Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adversarial Attacks, Regression, and Numerical Stability Regularization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.02885 v1 pith:OBLPVW53 submitted 2018-12-07 cs.LG cs.CRstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CRstat.ML
keywords attacksadversarialregressiondefensenumericalstabilityfunctionslearned
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Adversarial attacks against neural networks in a regression setting are a critical yet understudied problem. In this work, we advance the state of the art by investigating adversarial attacks against regression networks and by formulating a more effective defense against these attacks. In particular, we take the perspective that adversarial attacks are likely caused by numerical instability in learned functions. We introduce a stability inducing, regularization based defense against adversarial attacks in the regression setting. Our new and easy to implement defense is shown to outperform prior approaches and to improve the numerical stability of learned functions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adversarial Machine Learning Attacks on Financial Reporting via Maximum Violated Multi-Objective Attack

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MVMO, a new weighted multi-objective attack, can inflate earnings and lower fraud scores in about 50 to 66 percent of firm-years, versus under 14 percent for standard attacks.

Pith tools