A Decade of Action Quality Assessment: Largest Systematic Survey of Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions

Daoliang Xu; Hao Yin; Paritosh Parmar; Tianyou Zheng; Weiwei Fu; Yang Zhang

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

A Decade of Action Quality Assessment: Largest Systematic Survey of Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims to be the largest and most systematic survey of action quality assessment to date, reviewing over 200 papers through the PRISMA framework and organizing 26 datasets and 7 research trends.

desk verdict A genuinely useful AQA survey whose 'largest systematic review' claim is not yet auditable; worth serious refereeing after PRISMA transparency and consistency fixes. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02817 v1 pith:OA36SUUP submitted 2025-02-05 cs.AI cs.CV

Hao Yin , Paritosh Parmar , Daoliang Xu , Yang Zhang , Tianyou Zheng , Weiwei Fu This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.AIcs.CV

keywords actionqualityassessmentskillsvideounderstandingcomputervisionsystematicreviewPRISMAdeeplearningsurvey

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Action quality assessment (AQA) asks how well a person performs an action, not just what action it is. This paper claims to be the largest and most systematic survey of the field to date, reviewing over 200 research papers under the PRISMA framework through December 2024. It organizes 26 public datasets into 9 application domains, distills a decade of methodology into 7 research trends, and lays out challenges and future directions. A reader would care because AQA underpins physiotherapy, sports training, surgical skill evaluation, and quality control for AI-generated video, and a structured map of the field makes its progress and open problems visible.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing apparatus is the PRISMA systematic-review framework, applied as a four-stage pipeline: identification (keyword search in Web of Science and Google Scholar), screening (title/abstract deduplication and relevance filtering), eligibility (full-text quality and novelty review), and inclusion (195 papers, 26 datasets). The survey's organizing grid is a 2D taxonomy: 9 dataset domains by application scenario and 7 methodology trends by research objective, with performance tables comparing representative models under Spearman's rank correlation, relative $\ell^2$ distance, or accuracy. This machinery is what converts a literature collection into the claimed systematic map.

What would settle it

Run the same PRISMA search on Web of Science and Google Scholar for 'action quality assessment' with an explicit query, per-database date ranges, and documented inclusion and exclusion criteria; if the reproducible flow yields substantially more than 195 qualifying papers, or if tracing the reported 505 to 276 to 195 numbers proves impossible because no query can reproduce them, the survey's 'largest to date' claim is not settled. A quicker check: the abstract says 'over 200 research papers' while the method section says 195 papers met inclusion criteria, so reconciling that count is a concrete first test.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that it provides the most complete structured synthesis of AQA research produced so far. Concretely, it reports a four-stage PRISMA selection process that moved from 505 candidate records to 276 screened papers to 195 included papers (with 26 datasets), spans work from the first AQA datasets in 2014 through December 2024, and organizes the included literature into 7 principal trends: fine-grained analysis, multitask and multimodal methods, generalization, continual learning, explainability, comprehensive assessment, and self-supervised representation learning. It also classifies datasets into 9 domains (surgery, rehabilitation, daily activities, music, fitness, industrial manufacturing, dance, AI-generated video, and sports) and identifies persistent challenges in actions, datasets, and methodologies. If this claim is correct, the survey is a reference map that researchers can use to locate methods, benchmarks, and open problems in AQA.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the PRISMA literature search was complete and unbiased; the paper reports only the headline numbers (505 to 276 to 195 papers) without the search strings, databases' date ranges, or inclusion and exclusion criteria, so a reader cannot verify that the survey covers the full AQA literature rather than a convenience sample.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The field has moved from coarse score regression toward fine-grained, explainable, and multimodal assessment; the survey's 7-trend taxonomy makes that trajectory explicit.
Researchers and practitioners can use the 26-dataset, 9-domain inventory to choose benchmarks for sports, surgery, rehabilitation, fitness, dance, music, manufacturing, daily activities, or AI-generated video.
The survey's challenge analysis points to concrete next steps: larger multi-action real-world datasets, AI-generated multi-action datasets built with text-to-video models, and gold-standard action samples for reference-based scoring.
Methodology gaps identified, especially real-time lightweight models, interpretability, and robustness to missing modalities, define near-term research targets.
Standard metrics (SRC, R-l2, accuracy) are consolidated with formulas and usage guidance, supporting cross-paper comparisons.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the survey stops at December 2024 and cites two other December 2024 surveys in the same space, the 'largest to date' status is time-sensitive; an updated or living review would be needed to keep the map authoritative.
The proposed future direction of using text-to-video models to generate large-scale multi-action AQA datasets is testable: one could generate prompt-conditioned videos with known skill levels and measure whether models trained on them transfer to real-world judging benchmarks.
The 7-trend taxonomy could serve as a coding scheme for a follow-up meta-analysis that tracks the share of AQA papers per trend over time, turning the survey's qualitative 'rising trend' statements into quantitative evidence.
If gold-standard action samples become established, reference-based contrastive regression methods could be re-evaluated against that fixed anchor rather than against in-dataset best samples.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is the most useful AQA survey I have seen to date: it organizes the field into seven research trends and nine dataset domains, compiles performance tables, and covers work through December 2024, including AI-generated video evaluation. The taxonomy is sensible, the dataset summaries are practical, and the methodology timeline gives newcomers a real map of how the field evolved. That is a genuine contribution even though the paper contains no new methods or data.

The soft spots are real but concentrated in the systematic-review apparatus. The abstract says 'over 200' papers were reviewed; Section 1 reports 195 included papers. That is a concrete inconsistency. More importantly, the PRISMA pipeline is not auditable: no search strings, no per-database date ranges, no screening or eligibility criteria, no flow diagram. Without those, the 'largest and most comprehensive' claim is an assertion, not a demonstrated property. The paper also cites two competing 2024 surveys but never compares coverage against them, which weakens the comparative claim. The EgoExo4D mention in Section 3.3 without a Table 1 entry is a further inventory inconsistency. These are fixable, but they block verification of the headline claim.

The internal cross-reference errors, like swapped table references, look like copyediting rather than deep problems. The self-citations to Parmar are not themselves a flaw: he is a central contributor in AQA, and the survey's utility does not depend on those being fewer. The real issue is that the search process is undocumented, not who appears in the reference list.

Bottom line: the central taxonomy, dataset tables, and trend analysis hold up. This paper deserves a serious referee and likely publication after revision. I would ask the authors to release a PRISMA flow diagram and exact inclusion criteria, reconcile the 195/over-200 counts, fix the dataset inconsistency, and either add coverage comparisons with the other surveys or soften the 'largest' claim to match what is actually documented. If that happens, I would cite this as the standard entry point to AQA.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper claims to present the largest and most comprehensive systematic survey of Action Quality Assessment (AQA) to date, using the PRISMA framework to review papers published up to December 2024. It proposes definitions, metrics, a dataset inventory of 26 datasets in 9 domains, a taxonomy of research methods organized into 7 principal trends since 2014, and a discussion of challenges and future directions. The survey's central value would lie in a complete, auditable map of the AQA literature, but as submitted the completeness claim is not verifiable from the reported methodology.

Significance. If the search process is made auditable and the inventory is corrected, this survey would be a useful structured reference for AQA researchers: it consolidates dataset descriptions, provides comparative performance tables, organizes the methodological literature into seven trends, and makes its data available at a public URL. The PRISMA-based claim is an explicit strength in principle, but the missing search protocol and internal inconsistencies currently prevent the reader from checking the headline completeness claim.

major comments (4)

[Abstract, §1, §6] The paper reports inconsistent inclusion counts. The abstract and Section 6 say 'over 200' papers were systematically reviewed, while Section 1 reports that 195 papers met the inclusion criteria. If the 200+ figure refers to identified or screened papers rather than included papers, that should be stated explicitly; as written, the discrepancy undermines the precision of the headline claim and should be reconciled.
[§1 (PRISMA pipeline)] The PRISMA process is not reproducible. The manuscript reports only the keyword 'action quality assessment' and the sources Web of Science and Google Scholar, with counts 505, 276, and 195, but omits the exact search strings, per-database date ranges, deduplication method, and the inclusion/exclusion criteria used at the title/abstract and full-text stages. A PRISMA flow diagram and a search protocol (in the paper or in the linked data repository) are needed to support the claim that the survey covers the full AQA literature rather than a convenience sample.
[§3.3 and Table 1] The dataset inventory is internally inconsistent. Section 3.3 introduces EgoExo4D as an AQA-relevant dataset with 1224 samples and 16 hours of video, but Table 1, which is presented as the complete list of 26 publicly available datasets, does not include EgoExo4D. Either the dataset should be added to Table 1 and the counts and domain summaries updated, or its inclusion in Section 3.3 should be explicitly justified as outside the table's scope.
[§6 and references [216],[217]] The 'largest and most comprehensive survey to date' claim is unsupported by comparison with the two 2024 surveys cited as [216] and [217]. The manuscript does not state how many papers, datasets, or time periods those surveys cover, nor does it quantify the overlap or additionally covered items. The claim should be either substantiated with a concrete coverage comparison or softened to a description of scope.

minor comments (6)

[§2.4] The text says Pirsiavash et al. 'first pioneered the assessment of action quality in 2014', which conflicts with Section 4.1's statement that AQA research dates back to Gordon in 1995; the sentence should be qualified as referring to modern deep-learning-based AQA or the first AQA dataset.
[§4.2.1(3)] The cross-reference to 'Tab. 6' for the objective-evaluation methods appears to be incorrect: the objective-evaluation performance table is labeled Table 5, while Table 6 covers asymmetric relationships.
[§3.8] 'NeurlIPS 2024' should read 'NeurIPS 2024'.
[§5.2] 'comrehensively' should be 'comprehensively'.
[§4.1] 'withI3D-T ransformer decoder' has a spacing typo and should be 'with I3D-Transformer decoder'.
[Figure 2] The year axis appears to skip 2016, showing 14, 15, 17, 18, ...; please check whether this is a rendering issue or a labeling error.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: this survey's claims are externally checkable, with numerous but non-load-bearing self-citations by a co-author.

