REVIEW 2 cited by
Study of $X(6900)$ with unitarized coupled channel scattering amplitudes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this paper, we study the resonant state $X(6900)$. The scattering amplitudes of coupled channels, $J/\psi J/\psi$-$J/\psi \psi(2S)$-$J/\psi \psi(3770)$, are constructed with the interaction of four vector mesons described by effective Lagrangians. The amplitudes are calculated up to one loop, decomposed by partial wave projection, and unitarized by Pad$\acute{e}$ approximation. These amplitudes are fitted to the latest experimental data sets of di-$J/\psi$ and $J/\psi \psi(2S)$ invariant mass spectra of LHCb, CMS, and ATLAS. High-quality solutions are obtained. With these partial wave amplitudes, we extract the pole parameters of the $X(6900)$. Its quantum number is likely to be $0^{++}$. According to the pole counting rule as well as analysis of the phase shifts of the partial waves, it supports our previous conclusion that the $X(6900)$ prefers to be a compact tetra-quark.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Symmetry Analysis of Compact Tetraquark States and Implications for the Level Ordering of the Fully Charmed Candidates $X(6600)$, $X(6900)$, and $X(7100)$
Symmetry analysis of compact tetraquarks shows low-energy states favor J^P=2+ and places X(6600), X(6900), X(7100) among the lower levels of the fully charmed spectrum.
-
Symmetry Analysis of Compact Tetraquark States and Implications for the Level Ordering of the Fully Charmed Candidates $X(6600)$, $X(6900)$, and $X(7100)$
Counting symmetry-allowed states up to orbital angular momentum L=3 predicts low-lying compact tetraquarks prefer J^P=2^+, matching the observed 2^{++} fully charmed X states.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.