.01941]

2017 arXiv
[40]

Gao and H

P. Gao and H. Liu,Emergent supersymmetry in local equilibrium systems,JHEP01(2018) 040 [1701.07445]

2018 arXiv
[41]

Jensen, R

K. Jensen, R. Marjieh, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva and A. Yarom,A panoply of Schwinger–Keldysh transport,SciPost Phys.5(2018) 053 [1804.04654]

2018 arXiv
[42]

Feynman and F.L

R.P. Feynman and F.L. Vernon, Jr.,The theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system,Annals Phys.24(1963) 118

1963
[43]

Caldeira and A.J

A.O. Caldeira and A.J. Leggett,Path integral approach to quantum Brownian motion, Physica A121(1983) 587

1983
[44]

Akamatsu,Heavy quark master equations in the Lindblad form at high temperatures, Phys

Y. Akamatsu,Heavy quark master equations in the Lindblad form at high temperatures, Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 056002 [1403.5783]

2015 arXiv
[45]

Pajer,Lectures on Open Systems and Cosmology: Master Equation, Schwinger–Keldysh and Open Effective Field Theories,2607.14351

E. Pajer,Lectures on Open Systems and Cosmology: Master Equation, Schwinger–Keldysh and Open Effective Field Theories,2607.14351

arXiv
[46]

Salcedo, T

S.A. Salcedo, T. Colas and E. Pajer,An Open Effective Field Theory for light in a medium, JHEP03(2025) 138 [2412.12299]

2025 arXiv
[47]

Salcedo, T

S.A. Salcedo, T. Colas, L. Dufner and E. Pajer,An open system approach to gravity,JHEP 02(2026) 241 [2507.03103]

2026
[48]

Li,Stochastic Inflation as an Open Quantum System,Phys

Y.-Z. Li,Stochastic Inflation as an Open Quantum System,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 071501 [2507.02070]

2026 arXiv
[49]

Li,Stochastic inflation as an open quantum system II: open effective field theory and stochastic matching,2605.21929

Y.-Z. Li,Stochastic inflation as an open quantum system II: open effective field theory and stochastic matching,2605.21929. – 45 –

arXiv
[50]

Kamenev and A

A. Kamenev and A. Levchenko,Keldysh technique and non-linear sigma-model: basic principles and applications,Adv. Phys.58(2009) 197 [0901.3586]

2009 arXiv
[51]

Sieberer, A

L.M. Sieberer, A. Chiocchetta, A. Gambassi, U.C. Täuber and S. Diehl,Thermodynamic equilibrium as a symmetry of the Schwinger–Keldysh action,Phys. Rev. B92(2015) 134307 [1505.00912]

2015 arXiv
[52]

Sieberer, M

L.M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold and S. Diehl,Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems,Rept. Prog. Phys.79(2016) 096001 [1512.00637]

2016 arXiv
[53]

Berges,Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory,AIP Conf

J. Berges,Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory,AIP Conf. Proc.739(2004) 3 [hep-ph/0409233]

2004 arXiv
[54]

Jeon,Hydrodynamic transport coefficients in relativistic scalar field theory,Phys

S. Jeon,Hydrodynamic transport coefficients in relativistic scalar field theory,Phys. Rev. D 52(1995) 3591 [hep-ph/9409250]

1995 arXiv
[55]

Kovtun,Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,J

P. Kovtun,Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,J. Phys. A45 (2012) 473001 [1205.5040]

2012 arXiv
[56]

Glorioso and H

P. Glorioso and H. Liu,Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics,PoST ASI2017(2018) 008 [1805.09331]

2018 arXiv
[57]

Glorioso, L.V

P. Glorioso, L.V. Delacrétaz, X. Chen, R.M. Nandkishore and A. Lucas,Hydrodynamics in lattice models with continuous non-Abelian symmetries,SciPost Phys.10(2021) 015 [2007.13753]

2021 arXiv
[58]

P. Gao, P. Glorioso and H. Liu,Ghostbusters: Unitarity and Causality of Non-equilibrium Effective Field Theories,JHEP03(2020) 040 [1803.10778]

2020 arXiv
[59]

Donos and P

A. Donos and P. Kailidis,Nearly critical superfluids in Keldysh-Schwinger formalism,JHEP 01(2024) 110 [2304.06008]

2024 arXiv
[60]

Donos and P

A. Donos and P. Kailidis,Critical dynamics of superfluids,JHEP02(2026) 121 [2510.20750]

2026
[61]

Son and A.O

D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,Minkowski-space correlators in AdS/CFT correspondence: recipe and applications,JHEP09(2002) 042 [hep-th/0205051]

2002 arXiv
[62]

Skenderis and B.C

K. Skenderis and B.C. van Rees,Real-time gauge/gravity duality: prescription, renormalization and examples,JHEP05(2009) 085 [0812.2909]

2009 arXiv
[63]

de Boer, M.P

J. de Boer, M.P. Heller and N. Pinzani-Fokeeva,Holographic Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theories,JHEP05(2019) 188 [1812.06093]

2019 arXiv
[64]

Baggioli, Y

M. Baggioli, Y. Bu and V. Ziogas,U(1) quasi-hydrodynamics: Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory and holography,JHEP09(2023) 019 [2304.14173]

2023 arXiv
[65]