full rationale

The paper is a systematic review, not a derivation. Its central claims are a PRISMA-based census of the AQA literature and a taxonomy of datasets, methods, trends, and challenges. Neither reduces by construction to its own inputs: the dataset table, metric formulas, and methodology summaries are checkable against the cited primary papers, and the PRISMA pipeline is an empirical procedure whose outcome could in principle confirm or contradict the 'largest' claim. The auditability gaps—no search strings, no per-database dates, no inclusion/exclusion criteria, 195 included papers versus 'over 200' in the abstract, and EgoExo4D described in Section 3.3 but omitted from Table 1—undermine verification of completeness but are not circularity. The co-author's works are cited heavily, including priority claims such as 'Parmar and Morris et al. [3] were the first to propose utilizing deep spatiotemporal convolutional features (C3D network) for AQA' and 'Parmar et al. [27] introduced multimodal AQA.' These self-citations are not load-bearing for the survey's central organizational claims: the survey does not become true or false by virtue of citing them, and no equation or fitted parameter is involved. No specific circular reduction can therefore be exhibited; the score reflects only the prevalence of non-load-bearing self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a survey, the paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its central claim rests on the completeness of the literature search and on accurate transcription of prior results, both of which are only partially documented.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The PRISMA-based literature search identified all relevant AQA papers published up to December 2024.
The survey's claim to be the largest and most comprehensive depends on search completeness; the paper does not report search strings, databases, or inclusion and exclusion criteria (Section 1).
domain assumption Performance numbers reported in prior papers are accurately transcribed.
The comparison tables (Tables 2-12) reproduce results from cited papers, and the survey does not re-run experiments; any transcription errors would propagate.
ad hoc to paper The proposed seven-trend taxonomy adequately partitions the AQA methodology landscape.
The taxonomy is introduced by the authors in Section 4 and is not derived from an external standard; alternative organizations are possible.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Decade of Action Quality Assessment: Largest Systematic Survey of Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OA36SUUP

@misc{pith2026250202817,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Decade of Action Quality Assessment: Largest Systematic Survey of Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OA36SUUP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02817}
}

read the original abstract

Action Quality Assessment (AQA) -- the ability to quantify the quality of human motion, actions, or skill levels and provide feedback -- has far-reaching implications in areas such as low-cost physiotherapy, sports training, and workforce development. As such, it has become a critical field in computer vision & video understanding over the past decade. Significant progress has been made in AQA methodologies, datasets, & applications, yet a pressing need remains for a comprehensive synthesis of this rapidly evolving field. In this paper, we present a thorough survey of the AQA landscape, systematically reviewing over 200 research papers using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews & meta-analyses (PRISMA) framework. We begin by covering foundational concepts & definitions, then move to general frameworks & performance metrics, & finally discuss the latest advances in methodologies & datasets. This survey provides a detailed analysis of research trends, performance comparisons, challenges, & future directions. Through this work, we aim to offer a valuable resource for both newcomers & experienced researchers, promoting further exploration & progress in AQA. Data are available at https://haoyin116.github.io/Survey_of_AQA/

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

TechCoach: Towards Technical-Point-Aware Descriptive Action Coaching
cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

TechCoach introduces a new task, dataset, and method for generating technical-point-aware coaching commentary alongside action quality scores.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

225 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[216]

Vision-based human action quality assessment: A systematic review

Jiang Liu, Huasheng Wang, Katarzyna Stawarz, Shiyin Li, Yao Fu, and Hantao Liu. Vision-based human action quality assessment: A systematic review. Expert Systems with Applications, page 125642, 2024. 27

work page 2024
[217]

Lu- cidaction: A hierarchical and multi-model dataset for comprehensive action quality assessment

Linfeng Dong, Wei Wang, Yu Qiao, and Xiao Sun. Lu- cidaction: A hierarchical and multi-model dataset for comprehensive action quality assessment. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2024

work page 2024
[1]

Human action recognition and prediction: A survey

Yu Kong and Yun Fu. Human action recognition and prediction: A survey. International Journal of Computer Vision, 130(5):1366–1401, 2022. 1

2022
[2]

Assessing the quality of actions

Hamed Pirsiavash, Carl Vondrick, and Antonio Torralba. Assessing the quality of actions. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 556–571. Springer, 2014. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 27

2014
[3]

Learning to score olympic events

Paritosh Parmar and Brendan Tran Morris. Learning to score olympic events. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pages 20–28, 2017. 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19

2017
[4]

Jhu-isi gesture and skill assessment working set (jigsaws): A surgical activity dataset for human motion modeling

Yixin Gao, S Swaroop Vedula, Carol E Reiley, Narges Ahmidi, Balakrishnan Varadarajan, Henry C Lin, Lin- gling Tao, Luca Zappella, Benjamın B´ ejar, and David D Yuh. Jhu-isi gesture and skill assessment working set (jigsaws): A surgical activity dataset for human motion modeling. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention Workshop , volu...

2014
[5]

A data set of human body movements for physical rehabilitation exercises

Aleksandar Vakanski, Hyung-pil Jun, David Paul, and Russell Baker. A data set of human body movements for physical rehabilitation exercises. Data, 3(1):2, 2018. 1, 2, 6, 8, 19

2018
[6]

The kimore dataset: Kine- matic assessment of movement and clinical scores for remote monitoring of physical rehabilitation

Marianna Capecci, Maria Gabriella Ceravolo, Francesco Ferracuti, Sabrina Iarlori, Andrea Monteriu, Luca Romeo, and Federica Verdini. The kimore dataset: Kine- matic assessment of movement and clinical scores for remote monitoring of physical rehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation En- gineering, 27(7):1436–1448, 2019. 1, 2, 6, 8, 21

2019

Show all 225 references

[7]

Yu, Cindy H

Ruimin Li, Hong Fu, Yang Zheng, Wai-Lun Lo, Jane J. Yu, Cindy H. P. Sit, Zheru Chi, Zongxi Song, and Desheng Wen. Automated fine motor evaluation for developmental coordination disorder. IEEE Transac- tions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering , 27(5):963–973,2019. 1

2019
[8]

Do- main knowledge-informed self-supervised representations for workout form assessment

Paritosh Parmar, Amol Gharat, and Helge Rhodin. Do- main knowledge-informed self-supervised representations for workout form assessment. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 105–123. Springer, 2022. 1, 2, 4, 8, 9, 11, 25, 26, 27

2022
[9]

Egoexo-fitness: Towards egocentric and exocentric full-body action un- derstanding

Yuan-Ming Li, Wei-Jin Huang, An-Lan Wang, Ling-An Zeng, Jing-Ke Meng, and Wei-Shi Zheng. Egoexo-fitness: Towards egocentric and exocentric full-body action un- derstanding. In European Conference on Computer Vi- sion, 2024. 1, 2, 8, 9

2024
[10]

Ex- eChecker: Where Did I Go Wrong? arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10573, 2024

Yiwen Gu, Mahir Patel, and Margrit Betke. Ex- eChecker: Where Did I Go Wrong? arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10573, 2024. 1

2024 arXiv
[11]

Assembly101: A large-scale multi-view video dataset for understanding procedural activities

Fadime Sener, Dibyadip Chatterjee, Daniel Shelepov, Kun He, Dipika Singhania, Robert Wang, and Angela Yao. Assembly101: A large-scale multi-view video dataset for understanding procedural activities. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Reco...

2022
[12]

Differentiable Task Graph Learning: Proce- dural Activity Representation and Online Mistake De- tection from Egocentric Videos

Luigi Seminara, Giovanni Maria, and Farinella Antonino Furnari. Differentiable Task Graph Learning: Proce- dural Activity Representation and Online Mistake De- tection from Egocentric Videos. In arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.01486, 2024. 1

2024 arXiv
[13]

Gaia: Rethinking action quality assessment for ai-generated videos

Zijian Chen, Wei Sun, Yuan Tian, Jun Jia, Zicheng Zhang, Jiarui Wang, Ru Huang, Xiongkuo Min, Guang- tao Zhai, and Wenjun Zhang. Gaia: Rethinking action quality assessment for ai-generated videos. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2024. 1, 2, 8, 9, 11, 27

2024
[14]

Measuring the quality of exercises

Paritosh Parmar and Brendan Tran Morris. Measuring the quality of exercises. In International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society , pages 2241–2244. IEEE, 2016. 2, 4, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19

2016
[15]

Assessing vitreoreti- nal surgical training experience by leveraging instrument maneuvers and visual attention with deep learning neu- ral networks

Rogerio Nespolo, George R Nahass, Mahtab Faraji, Darvin Yi, Yannek Isaac Leiderman. Assessing vitreoreti- nal surgical training experience by leveraging instrument maneuvers and visual attention with deep learning neu- ral networks. In Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Scie...

2024
[16]

Who’s better? who’s best? pairwise deep ranking for skill determination

Hazel Doughty, Dima Damen, and Walterio Mayol- Cuevas. Who’s better? who’s best? pairwise deep ranking for skill determination. In Proceedings of the IEEE Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 6057–6066, 2018. 2, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19

2018
[17]

The pros and cons: Rank-aware temporal atten- tion for skill determination in long videos

Hazel Doughty, Walterio Mayol-Cuevas, and Dima Damen. The pros and cons: Rank-aware temporal atten- tion for skill determination in long videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7862–7871, 2019. 2, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13, 16,...

2019
[18]

A survey of vision-based human action evaluation methods

Qing Lei, Ji-Xiang Du, Hong-Bo Zhang, Shuang Ye, and Duan-Sheng Chen. A survey of vision-based human action evaluation methods. Sensors, 19(19):4129, 2019. 2

2019
[19]

A survey of video-based action quality assessment

Shunli Wang, Dingkang Yang, Peng Zhai, Qing Yu, Tao Suo, Zhan Sun, Ka Li, and Lihua Zhang. A survey of video-based action quality assessment. In International Conference on Networking Systems of AI , pages 1–9. IEEE, 2021. 2

2021
[20]

The prisma 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting system- atic reviews

Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie, Patrick M Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C Hoffmann, Cyn- thia D Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer M Tetzlaff, Elie A Akl, Sue E Brennan, et al. The prisma 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting system- atic reviews. BMJ, 372, 2021. 2

2020
[21]

What and how well you performed? a multitask learning approach to action quality assessment

Paritosh Parmar and Brendan Tran Morris. What and how well you performed? a multitask learning approach to action quality assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition, pages 304–313, 2019. 3, 8, 10, 11, 17, 19, 20, 28

2019
[22]

Cpr-coach: Recogniz- ing composite error actions based on single-class train- ing

Shunli Wang, Shuaibing Wang, Dingkang Yang, Mingcheng Li, Haopeng Kuang, Xiao Zhao, Liuzhen Su, Peng Zhai, and Lihua Zhang. Cpr-coach: Recogniz- ing composite error actions based on single-class train- ing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Patte...

2024
[23]

Multimodal action quality assessment

Ling-An Zeng and Wei-Shi Zheng. Multimodal action quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Image Pro- cessing, 2024. 3, 20, 21

2024
[24]

Temporal distance matrices for squat classification

Ryoji Ogata, Edgar Simo-Serra, Satoshi Iizuka, and Hi- roshi Ishikawa. Temporal distance matrices for squat classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pages 0–0, 2019. 3, 21

2019
[25]

Skeleton based action quality assessment of figure skating videos

Hui-Ying Li, Qing Lei, Hong-Bo Zhang, and Ji-Xiang Du. Skeleton based action quality assessment of figure skating videos. In International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education , pages 196–200. IEEE, 2021. 3, 20, 21

2021
[26]

Hierarchical neurosymbolic approach for comprehensive and explain- 30 Hao Yin and Paritosh Parmar et al

Lauren Okamoto and Paritosh Parmar. Hierarchical neurosymbolic approach for comprehensive and explain- 30 Hao Yin and Paritosh Parmar et al. able action quality assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition, pages 3204–3213,...

2024
[27]

Piano skills assessment

Paritosh Parmar, Jaiden Reddy, and Brendan Morris. Piano skills assessment. In IEEE International Work- shop on Multimedia Signal Processing , pages 1–5. IEEE,
[28]

Who danced better? ranked tiktok dance video dataset and pairwise action quality assessment method

Irwandi Hipiny, Hamimah Ujir, Aidil Azli Alias, Musdi Shanat, and Mohamad Khairi Ishak. Who danced better? ranked tiktok dance video dataset and pairwise action quality assessment method. International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics , 9(1):96–107, 2023. 3, 8, 9

2023
[29]

Egcn++: A new fusion strategy for ensemble learn- ing in skeleton-based rehabilitation exercise assessment

XB Bruce, Yan Liu, Keith CC Chan, and Chang Wen Chen. Egcn++: A new fusion strategy for ensemble learn- ing in skeleton-based rehabilitation exercise assessment. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024. 4, 20, 21

2024
[30]

Am i a baller? basketball performance assessment from first-person videos

Gedas Bertasius, Hyun Soo Park, Stella X Yu, and Jianbo Shi. Am i a baller? basketball performance assessment from first-person videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 2177–2185, 2017. 4, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19

2017
[31]

Group-aware contrastive regression for action quality assessment

Xumin Yu, Yongming Rao, Wenliang Zhao, Jiwen Lu, and Jie Zhou. Group-aware contrastive regression for action quality assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vi- sion, pages 7919–7928, 2021. 6, 14, 17, 18, 19, 26

2021
[32]

Action quality assessment across multiple actions

Paritosh Parmar and Brendan Morris. Action quality assessment across multiple actions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , pages 1468–1476. IEEE, 2019. 8, 10, 11, 21, 22

2019
[33]

Learning to score figure skating sport videos

Chengming Xu, Yanwei Fu, Bing Zhang, Zitian Chen, Yu- Gang Jiang, and Xiangyang Xue. Learning to score figure skating sport videos. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , 30(12):4578–4590,
[34]

An asym- metric modeling for action assessment

Jibin Gao, Wei-Shi Zheng, Jia-Hui Pan, Chengying Gao, Yaowei Wang, Wei Zeng, and Jianhuang Lai. An asym- metric modeling for action assessment. In European Con- ference on Computer Vision , pages 222–238. Springer,
[35]

Hybrid dynamic-static context-aware attention network for ac- tion assessment in long videos

Ling-An Zeng, Fa-Ting Hong, Wei-Shi Zheng, Qi-Zhi Yu, Wei Zeng, Yao-Wei Wang, and Jian-Huang Lai. Hybrid dynamic-static context-aware attention network for ac- tion assessment in long videos. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages 2526–2534, 2...

2020
[36]

Tsa-net: Tube self-attention network for action quality assessment

Shunli Wang, Dingkang Yang, Peng Zhai, Chixiao Chen, and Lihua Zhang. Tsa-net: Tube self-attention network for action quality assessment. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages 4902–4910, 2021. 8, 10, 16, 17

2021
[37]

Sportscap: Monocular 3d human motion capture and fine-grained understanding in challenging sports videos

Xin Chen, Anqi Pang, Wei Yang, Yuexin Ma, Lan Xu, and Jingyi Yu. Sportscap: Monocular 3d human motion capture and fine-grained understanding in challenging sports videos. International Journal of Computer Vision , 129:2846–2864, 2021. 8, 10, 16, 17

2021
[38]

Finediving: A fine-grained dataset for procedure-aware action quality assessment

Jinglin Xu, Yongming Rao, Xumin Yu, Guangyi Chen, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. Finediving: A fine-grained dataset for procedure-aware action quality assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 2949–2958, 2022. 8, 10, 11, ...

2022
[39]

Logo: A long- form video dataset for group action quality assessment

Shiyi Zhang, Wenxun Dai, Sujia Wang, Xiangwei Shen, Jiwen Lu, Jie Zhou, and Yansong Tang. Logo: A long- form video dataset for group action quality assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 2405–2414,
[40]

Localization-assisted uncer- tainty score disentanglement network for action quality assessment

Yanli Ji, Lingfeng Ye, Huili Huang, Lijing Mao, Yang Zhou, and Lingling Gao. Localization-assisted uncer- tainty score disentanglement network for action quality assessment. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages 8590–8597, 2023. 8, 11, 14, 15, 16

2023
[41]

Automatic modelling for interactive action as- sessment

Jibin Gao, Jia-Hui Pan, Shao-Jie Zhang, and Wei-Shi Zheng. Automatic modelling for interactive action as- sessment. International Journal of Computer Vision , 131(3):659–679, 2023. 8, 11, 18, 19

2023
[42]

Hodgins, Adam W

Fernando De la Torre Frade, Jessica K. Hodgins, Adam W. Bargteil, Xavier Martin Artal, Justin C. Macey, Alexandre Collado I Castells, and Josep Beltran. Guide to the carnegie mellon university multimodal activity (cmu-mmac) database. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR- 08-22, Pittsbur...

2008
[43]

Procedure-aware action quality assessment: Datasets and performance evaluation

Jinglin Xu, Yongming Rao, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. Procedure-aware action quality assessment: Datasets and performance evaluation. International Journal of Computer Vision , pages 1–22, 2024. 11, 14, 15, 16

2024
[44]

Catalin Ionescu, Dragos Papava, Vlad Olaru, and Cris- tian Sminchisescu. Human3. 6m: Large scale datasets and predictive methods for 3d human sensing in natural environments. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 36(7):1325–1339, 2013. 11

2013
[45]

The kinetics human action video dataset

Will Kay, Joao Carreira, Karen Simonyan, Brian Zhang, Chloe Hillier, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Fabio Vi- ola, Tim Green, Trevor Back, Paul Natsev, et al. The kinetics human action video dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.06950, 2017. 11

2017 arXiv
[46]

Fsd-10: A fine-grained classification dataset for figure skating

Shenglan Liu, Xiang Liu, Gao Huang, Hong Qiao, Lianyu Hu, Dong Jiang, Aibin Zhang, Yang Liu, and Ge Guo. Fsd-10: A fine-grained classification dataset for figure skating. Neurocomputing, 413:360–367, 2020. 11

2020
[47]

Vi-net—view-invariant quality of hu- man movement assessment

Faegheh Sardari, Adeline Paiement, Sion Hannuna, and Majid Mirmehdi. Vi-net—view-invariant quality of hu- man movement assessment. Sensors, 20(18):5258, 2020. 11

2020
[48]

Comprehensive instructional video analysis: The coin dataset and perfor- mance evaluation

Yansong Tang, Jiwen Lu, and Jie Zhou. Comprehensive instructional video analysis: The coin dataset and perfor- mance evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Anal- ysis and Machine Intelligence , 43(9):3138–3153, 2020. 11

2020
[49]

Casa: Cricket action similarity assessment in video footage using deep metric learning

Tevin Moodley and Dustin van der Haar. Casa: Cricket action similarity assessment in video footage using deep metric learning. In Southern African Conference for Artificial Intelligence Research, pages 139–153. Springer,
[50]

Win-fail action recognition

Paritosh Parmar and Brendan Morris. Win-fail action recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , pages 161–171, 2022. 11

2022
[51]

Functional movement screen dataset collected with two azure kinect depth sensors

Qing-Jun Xing, Yuan-Yuan Shen, Run Cao, Shou-Xin Zong, Shu-Xiang Zhao, and Yan-Fei Shen. Functional movement screen dataset collected with two azure kinect depth sensors. Scientific Data , 9(1):104, 2022. 11

2022
[52]

Fine-grained action analysis: A multi-modality and multi-task dataset of figure skating

Sheng-Lan Liu, Yu-Ning Ding, Si-Fan Zhang, Wen- Yue Chen, Ning Zhou, Hao Liu, and Gui-Hong Lao. Fine-grained action analysis: A multi-modality and multi-task dataset of figure skating. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02730, 2023. 11 A Decade of Action Quality Assessment 31

2023 arXiv
[53]

Flag3d: A 3d fitness activity dataset with lan- guage instruction

Yansong Tang, Jinpeng Liu, Aoyang Liu, Bin Yang, Wenxun Dai, Yongming Rao, Jiwen Lu, Jie Zhou, and Xiu Li. Flag3d: A 3d fitness activity dataset with lan- guage instruction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion, pages 22106–221...