Y. Bu, T. Demircik and M. Lublinsky,All order effective action for charge diffusion from Schwinger-Keldysh holography,JHEP05(2021) 187 [2012.08362]

2021 arXiv
[66]

Y. Bu, X. Sun and B. Zhang,Holographic Schwinger-Keldysh field theory of SU(2) diffusion, JHEP08(2022) 223 [2205.00195]

2022 arXiv
[67]

Hongo, S

M. Hongo, S. Kim, T. Noumi and A. Ota,Effective Lagrangian for Nambu–Goldstone modes in nonequilibrium open systems,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 056020 [1907.08609]

2021 arXiv
[68]

Hongo, S

M. Hongo, S. Kim, T. Noumi and A. Ota,Effective field theory of time-translational symmetry breaking in nonequilibrium open system,JHEP02(2019) 131 [1805.06240]. – 46 –

2019 arXiv
[69]

Akyuz, G

C.O. Akyuz, G. Goon and R. Penco,The Schwinger–Keldysh coset construction,JHEP06 (2024) 004 [2306.17232]

2024 arXiv
[70]

Hongo, N

M. Hongo, N. Sogabe, M.A. Stephanov and H.-U. Yee,Schwinger-Keldysh effective action for hydrodynamics with approximate symmetries,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 014020 [2411.08016]

2026 arXiv
[71]

Landry,The coset construction for non-equilibrium systems,JHEP07(2020) 200 [1912.12301]

M.J. Landry,The coset construction for non-equilibrium systems,JHEP07(2020) 200 [1912.12301]

2020 arXiv
[72]

C. Aron, G. Biroli and L.F. Cugliandolo,(non) equilibrium dynamics: a (broken) symmetry of the keldysh generating functional,SciPost Phys.4(2018) 008

2018
[73]

Bott and L.W

R. Bott and L.W. Tu,Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology, vol. 82 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, New York (1982), 10.1007/978-1-4757-3951-0

1982 doi
[74]

Nakahara,Geometry, Topology and Physics, Graduate Student Series in Physics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2 ed

M. Nakahara,Geometry, Topology and Physics, Graduate Student Series in Physics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2 ed. (2003), 10.1201/9781315275826

2003 doi
[75]

Wess and B

J. Wess and B. Zumino,Consequences of anomalous ward identities,Physics Letters B37 (1971) 95

1971
[76]

Frankel,The Geometry of Physics: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 3 ed

T. Frankel,The Geometry of Physics: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 3 ed. (2011), 10.1017/CBO9781139061377

2011 doi
[77]

S. Lin, Y. Bu and C. Lei,Non-Gaussianity from Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 036018 [2301.06703]

2024 arXiv
[78]

Burgess,Goldstone and pseudoGoldstone bosons in nuclear, particle and condensed matter physics,Phys

C.P. Burgess,Goldstone and pseudoGoldstone bosons in nuclear, particle and condensed matter physics,Phys. Rept.330(2000) 193 [hep-th/9808176]

2000 arXiv
[79]

Miransky and I.A

V.A. Miransky and I.A. Shovkovy,Spontaneous symmetry breaking with abnormal number of Nambu-Goldstone bosons and kaon condensate,Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2002) 111601 [hep-ph/0108178]

2002 arXiv
[80]

Schäfer, D.T

T. Schäfer, D.T. Son, M.A. Stephanov, D. Toublan and J.J.M. Verbaarschot,Kaon condensation and Goldstone’s theorem,Phys. Lett. B522(2001) 67 [hep-ph/0108210]

2001 arXiv
[81]

Delacretaz, Y.-H

L.V. Delacretaz, Y.-H. Du, U. Mehta and D.T. Son,Nonlinear bosonization of Fermi surfaces: The method of coadjoint orbits,Phys. Rev. Res.4(2022) 033131 [2203.05004]. – 47 –

2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

superconductor

J. Goldstone,Field theories with “superconductor” solutions,Nuovo Cim.19(1961) 154

1961

[2] [2]

Goldstone, A

J. Goldstone, A. Salam and S. Weinberg,Broken Symmetries,Phys. Rev.127(1962) 965

work page 1962

[3] [3]

Low and A.V

I. Low and A.V. Manohar,Spontaneously broken spacetime symmetries and Goldstone’s theorem,Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2002) 101602 [hep-th/0110285]

arXiv 2002

[4] [4]

Watanabe and H

H. Watanabe and H. Murayama,Redundancies in Nambu–Goldstone bosons,Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(2013) 181601 [1302.4800]

arXiv 2013

[5] [5]

Nicolis, R

A. Nicolis, R. Penco and R.A. Rosen,Relativistic fluids, superfluids, solids, and supersolids from a coset construction,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 045002 [1307.0517]

arXiv 2014

[6] [6]

Nicolis, R

A. Nicolis, R. Penco, F. Piazza and R. Rattazzi,Zoology of condensed matter: framids, ordinary stuff, extra-ordinary stuff,JHEP06(2015) 155 [1501.03845]

arXiv 2015

[7] [7]

Nielsen and S

H.B. Nielsen and S. Chadha,On how to count Goldstone bosons,Nucl. Phys. B105(1976) 445. – 43 –

work page 1976

[8] [8]

Leutwyler,Nonrelativistic effective Lagrangians,Phys

H. Leutwyler,Nonrelativistic effective Lagrangians,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 3033

work page 1994