2023
[54]

Which is the better teacher action? a new ranking model and dataset

Ming Fang, Xinning Du, Qi Liu, Yunpeng Zhou, Qiwen Liang, and Shuhua Liu. Which is the better teacher action? a new ranking model and dataset. In IEEE In- ternational Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 7695–7699. IEEE, 2024. 11

2024
[55]

Skatingverse: A large-scale benchmark for comprehensive evaluation on human action understand- ing

Ziliang Gan, Lei Jin, Yi Cheng, Yu Cheng, Yinglei Teng, Zun Li, Yawen Li, Wenhan Yang, Zheng Zhu, and Jun- liang Xing. Skatingverse: A large-scale benchmark for comprehensive evaluation on human action understand- ing. IET Computer Vision , 2024. 11

2024
[56]

Finerehab: A multi-modality and multi-task dataset for rehabilitation analysis

Jianwei Li, Jun Xue, Rui Cao, Xiaoxia Du, Siyu Mo, Ke- hao Ran, and Zeyan Zhang. Finerehab: A multi-modality and multi-task dataset for rehabilitation analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 3184–3193, 2024. 11, 28

2024
[57]

Mmw-aqa: Multimodal in-the-wild dataset for action quality assessment

Takasuke Nagai, Shoichiro Takeda, Satoshi Suzuki, and Hitoshi Seshimo. Mmw-aqa: Multimodal in-the-wild dataset for action quality assessment. IEEE Access,
[58]

Dynamical regularity for action analysis

Vinay Venkataraman, Ioannis Vlachos, and Pavan K Turaga. Dynamical regularity for action analysis. In BMVC, volume 67, pages 1–12, 2015. 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19

2015
[59]

Automated video assessment of human performance

Andrew S Gordon. Automated video assessment of human performance. In Proceedings of AI-ED, volume 2, pages 541–546, 1995. 11

1995
[60]

Trajectory based assessment of coordinated hu- man activity

Marko Jug, Janez Perˇ s, Branko Deˇ zman, and Stanislav Kovaˇ ciˇ c. Trajectory based assessment of coordinated hu- man activity. In International Conference on Computer Vision Systems , pages 534–543. Springer, 2003. 11

2003
[61]

Analyzing diving: A dataset for judging action quality

Kamil Wnuk and Stefano Soatto. Analyzing diving: A dataset for judging action quality. In Asian conference on computer vision , pages 266–276. Springer, 2010. 11

2010
[62]

A kinect-based system for physical rehabilitation: A pilot study for young adults with motor disabilities

Yao-Jen Chang, Shu-Fang Chen, and Jun-Da Huang. A kinect-based system for physical rehabilitation: A pilot study for young adults with motor disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities , 32(6):2566–2570, 2011. 11

2011
[63]

Sparse hidden markov models for surgical gesture classification and skill evalu- ation

Lingling Tao, Ehsan Elhamifar, Sanjeev Khudanpur, Gre- gory D Hager, and Ren´ e Vidal. Sparse hidden markov models for surgical gesture classification and skill evalu- ation. In Information Processing in Computer-Assisted Interventions, pages 167–177. Springer, 2012. 11

2012
[64]

Learning spatiotemporal features with 3d convolutional networks

Du Tran, Lubomir Bourdev, Rob Fergus, Lorenzo Tor- resani, and Manohar Paluri. Learning spatiotemporal features with 3d convolutional networks. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4489–4497, 2015. 12, 13, 18, 19

2015
[65]

Long short- term memory

Sepp Hochreiter and J¨ urgen Schmidhuber. Long short- term memory. Neural Comput., 9(8):1735–1780, Novem- ber 1997. 12

1997
[66]

Quo vadis, action recognition? a new model and the kinetics dataset

Joao Carreira and Andrew Zisserman. Quo vadis, action recognition? a new model and the kinetics dataset. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 6299–6308, 2017. 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 23, 27

2017
[67]

A short note about kinetics-600

Joao Carreira, Eric Noland, Andras Banki-Horvath, Chloe Hillier, and Andrew Zisserman. A short note about kinetics-600. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.01340 ,

arXiv
[68]

Deep residual learning for image recognition

Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 770–778, 2016. 13, 16, 17, 18

2016
[69]

Learning spatio- temporal representation with pseudo-3d residual net- works

Zhaofan Qiu, Ting Yao, and Tao Mei. Learning spatio- temporal representation with pseudo-3d residual net- works. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Con- ference on Computer Vision , pages 5533–5541, 2017. 13, 14

2017
[70]

Video swin transformer

Ze Liu, Jia Ning, Yue Cao, Yixuan Wei, Zheng Zhang, Stephen Lin, and Han Hu. Video swin transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 3202–3211, 2022. 13, 14

2022
[71]

Skill determination from long videos

Hazel R Doughty. Skill determination from long videos . Thesis, 2021. 13

2021
[72]

S3d: Stacking segmental p3d for action quality assessment

Xiang Xiang, Ye Tian, Austin Reiter, Gregory D Hager, and Trac D Tran. S3d: Stacking segmental p3d for action quality assessment. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pages 928–932. IEEE, 2018. 13, 14

2018
[73]

Learning and fusing multiple hidden substages for action quality assessment

Li-Jia Dong, Hong-Bo Zhang, Qinghongya Shi, Qing Lei, Ji-Xiang Du, and Shangce Gao. Learning and fusing multiple hidden substages for action quality assessment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 229:107388, 2021. 13, 14

2021
[74]

Temporal attention learning for action quality assessment in sports video

Qing Lei, Hongbo Zhang, and Jixiang Du. Temporal attention learning for action quality assessment in sports video. Signal, Image and Video Processing , 15(7):1575– 1583, 2021. 14, 15

2021
[75]

Likert scoring with grade decoupling for long-term action as- sessment

Angchi Xu, Ling-An Zeng, and Wei-Shi Zheng. Likert scoring with grade decoupling for long-term action as- sessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 3232–3241, 2022. 14

2022
[76]

Action quality assessment using trans- formers

Abhay Iyer, Mohammad Alali, Hemanth Bodala, and Sunit Vaidya. Action quality assessment using trans- formers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12318 , 2022. 14

2022 arXiv
[77]

Action quality assessment with temporal parsing trans- former

Yang Bai, Desen Zhou, Songyang Zhang, Jian Wang, Errui Ding, Yu Guan, Yang Long, and Jingdong Wang. Action quality assessment with temporal parsing trans- former. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 422–438. Springer, 2022. 14

2022
[78]

Learning time- aware features for action quality assessment

Yu Zhang, Wei Xiong, and Siya Mi. Learning time- aware features for action quality assessment. Pattern Recognition Letters, 158:104–110, 2022. 14, 15

2022
[79]

Fine-grained spatio-temporal parsing network for action quality assessment

Kumie Gedamu, Yanli Ji, Yang Yang, Jie Shao, and Heng Tao Shen. Fine-grained spatio-temporal parsing network for action quality assessment. IEEE Transac- tions on Image Processing , 32:6386–6400, 2023. 14

2023
[80]

Improving action quality assessment with across-staged temporal reasoning on imbalanced data

Pu-Xiang Lian and Zhi-Gang Shao. Improving action quality assessment with across-staged temporal reasoning on imbalanced data. Applied Intelligence, 53(24):30443– 30454, 2023. 14, 15

2023
[81]

A figure skating jumping dataset for replay-guided action quality assessment

Yanchao Liu, Xina Cheng, and Takeshi Ikenaga. A figure skating jumping dataset for replay-guided action quality assessment. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 2437–2445, 2023. 14, 15

2023
[82]

Label-reconstruction-based pseudo- subscore learning for action quality assessment in sport- ing events

Hong-Bo Zhang, Li-Jia Dong, Qing Lei, Li-Jie Yang, and Ji-Xiang Du. Label-reconstruction-based pseudo- subscore learning for action quality assessment in sport- ing events. Applied Intelligence, 53(9):10053–10067, 2023. 13, 14

2023
[83]

Hierarchical graph convolutional networks for ac- tion quality assessment

Kanglei Zhou, Yue Ma, Hubert PH Shum, and Xiaohui Liang. Hierarchical graph convolutional networks for ac- tion quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Circuits 32 Hao Yin and Paritosh Parmar et al. and Systems for Video Technology , 33(12):7749–7763,
[84]

Multi-stage contrastive regression for action quality assessment

Qi An, Mengshi Qi, and Huadong Ma. Multi-stage contrastive regression for action quality assessment. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 4110–4114. IEEE, 2024. 14, 15, 26

2024
[85]

Assessing action qual- ity with semantic-sequence performance regression and densely distributed sample weighting

Feng Huang and Jianjun Li. Assessing action qual- ity with semantic-sequence performance regression and densely distributed sample weighting. Applied Intelli- gence, 54(4):3245–3259, 2024. 14, 15

2024
[86]

Two-path target-aware contrastive regression for action quality assessment

Xiao Ke, Huangbiao Xu, Xiaofeng Lin, and Wenzhong Guo. Two-path target-aware contrastive regression for action quality assessment. Information Sciences , 664:120347, 2024. 14, 15, 26

2024
[87]

Fineparser: A fine-grained spatio-temporal action parser for human-centric action quality assess- ment

Jinglin Xu, Sibo Yin, Guohao Zhao, Zishuo Wang, and Yuxin Peng. Fineparser: A fine-grained spatio-temporal action parser for human-centric action quality assess- ment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 14628–14637, 202...

2024
[88]

Rhythmer: Ranking-based skill as- sessment with rhythm-aware transformer

Zhuang Luo, Yang Xiao, Feng Yang, Joey Tianyi Zhou, and Zhiwen Fang. Rhythmer: Ranking-based skill as- sessment with rhythm-aware transformer. IEEE Trans- actions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology ,
[89]

Temporal convolutional networks for action segmentation and detection

Colin Lea, Michael D Flynn, Rene Vidal, Austin Reiter, and Gregory D Hager. Temporal convolutional networks for action segmentation and detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 156–165, 2017. 13

2017
[90]

Attention is all you need

A Vaswani. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2017. 14

2017
[91]

End- to-end action quality assessment with action parsing transformer

Hang Fang, Wengang Zhou, and Houqiang Li. End- to-end action quality assessment with action parsing transformer. In IEEE International Conference on Vi- sual Communications and Image Processing , pages 1–5. IEEE, 2023. 14

2023
[92]

Towards Interaction-level Video Action Un- derstanding

Yang Bai. Towards Interaction-level Video Action Un- derstanding. Thesis, 2023. 14

2023
[93]

Mla-lstm: A local and global location attention lstm learning model for scoring figure skating

Chaoyu Han, Fangyao Shen, Lina Chen, Xiaoyi Lian, Hongjie Gou, and Hong Gao. Mla-lstm: A local and global location attention lstm learning model for scoring figure skating. Systems, 11(1):21, 2023. 15

2023
[94]

Automatic evaluation method for functional movement screening based on multi-scale lightweight 3d convolution and an encoder–decoder.Elec- tronics, 13(10):1813, 2024

Xiuchun Lin, Yichao Liu, Chen Feng, Zhide Chen, Xu Yang, and Hui Cui. Automatic evaluation method for functional movement screening based on multi-scale lightweight 3d convolution and an encoder–decoder.Elec- tronics, 13(10):1813, 2024. 15

2024
[95]

The establishment of a precise intelligent evaluation system for sports events: Diving

Ning Hao, Sihan Ruan, Yiheng Song, Jiashun Chen, and Longgang Tian. The establishment of a precise intelligent evaluation system for sports events: Diving. Heliyon, 9(11), 2023. 15

2023
[96]

D-stgcnt: A dense spatio-temporal graph conv-gru network based on trans- former for assessment of patient physical rehabilitation

Youssef Mourchid and Rim Slama. D-stgcnt: A dense spatio-temporal graph conv-gru network based on trans- former for assessment of patient physical rehabilitation. Computers in Biology and Medicine , 165:107420, 2023. 15

2023
[97]

Long video scoring method fusing high- precision pose and spatio-temporal attention modules

Lina Chen, Junbo Zhang, Weijie Wu, Chaoyu Han, and Hong Gao. Long video scoring method fusing high- precision pose and spatio-temporal attention modules. In Asia-Pacific Web and Web-Age Information Manage- ment Joint International Conference on Web and Big Data, pages 466–475....

2024
[98]

Action quality assessment with multi-scale tem- poral attention mechanism

Wei Wang, Hongyu Wang, Yingguang Hao, and Qiong Wang. Action quality assessment with multi-scale tem- poral attention mechanism. In International Conference on Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering, pages 247–251. IEEE, 2024. 15

2024
[99]

Fine-tuning siamese networks to assess sport gestures quality

M´ egane Millan and Catherine Achard. Fine-tuning siamese networks to assess sport gestures quality. In International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applica- tions, pages 57–65, 2020. 15

2020
[100]

Im- proving the movement synchrony estimation with action quality assessment in children play therapy

Jicheng Li, Anjana Bhat, and Roghayeh Barmaki. Im- proving the movement synchrony estimation with action quality assessment in children play therapy. In Pro- ceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, pages 397–406, 2021. 15

2021
[101]

End-to- end learning for action quality assessment

Yongjun Li, Xiujuan Chai, and Xilin Chen. End-to- end learning for action quality assessment. In Pacific Rim Conference on Multimedia, pages 125–134. Springer,
[102]

Scoringnet: Learning key fragment for action quality assessment with ranking loss in skilled sports

Yongjun Li, Xiujuan Chai, and Xilin Chen. Scoringnet: Learning key fragment for action quality assessment with ranking loss in skilled sports. In Asian Conference on Computer Vision , pages 149–164. Springer, 2018. 15

2018
[103]

A low-cost virtual coach for diagnosis and guidance in baseball/softball bat- ting training

Hou-Chin Liu and Chung-Ta King. A low-cost virtual coach for diagnosis and guidance in baseball/softball bat- ting training. In International Conference on Systems ,
[104]

Assessing action quality via attentive spatio- temporal convolutional networks

Jiahao Wang, Zhengyin Du, Annan Li, and Yunhong Wang. Assessing action quality via attentive spatio- temporal convolutional networks. In Chinese Conference on Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision , pages 3–
[105]

Towards accu- rate and interpretable surgical skill assessment: A video- based method incorporating recognized surgical gestures and skill levels

Tianyu Wang, Yijie Wang, and Mian Li. Towards accu- rate and interpretable surgical skill assessment: A video- based method incorporating recognized surgical gestures and skill levels. In Medical Image Computing and Com- puter Assisted Intervention , pages 668–678. Springer,
[106]

Learning goals from failure

Dave Epstein and Carl Vondrick. Learning goals from failure. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 11194–11204, 2021. 15

2021
[107]

Hallucinet-ing spatiotemporal representations using a 2d-cnn

Paritosh Parmar and Brendan Morris. Hallucinet-ing spatiotemporal representations using a 2d-cnn. Signals, 2(3):604–618, 2021. 15, 28

2021
[108]

A multi-task learning approach for human activity segmentation and ergonomics risk assessment

Behnoosh Parsa and Ashis G Banerjee. A multi-task learning approach for human activity segmentation and ergonomics risk assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Com- puter Vision , pages 2352–2362, 2021. 15, 28

2021
[109]

Deep Learning Methods for Video- Based Human Activity Recognition in Industrial Settings

Behnoosh Parsa. Deep Learning Methods for Video- Based Human Activity Recognition in Industrial Settings. Thesis, 2020. 15

2020
[110]

Improving state-of-the- art in detecting student engagement with resnet and tcn hybrid network

Ali Abedi and Shehroz S Khan. Improving state-of-the- art in detecting student engagement with resnet and tcn hybrid network. In Conference on Robots and Vision , pages 151–157. IEEE, 2021. 15

2021
[111]

Precise gymnastic scoring from tv playback

Qiaoge Li, Zhenghang Cui, Itaru Kitahara, and Ryusuke Sagawa. Precise gymnastic scoring from tv playback. In IEEE Global Conference on Consumer Electronics , pages 412–415. IEEE, 2022. 15

2022
[112]

Skeleton- based action quality assessment via partially connected lstm with triplet losses

Xinyu Wang, Jianwei Li, and Haiqing Hu. Skeleton- based action quality assessment via partially connected lstm with triplet losses. In Chinese Conference on Pat- tern Recognition and Computer Vision , pages 220–232. Springer, 2022. 15

2022
[113]

Multi-stage action quality assessment method

Langxi Liu, Pengjun Zhai, Dulei Zheng, and Yu Fang. Multi-stage action quality assessment method. In Pro- ceedings of the International Conference on Control, A Decade of Action Quality Assessment 33 Robotics and Intelligent System , pages 116–122, 2023. 15

2023
[114]

Resfnn: Residual structure-based feedforward neural network for action quality assessment in sports consumer electronics

Honghao Gao, Si Yu, Muddesar Iqbal, and Mohsen Guizani. Resfnn: Residual structure-based feedforward neural network for action quality assessment in sports consumer electronics. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2024. 15

2024
[115]

Improving action quality assessment using weighted aggregation

Shafkat Farabi, Hasibul Himel, Fakhruddin Gazzali, Md Bakhtiar Hasan, Md Hasanul Kabir, and Moshiur Farazi. Improving action quality assessment using weighted aggregation. In Iberian Conference on Pat- tern Recognition and Image Analysis , pages 576–587. Springer, 2022. 15

2022
[116]

Hand hygiene assessment via joint step seg- mentation and key action scorer

Chenglong Li, Qiwen Zhu, Tubiao Liu, Jin Tang, and Yu Su. Hand hygiene assessment via joint step seg- mentation and key action scorer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.12221, 2022. 15

2022 arXiv
[117]

Sedskill: Surgical events driven method for skill assessment from thoracoscopic surgical videos

Xinpeng Ding, Xiaowei Xu, and Xiaomeng Li. Sedskill: Surgical events driven method for skill assessment from thoracoscopic surgical videos. In International Con- ference on Medical Image Computing and Computer- Assisted Intervention, pages 35–45. Springer, 2023. 15

2023
[118]

Divenet: Dive action localization and phys- ical pose parameter extraction for high performance training

Pramod Murthy, Bertram Taetz, Arpit Lekhra, and Di- dier Stricker. Divenet: Dive action localization and phys- ical pose parameter extraction for high performance training. IEEE Access, 11:37749–37767, 2023. 15

2023
[119]

Segmentation and quality assessment of continuous fit- ness movements based on vision

Zeying Li, Hongtao Chen, Jing Cai, and Yanbing Xue. Segmentation and quality assessment of continuous fit- ness movements based on vision. InInternational Confer- ence on Intelligent Computing , pages 96–107. Springer,
[120]

Ms-tcn: Multi-stage temporal convolutional network for action segmentation

Yazan Abu Farha and Jurgen Gall. Ms-tcn: Multi-stage temporal convolutional network for action segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 3575–3584,
[121]

Action assessment by joint relation graphs

Jia-Hui Pan, Jibin Gao, and Wei-Shi Zheng. Action assessment by joint relation graphs. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 6331–6340, 2019. 16, 17

2019
[122]

Action qual- ity assessment with ignoring scene context

Takasuke Nagai, Shoichiro Takeda, Masaaki Matsumura, Shinya Shimizu, and Susumu Yamamoto. Action qual- ity assessment with ignoring scene context. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing , pages 1189–1193. IEEE, 2021. 16, 17

2021
[123]

Eagle-eye: Extreme-pose action grader using detail bird’s- eye view

Mahdiar Nekoui, Fidel Omar Tito Cruz, and Li Cheng. Eagle-eye: Extreme-pose action grader using detail bird’s- eye view. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , pages 394–402, 2021. 16, 17

2021
[124]

Pairwise contrastive learning network for action quality assessment

Mingzhe Li, Hong-Bo Zhang, Qing Lei, Zongwen Fan, Jinghua Liu, and Ji-Xiang Du. Pairwise contrastive learning network for action quality assessment. In Eu- ropean Conference on Computer Vision , pages 457–473. Springer, 2022. 16, 17, 26

2022
[125]

Dual- referenced assistive network for action quality assessment

Keyi Huang, Yi Tian, Chen Yu, and Yaping Huang. Dual- referenced assistive network for action quality assessment. Neurocomputing, 614:128786, 2025. 16, 17

2025
[126]

View-invariant pose analysis for human movement assessment from rgb data

Faegheh Sardari, Adeline Paiement, and Majid Mirme- hdi. View-invariant pose analysis for human movement assessment from rgb data. In Image Analysis and Pro- cessing, pages 237–248. Springer, 2019. 16

2019
[127]

Pose-guided matching based on deep learning for assessing quality of action on rehabilitation training

Yuhang Qiu, Jiping Wang, Zhe Jin, Honghui Chen, Min- gliang Zhang, and Liquan Guo. Pose-guided matching based on deep learning for assessing quality of action on rehabilitation training. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 72:103323, 2022. 16

2022
[128]

Ro- bust human pose quality assessment using optimal sub- pattern assignment

Yun Zhu, Shuang Liang, Peng Li, and Xiaojun Wu. Ro- bust human pose quality assessment using optimal sub- pattern assignment. In International Conference on Control, Automation and Information Sciences , pages 419–423. IEEE, 2022. 16

2022
[129]

Action quality assessment model using specialists’ gaze location and kinematics data—focusing on evaluating figure skating jumps

Seiji Hirosawa, Takaaki Kato, Takayoshi Yamashita, and Yoshimitsu Aoki. Action quality assessment model using specialists’ gaze location and kinematics data—focusing on evaluating figure skating jumps. Sensors, 23(22):9282,
[130]

Expert’s gaze-based prediction model for assessing the quality of figure skating jumps

Seiji Hirosawa, Takayoshi Yamashita, and Yoshimitsu Aoki. Expert’s gaze-based prediction model for assessing the quality of figure skating jumps. In International Symposium on Computer Science in Sport , pages 42–52. Springer, 2023. 16

2023
[131]

Computer Vision-based Action Quality Assessment Incorporating Human Expert’s Knowledge: Focusing on the Figure Skating Jump

Seiji Hirosawa. Computer Vision-based Action Quality Assessment Incorporating Human Expert’s Knowledge: Focusing on the Figure Skating Jump . Thesis, 2024. 16

2024
[132]

Learning effective skele- tal representations on rgb video for fine-grained human action quality assessment

Qing Lei, Hong-Bo Zhang, Ji-Xiang Du, Tsung-Chih Hsiao, and Chih-Cheng Chen. Learning effective skele- tal representations on rgb video for fine-grained human action quality assessment. Electronics, 9(4):568, 2020. 16

2020
[133]

Falcons: Fast learner-grader for contorted poses in sports

Mahdiar Nekoui, Fidel Omar Tito Cruz, and Li Cheng. Falcons: Fast learner-grader for contorted poses in sports. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops , pages 900–901, 2020. 16

2020
[134]

Hightlight video detection in figure skating

Shun Fan, Yuantai Wei, Jingfei Xia, and Feng Zheng. Hightlight video detection in figure skating. In Chi- nese Conference on Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision, pages 651–664. Springer, 2022. 16

2022
[135]

Toward action recognition and assessment using sfagcn and combinative regression model of spa- tiotemporal features

Zhitao Zhang, Zhengyou Wang, Shanna Zhuang, and Jiahui Wang. Toward action recognition and assessment using sfagcn and combinative regression model of spa- tiotemporal features. Applied Intelligence, 53(1):757–768,
[136]

A video-based aug- mented reality system for human-in-the-loop muscle strength assessment of juvenile dermatomyositis

Kanglei Zhou, Ruizhi Cai, Yue Ma, Qingqing Tan, Xin- ning Wang, Jianguo Li, Hubert PH Shum, Frederick WB Li, Song Jin, and Xiaohui Liang. A video-based aug- mented reality system for human-in-the-loop muscle strength assessment of juvenile dermatomyositis. IEEE Transactions on...

2023
[137]

Unlabeled action quality assessment based on multi- dimensional adaptive constrained dynamic time warping

Renguang Chen, Guolong Zheng, Xu Yang, Zhide Chen, Jiwu Shu, Wencheng Yang, Kexin Zhu, and Chen Feng. Unlabeled action quality assessment based on multi- dimensional adaptive constrained dynamic time warping. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.14161 , 2024. 16

arXiv
[138]

Gymetricpose: A light-weight angle-based graph adaptation for action quality assessment

Ulises Gallardo, Fernando Caro, Eluney Hern´ andez, Ri- cardo Espinosa, and Gilberto Ochoa-Ruiz. Gymetricpose: A light-weight angle-based graph adaptation for action quality assessment. In IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, pages 43–50. IEEE,
[139]

Learning to score sign language with two-stage method

Hongli Wen and Yang Xu. Learning to score sign language with two-stage method. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10383, 2024. 16

2024 arXiv
[140]

Research on worker action recogni- tion and evaluation in intelligent manufacturing training based on industrial metaverse

Gang Wu, Tan Li, Yuqi Zhou, Jin Guo, Jingyu Zhu, Nan- jiang Chen, Weining Song, Yalan Xing, Xianghui Meng, and Yanwen Lin. Research on worker action recogni- tion and evaluation in intelligent manufacturing training based on industrial metaverse. In Asia Simulation Con- ferenc...

2024
[141]

An attention-based adap- tive spatial–temporal graph convolutional network for 34 Hao Yin and Paritosh Parmar et al

Chengju Zhou, Jiayu Zeng, Lina Qiu, Shuxi Wang, Pingzhi Liu, and Jiahui Pan. An attention-based adap- tive spatial–temporal graph convolutional network for 34 Hao Yin and Paritosh Parmar et al. long-video ergonomic risk assessment. Engineering Ap- plications of Artificial Inte...

2024
[142]

Human motion analysis using 3D skeleton representation in the context of real- world applications: from home-based rehabilitation to sensing in the wild

Renato Manuel Lemos Baptista. Human motion analysis using 3D skeleton representation in the context of real- world applications: from home-based rehabilitation to sensing in the wild . Thesis, 2021. 16

2021
[143]

Intelligent Video-based Quality Assess- ment of Human Activities

Mahdiar Nekoui. Intelligent Video-based Quality Assess- ment of Human Activities . Thesis, 2022. 16

2022
[144]

A novel frame- work for fine grained action recognition in soccer

Yaparla Ganesh, Allaparthi Sri Teja, Sai Krishna Munnangi, and Garimella Rama Murthy. A novel frame- work for fine grained action recognition in soccer. In Advances in Computational Intelligence , pages 137–150. Springer, 2019. 16

2019
[145]

Manipulation-skill assessment from videos with spatial attention network

Zhenqiang Li, Yifei Huang, Minjie Cai, and Yoichi Sato. Manipulation-skill assessment from videos with spatial attention network. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF In- ternational Conference on Computer Vision Workshops , pages 0–0, 2019. 16

2019
[146]

What and how well you exercised? an efficient analysis framework for fitness actions

Jianwei Li, Qingrui Hu, Tianxiao Guo, Siqi Wang, and Yanfei Shen. What and how well you exercised? an efficient analysis framework for fitness actions. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation , 80:103304, 2021. 16

2021
[147]

Towards cumulative race time regression in sports: I3d convnet transfer learning in ultra-distance running events

David Freire-Obreg´ on, Javier Lorenzo-Navarro, Olive- rio J Santana, Daniel Hern´ andez-Sosa, and Modesto Cas- trill´ on-Santana. Towards cumulative race time regression in sports: I3d convnet transfer learning in ultra-distance running events. In International Conference on ...

2022
[148]

Three-stream fu- sion networks for student engagement recognition based on timesformer

Yan Wang, JinWei Wang, and Xue Bai. Three-stream fu- sion networks for student engagement recognition based on timesformer. In International Conference on Arti- ficial Intelligence and Computer Engineering , volume 12610, pages 758–764. SPIE, 2023. 16

2023
[149]

Knowledge and data co-driven intelligent as- sessment of chinese zither fingerings

Wenting Zhao, Shigang Wang, Yan Zhao, Jian Wei, and Tianshu Li. Knowledge and data co-driven intelligent as- sessment of chinese zither fingerings. Displays, 78:102442,
[150]

Keep your eye on the best: contrastive regression transformer for skill assessment in robotic surgery

Dimitrios Anastasiou, Yueming Jin, Danail Stoyanov, and Evangelos Mazomenos. Keep your eye on the best: contrastive regression transformer for skill assessment in robotic surgery. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , 8(3):1755–1762, 2023. 16

2023
[151]

An x3d neural network analysis for runner’s performance assessment in a wild sporting en- vironment

David Freire-Obreg´ on, Javier Lorenzo-Navarro, Olive- rio J Santana, Daniel Hern´ andez-Sosa, and Modesto Castrill´ on-Santana. An x3d neural network analysis for runner’s performance assessment in a wild sporting en- vironment. In International Conference on Machine Vision a...

2023
[152]

Prior knowledge- guided hierarchical action quality assessment with 3d convolution and attention mechanism

Haoyang Zhou, Teng Hou, and Jitao Li. Prior knowledge- guided hierarchical action quality assessment with 3d convolution and attention mechanism. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series , volume 2632, page 012027. IOP Publishing, 2023. 16

2023
[153]

Zeal: Surgical skill assessment with zero- shot tool inference using unified foundation model

Satoshi Kondo. Zeal: Surgical skill assessment with zero- shot tool inference using unified foundation model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.02738, 2024. 16

2024 arXiv
[154]

Full-reference motion quality assessment based on efficient monocular parametric 3d human body reconstruction

Yuxin Huang, Yiwei Yuan, Xiangyu Zeng, Ling Xie, Yiyu Fu, Guanghui Yue, and Baoquan Zhao. Full-reference motion quality assessment based on efficient monocular parametric 3d human body reconstruction. In IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, pages 1–6. IEEE, 20...

2024
[155]

Assessing judging bias: An example from the 2000 olympic games

John W Emerson, Miki Seltzer, and David Lin. Assessing judging bias: An example from the 2000 olympic games. The American Statistician , 63(2):124–131, 2009. 17

2000
[156]

International bias detected in judging gymnastic competition at the 1984 olympic games

Charles J Ansorge and John K Scheer. International bias detected in judging gymnastic competition at the 1984 olympic games. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59(2):103–107, 1988. 17

1984
[157]

The harder the task, the higher the score: Findings of a difficulty bias

Hillary N Morgan and Kurt W Rotthoff. The harder the task, the higher the score: Findings of a difficulty bias. Economic Inquiry, 52(3):1014–1026, 2014. 17

2014
[158]

Uncertainty-aware score distribution learning for action quality assessment

Yansong Tang, Zanlin Ni, Jiahuan Zhou, Danyang Zhang, Jiwen Lu, Ying Wu, and Jie Zhou. Uncertainty-aware score distribution learning for action quality assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 9839–9848,
[159]

Uncertainty-driven action quality assessment

Caixia Zhou, Yaping Huang, and Haibin Ling. Uncertainty-driven action quality assessment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.14513, 2022. 17, 18, 19

2022 arXiv
[160]

Objectively measure player performance on olympic weightlifting

Anandi Karunaratne, Chamin Jayasooriya, Sampath Deegalla, and Rajitha Navarathna. Objectively measure player performance on olympic weightlifting. In Interna- tional Conference on Information and Automation for Sustainability, pages 410–415. IEEE, 2021. 17

2021
[161]

Gaussian guided frame sequence en- coder network for action quality assessment

Ming-Zhe Li, Hong-Bo Zhang, Li-Jia Dong, Qing Lei, and Ji-Xiang Du. Gaussian guided frame sequence en- coder network for action quality assessment. Complex & Intelligent Systems , 9(2):1963–1974, 2023. 17, 18, 19

1963
[162]

Rica2: Rubric- informed, calibrated assessment of actions

Abrar Majeedi, Viswanatha Reddy Gajjala, Satya Sai Srinath Namburi GNVV, and Yin Li. Rica2: Rubric- informed, calibrated assessment of actions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.02138, 2024. 17, 18, 19

2024 arXiv
[163]

Auto-encoding score distri- bution regression for action quality assessment

Boyu Zhang, Jiayuan Chen, Yinfei Xu, Hui Zhang, Xu Yang, and Xin Geng. Auto-encoding score distri- bution regression for action quality assessment. Neural Computing and Applications , 36(2):929–942, 2024. 17, 18, 19

2024
[164]

Action quality assessment using siamese network-based deep metric learning

Hiteshi Jain, Gaurav Harit, and Avinash Sharma. Action quality assessment using siamese network-based deep metric learning. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , 31(6):2260–2273, 2021. 17, 18, 19

2021
[165]

A novel blind action quality assessment based on multi-headed gru network and at- tention mechanism

WenHao Sun, YanXiang Hu, Bo Zhang, XinRan Chen, CaiXia Hao, and YaRu Gao. A novel blind action quality assessment based on multi-headed gru network and at- tention mechanism. In International Conference on Ar- tificial Intelligence, Automation, and High-Performance Computing, ...

2023
[166]

Contrastive learning for action assessment using graph convolutional networks with augmented virtual joints

Chung-In Joung, Seunghwan Byun, and Seungjun Baek. Contrastive learning for action assessment using graph convolutional networks with augmented virtual joints. IEEE Access, 2023. 18

2023
[167]

A hierarchical joint training based replay-guided con- trastive transformer for action quality assessment of figure skating

Yanchao LIU, Xina CHENG, and Takeshi IKENAGA. A hierarchical joint training based replay-guided con- trastive transformer for action quality assessment of figure skating. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences ,
[168]

Assessment of Human Actions in Videos

Hiteshi Jain. Assessment of Human Actions in Videos . Thesis, 2020. 18

2020
[169]

Learn- ing semantics-guided representations for scoring figure skating

Zexing Du, Di He, Xue Wang, and Qing Wang. Learn- ing semantics-guided representations for scoring figure skating. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia , 2023. 20

2023
[170]

Multi-skeleton structures graph convo- lutional network for action quality assessment in long videos

Qing Lei, Huiying Li, Hongbo Zhang, Jixiang Du, and Shangce Gao. Multi-skeleton structures graph convo- lutional network for action quality assessment in long videos. Applied Intelligence, 53(19):21692–21705, 2023. 20, 21 A Decade of Action Quality Assessment 35

2023
[171]

Skating- mixer: Long-term sport audio-visual modeling with mlps

Jingfei Xia, Mingchen Zhuge, Tiantian Geng, Shun Fan, Yuantai Wei, Zhenyu He, and Feng Zheng. Skating- mixer: Long-term sport audio-visual modeling with mlps. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 37, pages 2901–2909, 2023. 20, 21

2023
[172]

A skeleton-based rehabilitation exercise assessment system with rotation invariance

Kaili Zheng, Ji Wu, Jialin Zhang, and Chenyi Guo. A skeleton-based rehabilitation exercise assessment system with rotation invariance. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering , 31:2612–2621,
[173]

2m-af: A strong multi-modality framework for human action quality assessment with self-supervised representation learning

Yuning Ding, Sifan Zhang, Liu Shenglan, Jinrong Zhang, Wenyue Chen, Duan Haifei, Bingcheng Dong, and Tao Sun. 2m-af: A strong multi-modality framework for human action quality assessment with self-supervised representation learning. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conf...

2024
[174]

Visual-semantic alignment temporal parsing for action quality assessment.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , 2024

Kumie Gedamu, Yanli Ji, Yang Yang, Jie Shao, and Heng Tao Shen. Visual-semantic alignment temporal parsing for action quality assessment.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , 2024. 20

2024
[175]

An expert-knowledge-based graph convolutional network for skeleton-based physical rehabilitation exercises as- sessment

Tian He, Yang Chen, Ling Wang, and Hong Cheng. An expert-knowledge-based graph convolutional network for skeleton-based physical rehabilitation exercises as- sessment. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2024. 20, 21

2024
[176]

Learning sparse temporal video mapping for ac- tion quality assessment in floor gymnastics

Sania Zahan, Ghulam Mubashar Hassan, and Ajmal Mian. Learning sparse temporal video mapping for ac- tion quality assessment in floor gymnastics. IEEE Trans- actions on Instrumentation and Measurement , 2024. 20, 21

2024
[177]

Narrative action evaluation with prompt-guided multimodal inter- action

Shiyi Zhang, Sule Bai, Guangyi Chen, Lei Chen, Ji- wen Lu, Junle Wang, and Yansong Tang. Narrative action evaluation with prompt-guided multimodal inter- action. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 18430–18439, 2024. 20

2024
[178]

On Action Quality Assessment

Paritosh Parmar. On Action Quality Assessment. Thesis,
[179]

Vision-language action knowledge learning for semantic-aware action qual- ity assessment

Huangbiao Xu, Xiao Ke, Yuezhou Li, Rui Xu, Huanqi Wu, Xiaofeng Lin, and Wenzhong Guo. Vision-language action knowledge learning for semantic-aware action qual- ity assessment. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 423–440. Springer, 2024. 20

2024
[180]

Skeleton-based deep pose feature learning for action quality assessment on figure skating videos

Huiying Li, Qing Lei, Hongbo Zhang, Jixiang Du, and Shangce Gao. Skeleton-based deep pose feature learning for action quality assessment on figure skating videos. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Represen- tation, 89:103625, 2022. 21

2022
[181]

Tai chi action quality assessment and visual analysis with a consumer rgb-d camera

Jianwei Li, Haiqing Hu, Qingjun Xing, Xinyu Wang, Jinyang Li, and Yanfei Shen. Tai chi action quality assessment and visual analysis with a consumer rgb-d camera. In IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, pages 1–6. IEEE, 2022. 21

2022
[182]

Study on assess- ment methods of developmental coordination disorder in children

Wen-Bo Cui, Wen-Ai Song, Zi-Tong Pei, Yi Lei, Qing Wang, Yan-Jie Chen, and Ji-Jiang Yang. Study on assess- ment methods of developmental coordination disorder in children. In IEEE Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference, pages 1507–1512. IEEE, 2023. 21

2023
[183]

Evaluating simple exercises with a fuzzy system based on human skeleton poses

Chyan Zheng Siow, Wei Hong Chin, and Naoyuki Kubota. Evaluating simple exercises with a fuzzy system based on human skeleton poses. In IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems , pages 1–6. IEEE, 2023. 21

2023
[184]

A contrastive learning network for perfor- mance metric and assessment of physical rehabilitation exercises

Long Yao, Qing Lei, Hongbo Zhang, Jixiang Du, and Shangce Gao. A contrastive learning network for perfor- mance metric and assessment of physical rehabilitation exercises. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2023. 21

2023
[185]

Ac- tion quality assessment for asd behaviour evaluation

Dinghuang Zhang, Dalin Zhou, and Honghai Liu. Ac- tion quality assessment for asd behaviour evaluation. In International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, pages 483–488. IEEE, 2023. 21

2023
[186]

Markerless vision-based functional movement screen- ing movements evaluation with deep neural networks

Yuan-Yuan Shen, Qing-Jun Xing, and Yan-Fei Shen. Markerless vision-based functional movement screen- ing movements evaluation with deep neural networks. Iscience, 27(1), 2024. 21

2024
[187]

Reveal fluidity behind frames: A multi-modality framework for action quality assessment

Siyuan Xu, Peilin Chen, Yue Liu, Meng Wang, Shiqi Wang, and Sam Kwong. Reveal fluidity behind frames: A multi-modality framework for action quality assessment. In IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, pages 1–6. IEEE, 2024. 21

2024
[188]

Improving Articulated Pose Tracking and Contact Force Estimation for Qualitative Assessment of Human Actions

Nathan Louis. Improving Articulated Pose Tracking and Contact Force Estimation for Qualitative Assessment of Human Actions. Thesis, 2024. 21

2024
[189]

Hand-Eye Behaviour Analytics for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Dinghuang Zhang. Hand-Eye Behaviour Analytics for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder . Thesis, 2023. 21

2023
[190]

Human Motion Analysis

Sania Zahan. Human Motion Analysis . Thesis, 2024. 21

2024
[191]

Kinematic diversity and rhythmic alignment in choreographic quality transformers for dance quality assessment

Doyoung Kim, Taewan Kim, Inwoong Lee, and Sanghoon Lee. Kinematic diversity and rhythmic alignment in choreographic quality transformers for dance quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2024. 21

2024
[192]

Adaptive action assessment

Jia-Hui Pan, Jibin Gao, and Wei-Shi Zheng. Adaptive action assessment. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Anal- ysis and Machine Intelligence , 44(12):8779–8795, 2022. 22

2022
[193]

Adaptive stage-aware assessment skill transfer for skill determination

Shao-Jie Zhang, Jia-Hui Pan, Jibin Gao, and Wei-Shi Zheng. Adaptive stage-aware assessment skill transfer for skill determination. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia ,
[194]

Cofinal: Enhancing action quality assessment with coarse-to-fine instruction alignment

Kanglei Zhou, Junlin Li, Ruizhi Cai, Liyuan Wang, Xingxing Zhang, and Xiaohui Liang. Cofinal: Enhancing action quality assessment with coarse-to-fine instruction alignment. In International Joint Conference on Artifi- cial Intelligence , 2024. 22

2024
[195]

Pecop: Parameter efficient contin- ual pretraining for action quality assessment

Amirhossein Dadashzadeh, Shuchao Duan, Alan Whone, and Majid Mirmehdi. Pecop: Parameter efficient contin- ual pretraining for action quality assessment. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Ap- plications of Computer Vision , pages 42–52, 2024. 22, 23, 24

2024
[196]

Continual action assessment via task- consistent score-discriminative feature distribution mod- eling

Yuan-Ming Li, Ling-An Zeng, Jing-Ke Meng, and Wei- Shi Zheng. Continual action assessment via task- consistent score-discriminative feature distribution mod- eling. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2024. 22, 23, 24

2024
[197]

Magr: Manifold-aligned graph regularization for continual action quality assessment

Kanglei Zhou, Liyuan Wang, Xingxing Zhang, Hu- bert PH Shum, Frederick WB Li, Jianguo Li, and Xiaohui Liang. Magr: Manifold-aligned graph regularization for continual action quality assessment. In European Con- ference on Computer Vision , pages 375–392. Springer, Cham, 2024. ...

2024
[198]

Learning Strategies for Parkinson ’s Disease Severity Assessment

Amirhossein Dadashzadeh. Learning Strategies for Parkinson ’s Disease Severity Assessment. Thesis, 2024. 23

2024
[199]

Ex- tracting and interpreting unknown factors with classifier for foot strike types in running

Chanjin Seo, Masato Sabanai, Yuta Goto, Koji Tagami, Hiroyuki Ogata, Kazuyuki Kanosue, and Jun Ohya. Ex- tracting and interpreting unknown factors with classifier for foot strike types in running. In International Con- ference on Pattern Recognition, pages 3217–3224. IEEE,
[200]

Towards accu- rate and interpretable surgical skill assessment: a video- based method for skill score prediction and guiding feed- back generation

Tianyu Wang, Minhao Jin, and Mian Li. Towards accu- rate and interpretable surgical skill assessment: a video- based method for skill score prediction and guiding feed- back generation. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery , 16(9):1595–1605, 2021. 23

2021
[201]

23 36 Hao Yin and Paritosh Parmar et al
[202]

Iris: Interpretable rubric-informed segmentation for action quality assessment

Hitoshi Matsuyama, Nobuo Kawaguchi, and Brian Y Lim. Iris: Interpretable rubric-informed segmentation for action quality assessment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces , pages 368–378, 2023. 23, 24

2023
[203]

Determinant analysis and developing evaluation indica- tors of grade of execution score of double axel jump in figure skating

Seiji Hirosawa, Michiko Watanabe, and Yoshimitsu Aoki. Determinant analysis and developing evaluation indica- tors of grade of execution score of double axel jump in figure skating. Journal of Sports Sciences, 40(4):470–481,
[204]

Towards unified sur- gical skill assessment

Daochang Liu, Qiyue Li, Tingting Jiang, Yizhou Wang, Rulin Miao, Fei Shan, and Ziyu Li. Towards unified sur- gical skill assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion, pages 9522–9531, 2021. 24, 25

2021
[205]

Interpretable long- term action quality assessment

Xu Dong, Xinran Liu, Wanqing Li, Anthony Adeyemi- Ejeye, and Andrew Gilbert. Interpretable long- term action quality assessment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11687, 2024. 23, 24

2024 arXiv
[206]

An unsupervised sequence-to-sequence autoencoder based human action scoring model

Hiteshi Jain and Gaurav Harit. An unsupervised sequence-to-sequence autoencoder based human action scoring model. In IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing, pages 1–5. IEEE, 2019. 25

2019
[207]

Will you ever become popular? learning to predict virality of dance clips

Jiahao Wang, Yunhong Wang, Nina Weng, Tianrui Chai, Annan Li, Faxi Zhang, and Sansi Yu. Will you ever become popular? learning to predict virality of dance clips. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications , 18(2):1–24, 2022. 24, 25

2022
[208]

Towards improved and interpretable action quality assessment with self-supervised alignment

Konstantinos Roditakis, Alexandros Makris, and Antonis Argyros. Towards improved and interpretable action quality assessment with self-supervised alignment. In Proceedings of the PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference, pages 507–513, 2021. 25, 26

2021
[209]

Assessing physical rehabilitation exercises using graph convolutional network with self-supervised regu- larization

Chen Du, Sarah Graham, Colin Depp, and Truong Nguyen. Assessing physical rehabilitation exercises using graph convolutional network with self-supervised regu- larization. In Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society , pages 281–285. ...

2021
[210]

Self-updatable database sys- tem based on human motion assessment framework

Kyoungoh Lee, Yeseung Park, Jungwoo Huh, Jiwoo Kang, and Sanghoon Lee. Self-updatable database sys- tem based on human motion assessment framework. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 32(10):7160–7176, 2022. 25

2022
[211]

Semi-supervised action quality assessment with self-supervised segment feature recovery

Shao-Jie Zhang, Jia-Hui Pan, Jibin Gao, and Wei-Shi Zheng. Semi-supervised action quality assessment with self-supervised segment feature recovery. IEEE Trans- actions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , 32(9):6017–6028, 2022. 25, 26

2022
[212]

Self-supervised subaction parsing network for semi-supervised action quality assessment

Kumie Gedamu, Yanli Ji, Yang Yang, Jie Shao, and Heng Tao Shen. Self-supervised subaction parsing network for semi-supervised action quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 2024. 25, 26

2024
[213]

Con- trastive self-supervised learning for automated multi- modal dance performance assessment

Yun Zhong, Fan Zhang, and Yiannis Demiris. Con- trastive self-supervised learning for automated multi- modal dance performance assessment. In IEEE Inter- national Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 1–5. IEEE, 2023. 25

2023
[214]

Dancemvp: Self- supervised learning for multi-task primitive-based dance performance assessment via transformer text prompting

Yun Zhong and Yiannis Demiris. Dancemvp: Self- supervised learning for multi-task primitive-based dance performance assessment via transformer text prompting. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pages 10270–10278, 2024. 25

2024
[215]

Semi-supervised teacher-reference-student architecture for action quality assessment

Wulian Yun, Mengshi Qi, Fei Peng, and Huadong Ma. Semi-supervised teacher-reference-student architecture for action quality assessment. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 161–178. Springer, Cham,
[218]

Genesis: A universal and generative physics engine for robotics and beyond, December 2024

Genesis Authors. Genesis: A universal and generative physics engine for robotics and beyond, December 2024. 27

2024
[219]

A comprehensive survey of action quality assessment: Method and benchmark

Kanglei Zhou, Ruizhi Cai, Liyuan Wang, Hubert PH Shum, and Xiaohui Liang. A comprehensive survey of action quality assessment: Method and benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.11149 , 2024. 27

2024 arXiv
[220]

A survey of learning causality with data: Problems and methods

Ruocheng Guo, Lu Cheng, Jundong Li, P Richard Hahn, and Huan Liu. A survey of learning causality with data: Problems and methods. ACM Computing Surveys , 53(4):1–37, 2020. 28

2020
[221]

Towards data- and knowledge-driven ai: a survey on neuro-symbolic computing

Wenguan Wang, Yi Yang, and Fei Wu. Towards data- and knowledge-driven ai: a survey on neuro-symbolic computing. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 2024. 28

2024
[222]

Learn- ing to Visually Connect Actions and their Effects

Paritosh Parmar, Eric Peh, and Basura Fernando. Learn- ing to Visually Connect Actions and their Effects. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.10805, 2024. 25, 26

2024 arXiv
[223]

Causality matters in medical imaging

Daniel C Castro, Ian Walker, and Ben Glocker. Causality matters in medical imaging. Nature Communications, 11(1):3673, 2020. 28

2020
[225]

Ego-exo4d: Understanding skilled human activity from first-and third-person per- spectives

Kristen Grauman, et al. Ego-exo4d: Understanding skilled human activity from first-and third-person per- spectives. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 19383–19400, 2024. 9

2024
[2021]

3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 19, 20, 21

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [216]

Vision-based human action quality assessment: A systematic review

Jiang Liu, Huasheng Wang, Katarzyna Stawarz, Shiyin Li, Yao Fu, and Hantao Liu. Vision-based human action quality assessment: A systematic review. Expert Systems with Applications, page 125642, 2024. 27

work page 2024

[2] [217]

Lu- cidaction: A hierarchical and multi-model dataset for comprehensive action quality assessment

Linfeng Dong, Wei Wang, Yu Qiao, and Xiao Sun. Lu- cidaction: A hierarchical and multi-model dataset for comprehensive action quality assessment. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2024

work page 2024

[3] [1]

Human action recognition and prediction: A survey

Yu Kong and Yun Fu. Human action recognition and prediction: A survey. International Journal of Computer Vision, 130(5):1366–1401, 2022. 1

2022

[4] [2]

Assessing the quality of actions

Hamed Pirsiavash, Carl Vondrick, and Antonio Torralba. Assessing the quality of actions. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 556–571. Springer, 2014. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 27

2014

[5] [3]

Learning to score olympic events

Paritosh Parmar and Brendan Tran Morris. Learning to score olympic events. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pages 20–28, 2017. 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19

2017

[6] [4]

Jhu-isi gesture and skill assessment working set (jigsaws): A surgical activity dataset for human motion modeling

Yixin Gao, S Swaroop Vedula, Carol E Reiley, Narges Ahmidi, Balakrishnan Varadarajan, Henry C Lin, Lin- gling Tao, Luca Zappella, Benjamın B´ ejar, and David D Yuh. Jhu-isi gesture and skill assessment working set (jigsaws): A surgical activity dataset for human motion modeling. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention Workshop , volu...

2014

[7] [5]

A data set of human body movements for physical rehabilitation exercises

Aleksandar Vakanski, Hyung-pil Jun, David Paul, and Russell Baker. A data set of human body movements for physical rehabilitation exercises. Data, 3(1):2, 2018. 1, 2, 6, 8, 19

2018

[8] [6]

The kimore dataset: Kine- matic assessment of movement and clinical scores for remote monitoring of physical rehabilitation

Marianna Capecci, Maria Gabriella Ceravolo, Francesco Ferracuti, Sabrina Iarlori, Andrea Monteriu, Luca Romeo, and Federica Verdini. The kimore dataset: Kine- matic assessment of movement and clinical scores for remote monitoring of physical rehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation En- gineering, 27(7):1436–1448, 2019. 1, 2, 6, 8, 21

2019